celebpeek
  • Home
  • Bollywood
  • Hollywood
  • Lifestyle
  • Fashion
celebpeek
  • Music
  • Celebrity News
  • Events
  • TV & Streaming
Home » PopMatters » Page 7
Tag:

PopMatters

Arkansas Traveler Dylan Earl Takes Us for a Ride » PopMatters
Music

Arkansas Traveler Dylan Earl Takes Us for a Ride » PopMatters

by jummy84 October 10, 2025
written by jummy84

Dylan Earl is that friend your parents never wanted you to hang out with. They knew he had a healthy disrespect for authority and would rather drive around smoking than do anything constructive. His love of nature trumped his desire to do chores. He wasn’t lazy; he just didn’t understand what was better than hanging out in the woods or cruising the byways. At least, that’s how he comes across on his latest album, the complacently titled Level-Headed Even Smile. He’s sitting on top of the world on his “Lawn Chair” and invites you to accompany him in the backyard. You can hear him pop a top as he invites one to join him.

The Arkansas traveler wants you to “Get in the Truck”, where the radio and the road take one wherever one’s going. He gets high just being in the Ouachita National Forest in the Natural State. The simple pleasures of mountain life in the “White River Valley” (a Jimmy Driftwood cover) can be found in bird songs and the sighing of pine trees. Earl can be corny and old-fashioned, but his smooth voice bleeds sincerity. There are traces of classic country in his purposeful Merle Haggard-style delivery. Earl never seems to strain to reach a note.

That doesn’t mean the singer-songwriter’s content. Earl sings about hitting rock bottom in Little Rock and clearly enjoys hitting the bottle too much to deal with the pain of heartbreak. “I guess I’ll sober up when I’m dead,” he sings with a smirk. That contrasts with the satisfied persona who finds solace in nature. He needs a dose of wildlife to insulate him from the hurt of daily life. This push and pull keeps the album from sounding too similar from one track to the next.

Something is missing here, and that’s other people. Earl may have friends and family, but they scarcely make an appearance in his lyrics. He claims to be “Two Kinds of Loner”, but we really don’t know why. Sure, hell can be other people, but so can heaven.    

Earl’s sense of humor keeps things from getting too heavy. His take on outlaw country inverts the Charlie Kirk perspective on empathy. He notes “White privilege is real” and rails against the hypocrisy of those with authority and sings with an affected drawl to show his Southern roots. Why, he’s just a good ol’ boy, NOT! He’s funny, but he is serious.

As the title song says, the singer-songwriter aspires to be on even keel. That mostly means being alone while complaining about or celebrating being alone. He can find that mental state somewhere in the Arkansas woods, in the bottom of the bottle, or just taking a drive through the country, but it does seem that he can’t stay levelheaded for long. There is always something to disrupt his inner peace. Dylan Earl needs a friend or more friends or even a lover, but he seems like the character one’s parents warned about. He may waste your time, but he would be a good pal.

October 10, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Insane Clown Posse
Music

An Insane Clown Posse Hatchetman for Every Deathmatch » PopMatters

by jummy84 October 10, 2025
written by jummy84

Deathmatch wrestling thrives on the margins of mainstream wrestling. It’s a world of blood, shattered glass, and extreme violence that embraces pain as spectacle. Its practitioners are often seen as society’s outcasts, those willing to risk everything for their art.

Over the last few decades, one curious visual and cultural symbol has become deeply ingrained in the fabric of deathmatch wrestling: the hatchetman. The hatchetman uses he iconic logo of the Insane Clown Posse and its Juggalo fan base.

You see it inked on bodies, on gear, blasted from speakers in the form of Insane Clown Posse or Psychopathic Records music during wrestler entrances. Even deathmatch performers from places as far-flung as Russia, like Alex Nabiev, adopt the imagery.

This raises the question, Why is the hatchetman everywhere in deathmatch wrestling? Is it a genuine identity — or a convenient shortcut to belonging?

Insane Clown Posse in the Ring

I like Insane Clown Posse. I respect what they’ve built not just as musicians, but as wrestlers, promoters, and creators of a subculture that gave deathmatch wrestling a stage when few others cared. This isn’t coming from a place of ignorance or mockery.

However, liking Insane Clown Posse doesn’t mean I want to see every other wrestler use the same three tracks for their entrance music. After the tenth guy in a local gym walks out to “Chicken Huntin’”, it stops feeling like rebellion and starts feeling like routine. That’s where this critique begins, not in contempt, but in a desire for evolution.

Embracing the Juggalo

From Insane Clown Posse’s perspective, Juggalos represent a family for outsiders. They champion the misfits — people rejected by mainstream society — embracing the weird, the scarred, the angry. Insane Clown Posse’s own history is rooted in outsider status, fighting major label rejection and mainstream disdain.

That same philosophy carried over into wrestling. In 1999, Insane Clown Posse founded Juggalo Championship Wrestling (a promotional vehicle built to spotlight hardcore, comedic, and deathmatch wrestling, the kind of performance that didn’t fit neatly into mainstream wrestling’s polished mold. Through Juggalo Championship Wrestling and their annual Gathering of the Juggalos festival, they provided a stage for underground wrestlers long before it was profitable or considered cool.

For many, Juggalo Championship Wrestling was the first platform that took their brand of chaos seriously. From their perspective, supporting deathmatch wrestling wasn’t a gimmick; it was an extension of the world they’d already built.

During the heyday of World Wrestling Entertainment and World Championship Wrestling, fans often brought hatchetman signs to wrestling events, forging a unique connection between the underground music scene – particularly the Juggalos and Insane Clown Posse culture – and professional wrestling. These signs weren’t just fan props; they became powerful symbols, linking the hatchetman emblem with the wrestling world and serving as a visual rallying point that united like-minded fans.

This crossover helped embed the hatchetman deeply into deathmatch wrestling’s fabric, illustrating how music subcultures and wrestling fandoms often overlap. The presence of these signs at wrestling events reflected a broader cultural exchange where Juggalos found a home in the violent, rebellious spectacle of hardcore and deathmatch wrestling.

It’s important to remember that Insane Clown Posse aren’t just a symbol; Violent J and Shaggy 2 Dope trained as wrestlers, took bumps, traveled extensively, and faced the same grind and rejection as countless others trying to make it in the business. While they’re better known for creating and promoting their own wrestling company, Juggalo Championship Wrestling, than for in-ring accolades, their deep involvement in the wrestling world lends authenticity to the underground scene they helped shape.

They didn’t just slap the hatchetman on merchandise; they personified it. Loud, theatrical, defiant, and determined to be heard on their own terms, Insane Clown Posse as wrestlers and promoters lived the same struggles many deathmatch performers know intimately: being misunderstood, dismissed, and still stepping through the curtain to perform for those who do get it.

Juggalo Championship Wrestling became a dedicated platform for hardcore and deathmatch wrestling. The promotion offered consistent exposure and opportunity to wrestlers who embraced extremity, absurdity, and outsider identity. This solidifies the hatchetman as more than a fan symbol, but as an organizing force in the underground wrestling circuit.

It’s also worth noting that Insane Clown Posse, during their stints in World Championship Wrestling and World Wrestling Entertainment, were never positioned as main-event talent. Their roles were mostly mid-to-lower card; sideshow attractions, comedic violence, or cult favorites. That’s not a knock; they knew their lane and embraced it.

When wrestlers today adopt Insane Clown Posse themes, entrance music, or iconography, they’re not just aligning with an aesthetic; they’re signaling their identity as underground performers, intentionally or not. There’s nothing inherently wrong with that. Still, it reflects an important reality: embracing Insane Clown Posse often comes with an unspoken admission: “I’m not here to go mainstream. I’m here to go hard.”

Insane Clown Posse’s wrestling influence didn’t end with World Championship Wrestling and World Wrestling Entertainment. In Total Nonstop Action wrestling, their connection to wrestling continued to make waves. Perhaps most notably, when wrestling legend Scott Hall made a memorable ringside appearance alongside Insane Clown Posse, it highlighted how Juggalo culture had become deeply embedded in wrestling, allowing it to be embraced by iconic figures. This moment stands as a testament to Insane Clown Posse’s lasting footprint, bridging underground culture and broader wrestling audiences.

Insane Clown Posse’s presence extended beyond live wrestling and music. They were also playable characters in the 2004 video game Backyard Wrestling 2: There Goes the Neighborhood, further spreading their hardcore, theatrical style to gaming audiences and amplifying their crossover appeal.

Originality Over Imitation

Hardcore and deathmatch promotions, such as Combat Zone Wrestling and Independent Wrestling Association Mid-South, also embraced Insane Clown Posse’s music and cultural aesthetic. While no official catalog of entrance themes exists, Insane Clown Posse and other Psychopathic Records tracks have become something of a default soundtrack in these circles.

This musical overlap links Insane Clown Posse’s horrorcore style with the brutal spectacle of hardcore wrestling. Deathmatch wrestling may not have grown the way it did without Insane Clown Posse’s support. Over time, however, what began as a welcoming subculture started to feel more like a uniform. The hatchetman tattoo, the music, the merchandise — they became almost expected in deathmatch circles.

Consider legends like Mick Foley, Sabu, and Necro Butcher — all worked JCW, but none relied solely on Juggalo culture to define themselves. Wrestlers often signal their proximity to Juggalo culture through clothing, music, or stable affiliations, which complicates the idea of belonging.

Raven, for instance, wore an Insane Clown Posse “Great Milenko” shirt on World Championship Wrestling broadcasts and briefly aligned with the Juggalo-associated stable, Buddy Van Horn’s 1988 dark comedy, The Dead Pool, which included Insane Clown Posse and Vampiro. Still, his character remained distinct: dark, brooding, and psychologically layered — separate from carnival theatrics.

Later, Great Muta joined World Championship Wrestling’s Dark Carnival, also featuring Insane Clown Posse and Vampiro. Despite the alliance, Muta remained unmistakably himself: a mystical figure drawn from Japanese wrestling tradition, not Juggalo culture.

Vampiro, on the other hand, perhaps did more than any mainstream wrestler to promote Insane Clown Posse from within. He wore clown makeup, leaned into the mythos, and helped Insane Clown Posse’s aesthetic bleed further into televised wrestling.

These examples illustrate the key point: association is not the same as identity. Many wrestlers borrow from the Juggalo image for storyline or spectacle, but maintain personal uniqueness beyond the paint and soundbites.

In contrast, Japanese deathmatch legends such as Mitsuhiro Matsunaga, Atsushi Onita, Jun Kasai, and Masashi Takeda forged identities rooted in themes of samurai honor, punk, nihilism, and horror. No hatchetman. No clown gimmicks. Just personal visions of violence.

So why do international wrestlers adopt Juggalo imagery? Russian deathmatch performer Alex Nabiev wears a hatchetman tattoo. Whether it’s sincere fandom or a symbolic shortcut, the answer points to one thing: a sense of belonging.

Known for his extreme self-destructive style, Nabiev pushes boundaries with no-limits violence, sometimes wrestling in brutal “Blood and Sand” matches outside traditional rings — literally battling in sand-filled yards. Like the Russian GG Allin of wrestling, he carves a legacy defined by nihilism, shock, and unpredictable intensity. While the hatchetman marks his connection to the underground, what Nabiev brings to the ring is entirely his own sickness.

This pattern extends beyond wrestling. Many rap and horrorcore artists adopt Insane Clown Posse’s lingo, face paint, and the hatchetman symbol to build identity and community. Like wrestlers, they find in Insane Clown Posse a ready-made mythology and fanbase that signals outsider status and rebellion. While this can create strong bonds, it also risks diluting individuality, turning vibrant artists into echoes of a dominant iconography rather than innovators in their own right. The question then becomes, “How do you honor your roots without becoming a copy?”

Deathmatch wrestling is filled with loners and outsiders. Juggalo culture provides a ready-made identity and a built-in fan base. For some, that’s survival. For others, it’s a creative crutch. That shortcut comes with a cost. It can dilute originality, turning unique voices into copies of a louder one.

Pain alone isn’t enough in deathmatch wrestling anymore. If everyone bleeds, wears the same shirt, and walks out to the same songs, what sets anyone apart? The best deathmatch wrestlers don’t cosplay rebellion; they invent it. They build personas out of trauma, vision, and risk.

Insane Clown Posse gave deathmatch wrestling a megaphone when few others did. That’s worthy of respect. For the scene to grow, however, it needs new voices, not just hatchet-wielding echo chambers.

October 10, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Greil Marcus 2025
Music

Greil Marcus Tells His Stories About Others’ Stories » PopMatters

by jummy84 October 9, 2025
written by jummy84

Cultural critic Greil Marcus was at the vanguard of the first generation of rock critics—Nick Tosches, Jon Landau, Lester Bangs—when a record review could shape you as a person as if you were molten metal. At 23, Marcus began sending reviews to Rolling Stone in 1968, before becoming its first reviews editor. Afterwards, he wrote for Detroit-magazine, no-holds-barred, Creem.

Since then, Marcus has created an oeuvre that, in rock criticism, is daunting and unparalleled, which includes his seminal book, Mystery Train: Images of America in Rock ‘n’ Roll Music (1975), which contextualizes rock ‘n’ roll within the history of the United States: how, for example, the music of the Band encompassed Mark Twain, Herman Melville, and the American Civil War.

Greil Marcus went on to write other significant works: Lipstick Traces: A Secret History of the 20th Century (1989); Invisible Republic: Bob Dylan’s Basement Tapes (1997); and, more recently, Folk Music: A Bob Dylan Biography in Seven Songs (2022). His latest, What Nails It (2024), is part of Yale University Press’ series Why I Write, which PopMatters reviewed last year.

Also, Marcus’ work as an editor includes Stranded: Rock and Roll for a Desert Island (1979), an important early anthology of rock criticism; The Rose & the Briar: Death, Love and Liberty in the American Ballad (co-edited with American historian Sean Wilentz, 2005); and A New Literary History of America (with Harvard Professor of English and of African American Studies Werner Sollors, 2009).

PopMatters met Greil Marcus via Zoom to discuss the recent 50th anniversary edition of his groundbreaking text Mystery Train, as well as writing, music, the United States, Bob Dylan, Dock Boggs, and humor.

The Misery Behind Mystery Train

Mystery Train‘s 50th Anniversary Edition was recently published by Plume. A seminal text in Greil Marcus’ oeuvre, its creation was not as smooth a ride for him as it became for his readers.

Had you tested the ideas in Mystery Train in previous writings of yours, such as record reviews or essays?

Well, I didn’t try them out in the sense of writing about them. But all of that, as the book was originally published [Mystery Train], 50 years ago, came out of my time at the University of California, Berkeley, where I studied and later taught American Studies.

It was also influenced by the books I read at the time, the lectures I attended, and the classes I participated in. I learned about the Puritans, including John Winthrop, as well as Thomas Jefferson, Walt Whitman, Abraham Lincoln, Herman Melville, and Jonathan Edwards, among others. This really formed the template through which I was able to see contemporary performers—whether that was Elvis Presley, the Band, or Sly Stone—and get a sense of the vast terrain they were inhabiting, attempting to fill in their music or songs.

What were the roles they were acting out, I thought? So, it seemed to me they had real ancestors in American history. Now they have become ancestors themselves—see how many people who have followed in their footsteps.

Similar to Walt Whitman, looking toward future bards?

That’s right, fixing on Whitman is just perfect; he had such a sense that there were going to be armies of poets, following in his wake. He wanted that.

Would Mystery Train work if you changed one of the six artists who feature in the book?

I don’t know, because it’s not really an abstract question. I wrote the book; I wrote it when I wrote it, so I wrote about people whose work attracted me and that also seemed unsolved. That isn’t saying I solved it, just that there were open questions in their music. Why are people responding like this? Why do people seem to care so much? What’s special about the work of these people that makes them different from all the various performers around or before them?

Also, I felt like writing about people who, to me, hadn’t been written about well before. Obviously, a lot had been written about all these people, but I felt that it was all superficial, all gloss, all publicity. Nobody had really wrestled with their music. That is how I felt, anyway. Maybe that is a little egotistical, but that was my motive.

Does it strike you as young for having written Mystery Train in your late 20s?

No. I am the same person. I was writing the book. I was also married and a father.

Also, it was a wrenching, devastating, miserable experience writing that book. I don’t know how many times I thought, “I just could get in my car and drive off a cliff, and then I wouldn’t have to finish the book.” I felt like I would never be able to finish it. It was this enormous burden. I had never written a book before. I didn’t know how to do it.

I remember when I finished it—I finished it about two or three in the morning. It was the Band chapter. I fell asleep in the living room. My wife found me in the morning, fast asleep. I woke up, and I said, “I finished. It’s over.” And I meant it’s over. This horrible ordeal that I put myself, her, and the little girls through—it was over. I didn’t have to worry about it anymore; I didn’t care what anybody thought; I didn’t care about the reviews; I didn’t care about anything.

After that, it was in somebody else’s hands. I knew its weaknesses. I knew where the cheats were. I knew where I had fallen short. I was surprised by the reviews, which were positive and unquestioning. That was simply because no one had written about this subject on the level that I was trying to write about it on. That’s all.

Did writing other books get easier, then?

Easier in this sense: that I have written a book and finished it. I knew with other books that, ultimately, I would get there.

The next book I wrote was Lipstick Traces; Mystery Train took two years to write, and that took nine. Most of those years were spent writing. The research, interviews, and travel took about two years.

I remember saying to my wife at one point, when I was wrestling with the last 100 pages of Lipstick Traces, “I’ve been trapped in Paris in 1953 for three years and I don’t know how to get out.” She said, “Well, there are worse places to be.” That was tremendously liberating for her to say that.

Ultimately, I finished that book. Later, I wrote three books in one month each.

The first time was because I was asked to write a book while I was in the middle of writing something else. A publisher called me and said, “Did you know that next year will be the 40th anniversary of the release of ‘Like a Rolling Stone’?” I said, “No.” I mean, who thinks of 40th anniversaries? He said, “Well, it is. It is really going to be a big deal. We want to publish a book about that song, and we want you to write it.” I said, “Well, I am working on another book; I can’t write two books at once. So thank you very much.”

I told my wife about this. She said, “You didn’t tell them that it has been your favorite song since the first time that you heard it? That you have listened to it thousands of times?” “No, I didn’t tell them that.” She said, “Well, if you don’t write that book, someone else is going to write it, and that is going to make you very unhappy. I think you ought to call them back and figure out a way that you can write this book.”

So I came up with an absurd fantasy that I could take a month out of the other book, which was The Shape of Things to Come, and write this book on “Like a Rolling Stone”. It only has to be 35,000/40,000 words. I could conduct interviews, research, make notes, and think thoughts. Write the stuff.

I thought I could do it in a month, which is completely ludicrous. I called the guy back and I said, “I’d like to do it.” Then I did. I wrote it [Like a Rolling Stone: Bob Dylan at the Crossroads (2005)] in a month.

Greil Marcus’ Fascination with American Mythology

American flag guitar
Image: Bipul Kumar | AdobeStock

When reading Greil Marcus’ books, such as Mystery Train, one thing becomes clear: he deeply and compassionately cares about the United States; the country comes alive and dies and is reborn in a single paragraph. Like some great American thinkers, Marcus showcases his feelings of betrayal and love for the young country—a country founded upon an idea, which Americans, for better or worse, grapple with from the cradle to the grave.

This reverence Greil Marcus has for the United States sometimes—if not overtly—turns into sadness, a lament for never having fulfilled its promise to be a “city on a hill”, as John Winthrop declared in a sermon in 1630, a beacon of hope. Glimpses of its potential greatness have, ironically, come through, exposing its failings and acts of wantonness. This is heard in the songs of blues artists Son House and Skip James; country singer Buell Kazee; and folk artist Roscoe Holcomb. That is where Marcus takes his respite: the old-time religion of country blues.T

With the themes of American democracy and the American dream frequently appearing in your writings, I always thought Springsteen would make a perfect subject for you.

No. There is a way in which Bruce is so conscious of the kind of themes that I try to bring to bear in Mystery Train that he is a transparent figure. For me, the term “Mystery Train” really applies to everyone in the book; there is something elusive about where their music comes from, which is why their themes are so deep. It seems so different from the music of the people around them. I don’t get that sense of mystery in Bruce Springsteen’s work; it has many other qualities, but not that.

In your work, there is a breakdown between non-fiction and fiction. How important is the blurring of the two for writing about music?

That’s really endemic to criticism as such, as a mode of writing, as a mode of thinking. Here you’re writing about someone else’s work. You’re not writing a fictionalized autobiography. You’re not imagining characters out of whole cloth. You’re following someone else’s work and you’re trying to make sense of it. You’re trying to convey your enthusiasm, your disappointment, your shock, your gratification, whatever it might be.

You want to tell other people about this: ‘You gotta hear this. You gotta see this. Don’t go near it. It will reduce you as a human being.’ Whatever. It’s an argument you feel that you need to make.

It seems to me that, when you are doing this most intensely, you veer into fiction. That’s where you have to go. You have to tell a story to make sense of what you’re trying to see rather than to analyze or take it apart; no, you want a story that illuminates what you think is there. You’ve got to write your own story about someone else’s story.

I first found that in D. H. Lawrence’s Studies in Classic American Literature (1923). He’s a novelist; he has authority. He has an authority that most critics don’t have, and he brings that novelist’s ability to create new worlds in conversation with Herman Melville, Benjamin Franklin, whoever it might be in that book. You can find it in Pauline Kael‘s work, too.

You have a distinctive prose style. Did you try to emulate a writer in your early days?

No. I tried to emulate people in the sense that I liked to go as far as they did. I wondered how they did it. I don’t know how they got there, but I want to get there, too.

Some gave me ambition, but in terms of style, every writer has their own style. You learn to trust it. Sometimes you learn to rein it in. I have written sentences when I am using six em dashes. I thought, ‘You know, this is hard to follow. Maybe I should pull it back a little bit. Put a period here. It wouldn’t kill it.’

Some of the earliest cave paintings are called meanders. Usually, they are on the ceilings of caves, dating back 15,000 to 20,000 years ago. The people who made them were simply using their fingers for patterns on the ceilings of caves. The patterns are not random. They have direction. They reach a point where the story being told—trace lines—comes to an end, and another story begins. You can perceive this. So they’re not random. They’re not doodles. Yet they keep going.

I have some of that spirit in me when I want to keep going in a sentence. Not like the French, though [Marcus says with an impish smile].

When you are writing about something—a record, a book, or a movie, whatever, and addressing the invisible world out there, whoever might be reading you—it is because you think it will make their life bigger. It will show them something they’ve not seen before. You want to pass it on. You’ve received a gift; you want to pass it on.

You’ve Really Got to Listen

Lottery Shirley Jackson Bojack Horseman
Photo: Stock | Pixabay

Within our discussion, Greil Marcus’ unquenchable passion and intellectual acumen are infectious. He is the teacher that you wish you had; he has a mellifluous, Californian voice—perfect for lecturing. In fact, Marcus taught at the University of California, Berkeley, Princeton University, and the University of Minnesota. He is highly opinionated yet sensitive, intense yet light, precise yet loquacious. You wish you had experienced a front row seat to his classroom lectures.

In your book Folk Music, you point out that when Bob Dylan performs “No More Auction Block” in 1962, it serves as a powerful early manifestation of the quality that defines his music in its most uncanny moments throughout his life: empathy. I think this is an astute observation.

There’s nothing so brilliant about this insight; it’s simply listening to what Dylan says. About one point, he said, “I can see myself in others.” In “Positively 4th Street”, there is a lyric in which he sings, “I wish that for just one time you could stand inside my shoes / And just for that one moment I could be you.”

In other words, if you see through my eyes what I see when I see you. That is a very harsh song. And yet, there is love, connection, empathy. You’re a total loser. You’re a complete fraud. And I can look at you and feel how awful it must be to be that kind of person. So it is a cruel, put-down song, but it also has empathy at its core.

Sometimes, with any interesting artist, you pay attention to what they say; they will say, This is who I am. This is how I do it. So often people will say, ‘Oh, that’s so simplistic, he or she can’t really be telling us what we want to hear.’

Forget about what you want to hear; listen to what is there. I read Dylan saying that; it struck me as true. Then I began to hear it all through his work. It was magical to listen that way.

Was Lipstick Traces—which is partly about European art movements, such as Dadaism—a reaction against your previous book, Mystery Train, which is deeply embedded in the American experience?

No. It was an obsession that developed, and I tried to pursue that obsession as far as I could.

There is another thing too: everybody liked Mystery Train—it only got rave reviews. Like I said before, I knew, or it seemed to me, it wasn’t really as good as so many people thought. That there were problems with it. There were places where it fell short.

When I started writing Lipstick Traces, about a year or two into it, I thought, ‘you know, I’m writing a book that not everybody is going to like.’ That was very liberating because I didn’t care. As it is a tremendously long book, there was a point where finishing it was all that I cared about.

By the time I finished it, I was completely insulated from all the very bad reviews it got when it was published. Some of them were quite vicious. I didn’t care. I finished it. I spent nine years writing [Lipstick Traces]. It was published. It was the best that I could do. It went on, luckily, to live a life, despite the initial reactions.

Do you have a book of yours that you are most proud of?

Yeah. Lipstick Traces. I remember when I finished it, I thought, ‘This is the best that I can write.’ I will never write as well again.

I think that is probably true. Just the quality of the writing to me. Other people might not find it to be so well-written, but I know this is the best that I can do.

Then, Folk Music—I’m really proud of that book. I pursued or followed many lines as far as I could. You know, I spent 30 pages writing about different versions of the old folk song “Jim Jones”. It’s not really an obvious thing to do. I wanted to see if I could play out the string.

When you write with a sense of freedom, when you start with, ‘why would anyone want to read this? I am going to make a case so compelling that people have to read it.’ When you have that kind of ambition, that kind of energy, it becomes self-sustaining.

All the books that I have written, I remember the circumstances of writing them; some are gratifying, some are not. Some, you feel this is the best that I can do. Some, you feel like there is something off about this—it just doesn’t work, but I can’t fix it. There might be things wrong with it, but this is the best that I can do. I do not think that I dishonored the subjects.

He’s Got Dock Boggs in His Bones

Reading Greil Marcus for the first time was a revelation for me. It was his 1997 book, Invisible Republic, about Bob Dylan’s Basement Tapes. Marcus effectively bypasses the Basement Tapes to write about the Virginia old-time singer and banjo player Dock Boggs, who is resurrected so well that you can almost feel his breath on your neck; his otherworldly, quasi-yodeling voice from the very soul of Appalachia drives a stake through your heart.

Reading Marcus’ serpentine prose felt like an eternal return through a weightlessness in which life could come and go, and come again, and you, the reader, too, became a bigger part of this story, a hidden republic. Invisible Republic said: it did not matter who you were or about to become, if you never heard of Boggs, you were Boggs himself. You got lucky or lucked out, regardless of whether you’re young or old. In other words, Invisible Republic shows you a lot about yourself through the subconscious of the United States.

Did you think Invisible Republic—in which your famous coinage “old, weird America” derives from—was going to have such a cultural impact?

No. That book came out of the urge to write a book. I needed to write another book, but I didn’t have an idea or a subject.

Our oldest daughter’s then-boyfriend sent me a set of five CDs of basement tape bootlegs. Maybe 100 or 105 songs, including a lot I’ve never heard. A lot of fragments. A lot of unfinished pieces, along with unfinished songs that I had heard before, but also unfinished songs that nobody had heard.

I put those CDs in a little primitive car CD player while my wife and I drove to Montana, and back. When we got home, I said, ‘I could write a book about this stuff.’ There is so much in those fragments and songs.

I didn’t know what the book would be or what it would encompass. So I spent a couple of years working on that. I had a wonderful time doing it. It was play. I didn’t write it with the expectation that it would be a breakthrough, or that I would reveal things people didn’t know. It was just that I was having fun.

Had you listened to Dock Boggs before writing Invisible Republic?

I was listening to Dock Boggs for years, going back to probably 1970. After Altamont, which was the worst day of my life. Even before finding out somebody had been murdered at the concert while it was going on. Just the day, living through that violence, ugliness, selfishness, disrespect, mindlessness, god, it was awful. It was an ugly day.

After that, I didn’t want to listen to rock ‘n’ roll anymore. I spent a year listening to nothing but old country blues and pre-country music, such as Dock Boggs, which is really country blues; it just happens to have been made by a white man in the Virginia mountains in the 1920s. I listen to Dock Boggs over and over. He is part of my life, my whole frame of reference for what is good in the world.

When I was writing Invisible Republic, I wanted to write about Dock Boggs. I happened to meet Barry O’Connell [music researcher], who had spent years transcribing tapes of interviews that Mike Seeger [Pete Seeger‘s half-brother] had done with Dock Boggs. They were very long and elaborate, and often torturous interviews; they were less like interviews than two people spending time together, and one of them getting drunk and pouring out his heart to the other.

Barry told me about the work he had been doing. I told him how much I loved Dock Boggs, and he said, “Well, I will show you what I have done.”

So he gave me the transcripts of these conversations, then he gave me the actual tapes. Later, I became friends with Mike Seeger, who spoke about the circumstances of these conversations. Essentially, I had this unknown autobiography of Dock Boggs to accompany the music.

It was just shocking to listen to him. The things he said. The things he had done. The way he told his stories. It was another form of music. I have been listening to Dock Boggs for a long time, but through the interviews, I feel like I met Dock Boggs. He died in 1971, but in his music and interviews, he is present to me.

This was wonderful and really thrilling to write about it. I remember Nick Tosches writing in one of his books, I think it is in Where Dead Voices Gather (2001), about a conversation we had. ‘Greil was telling me about this book; he’s pretending it is about the Basement Tapes, but, really, it’s about Dock Boggs.’ He was right. In a way, I wrote Invisible Republic to have a nice framework so I could write about Dock Boggs.

Why did Dock Boggs, compared to Clarence Ashley or other old-time musicians, stand out to you?

Clarence Ashley‘s music is wonderful. Clarence Ashley is in Invisible Republic, too. So are many other musicians: Buell Kazee, and all the people you get to hear for the first time listening to Harry Smith’s Anthology of American Folk Music, which came out in 1952, and kind of snuck its way through culture over the decades, until people began to stumble upon it like I stumbled upon it in 1970. But there was something different about Dock Boggs. There was something bitter, unsatisfied, maligned, and self-loathing about his music.

In other words, this music did not explain itself. It said more than that: it said, you’re never going to understand. Well, that can be kind of alluring, if you have a certain cast of mind. I want to understand. I didn’t mean that I wanted to connect biographical details of his life to his music—I mean, I wanted to know how it feels to be so exiled from everyone else. To feel that nobody knows you. Nobody sees you. That is what I got from Dock Boggs. So it was a great mystery, not to try to solve, but to render on the page. That was what I was trying to do with Invisible Republic.

It seemed to me that Bob Dylan, who loved Dock Boggs, made that very clear. A lot of the Basement Tapes were saying, ‘I want to go as far as he went. I want to take someone as far as he took me.’ That seemed to me what part of the Basement Tapes were, and part of what was legitimate to write about.

Egoism Is a Funny Thing

Whereas Greil Marcus courts mystery—attracted and intrigued, content to keep it a mystery—Nick Tosches enters headfirst, wanting to unlock the enigma that is, say, Jerry Lee Lewis, and in so doing, he will come to understand a part of himself.

Marcus, on the other hand, walks through an invisible door—a metaphorical and metaphysical journey. He wrestles with what it means to be alive—weal and woe, joy and strife, pleasure and pain. He writes this process through his figures, whose voices are unheard, until, somehow, if it has been predestined or prewritten, their voices come alive from beyond the grave—and are heard with fresh ears. You could say, Greil Marcus resurrects the dead.

In 1993, Dylan explained to music writer Dave Marsh the difference between him and a later generation of musicians, such as Bruce Springsteen, “They weren’t there to see the end of the traditional people. But I was.” What are your thoughts?

To me, what he meant was that he saw Dock Boggs, Clarence Ashley, Skip James, Mississippi John Hurt, and Son House. He got the sense that these people had lived lives and learned things that, when they died, would go out of the world, would never be there anymore. It was going to be up to him to pass on what he had learned from them. His responsibility.

That is the egotism of the artist. ‘I have to do this. No one else can. It’s my burden. It’s my privilege. I’m the only translator. No one else understands who these people really were, but, somehow, I have to pass on whatever it is that I can.’ Dave Marsh said when these people die, something is going to go out of the world. It’s going to be gone. That’s a very sobering thought.

In your book, Bob Dylan by Greil Marcus: Writings 1968–2010, there is an essay entitled “Desolation Row”, in which you discuss how, when Dylan first performed “Desolation Row” live in 1965, the audience couldn’t stop laughing. In the piece, you compare the carnival-esque world of “Desolation Row” to Christ’s Entry into Brussels in 1889, by the Belgian painter James Ensor. What inspired the idea for the piece?

It was someone else’s idea. The Getty Foundation in Los Angeles acquired Christ’s Entry into Brussels in 1889, James Ensor’s huge mural painting, which is this horrible, vulgar commercial fare. The curator said, “This painting reminds me of ‘Desolation Row’; it is the same world: malevolent, threatening, dangerous, crazy, carnival-like. We would like you to write an essay about this and come down to give a lecture about it.”

It was such an odd assignment. I said, “Okay, I’ll do it.” So it was somebody else’s idea. It was not my idea; I just tried to play out the string. I grew fascinated with Ensor, and I spent a lot of time looking at his work, seeing the affinity for others that he had seen and shown in his art. I thought that this would be fun to write about and work with.

How important is humor in music writing?

You know, you have to bring a certain disrespect to criticism—a disrespect to the object of your attention, and a disrespect of yourself. In other words, if this isn’t fun, it isn’t worth doing. If it’s fun, you know some cruel and outrageous comment is going to occur to you, and you’d better put it in. Better not leave it out, ‘cause that is part of your response.

At the end of our conversation, I suggested that I see the influence of F. Scott Fitzgerald in Greil Marcus’ writing (the elegiac nature of his work, regarding the ever-present yet evanescent, almost graspable, American past). “I’m no Fitzgerald,” Marcus drolly responds, with a mischievous smile and a twinkle in his eye; his reverence for Fitzgerald too great to go there.

Greil Marcus might be no F. Scott Fitzgerald, but what he has achieved through his writings is to articulate how the United States has shaped the mythology of rock ‘n’ roll. Moreover, he has brought musicians to life through his prose, and in doing so, delineates how music can literally change the way you see them, yourself, and how you see the world.

Martin Scorsese once quipped, “Your job is to get your audience to care about your obsessions.” This is what it is like to read Greil Marcus: he makes you care about his subjects. Did I care about Dock Boggs before reading Invisible Republic? No. Before Invisible Republic, Dock Boggs was a stranger, a specter, a name without a soul. Now, Dock Boggs is like a remembered friend. When he opens his parched lips trying to keep death at bay in “Oh Death”—though knowing that it is a futile task—it is difficult not to weep: for the narrator, for Dock Boggs, and for humankind.

After our conversation has finished, it dawns upon me that, despite the disparate themes and meanderings of it, much like Greil Marcus’ sinuous prose, it has direction and form. The patterns of our conversation are not random.

October 9, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Henry Threadgill Extends His Compositional Daring Into Intimacy » PopMatters
Music

Henry Threadgill Extends His Compositional Daring Into Intimacy » PopMatters

by jummy84 October 9, 2025
written by jummy84

The musical art of composer Henry Threadgill has taken many forms over the course of more than half a century. When he emerged as a darting, era-spanning alto saxophonist with the trio AIR in 1971, Threadgill was already defying expectations, playing in the post-bebop “free style” of that loft jazz era, but also covering ragtime songs along the way. His bands over the years were adventurous and unusual: a sextet with two drummers, cello, and brass; the Very Very Circus with two electric guitars and two tubas; a Flute Force Four with, you guessed it, four flutes; the Make a Move band with guitar and accordion; and Zooid, his most recent band, which shapeshifts from project to project.

Along the way, it became clear that Threadgill’s bracing saxophone playing was only a small part of his art. As a composer and bandleader, he had developed a distinctive voice, refracting the lineage of jazz through his personal musical language: contrasting timbres, overlapping rhythms, and a practice of improvisation that encouraged unusual intervals and fresh melodic patterns. During recent recordings, it became clear that Threadgill’s art has expanded beyond any single band to encompass ensembles of unusual size and composition.

The new album, Listen Ship, features a particularly unique ensemble of four acoustic guitars (Brandon Ross on the soprano in addition to Bill Frisell, Miles Okazaki, and Greg Belisle-Chi), two acoustic bass guitars (Jerome Harris and Stomu Takeishi), and two pianos (Maya Keren and Rahul Carlberg). The musicians play a suite of 16 precise and sympathetically connected pieces that largely evade a sense of genre.

Let me emphasize: although Henry Threadgill began his career as a “jazz musician”, Listen Ship only fleetingly sounds like jazz. However, the guitar-centric pieces, in particular, contain the rhythmic give-and-take that is distinctive to jazz. The music, in terms of genre or category, is simply in its own space.

For the first six installments, Threadgill segregates the pianos and guitars, alternating between piano duets and guitar treatments. (For titles, the segments are “lettered”, A, B, etc, with “IJ” as a single piece.) The contrast between these first pieces acts as a prelude. The piano duets are slower and more legato, with notes and clusters ringing in gentle pastels that only occasionally ruffle your sonic feathers. For example, “E” is a set of whispered curls and chords, with low tones and cushioned chords setting up isolated spikes of high notes. Threadgill allows Keren and Carlberg moments of drama here, but most of the playing comes home to layers of gentle accompaniment.

The guitars-only pieces that start the suite are more likely to be contrapuntal and rhythmic, like “D”, with its delicate, dancing plucking. The guitars cover the spectrum from high to low, each voice in place but coming together in strands of written melody that cycle around like a wheel.

The first segment that brings all the instruments together develops Threadgill’s ideas more fully. On “G”, the guitars continue to assert a more percussive voice, but the pianos emerge gently from beneath and then match the guitars with vigor. Suddenly, then, this piece resets to allow the keyboards to play a ballad segment that reinforces their identity, which invites the guitars along, with a bass guitar trading lead improvisations with Ross’s soprano. Ultimately, the eight instruments converge in a single theme.

The second half of the program continues to mix the players and instruments more freely. The bass guitarists face off on a frankly funky duel on “M”; a single piano part underlies one jagged guitar melody on “P”; and the 40-second “Q” is a tightly-composed symphony in a flash.

The two longest segments of the suite also come in this second half of the program, and they are the highlights. The concluding piece, “R”, offers the richest harmonic landscape on the record. The opening piano solo sounds conspicuously like (almost) mainstream jazz, though with this program’s criss-crossing guitar accompaniment. Guitarists also solo, utilizing beautiful harmonic movement as the piece develops a solid background of rhythmic hits. In the final minute, Threadgill brings together a written melody that pays off everything that came before.

A particularly sumptuous performance emerges in segment “L”, marked by a lead guitar that begins with a Flamenco-tinged lyrical bravura. Pianos and guitars move beneath the lead with gentle, consonant support, lifting the piece to shivering beauty. Listeners familiar with some of the folk-inspired jazz of the 1970s may hear echoes of the band Oregon with Ralph Towner’s guitar. Still, soon enough Threadgill’s written theme distinguishes the piece as his own, with two guitars playing a unison melody as bass, piano chords, and contrasting melodies and percussive effects complete the album’s most masterful performance.

One other observation seems important. The soloists on this album typically stand out as utterly themselves regardless of the context in which you hear them play. Bill Frisell, Miles Okazaki, and Brandon Ross rarely disappear into a recording, essentially anonymous. However, it’s seldom obvious on this record who may be soloing. That may be because the settings are so gentle and careful that these huge musical personalities didn’t look to impose their singular stamps. Does this mostly quiet program invite or require a certain egolessness?

Compared to many of Henry Threadgill’s prior ensemble recordings, Listen Ship is a delicate work. Perhaps it tempts us to overlook it, but small can be bold as well as beautiful. This new composition and construction by Threadgill has a “chamber jazz” quality at times. Still, in its relative hush — no urgent saxophones, no amplified insistence or distortion — it invites the closest possible listening. Careful attention is richly rewarded by Listen Ship. You will hear some of the finest creative musicians in the world lose themselves in Henry Threadgill’s patterns and plans, the pathways he sets up that allow melodies and rhythms to wander, weave, and be discovered.

This is subtle music, only occasionally acerbic, but capable of a full range of interest. It moves across styles — yes, there is some folkiness, some hip jazz harmonies, some moments of noise or just texture — but it is best understood as a boundary-blasting form that reflects the adventure inside the head and soul of Henry Threadgill, the most congenial and inviting avant-garde artist in American music.
Listen Ship is a gentle, daring classic.

October 9, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Doja Cat 2025
Music

Doja Cat’s 1980s Extravagance Is Remarkable on ‘Vie’ » PopMatters

by jummy84 October 9, 2025
written by jummy84

Doja Cat is an all-or-nothing pop star. In 2023, the rapper tweeted to fans, “I don’t love y’all cos I don’t know y’all.” Extremes are her medium. When Doja Cat, whose real name is Amala Dlamini, attended Schiaparelli’s Spring/Summer 2023 fashion show, she wore a red body paint look covered in head-to-toe crystals. With her song “Paint the Town Red”, the absurd look captured Doja’s refined brand of camp. At that show, when the singer crossed paths with beauty mogul Kylie Jenner, who wore a lion’s head on her chest, the pair exchanged a cursory ‘Good to see you’ with each other. Their outlandish costumes were not acknowledged. 

Doja’s fifth album, Vie, French for “live”, is an about-face from its predecessor, 2023’s Scarlet. On that record, Doja sought to prove herself as a rapper, perhaps in response to a 2022 comment from Remy Ma on the podcast Drink Champs: “I don’t think [Doja Cat] is a rapper,” Remy said. While Doja did not respond directly, she tweeted, “The truth is I do tell stories, use punchlines regularly, and prioritize world play frequently. This is what rapping is by definition.”

In response, Scarlet crusaded for rap dominance, but critics said it lost the charm of Doja’s pop-infused early hits. This criticism became the jumping-off point for Vie, which rejects the notion that a need for rap credentials is the singer’s primary motive and establishes Doja as the type of star whose credibility as an artist does not rely on album-by-album critiques. Mixing 1980s pop and R&B on Vie, Doja remains an elusive, genre-bending savant. 

The record’s standout tracks fully embrace 1980s synthpop. The lead single “Jealous Type” bears no trace of another genre, giving Doja room to experiment on the other tracks, while proving the album’s thesis about versatility. The familiarity of 1980s pop brings Doja dangerously close to validating the criticism that she’s not a real rapper. However, by repackaging a maximalist genre in her seductive image, Doja turns herself into an enigma, immune to accusations of pastiche. 

A modern pop star paying homage to the 1980s is not a new idea. Taylor Swift received a synthpop makeover with 1989, and Dua Lipa tried disco on Future Nostalgia. Why does pop keep going back to that decade? During that time, the genre became glamorous. The rock stars of the 1960s were larger than life, and the singer-songwriters of the 1970s were open-hearted and intriguing, but the 1980s made music opulent. As a result, modern celebrities are cartoonish fashion muses. At the 2023 Met Gala, in honor of Karl Lagerfeld, Doja dressed as a cat and “Meow” -ed during interviews. 

While Vie’s main throughline is the 1980s, other elements surface. In “Acts of Service”, Doja Cat’s sultry vocals glide over a laconic R&B soundscape, while dreamy synths allude to the album’s central motif. A psychedelic guitar riff opens “Make It Up”, a trap-inspired plea for forgiveness where indifference becomes a means of seduction. In the irreverent “AAAH MEN!”, Doja recounts a litany of lovers’ shortcomings, but does not wallow. The ease of her delivery over a rapid bassline suggests that any former pain is no longer worth considering. 

The rap verses and catchy chorus of “Gorgeous” tie the album together, reconciling Doja’s nature as a hip-hop provocateur and pop hitmaker. The song’s music video is a parody of a cosmetics commercial, starring Doja alongside models Alex Consani and Anok Yai. The video is sumptuous and luxurious, featuring panoramic shots of glistening bottles of product and close-ups of the stars’ faces.  

The video accomplishes several purposes. Firstly, it continues the album’s 1980s references by depicting the over-the-top beauty trends of that decade. Secondly, it examines Doja’s place in pop. A frequent front-row presence at fashion shows, Doja Cat embodies the marriage of fashion and pop culture. Similarly, her celebrity stemmed from the union of music and the internet. By satirizing commercialized beauty, Doja Cat portrays herself as glamorous while upholding the cultural change that produced her: beauty must be contextualized to have meaning. 

Unlike other celebrities, Doja does not set boundaries with the public to create a mystique. Instead, she critiques the absurdity of her platform. “I got surgery ’cause of the scrutiny,” she admits in “Gorgeous”. “Vegas”, a song Doja recorded for the 2022 biopic Elvis, embodies the main accomplishment of Vie by interpolating the melody of Elvis’ “Hound Dog” over a trap beat. By referencing pop so overtly, Doja finds her own place within the genre. 

At the 2024 Met Gala, Doja Cat and Kylie Jenner crossed paths again, this time in a not-so-polite manner. Instead of a courtesy greeting, red-carpet footage showed Jenner cast a judgmental up-and-down glance in Doja’s direction. Pop culture is like an arena where celebrities utilize various creative media to further their self-expression. As a title, Vie does not have a clear thematic connection to the album’s contents. Is it meant to imply that Doja Cat is living her best life? Given the star’s inscrutable persona, pulling off an extravagant album is a remarkable accomplishment. No matter what criticism she is responding to, Doja Cat lands on all fours. 

October 9, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Dar Williams
Music

Dar Williams Commits to the ‘Hummingbird Highway’ » PopMatters

by jummy84 October 8, 2025
written by jummy84

Dar Williams toured a spice farm in Belize set amid pristine jungles and primordial Mayan ruins. At a bumpy junction, the driver informed the passengers that there were three possible options: steering east, veering west, or staying on the middle road, which he referred to as the Hummingbird Highway. The instant wholly seized Williams‘ attention. Something about the trail choices resonated, especially the enticing description of the middle one, which struck her as a vivid metaphor for human life.

Dar Williams, one of folk music’s most cherished gifts, titled her newest album, Hummingbird Highway, a homage to the interdependence of boundless getaway and eternal return, another impressive offering from someone whose heart first journeyed to music long ago, and whose emotional vigilance and poetic vigor seem to only intensify with age. Indeed, the more Williams thought about the variety of roads, the more similarities she hit upon between herself and the hummingbird. “Hummingbirds have these fantastic migrations and hummingbirds need constant fueling,” said Williams.

Shortly after the Belize trip, Williams met a woman who told her that she and her daughter had matching hummingbird tattoos, which the woman described as symbolic of distance and closeness, departure and arrival, the desire to fly in every direction with an understanding that the lucky ones can always ground again at home. Williams treasured the richness of all of this imagery. Once again, she contemplated the hummingbird, finding numerous analogies to the human experience and extracting her own correlations.

“Curiosity, love, longing, we’ve got all of these ways of getting around,” notes Williams. “And it’s not always going forward. Like an artist, the hummingbird goes upside down and goes inside out. Flexibility, creativity, fastness, and travel all make for a complicated person and parent. Hummingbird Highway was written from the perspective of a child, one with a peripatetic, depressed, perhaps bipolar, frenetic, creative, generous, loving parent.”

In a recording career that began with a demo tape in 1990 titled I Have No History, Williams has long leaned on songwriting (Hummingbird Highway is her 11th album) and other forms of writing (she has written several travelogues and non-fiction books) to cast off and expose her blood and beauty to the world. Her creative journey was nurtured early in childhood, bolstered by the support of parents who, as she said, “leaned into the commons culturally”. Born and raised in Westchester County, New York, music was always in the air at home. So, too, was love and praise.

Her mother, a preschool teacher, believed in letting her students and children choose their instruments first and then take lessons to learn how to play them, not the other way around. Her parents always supported their community’s arts programs; on one occasion, they even sold grapefruits to raise funds for the local orchestra.

“I think that that influenced my love of working with coffeehouses,” said Williams. “It has influenced my love of things like art spaces that somehow figured out how to run a complex sound system, places that were community crowdfunded by a bunch of people who retrofitted it themselves from an old shoe store.”

Most of the music shaping Williams’ preferences she first heard long ago in her parents’ vinyl collection. At age 17, home from school one afternoon, she pulled out a couple of Judy Collins‘ records. She fell in love with Collins’ 1967 album, Wildflowers, which featured powerful orchestral arrangements by Joshua Rifkin and included her nourishing tone on songs by Joni Mitchell and Leonard Cohen. She remembers lines to “Sons Of”, a track from the 1970 album Whales & Nightingales, as if she had just heard them moments ago.

“On these two albums by Judy, there were songs about lost sons and going to war and never coming back and brilliant, classical arrangements by Rikfin. There was poetry, peace, Pete Seeger, Leonard Cohen, Jacques Brel, a song with whales in it … Music made around that time, the musicians literally considered themselves to be turning the wheels of life and death, of culture and civilization. I wanted to be a part of that fabric.”

Williams treasured the pomp and flaming fire of Marvin Gaye, his charged, sexualized characteristics, his Motown expression, as well as his connection to the wider world of society and humanity. Because of him, music became more to her than just what was present in her home and town. Music now represented the fullness of the planet. She was no longer merely listening to voices and sounds but comprehending human dignity. Simon and Garfunkel were also key early influences.

“Paul Simon‘s iconography of urban life and ordinary things, buildings, people, and food, influences me to this day,” said Williams. “The idea of trying to create a sacred landscape from our daily lives comes directly from Simon and Garfunkel.”

Committing to Worlds, Finding Inner Blueprint

Hummingbird Highway is classic Dar Williams, a fresh supply of drink from the ever-flowing spring, exemplifying all of the strong points that make her music enjoyable in all its words and ways. Spot on humility supplies the nourishment of every song. Some express gladness, some are heavy, some are weightless, and others reflect her attempt to reconcile everything within herself. Breadth and beauty reside in all of them, displaying and epitomizing a songwriting mantra that Williams has practiced for a while, which is to allow the song the latitude to grow and shine on its own terms.

“My personal motto is to stick to writing the song that you are writing,” said Williams. “You shouldn’t just bat away a perfectly delightful song about a dragonfly landing on your shoulder, right? You can get to the bottom of a song, whether it is a lighthearted or not-so-lighthearted song. Just keep yourself in the shoes of the characters, and find out what’s really happening. Songwriting is committing to the world that you find yourself in.

“We go to music that makes us cry, helps us laugh, helps us bang our heads around, and makes us forget things, or makes us be in the ecstatic moment and escape from the murky depths. Feel that first inspiration and keep on going. It ends up being deeper than you thought anyway, even if it’s a flaky song. It’s a way into your inner blueprint, and there is a reason it surfaced at that moment. Who are we to say what’s deep and what’s not deep?”

Williams doesn’t journal or write every single day. She does, however, seek to be inspired daily, constantly looking for something surprising or special in the ordinary flashes of day-to-day life, a need that she can satisfy sitting at a museum or on a park bench.

“That’s part of the honest struggle between pedestrian things and poetic things,” said Williams. “The artist decides all of that on a personal level and decides what in their life it is that they would like to turn into poetry.”

Photo: Carly Rae Brunnalt / Hello Wendy

Archeology of Life’s Work

The deeper she delves into her career, the more Dar Williams realizes that there is a holy motion guiding every recording, pushed forward by an intention that’s both specific and cumulative.

“Music is like archaeology, where there are a lot of layers,” said Williams. “And each album is a layer, and an album is an eon of my life. Looking back, I can pinpoint times in my life depending on which album I was writing or touring with and what issues were coming up. Like archaeology, it all sort of seems to make sense in its own world, even though it doesn’t at the time it [the record] comes out. There is a certain palate, a certain feel, a certain personality, and a certain neuroses attached to each album. It is another way to keep a chronicle of a life and another way to gauge a life.”

Many of the songs on Hummingbird Highway were written during the pandemic and hold numerous references to birds, indicative of a point when Williams spent hours alone staring at and refilling the bird feeder in the garden. Songs include “Tu Sais Le Printemps”, a French bossa nova tune, and “All Is Come Undone”, a piece of writing which came to Williams as she was breaking up earth in the backyard, attempting to convert an idle spec of dirt into a thriving meadow, listening to Thomas Hardy’s poem “The Later Autumn”.

Dar Williams’ stab at modern Americana, “Put the Coins on His Eyes”, was inspired by the storied history of early labor unions, movements, and revolutions in the US, and all of the agitation, suppression, and violence marking their expansions and downfalls.

Magic of Making Music Together

The joy of taking a batch of new songs on the road is still undeniable to Dar Williams, who approaches every night with an alchemist’s urge for transformation, a reverence for experimentation, and a spiritual curiosity about the essence of things.

“It is a great thing to walk out and feel the energy of the people,” said Williams. “It’s best when there is no skepticism and no suspicion. But some audiences are tentative. You can feel it within the first couple of songs, like a massage therapist who feels tension; you feel the accretion of awareness for what kind of energy field you are walking into. The goal is to get to another place musically together with the audience.”

October 8, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Molly Tuttle 2025
Music

Molly Tuttle Dives Headfirst Into Entertaining Country Pop » PopMatters

by jummy84 October 8, 2025
written by jummy84

So Long Little Miss Sunshine

Molly Tuttle

Nonesuch

15 August 2025

On singer Molly Tuttle’s newest album, So Long Little Miss Sunshine, the country rising star is letting bluegrass take a bit of a backseat this time. A light, infectiously optimistic collection of songs, primarily fitting snugly within the cozy confines of country pop, Tuttle‘s latest album allows her to flex her musical muscles beyond bluegrass and the folksy Americana of her previous work.

Tuttle, who’s widely credited with bringing bluegrass closer to the mainstream following her Grammy nomination for Best New Artist in 2023 alongside musicians like Samara Joy and Anitta, grew up on bluegrass in the Palo Alto area. While the San Francisco Bay Area might not be the most obvious place of origin for bluegrass’s ingénue in residence, Tuttle’s Northern California roots creep through the Appalachian overgrowth of the genre, evident in influences like the Grateful Dead and Jefferson Airplane.

Tuttle grew up on bluegrass, joining her family’s band, the Tuttles, with AJ Lee when she was just 15 years old. When we asked Tuttle what it felt like to have been recognized as one of the greats in a genre she grew up on, she told us, “It’s an amazing feeling. When I see my name placed with this new generation of bluegrass musicians, it’s such a cool feeling. Ever since I was eight years old and picked up a guitar, it’s been a dream of mine to make my life centered around music. It’s just so cool that this music has had this resurgence and reached this new fan group. There are so many more people here now, and it’s great to see the music is rising.”

Although flavors of Tuttle’s bluegrass roots are evident in So Long Little Miss Sunshine, the album represents a definite departure from Tuttle’s previous work. Being that bluegrass is a very “tradition-minded” genre, we asked Tuttle how she decides when to push the boundaries of the genre a bit and when to honor its more “traditional” aspects. Tuttle tells us it’s a fine line she has to walk. Elements of her trademark guitar picking and bluegrass flair shine through on some tracks.

Still, Tuttle wanted to create something that felt wholly “her” and not necessarily centered around the structures of a more traditional bluegrass album. Tracks like “Rosalee”, a spunky bluegrass ballad, would be right at home in Tuttle’s older work, like her Grammy-winning album Crooked Tree, while others, like the lead single ‘That’s Gonna Leave a Mark”, feel like they could be plucked right from the airwaves of country pop radio.

By giving herself a bit more freedom with production design, many of the confines Tuttle was accustomed to working within seemed to slip away, allowing for more rip-roaring live performances with heavy drumlines punctuated by more traditional bluegrass-sounding tracks. Moving away from the more storytelling, folksy aspects of bluegrass, Tuttle could break away and tell her own story in a way that felt authentic to both her and the music that influenced her.

In an Instagram post promoting the record’s release, Tuttle encouraged listeners to experience the tracks in the order in which they appear on the album (a foregone art lost to streaming and shuffle play supremacy). Of how she chose to order the LP, Tuttle said it was arranged both thematically and sonically. Tracks near the end of the album, like “No Regrets”, hark on notions of acceptance and moving on, while songs like “Story of My So Called Life” show Tuttle reflecting on the blank page, deciding where her music will take her next.

The Grammy-winning singer notes, “Kicking it off with a song like ‘Everything Burns’ that’s kind of dark and restless starts off the arc of the album with a bang. There were just certain interludes we came up with to weave the songs together. Certain things happen at the end of songs that weave into the next one. It was really fun to record the album this way. We were pretty diligent about going in with the track order and recording to work out those interludes.”

Smack in the middle of the album, a cover of Swedish pop duo Icona Pop‘s 2012 hit “I Love It” makes a surprise appearance. On her decision to include the cover, Tuttle said, “It came about in a very funny and random way. I had just heard that song, and it popped back into my head. Probably because of Charli XCX blowing up. We were in the studio doing pre-production and coincidentally Jake Joyce [her producer] said, ‘I really wanna do a cover of that song, but make it really spacey and kind of trippy.’”

Molly Tuttle went home and learned the song that night, recording it the next day in an hour. By the time the album was nearing completion and Joyce sent her a tracklist, she’d almost forgotten they’d recorded it. While a Swedish pop song more than a decade old might seem incongruous to an upbeat collection of country tracks, the song seamlessly slips into the rhythm of the album, almost entirely disguised by Tuttle’s stripped-down and more melodic iteration of the track.

With much of So Long Little Miss Sunshine harkening to the act of letting go, we asked Tuttle if there were any themes in music she felt she was ready to say “so long” to. “I feel like musically I don’t know what I’d like to let go of, except for feeling like kind of a fraud in a way. Since I’m not from the South, sometimes I feel like I have a little bit of imposter syndrome. But I feel like for me I want to move forward to a more expansive vision of who I am as an artist, which I think I did a little more on this record, and I’m excited for whatever I do next because I feel like I’ve gotten a clearer vision of who I am and where I’m going.”

With bluegrass having a definitive geographic association, we asked Molly Tuttle how location influenced this album. The country singer told us that while the Bay Area still very much feels like home to her, Nashville (where she’s lived for the last decade) left its mark on this album more than it has on any of her past work.

For all its love of freedom and family, bluegrass (and country more broadly) finds itself in a precarious position as unbridled patriotism moves from “love of country” to often bordering on fascistic nationalism. With much of country music being co-opted by conservatism, we asked Tuttle if the political climate has changed her relationship to the genre.

“I do feel like, for me as a woman in this male-dominated industry. It was hard for me to find my voice within that. There was a shift I noticed in my early 20s. When I moved to Nashville, people became more curious about ‘What is it like for a woman in the music industry?’ and people weren’t really asking those questions.”

October 8, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Taylor Swift The Life of a Showgirl
Music

Taylor Swift Brilliantly Captures the Zeitgeist on New LP » PopMatters

by jummy84 October 7, 2025
written by jummy84

In a 2014 Rolling Stone cover story, Taylor Swift described passing a man on the street who, inexplicably, walked around with a cat on his head. She wanted to take a picture, but hesitated: “What if he just wants to walk around with a cat on his head, and not have his picture taken all day?” The singer-songwriter offered sympathy because she is a massive celebrity, photographed every time she leaves home. 

Aside from romantic love, Swift‘s own fame has been the main subject of her work. In a 2015 interview with Glamour, the singer assessed her trajectory: “I was not shot out of a cannon. It was about five years before I became recognizable to everyone.” The irony of Swift’s life is that when she says “everyone”, it could literally mean every human. 

This universal existence is the premise for Swift’s 12th studio album, the Max Martin-produced The Life of a Showgirl. Swift first worked with Martin on 2012’s Red, venturing into pop, and the journey to the stratosphere took off from there. Swift collaborated with Martin on 1989 and Reputation, and Jack Antonoff added indie flair to Lover and Midnights. For a change, Aaron Dressner of the National created the acoustic soundscape of folklore and evermore. 

In terms of theme, The Life of a Showgirl is a sister to 2024’s The Tortured Poets Department. Both albums portray the distorted human experience of famous people, their emotions turned into products of public consumption. However, when fame itself becomes a product, can any part of a celebrity’s life appear human? 

In the Tortured Poets track “Who’s Afraid of Little Old Me?” Swift compares herself to a circus animal: “I am what I am ’cause you trained me.” The symbolism of The Life of a Showgirl is thinly veiled by comparison, but that is not to the album’s discredit. Swift is a confessional writer. In “Elizabeth Taylor”, Swift likens the reaction she would have to her current love affair ending to the infamous meltdown of a 1950s icon. “I’d cry my eyes violet,” she says, launching into a haunting hook. 

Elsewhere on Showgirl, Taylor Swift settles scores. “CANCELLED!” is an eerie and arresting takedown of the celebrity industrial complex. “Good thing I like my friends canceled,” Swift says over a bassline that sounds like a musical death march in the best way possible. “Welcome to my underworld,” she adds, implying that, in an alternate universe, her network of famous friends could have been a convincing band of villains. 

The revenge-seeking continues. In “Actually Romantic”, Swift takes aim at Charli XCX in the same way “Bad Blood” addressed a feud with Katy Perry. “Like a chihuahua barking at me from a tiny purse / That’s how much it hurts,” Swift says. Allegedly, Charli XCX wrote “Don’t wanna see her backstage at my boyfriend’s show,” on “Sympathy Is a Knife”, about Swift. Charli XCX is married to the drummer of The 1975, and Swift dated the band’s frontman, Matty Healy. 

The Life of a Showgirl reveals that Swift is now in a healthy relationship. In “Honey”, the singer mentions a lover who called her in the middle of the night to ask what she was wearing, but did not remember the conversation the next day. (This sounds like Healy.) On the other hand, Kansas City Chiefs tight end Travis Kelce offers a benign new chapter. “Got me dreaming ’bout a driveway with a basketball hoop,” Swift says on “Wi$h Li$t”. You can’t help but be happy for her. 

In “Father Figure”, which interpolates George Michael‘s song of the same name, Swift recalls a protege who betrayed her. The song is the album’s best example of Swift’s strengths. A key change in the final chorus provides a melodic lift that matches the increased stakes of a back-stabbing. “Who’s portrait’s on the mantel? Who covered up your scandals?” she asks.

Soothing harmonies and dreamy synths throughout the song contrast its narrative, mixed emotions, in a concise vessel. Swift’s revenge is necessary, but she is sad to let go of an apprentice. “Father Figure” sounds like what Miranda Priestly, the fashion editor of The Devil Wears Prada, would have written about the assistant who resigned after a great accomplishment. 

Like Priestly, Swift understands that moral ambiguity is necessary to uphold a well-meaning empire. “I’m married to the hustle,” she says on the title track, which closes the album and features Sabrina Carpenter. The presence of Swift’s pop star protege embodies the song’s narrative, where an aspiring starlet achieves her destiny and passes the torch. 

The song’s outro is a recorded clip of Swift closing an Eras Tour show. While some of Showgirl’s tracks may lack the eccentricity of Midnights, this recording reminds listeners they played a part in the album’s origin. “I never really let myself say, ‘I’ve made it,” but the Eras Tour…this is different,” Swift said on Kelce’s New Heights podcast.  

Elsewhere, “Eldest Daughter” is a searing look back at Swift’s coming-of-age. “Every eldest daughter was the first lamb to the slaughter,” she says. This assessment describes Swift’s place in the music industry as a confessional songwriter who emerged in the 2000s diva era, yet received the same, if not more, tabloid scrutiny. 

The Life of a Showgirl enshrines Swift’s proof of concept as a celebrity: modern fame is an act of honesty and excess, a contemporary witch trial, and a glamorous night out. Charli XCX, Swift’s newest rival, brought depth to the dancefloor ruminations of brat: “I’m famous but not quite / One foot in a normal life,” she said on “I might say something stupid.” 

On Showgirl’s cover, Swift is submerged, her face poking above the surface of the water. The image references “The Fate of Ophelia”, where Swift thanks a lover for saving her from Shakespearean tragedy. Martin’s production bobs and weaves around Swift’s subtle hesitations and soulful spillovers: “If you’d never come for me / I might’ve lingered in purgatory.” 

When Swift is concise, it makes a bold statement. Although now heralded as an opus, upon its release, critics found Red scattershot. A succinct collection of uniform pop bangers, 1989, followed. Similarly, Showgirl is 12 tracks compared to Tortured Poets’ 31. However, in this case, brevity does not equal wit. “Did you, girlboss too close to the sun?” Swift asks on “CANCELLED!” A grab bag of internet slang is an unfortunate presence on the album. 

Overall, Swift’s writing holds up. The bridge of “Eldest Daughter” is a cinematic reverie of youthful indiscretions and natural imagery. “We lie back, a beautiful time lapse / Fairytale kisses and lilacs,” Swift says, as lush harmonies and acoustic guitars create a wistful medley. 

“I’m an archer. We stand back, assess, process how we feel, raise a bow, pull back, and fire,” she said in a 2019 Rolling Stone interview, referring to her astrological sign, Sagittarius. The Life of a Showgirl is not a misfire, but 1989 was a bullseye. Both albums share a similar mission: named for the singer’s birth year, 1989 marked a renewal and the start of an imperial phase. “I’m immortal, baby dolls, I couldn’t [die] if I tried,” Swift says on Showgirl’s title track. 

Swift wrote The Tortured Poets Department in a highly pressurized environment: the beginning of the biggest concert tour of all time, the breakdown of her six-year relationship with Joe Alwyn, and her chaotic rebound with Matty Healy. This public echo chamber resembles a scene in the music video for “Fortnight”, where Swift plays a captive in a laboratory, forced to take experimental drugs. “Forget him,” one pill bottle reads. 

Singer-songwriters want to tell their stories, but Swift is also a celebrity. Consequently, the public has an interest in providing “advice” based on what her life appears to be. Additionally, after a prolific run of albums, listeners chime in on what type of music Swift should release. The eagerness to form opinions on the singer’s creative decisions proves she has done her job. The ability to discuss the work is part of the product being sold. 

Taylor Swift can capture the zeitgeist because she understands the concept of one: a battle between tension and freedom, and the knowledge that conflict is necessary to sustain the things we want. The Tortured Poets Department proves Swift will navigate pain when it is part of a story. The Life of a Showgirl releases that angst. “They stood by me before my exoneration,” Swift said on “CANCELLED!” Even non-existence as a public figure is a discourse Swift engaged with and survived. Now that’s showmanship. 

October 7, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Greil Marcus Mystery train graffiti
Music

Greil Marcus’ Mystery Train Keeps on Rollin’ » PopMatters

by jummy84 October 7, 2025
written by jummy84

Cultural critic Greil Marcus’ classic text, Mystery Train, has been republished to mark its 50th anniversary; its title taken from Elvis Presley’s last single for Sun Records. The train—mysterious and elusive, a metaphor for fate and desire, though equally literal as symbolic—has been rolling along since the Carter Family in the 1930s to Bob Dylan in 2020 with “Murder Most Foul”; it snakes through the subconscious of the United States, where the nation’s imagination lies frighteningly and frightfully naked—alive. From John Winthrop to Little Richard, returning to Herman Melville, Mystery Train is a ride—that is for sure.

Little introduction is needed for Greil Marcus, who was the first reviews editor for Rolling Stone and, subsequently, wrote for Detroit magazine Creem, when rock criticism was in ascendancy. Apart from Mystery Train: Images of America in Rock ‘n’ Roll Music, Marcus has written other seminal books, including Lipstick Traces: A Secret History of the 20th Century (1989); Invisible Republic: Bob Dylan’s Basement Tapes (1997); and, more recently, Folk Music: A Bob Dylan Biography in Seven Songs (2022).

Once on the mystery train, it is difficult to get offl Along the way, it picks up speed, ploughing harder and faster, deeper and broader than most non-fiction and fiction books. Indeed, it could be classified as fiction (isn’t the best non-fiction writing fiction, anyway?). Mystery Train crackles like an ole’ Vocalion 78 with secrets floating in the ether, waiting to be caught. Certain books make you dream; Mystery Train wakes you up to the blunt fact that you are alive.

Greil Marcus Keeps Rollin’ Table of Contents

The prologue of Mystery Train recounts The Dick Cavett Show, in which the New York critic John Simon and Erich Segal, author of Love Story [1970], and Yale Professor of Classics. They are having a heated debate about Euripides—as if the Greek tragedian will come back to life and let them know which one is correct before telling them both to put a cork in it. Little Richard, having had enough of this pretentious conversation, brings it to a crashing and dramatic halt.

The point: Greil Marcus uses this scene as a metaphor for how little importance critics have when compared to an artist. Especially an artist such as Little Richard, who inspired a 15-year-old Robert Zimmerman to pound his keys like a pugilist when performing Richard’s “Jenny, Jenny” in the auditorium of Hibbing High School, backed by his group the Shadow Blasters, in April 1957.

Greil Marcus was in his late 20s when he wrote Mystery Train, and, in one sense, it is a young man’s book: filled with incandescent rage and reckless ambition. *Speaking about the records of Robert Johnson, Chicago blues guitarist Mike Bloomfield (whose meaty guitar playing on Highway 61 Revisited hits better than most that it could make even the heavyweight champion of the world sweat), says, “ … I do know that in them you can hear a young man, a young man with an amazing amount of young man’s energy, the kind of thing that you would find in the early Pete Townshend, or early Elvis.”

Bloomfield forgot to mention Marcus. Passion for music is a young “man’s” game, and this is what you take away from Mystery Train: a writer who has everything to say and nothing to lose, a beauty with terrifying depth.

The classic book, Mystery Train, is so much more than a text on rock ‘n’ roll; it lays the foundation of the themes Greil Marcus will explore throughout his oeuvre, including his much-beloved and elusive United States. Specifically, how the United States being an “invented nation” impacts what it means to be an American today.

Thus, Mystery Train is a sweeping reaction to the imagination of the United States. Its purpose is to shed light on the collective unconscious of America, where Marcus likes to hang out, much like a Jungian analyst (I hope his rates are reasonable). However, instead of understanding the archetypal, shapeshifting hero Coyote (where is Bob Dylan when you need him? He told you: “I’m Not There”), Marcus delves into the symbolism of the devil in blues music, and Stagger Lee with his brand new Stetson hat. (What would have Lloyd Price made of Mystery Train? Or was he too busy watching the leaves tumbling down?)

As Greil Marcus explained in 1974, these American archetypes in the nation’s imagination—unconscious, psyche, call them what you want—are united yet elusive. Yes, Mystery Train is subterranean; you will not see daylight again.

For those who are not conversant with the history of the United States, there is one name you will learn to know by heart when reading Greil Marcus: John Winthrop. While aboard the ship Arbella during the trans-Atlantic journey from Britain to New England in 1630, Winthrop delivered a sermon to his fellow Puritans to prepare them for a new life in the Americas under the banner of Christ, their Redeemer. This sermon included the phrase “city on a hill,” which meant that if the Puritans failed to uphold their covenant with God, their sins would be for the world to see; simultaneously, they would also be a shining example. Arguably, the origin of American exceptionalism.

For Greil Marcus (granted, he has a wild imagination), this intense drama is played out to this day, both in real life and art. Therefore, questions arise: how has the United States betrayed the idealism of its Puritan foundation? Conversely, what is the reaction of the present-day United States to the Puritans’ failings? These are some of the questions posed in Mystery Train and again in Invisible Republic: Bob Dylan’s Basement Tapes, reaching an apex in The Shape of Things to Come: Prophecy in the American Voice (2006).

In the prologue to Mystery Train, Marcus quotes from Leslie Fiedler’s 1968 essay “Cross the Border—Close the Gap“: “To be an American (unlike being English or French or whatever) is precisely to imagine a destiny rather than to inherit one; since we have always been, insofar as we are Americans at all, inhabitants of myth rather than history.” He deploys this as a springboard for Mystery Train: how American artists straddle between what is inherited and what is imagined, between history and myths, between fact and fiction.

Harmonica Frank: Dramatis Personae

Photo: Memphis International Records

Like the Puritans establishing settlements in New England, Mystery Train‘s two chapters—which are about hillbilly Harmonica Frank and the blues musician Robert Johnson—are entitled “Ancestors”; the other four—The Band, Sly Stone, Randy Newman, and Elvis Presley—are entitled “Inheritors”.All the artists in Mystery Train embody the paradoxical nature of the United States: between rebellion and conformity, freedom and obligation, ambition and restraint, real and unreal, offensiveness and inoffensiveness. Put differently, each artist is an insignia, a symbol, a countenance of the Janus-faced nature of American society.

Yes, Greil Marcus’ work is deep, like a black hole. He makes a profound point every other line, which takes minutes to assimilate; by then, you’re out of breath, wondering if he doesn’t know that there are readers—like myself—out there, trying damn hard to keep up with him. Oh, and who the hell is—and what is so great about—Harmonica Frank? I have heard of Guitar Slim—but Harmonica Frank? Is he kidding?

I swear he exists purely as a function for Mystery Train—or is part of Marcus’ fantasy for old-timey characters who are not so much real as fabulous. Have you heard of Harmonica Frank before or since?

Harmonica Frank was real! (music producer Steve Lavere rediscovered him.) The blues scholar Don Kent wrote the following about the otherworldly blues musician Geeshie Wiley: “If she did not exist, it would not be possible to invent her.” With a wry insouciance, Greil Marcus responds, “So did she invent herself?” However, Harmonica Frank takes it one step further: he could not have existed and still have influenced rock ‘n’ roll.

Enough of these ridiculous metaphysical asides, take a listen to Harmonica Frank’s talking blues number, “The Great Medical Menagerist”, his only single for Sun Records, in which he is more feline than human with those fiendish falsettos and caterwauls, blithely and gleefully making a fool of himself at his own expense. He was a larger-than-life vagrant who personified rock ‘n’ roll before rock ‘n’ roll; dirty, wild, and absurd. Unlike Bob Dylan, Harmonica Frank blew his lungs not even for a dollar a day. In fact, he smiled at obscurity. Born for the lonesome road.

In the Harmonica Frank chapter, Greil Marcus demands that you understand that this artist cannot be cast aside to the ash heap of history or, to purloin from the author, the “dustbin of history”. There is no question that this wailing clown is part of rock ‘n’ roll’s story, or, more accurately, essential to the rock ‘n’ roll topography that Marcus carves out in Mystery Train.

Travelling around the country, playing medicine shows, weirdo Harmonica Frank captured the strangeness rooted in the American experience, which Greil Marcus would later coin as “The Old, Weird America” (the inescapable epitaph for Marcus!). For Sam Phillips, founder of Sun Records, Harmonica Frank was his first shot at success, before Elvis Presley. Always before Presley.

The Elvis Presley chapter in Mystery Train is, by far, the strongest: Elvis Presley comes alive and, before long, not only are you walking alongside him but seeing through is eyes. You see this especially when Marcus delves into the ‘68 Comeback Special; a performance in which Presley reclaims his throne of “King of Rock and Roll” and searches for a future while confronting his past, atoning for his sins, seeking redemption, all in the name of the Lord.

America’s Mythical Transfiguration

Greil Marcus Graffiti train Arpad Czapp unsplash 1
Photo: Ezekial Powell | Unsplash

At the beginning of the Robert Johnson chapter, Greil Marcus writes, “It may be that the most interesting American struggle is the struggle to set oneself free from the limits one is born to, and then to learn something of the value of those limits.” Each artist in Mystery Train, some more than others, has grappled with limitations that they were born to.

In Invisible Republic: Bob Dylan’s Basement Tapes (1997), Marcus writes at length about the reinvention that occurs in “Lo & Behold!”; effectively, the narrator pulls out of a town on a train to start anew but, when a conductor asks for his name, his mask falls off; the nation’s past and his own has caught up with him. William Faulkner wrote about the past not being past, while F. Scott Fitzgerald wrote that you cannot repeat the past; the past haunts the United States.

What these American writers understood, or tried to grapple with, is, as Greil Marcus hammers down at with a John Henry sledgehammer, that the nation’s history, due to being a nation built upon an idea, the past is always present. No more so than in the music of these six artists.

The six artists in Mystery Train follow a story bigger than themselves: that old United States’ narrative of self-invention. “In the work of each performer there is an attempt to create oneself, to make a new man out of what is inherited and what is imagined.” Robert Leroy Dodds to sold-his-soul-to-the-devil Robert Johnson, whose spindly fingers knocked out unorthodox chords like a barroom brawler.

All six acts have held contradictory feelings about the past, selves, place, success, and meaning. This is perhaps best summed up by Walt Whitman’s quip, “I Contain Multitudes”, which is an American characteristic and makes up for the American experience (despite the members of the Band being Canadian, minus Levon Helm).

Fitzgerald’s Every-Luring Green Light

American artists, sometimes unwittingly, expose the illusion of the American dream, the emptiness that lurks beneath the surface. They eviscerate the dream and themselves in the process. Nobody did so more than the parvenu Presley, who personified the rags-to-riches story that never leads to happiness; in his case, it ended in early death.

If not death, then, “Lonely at the Top”, as the quasi-vaudevillian Randy Newman sang, as if he was too wise to play the game. Greil Marcus highlights his ironic aside of wanting to perform at Shea Stadium to theater concertgoers, while his 1974 album, Good Old Boys, was rising in the charts. This is nothing but the goddam truth. Thus, the United States is partly founded upon a lie: success as succor.

When an American fails, Greil Marcus suggests, it is more than a personal failure: it is a failure by the person on the community and the community’s failure on that person. However, the failure of the American Dream does not fit into the country’s narrative and, thus, is usually scorned, ignored, or pushed aside as if it were contaminated; anything but accepted as a rigged game.

Yet, suppressing failure creates a further isolation already embedded in the American character, which is why, in rock ‘n’ roll, you get the archetypal image of the drifter driving along a lonely highway, wondering why his dream has turned into a nightmare. He’s wishing for more gas in the tank to drive himself over the bridge, where, perhaps, the real promised land awaits.

As Marcus alludes to in Mystery Train, the destructive side of the American dream is played out in the vernacular of rock ‘n’ roll. This would continue post-publication of Mystery Train in a figure, such as Bruce Springsteen, who—post-The River, an album containing “Hungry Heart”, his first top-10 hit on the Billboard Hot 100—delivers his midnight prayer.

“It’s a hey ho rock and roll, deliver me from nowhere,” to an empty highway, as if echoing Robert Johnson, along with all his whirling Puritan devils (we will get to that later). Springsteen sings the line jocularly, as if to pick up the narrator’s forlorn spirits or, let’s be honest, himself from the waist-deep abyss of the American dream gone wrong, even when it supposedly went right.

America’s Collective Unconscious

vintage guitar, folk guitar
Photo: bizoo_n | AdobeStock

As seen by its subtitle, “Images of America in Rock ‘n’ Roll Music”, Mystery Train asks, What are the myths, stories, and images that Americans inherit? Furthermore, what does Stagger Lee’s archetypal story portray about the United States’ fantasy of violence? Where does the image of the devil in blues music derive from?

Greil Marcus posits that the struggle between God and the devil is the legacy of the Puritan weirdness; they brought along a promise they could not keep, and their failures set the devil loose. In the 1920s and 1930s, blues singers, not gospel, were the real Puritans, Marcus explains in Mystery Train. They knew the devil better than most and, at the worst of times, they were the devil. For Marcus, Johnson was a failed Puritan.

Of course, Marcus is postulating a symbolic argument, as is the entirety of Mystery Train. This is why some readers fail to understand Marcus: they take him literally. Marcus has tapped into a way of understanding the United States on a symbolic level: to match myth with myth, song with song, art with art. Also, to understand the psychological effects of the country is to go beyond facts; it is to see it from the bottom up.

That being said, Greil Marcus is also literal. He has no qualms in taking the Faustian bargain Robert Johnson made at face value: “you could even take it literally,” Marcus writes, as if a matter-of-fact, an indifferent shrug of the shoulders, no bigger, right? Perhaps Marcus is correct: the selling of the soul in exchange for musical prowess returns to the Egyptians, as highlighted in a footnote in the “Notes and Discographies” section of Mystery Train, which is now, in the 50th anniversary edition, 269 pages long. (In the first edition, it was 25 pages.) Unsurprisingly, there is nothing new under the sun: what seems numinous today will be prosaic tomorrow, and vice versa.

“The image of the devil is a way of comprehending the distance between Fitzgerald’s shining image of American possibilities and his verdict on its result,” he pens. This is what makes Mystery Train engrossing: Greil Marcus neither goes down roads that you expect nor takes things as metaphors. For him, myths are real.

All these ideas will stay with him throughout his writing life, as he pens in his author’s note in 1974, “the resonance of the best American images is profoundly deep and impossibly broad. I wrote this book in an attempt to find some of those images, but I know now that to put oneself in touch with them is a life’s work.”

Imagined Democratic Vistas

Greil Marcus is obsessed with the reverberations of art: how one art form—such as song, film, or novel—connects with another. At his best, he binds seemingly disparate artifacts, rendering the idea of “being a stretch” obsolete, as that is its point: fiction emerges from fact. The creation of art is never coldly calculated—a thousand thoughts flow from and into artists in the process—so why not apply this to criticism?

The way in which Marcus oscillates between decades, centuries even, is closer to the workings of an artist—perhaps as he is a writer first, critic second—than the cold analytical eye of a professor. Like the Chantels, Marcus has rhythm, which is why he can get to the heart and soul of America quicker and better than most. An artist understands another artist.

Yes, of course, Marcus makes Whitmanesque transcendental leaps, but so did the artist that he is writing about. Whether consciously or not, there is an indebtedness to Marcus’ thinking to the German cultural critic and philosopher, Walter Benjamin; they both express an understanding that any historical investigation is exclusively embedded in the present moment—in other words, we can only understand the past in the present and understand the present from the past.

In the epilogue, Greil Marcus explicates that these six artists—lost and found, unknown and known, revered and discarded, in the United States—were working within Walt Whitman’s framework. “Whitman thought limits were undemocratic,” Marcus writes. “As good democrats, we fight it out within the borders of his ambition.” With all their might, these artists pushed against their limits; in Mystery Train, Marcus does too.

*This is reported in the “Notes and Discographies” section of Mystery Train. The 50th anniversary edition of the book includes Greil Marcus referencing the birth and death dates of every figure referenced who has passed away, turning this edition into a eulogy. It leaves you with a somber question: What will go out of the world with Greil Marcus?

October 7, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Bobby Brown Bobby
Music

Bobby Brown’s Funkiest Last Dance » PopMatters

by jummy84 October 7, 2025
written by jummy84

The intended concept for Bobby Brown’s eponymous third studio album, released in 1992, was simple: just keep it Bobby. For the better part of two years, beginning with his 1986 departure from New Edition, the genre-defying quintet he had founded at the age of 12, and then a subsequent debut, 1986’s King of Stage, which was largely ignored, the singer had seemingly lost track of who he was.

“We had to regroup and find out what my identity was as a singer,” Brown admitted in Fred Bronson’s 1985 book, The Billboard Book of Number 1 Hits. He found it with 1988’s Don’t Be Cruel.

In its time, Bobby Brown’s second studio album was as ubiquitous as Le Coq Sportif tracksuits, asymmetrical haircuts, and Roger Rabbit. Shedding the bubblegum, teeny-bopper image of his boy band past, he served an aural photonegative that matched his unapologetic, hard-strutting swagger. R&B with attitude. He opted for funkier, hip-hop syncopated rhythms that packed a kick like the “Heartbreak Kid” Shawn Michaels, and the kind of slinky synth-driven arrangements that conceive electric footwork at house parties and block parties. The result was a smash hit that shook the pop world.

Don’t Be Cruel topped the Billboard 200 chart for a stunning six weeks and spawned not two, but five Top 10 hits on the overall pop chart, including the biggest of them all, “My Prerogative”. Produced by Harlem-bred maestro Teddy Riley, “My Prerogative” would become the raison d’être for the sonic movement that Village Voice writer Barry Michael Cooper famously defined as “new jack swing”. 

As for that originally intended concept for album number three, Bobby Brown figured that after having fully defined his identity with a blockbuster album to boot, he didn’t have to dig any deeper. “You don’t fix something that ain’t broke,” he shared in a 1992 interview, when referring to recruiting Riley to produce a bulk of Bobby. By then, there was one problem: everyone wanted a piece of Teddy’s jam; most notably, Michael Jackson. 

Backed by popular demand, Riley’s soul-heated fusion of R&B, go-go, gospel, and hip-hop was the sonic Nike Air Jordan of the late 1980s; a musical style that dressed for the occasion, scoring everything from the booming car systems down 125th Street to the vibrant dance parties steeped in films like
Reginald Hudlin’s House Party (1990).

As the story goes, Michael Jackson was so impressed with Teddy Riley’s production that he called on the producer to work on his 1991 album, Dangerous. On Jackson’s part, the timing of it couldn’t have been a coincidence. Bobby Brown’s ascendancy during his Cruel era earned the singer plenty of “next Michael Jackson” comparisons. The singer’s music videos earned as many plays as Jackson’s; some would even say that Cruel captured more of the aggressive, outlaw spirit that Jackson tried to convey on 1987’s Bad. Brown, for his part, didn’t downplay the competition, either. 

In a 1989 interview, Bobby Brown acknowledged his status as the hot new act, stating, “The people was waiting on another solo artist… they was getting sick and tired of the Michael Jackson’s and the Prince’s, and all these different kinds of images, these people that make themselves to be something that they’re not.” Whether or not Jackson caught wind of the comment, his working with Riley put Bobby in limbo.

“If Michael hadn’t been in the picture, Bobby’s album would have been out last year,” Riley admitted to the L.A. Times in 1992. Though Brown had enough material to release the album before then — having worked on material with Kenneth “Babyface” Edmonds and Antonio “L.A.” Reid, the in-demand hitmakers who crafted a bulk of Cruel’s genre-defining jams that would literally and figuratively birth generations — he needed the Teddy sound. 

The final song added to Don’t Be Cruel was “My Prerogative”, and it was after the singer traveled across the country to record in Riley’s St. Nicholas project’s apartment. That the result became the biggest hit of their career wasn’t so much luck as it was a clear indication of their winning chemistry. In Riley, Brown found the ideal vehicle for him to “Roger Rabbit” over the yellow median line between hip-hop and R&B’s then-two-way road. In Brown, Riley found the charismatic superstar capable of long-darting his rhythmic concoction to the masses. Together, they developed the beating heart of New Jack Swing.  

Bobby Brown’s Fall from Fashion

In interviews, Bobby Brown ignored the glitter-gloved rumors about the album delay, instead crediting it to perfectionism. “People’d say Hammer was about to drop his album or Michael was about to drop his album,” he told the L.A Times. “I just kept telling them my album isn’t ready. I don’t want to drop it now. It’d get lost in the mixture of everything else.” It did. 

When Bobby finally arrived in August 1992, the hip-hopera that Bobby Brown and Teddy Riley perfected in 1988 had no doubt fallen out of fashion. What was once a craze had begun to fade. Singers like Mary J. Blige were double-dutching between “Top Billin’” drumbeats and “Clean Up Woman” samples to usher in a new musical blend known as hip-hop soul.

Dr. Dre and his band of West Coast rhymers widened the aural aperture with their gin-drenched G-Funk. As this new era of Black music was being formed, new jack fatigue was in full swing. By then, any remnants of new jack excitement had been squeezed bone dry by Jackson’s $32-million-selling album of 1991, Dangerous. 

sub-header?

Although mistimed, Bobby presented the funkiest last dance of the entire New Jack Swing era. 

With earworm-architects Babyface and L.A. Reid also in the wings as producers, every element of the album functions like it’s in service to the dancefloor — so much of it feels as if they transposed the pulse of the hottest Uptown nightclub on a Saturday night. “Humpin’ Around”, the frenetic lead single produced by Babyface and Reid, sounds like the combination of Pop Rocks and Red-Bull, while “Get Away”, a frothy spiritual sequel to “My Prerogative”, packs enough funk to warrant a James Brown “hit me” ad-lib as Riley’s infectious groove wraps around Brown’s commanding vocals like a velvet ropes at a VIP section.

“Ain’t nothing but the funk, baby,” Brown boasts in the song’s opening seconds, as if to cocksurely advise listeners to strap in for what’s to be a Teddy-jamtastic ride.

Funky, operatically street, and gloriously danceable, Bobby is all of these things, all at once. Not a track on it feels enervated, and when the pace does slow down, such as on softer jams like “Lovin’ You Down” and “College Girl”, it’s so that the smoldering, red-light bedroom R&B can be dialed up to the max. Much of its unrelenting, flinty energy is credited to Riley shouldering more of the production load than he did on Cruel. Though Babyface and Reid supply the album’s certified hits in “Humpin’ Around” and “Good Enough”, both easily cracked the Top 10 of the Hot 100, those records sound like invited guests next to Riley’s work.  

With Brown, standout tracks aren’t just defined by how sonically polished or catchy they are; it’s the ones that elicit a toe-tap or full-on dance number. That much is apparent in songs like “Two Can Play That Game” and “Til the End of Time”, which sound like they were crafted during an 11PM middle-of-the-club choreographic showdown. His melodic swoons over Riley’s feverish mix fit like a glove, prompting a pop-and-lock or cabbage patch from the listener.

“One More Night” pulls you in with a slinky bass groove Lego-pieced over a riff from Average White Band’s “School Boy Crush” that coalesces with Bobby Brown’s syrupy pleas of a second chance. Before the song could fade, the singer slips into a sticky staccato that amplifies Riley’s syncopated drums into a hypnotic effect:

We’ve had ups and downs but
Perfect love will find us
If you’ll just be patient
And you’ll feel that love sensation

That this batch of bodyrolling records was all released in the twilight of the New Jack Swing epoch makes the timing of Bobby all the more frustrating. The only time the album loses steam is when there are no grooves to step to. The ballads in the second half, specifically the non-Riley set, feel like a “turnt up” house party getting abruptly interrupted to inform the guests that someone’s car is blocking the driveway.

Songs like the quietstorm-y “Storm Away” and Debra Winans’ duet “I’m Your Friend” attempt to put Bobby Brown’s vocal range on full display. The problem with that, though, is that Brown isn’t the heavyweight, sterling-silvered vocalist they require. Although beautifully intended, these songs instead expose a room for growth, rather than showcasing his range.

In an interview 25 years after the release of Bobby, Teddy Riley revealed that there had originally been plans to record more songs for the album. According to the producer, the pair finished 13 songs, but he wanted Brown to pin down 13 more. Bobby Brown, who at the time was gearing up to marry Whitney Houston and rushing to get the overdue album out to the world, refused.

“He’s like, ‘Man, we finished. I’m out of here. I’m getting married,” recalled Riley. There’s no telling whether or not those records would have sonically elevated Bobby further than what came to be — Riley ended up using them for Blackstreet, whose debut album arrived two years later — but what’s indisputable is Brown’s prerogative to stick to the formula that broke the mold in the first place.


Works Cited [in process]

Anderson, Trevor. “Chart Rewind: In 1989, Bobby Brown Took New Jack Swing to No. 1″. Billboard Pro. 21 January 2021.

Carter, Kelly L. “Bobby Brown speaks: the secret behind every song on ‘Don’t Be Cruel’”. Andscape. 31 August 2018.

Hilburn, Robert. “How Cruel Can Fame Be?” Los Angeles Times. 17 September 1992.

Hunt, Dennis. “THE WAITING: Bobby Brown has been tabbed…” Los Angeles Times. 1 March 1992.

Levy, Glen. “Top Selling Albums and Singles 1989“. Time. 18 January 2009.

Mao Jeff: Teddy Riley Interview. Red Bull Music Academy. 2017.

Weiss, Jeff. “Dangerous: Michael Jackson”. Pitchfork. 7 August 2016.

October 7, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Newer Posts
Older Posts

Social Connect

Facebook Twitter Instagram Pinterest Youtube Snapchat

Recent Posts

  • 2009 feels like a whole other world away

  • Watch Ariana Grande and Jimmy Fallon Perform a History of Duets

  • Spotify’s Joe Hadley Talks ARIA Awards Partnership

  • Nick Offerman Announces 2026 “Big Woodchuck” Book Tour Dates

  • Snapped: Above & Beyond (A Photo Essay)

Newsletter

Subscribe my Newsletter for new blog posts, tips & new photos. Let's stay updated!

Categories

  • Bollywood (1,929)
  • Celebrity News (2,000)
  • Events (267)
  • Fashion (1,605)
  • Hollywood (1,020)
  • Lifestyle (890)
  • Music (2,002)
  • TV & Streaming (1,857)

Recent Posts

  • Shushu/Tong Shanghai Fall 2026 Collection

  • Here’s What Model Taylor Hill Is Buying Now

  • Julietta Is Hiring An Assistant Office Coordinator In Dumbo, Brooklyn, NY (In-Office)

Editors’ Picks

  • 2009 feels like a whole other world away

  • Watch Ariana Grande and Jimmy Fallon Perform a History of Duets

  • Spotify’s Joe Hadley Talks ARIA Awards Partnership

Latest Style

  • ‘Steal This Story, Please’ Review: Amy Goodman Documentary

  • Hulu Passes on La LA Anthony, Kim Kardashian Pilot ‘Group Chat’

  • Hannah Einbinder Slams AI Creators As “Losers”

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

@2020 - celebpeek. Designed and Developed by Pro


Back To Top
celebpeek
  • Home
  • Bollywood
  • Hollywood
  • Lifestyle
  • Fashion
celebpeek
  • Music
  • Celebrity News
  • Events
  • TV & Streaming