Tag:

Court

Candace Owens Loses Bid To Enter Australia For Speaking Tour After High Court Upholds Government's Visa Denial Over Extremist & Inflammatory Comments'
Celebrity News

Candace Owens Loses Bid To Enter Australia For Speaking Tour After High Court Upholds Government’s Visa Denial Over Extremist & Inflammatory Comments’

by jummy84
written by jummy84

Candace Owens


Candace Owens Loses Bid To Enter Australia For Speaking Tour After High Court Upholds Government’s Visa Denial Over Extremist & Inflammatory Comments’

Australia has given #CandaceOwens a big fat “No, thank you.”

The controversial far-right commentator has lost her legal battle to enter #Australia after the nation’s highest court upheld a government decision to deny her a visa. Her application was previously rejected in October 2024 by the Home Affairs Minister over concerns that Candace’s presence could “incite discord in the Australian community.” They argued that Candace had made “extremist and inflammatory comments towards Muslim, Black, Jewish and #LGBTQIA+ communities,” which could generate controversy and hatred.

Candace’s legal team fought back, appealing to the High Court. However, the court’s unanimous decision backing the ban means Candace will not be able to proceed with her planned speaking tour across Australia and #NewZealand. In addition to the visa denial, she’ll also have to pay the government’s legal costs.


0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Abhishek Bachchan, Aishwarya Rai Move Court Against YouTube, Google Over Deepfake Videos
Bollywood

Abhishek Bachchan, Aishwarya Rai Move Court Against YouTube, Google Over Deepfake Videos

by jummy84
written by jummy84

Actor couple Abhishek Bachchan and Aishwarya Rai Bachchan have taken a decisive stand against the growing menace of deepfake content. According to a Reuters report, the two have filed legal action against YouTube and its parent company Google, seeking $450,000 (nearly ₹4 crore) in damages, along with a permanent injunction to prevent the misuse of their likeness through artificial intelligence–generated videos.

The case highlights a pressing concern within the entertainment industry: the rise of AI-driven deepfakes that blur the line between real and fabricated content, often with damaging consequences for celebrities.

Allegations in the Lawsuits

The lawsuits, filed separately by Abhishek and Aishwarya, reportedly contain hundreds of links and screenshots of YouTube videos that the actors describe as “egregious,” “sexually explicit,” or “fictitious” AI-generated material. The couple argues that these videos not only harm their reputation but also pose larger questions about how platforms regulate the misuse of artificial intelligence.

According to Reuters, the filings, dated September 6, raise particular concern over YouTube’s content and third-party training policies. These policies, the actors claim, allow users to give consent for their videos to be used in training AI models — a loophole that risks the further spread of infringing and misleading content.

The Risk of AI Misuse

The filings reportedly warn that when such harmful content is used to train AI systems, the problem is compounded. The documents state:
“Such content being used to train AI models has the potential to multiply the instances of use of any infringing content, i.e. first being uploaded on YouTube, being viewed by the public, and then also being used to train.”

The couple further argues that if AI platforms are trained on biased or defamatory content, the technology will inevitably learn and replicate these falsehoods. This, they claim, not only infringes their intellectual property rights but also risks spreading untrue and damaging portrayals across digital platforms.

Court Proceedings So Far

The matter is currently being heard in the Delhi High Court. Last month, the court asked Google’s legal representatives to submit written responses before the next scheduled hearing on January 15. Until then, the case has drawn considerable attention as one of the high-profile legal battles over AI misuse in India.

Legal experts believe that this case could set a significant precedent in how Indian courts deal with the intersection of celebrity rights, intellectual property, and AI-generated content.

Why This Matters

The misuse of AI to generate deepfake videos has become a global issue. From fake political speeches to manipulated celebrity clips, the technology has sparked debates about consent, regulation, and digital ethics. For actors like Aishwarya Rai and Abhishek Bachchan, whose personal and professional lives are constantly under public scrutiny, the stakes are even higher.

By taking legal action, the Bachchans are not only safeguarding their own reputations but also drawing attention to the urgent need for stricter controls on AI content moderation. Their move may inspire other public figures to pursue similar actions, especially as deepfake content becomes harder for audiences to distinguish from reality.

The Bachchans’ Film Updates

Away from the courtroom, both Abhishek and Aishwarya continue to maintain active careers in cinema.

Aishwarya Rai Bachchan was last seen in Mani Ratnam’s Ponniyin Selvan: II (2023), where her performance earned widespread praise. She has not yet officially announced her next project, though speculation about upcoming films continues to follow her.

Abhishek Bachchan was most recently seen in Madhumita’s Kaalidhar Laapata, co-starring Mohammed Zeeshan Ayyub and Daivik Bhagela. Looking ahead, he is set to appear in Siddharth Anand’s King, a star-studded project that will feature Shah Rukh Khan and Suhana Khan.

Looking Ahead

The outcome of this case will be closely watched, not just by fans of the Bachchans but also by the global entertainment community. As AI technology continues to advance, questions of privacy, consent, and accountability will only grow louder.

For now, Abhishek and Aishwarya’s legal challenge signals a strong pushback against the unchecked rise of deepfake exploitation — a move that could shape the future of digital rights in India.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Young Thug Shows Up To Court To Support Metro Boomin In Producer's Civil S3xual A$$ault Trial
Celebrity News

Young Thug Shows Up To Court To Support Metro Boomin In Producer’s Civil S3xual A$$ault Trial

by jummy84
written by jummy84

Screenshot

Young Thug Shows Up To Court To Support Metro Boomin In Producer’s Civil S3xual A$$ault Trial

#YoungThug is showing up for those who matter to him. The rapper took time out of his schedule to appear for day two of court proceedings in #MetroBoomin’s civil s3xual a$$ault trial. He was spotted heading inside the Los Angeles courthouse wearing green pants and a white tank.

As reported, A woman, Vanessa LeMaistre, has accused the producer of r@ping her in a #BeverlyHills hotel room in 2016. On day one of the trial, LeMaistre testified that taking the psychedelic plant Ayahuasca eight years later helped her realize that she needed to seek legal action.

#Metro’s legal team has slammed the allegations, saying she’s upset he “stopped giving her attention after the last time they had s3x.” They added, “We are here because she thought my client could solve her financial problems. And so she made a claim that he s3xually a$$aulted her, expecting that he would just write a check to make it all go away quickly and quietly.”

The trial is expected to conclude on Friday (Sept. 26)


0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Karan Johar Aryan Khan
Bollywood

Karan Johar Gets Relief From Delhi High Court in Personality Rights Case

by jummy84
written by jummy84

Filmmaker Karan Johar has secured significant relief from the Delhi High Court after raising concerns about the misuse of his image, voice, and name on social media without consent. The court affirmed that his personality rights would be protected and directed major tech companies, including Google, Meta, and X, to provide relevant information. Meanwhile, the e-commerce site Redbubble has been ordered to take down content deemed objectionable, with the court promising a detailed order at the next hearing.

 Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora clarified that “Defendants 14, 15, and 16, which comprise the social networking companies Google, Meta, and X, will supply IT log records in addition to Basic Subscriber Information details.” The court also summoned other online platforms like Giphy and Pinterest (defendants 2-5 and 7-10) as part of Johar’s main lawsuit. Summons for the remaining defendants, including Redbubble and the social media giants, will be considered at the next hearing, as they were primarily impleaded for compliance purposes.

The court indicated during proceedings, “In the IA (interim relief application), I will pass a detailed order. Injunction to be granted.” Counsel for Redbubble confirmed they would begin removing infringing material within a week. At the previous hearing, the court had asked Johar to provide a precise list of URLs or posts that required action and to clarify the types of content, such as whether they were defamatory, obscene, or misleading.

Karan Johar

This development comes amid a series of recent decisions by the Delhi High Court protecting celebrity personality rights. Similar orders were recently passed in favour of Aishwarya Rai Bachchan and Abhishek Bachchan, where the court noted that the unauthorized use of their images, voices, and names through technologies like AI constitutes a violation of privacy. The Johar case reinforces the judiciary’s stance on safeguarding individuals against misuse of their digital persona. 

Also Read: Karan Johar and Teja Sajja Talk About Their Love for Samantha and Shah Rukh Khan Respectively

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Kangana Ranaut Withdraws Plea in Supreme Court, Faces Defamation Trial Over Farmers' Protest Tweet
Bollywood

Kangana Ranaut Withdraws Plea in Supreme Court, Faces Defamation Trial Over Farmers’ Protest Tweet

by jummy84
written by jummy84

Kangana Ranaut, actor and Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) MP, has withdrawn her plea from the Supreme Court seeking to quash a criminal defamation complaint against her. The complaint stems from a retweet she made during the 2020-21 farmers’ protests against the now-repealed farm laws.

​A bench of Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta showed disinclination to entertain the plea, suggesting that Ranaut pursue alternative remedies before the trial court. This led her counsel to withdraw the petition. Ranaut had previously moved the top court after the Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed her plea, ruling that she failed to establish that her allegedly defamatory post was made in good faith.

​Justice Mehta expressed reservations about Ranaut’s comments, stating, “What about your comments? It was not a simple retweet. You have added your own comments. You have added spice.” When her counsel stated that Ranaut had issued a clarification, Justice Mehta responded that the clarification could be presented before the trial court.

​Ranaut’s counsel also highlighted the difficulty of her traveling to Punjab, to which the bench suggested she could seek an exemption from personal appearance. The bench warned that if the counsel argued further, it might be constrained to make adverse comments that could prejudice her defense in the trial.

​The defamation complaint was filed by Mahinder Kaur, a 73-year-old woman from Bathinda, Punjab, in January 2021. Kaur claimed that Ranaut made “false imputations and remarks” against her in a retweet, alleging that she was the same “dadi” (grandmother) who was part of the Shaheen Bagh protest.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
HYBE and Min Hee-jin Clash in Court Over Shareholder Agreement
Music

HYBE and Min Hee-jin Clash in Court Over Shareholder Agreement

by jummy84
written by jummy84

Former ADOR CEO Min Hee-jin, who has been locked in a protracted legal battle with HYBE, appeared in person on Thursday (Sept. 11) at the Seoul Central District Court. It was her first court appearance since the dispute began last year. On the witness stand was HYBE’s chief legal officer, Jung Jin-soo.

That day, the court heard two consolidated claims: HYBE’s request to confirm the termination of a shareholder agreement, and Min’s demand for payment under a put option (a contractual right to sell shares back). Positions between the parties remained sharply divided. The hearing revisited long-running flashpoints — allegations that HYBE’s new girl group copied NewJeans, clauses described by Min as “slave-like” non-compete terms, and claims of “forced album releases” targeting NewJeans. Jung questioned Min’s outside activities and possible breaches of contract, while Min countered, calling the narrative “fiction” and accusing the witness of “multiple false statements.” The courtroom confrontation stretched for almost five hours.

Related

The court plans to question Min again on Nov. 27 and wrap up arguments on Dec. 18, with a ruling expected in January 2026. At the heart of the civil dispute is the validity of a put option estimated at around 26 billion won (approximately $19 million USD). The shareholder agreement reportedly allows Min to sell up to 75% of her ADOR stake to HYBE, based on 13 times the company’s average operating profit over the previous two years. Applying ADOR’s 2022 loss of 4 billion won and 2023 profit of 33.5 billion won, the amount is calculated at roughly 26 billion. HYBE argues that the shareholder agreement was terminated in July 2023, nullifying the option, while Min maintains there was no termination and says she resigned only after exercising the option in November.

Later that afternoon, a separate proceeding was held: the second closed mediation session in ADOR’s lawsuit seeking confirmation of NewJeans’ exclusive contract validity. At the first session on August 14, members Minji and Danielle attended, drawing heavy media attention, but no agreement was reached. The session ended after just 20 minutes without a settlement, and the court scheduled a main ruling for October 30. NewJeans members remain barred from independent activities under a preliminary injunction granted to ADOR.

HYBE and Min Hee-jin’s put-option case is expected to conclude arguments by the end of the year, with a verdict likely in January. The NewJeans-ADOR contract dispute is also nearing resolution, with a decision set for Oct. 30. Nearly a year of intertwined litigation among HYBE, Min Hee-jin, ADOR and NewJeans is heading toward sequential conclusions as the year draws to a close — and the industry is watching closely to see where this saga ultimately lands.

Daily newsletters straight to your inbox


Sign Up

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Disney’s Wizards and Teen Vampire, ‘Wrong Paris’ Romcom, ‘Rainmaker’ in Court, Streaming ‘Warfire’
TV & Streaming

Disney’s Wizards and Teen Vampire, ‘Wrong Paris’ Romcom, ‘Rainmaker’ in Court, Streaming ‘Warfire’

by jummy84
written by jummy84

Disney / Justin Stephens

Wizards Beyond Waverly Place

The sequel to Disney’s Wizards of Waverly Place returns for a second season with back-to-back episodes, featuring a crowded house of young wizards now that protégée Billie (Janice LeAnn Brown) has been joined in the magic trade by Russo brothers Roman (Alkaio Thiele) and Milo (Max Matenko). While Justin (David Henrie) helps train the young wizards for the Family Wizard Competition, expect guest-star appearances by Selena Gomez (reprising her role as Justin’s sister Alex), What We Do in the Shadows alum Harvey Guillén as Gossip Stone and Criminal Minds‘ Kirsten Vangsness as Bigelow McFigglehorn, a member of the Wizard Tribunal. All episodes of Season 2 will begin streaming on Disney+ on October 8.

Kenzi Richardson in 'Vampirina: Teenage Vampire' Season 1 Episode 1

Disney / Mitch Haaseth

Vampirina: Teenage Vampire

The supernatural fun continues on a music-heavy comedy series starring Kenzi Richardson as Vampirina — or as her friends call her, “Vee” — a tween vampire from Transylvania who’s left the crypt to sink her teeth into a performing-arts boarding school. As one does. Living Single‘s Kim Coles costars as the Wilson Hall Academy of the Arts’ Dean Merriweather, with Jiwon Lee as Vee’s perky roommate Sophie and Milo Maharlika as Demi, a 600-year-old ghost sent by Vee’s parents to keep a spectral eye on Vee. The entire season will begin streaming on Disney+ on October 15, with the first single (“Slay”) available today.

Naika Toussaint as Amber, Miranda Cosgrove as Dawn, Madeleine Arthur as Cinderella, Madison Pettis as Lexi, Hannah Stocking as Eve and Pierson Fodé as Trey in 'The Wrong Paris'

Diyah Pera / Netflix

The Wrong Paris

What would Emily Cooper (of Emily in Paris) do? Have a meltdown, most likely. Which is country girl Dawn’s (Miranda Cosgrove of iCarly fame) initial reaction when she signs on as a contestant for the Honey Pot dating show, set in Paris, where she hopes to pursue her art-school dreams. But reality (as in reality TV) sets in when she discovers the show is actually set in Paris, Texas. This being a romcom, you won’t be surprised to learn that the cowboy bootcamp has an upside: the bachelor himself, a hunky hayseed named Trey (Pierson Fodé) who takes a shine to Dawn.

THE RAINMAKER -- Episode 104 -- Pictured: Milo Callaghan as Rudy Baylor -- (Photo by: Christopher Barr/USA Network)

Christopher Barr / USA Network

The Rainmaker

Novice lawyer Rudy (Milo Callaghan) squares off in court on the opposite side of his girlfriend Sarah (Madison Iseman) for a high-stakes evidentiary hearing in a pivotal episode of the legal drama based on John Grisham’s bestseller. Sarah and her new mentor Brad (Wade Briggs) know their jobs at Tinley Britt are on the line, while Rudy keeps trying to prove himself to his boss Bruiser (Lana Parrilla), though he has a risky habit of ignoring all of her advice and warnings. Adding to the anxiety: the results of the bar exam are beginning to come in.

Joseph Quinn, D'Pharaoh Woon-A-Tai in 'Warfare'

Murray Close / A24 / Everett Collection

Warfare

Described by the New York Times as “a tough, relentless movie about life and death in battle,” writer-director Alex Garland and Ray Mendoza’s unflinching 2025 real-time war film set during an ill-fated Iraq War mission makes its streaming debut. (The movie premieres on HBO Saturday at 8/7c.) The ensemble cast includes Reservation Dogs‘ D’Pharaoh Woon-A-Tai, Shogun‘s Cosmo Jarvis, Heartstopper‘s Kit Connor, Will Poulter (The Bear), Finn Bennett (True Detective: Night Country), and Noah Centineo (To All the Boys I’ve Loved Before).

'Chief of War' Season 1 Episode 8

Apple TV+

Chief of War

War clouds are forming on several fronts in the penultimate episode of Jason Momoa‘s historical epic set in the pre-unification Hawaiian Islands of the early 1800s. Grieving the slaughter on the beach of hundreds of innocent villagers by European invaders, Ka’iana (Momoa) is losing faith in war chief and future king Kamehameha’s (Kaina Makua) resolve. And there’s another enemy within, with the battle-hungry Keoua (Cliff Curtis) on the rampage.

INSIDE FRIDAY TV:

  • True Crime Watch: On ABC‘s 20/20 (9/8c), Stephanie Ramos reports on the 2001 murder of Leslie Preer in her suburban Maryland home, which was only solved nearly 25 years later when DNA under her fingerprints finally found a match. On Dateline NBC (10/9c), Keith Morrison reports on the investigation into the 2014 murder in Calgary, Alberta of Shannon Madill Burgess, an aspiring actress and newlywed.
  • Lost in the Jungle (9/8c, National Geographic): A real-life survival story unfolds in a documentary from Oscar winners Chai Vasarhelyi and Jimmy Chin (Free Solo, The Rescue) and director Juan Camilo Cruz, recounting the 40-day ordeal of four Indigenous children who are stranded in the Columbian jungle after a 2023 plane crash.

ON THE STREAM:

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Aishwarya Rai Bachchan Got Relief From Delhi High Court In Petition Against Use of AI-Generated Content
Bollywood

Aishwarya Rai Bachchan Got Relief From Delhi High Court In Petition Against Use of AI-Generated Content

by jummy84
written by jummy84

Bollywood actress Aishwarya Rai Bachchan has received significant relief from the Delhi High Court in her petition against the unauthorized use of her photos, videos, voice, and AI-generated content. The court observed that the misuse of a celebrity’s identity without consent is not only a violation of their personality rights but also an infringement of their fundamental right to live with dignity.

Aishwarya Rai Bachchan

Issuing interim directions, the court ordered e-commerce platforms, Google, and other respondents to take immediate action. Within 72 hours, they must remove, block, and deactivate all complaint URLs flagged in Aishwarya’s petition. Additionally, the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) has been instructed to issue necessary directives to ensure that such content is taken down. Google and other platforms have also been asked to submit original customer information in a sealed envelope.

Aishwarya Rai Bachchan

Aishwarya’s petition raised concerns over the misuse of her personality and copyright rights. She highlighted that her images were being tampered with using AI technology, and in some cases, even obscene content was being circulated online in her name without authorization. The actress stressed that such misuse not only damages her reputation but also causes financial losses.

Aishwarya Rai Bachchan

Justice Girish Kathpalia, while passing the order, remarked that unauthorized exploitation of a celebrity’s identity can mislead the public, dilute their brand value, and tarnish their credibility. He stated, “The plaintiff has made a strong prima facie case. Misuse of her name, pictures, or signature without consent creates confusion and is clearly a violation.” The court further noted that some respondents had used Aishwarya’s personality traits with the help of AI tools, thereby intensifying the harm to her dignity and reputation. Interestingly, Aishwarya is not the only one from the Bachchan family to move court on this issue. Her husband, actor Abhishek Bachchan, has also filed a similar petition.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Equity To Appeal Against Spotlight Ruling From High Court
TV & Streaming

Equity To Appeal Against Spotlight Ruling From High Court

by jummy84
written by jummy84

UK actors union Equity will seek to appeal the High Court judgement that saw its claim against casting directory Spotlight thrown out last week.

General Secretary Paul Fleming said the Equity Council, which met yesterday, “has decided to seek an appeal of the judgment” with the help of the Trades Union Congress (TUC).

This application to appeal will now be submitted to the UK Court of Appeal. Equity had 21 days after the ruling with which to appeal and the appeal has been backed by the TUC at its annual congress today.

The ruling of the much-publicized legal case dismissed Equity’s claim that Spotlight should be classed as an “employment agency” and should therefore only be able to charge fees that would “be no more than a reasonable estimate of the cost of production.” 

All claims were dismissed by the High Court last week, which found Spotlight “does not provide services for the purposes of finding persons employment with employers or of supplying employers with persons for employment by them.”

After the ruling, Spotlight CEO Matt Hood accused Equity of “misleading” its members about the case and described the case as a “cynical, performative and expensive legal proceeding.” When the appeal is resolved, it is understood that the costs for the case will be published by Equity.

Hood offered an olive branch to Equity last week to co-operate on the issue but Equity is instead going down the appeals route.

“It’s no surprise that the law has landed on the side of big business in this decision, with no regard for the many low-earning Equity members seeking to get by in an industry where the odds are too often stacked against them,” said Fleming. “This case simply sought the protection of regulation to limit fees to a ‘reasonable’ level through existing regulations, but the implications of the judgment are large and the idea that Spotlight can’t be regulated is dangerous and has consequences for the wider economy. Equally worrying are the sweeping implications for working people across the UK, who may now be left unprotected from up front charges by similar platforms elsewhere in the growing gig economy.”

Equity’s council met yesterday and voted to pursue the appeal and the union is also seeking a meeting with the government’s new employment rights minister.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Did Cardi B Win Her Court Case? Updates on Trial Verdict – Hollywood Life
Celebrity News

Did Cardi B Win Her Court Case? Updates on Trial Verdict – Hollywood Life

by jummy84
written by jummy84

Image Credit: GC Images

Unless you don’t have a TikTok account, you probably know that Cardi B was on trial against a security guard over assault allegations — and the court case has gone viral on social media. The 32-year-old music artist didn’t hold her tongue while testifying, and her sassy remarks made headlines. As fans wait for updates on the case, the jury reached a verdict in the afternoon on September 2.

Hollywood Life has the latest updates on Cardi B’s trial verdict below.

Why Was Cardi B on Trial? Attack Allegations Explained

Cardi B was accused by security guard Emani Ellis of assaulting her in 2018 at an obstetrician’s office in Beverly Hills, California. Cardi  alleged that Ellis was recording her without consent in the office and instead there was no physical altercation — only a verbal argument. At the time, the “WAP” rapper was pregnant, and she wanted to keep it private.

@courttvlive

“You don’t want everybody in your business.” Defendant #CardiB testified that she didn’t want anyone to know she was pregnant the day of her “verbal altercation” with security guard EmaniEllis. #CourtTV What do YOU think? WATCH LIVE on YouTube! #courttvtiktok #court #Cardi #CardiBtrial

♬ original sound – Court TV – Court TV

“She couldn’t get a scratch from me because I didn’t touch her,” Cardi claimed on the stand. “She didn’t touch me. She was going to touch me, but she didn’t get to touch me.”

Ellis denied filming Cardi B and claimed the argument turned physical, alleging that Cardi spat on her and cut her cheek with her fingernails. Ellis is suing Cardi for $24 million in damages.

@courttvlive

#CourtTV takes a look back at CardiB’s best and boldest highlights from the stand during her civil assault trial. What’s YOUR favorite moment? 👀 #truecrime #truecrimestory #court #courtroomdrama #courtroom #courttvtiktok #Cardi #CardiBTrial

♬ original sound – Court TV – Court TV

Can I Watch the Cardi B Trial Live?

Yes. While major cable news networks are not livestreaming the trial, multiple livestreams are available on YouTube.

Cardi B’s Trial Verdict: Was She Found Guilty?

Rolling Stone reported on September 2 that a verdict had been determined in Cardi B’s case, but the details are still unclear at the time of publication. Per the publication, the jury — consisting of six men and six women — began deliberations at 2:15 p.m. that day and submitted a note at 3:15 declaring they had reached a verdict.

The jury found Cardi B not liable on all charges in the civil suit, according to ABC News.

Cardi B’s trial went viral on TikTok after she mouthed off on the stand more than once. Fans especially cackled at the moments when she held nothing back, including profanities, while repeating what she allegedly said to Ellis.

“I said b**ch get the f**k out my face. Why are you in my face?” Cardi said. “Why are you recording me? Ain’t you supposed to be security?”

After being questioned why she felt worried during her argument with Ellis, Cardi claimed it was because “this girl’s about to f**king beat my ass! Hello?”

The Grammy Award winner’s facial expressions and reactions also sparked laughter in the courtroom, as seen in multiple TikTok clips. One of the most viral moments came when she corrected a lawyer who asked why her hair had changed from black to platinum blonde. After chuckling for a moment, Cardi said, “They’re wigs.”

When Is the Cardi B Trial Over?

The trial was expected to end sometime in the second week of September. However, since a verdict was reached by the afternoon on September 2, the trial should end this week.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Newer Posts
Older Posts