celebpeek
  • Home
  • Bollywood
  • Hollywood
  • Lifestyle
  • Fashion
celebpeek
  • Music
  • Celebrity News
  • Events
  • TV & Streaming
Home » controversy » Page 2
Tag:

controversy

The End Of Shah Rukh Khan's Reign? Fans Left Disappointed Over His Latest Controversy! | Glamsham.com
Bollywood

The End Of Shah Rukh Khan’s Reign? Fans Left Disappointed Over His Latest Controversy! | Glamsham.com

by jummy84 October 17, 2025
written by jummy84

Indian YouTuber and social commentator Dhruv Rathee has touched off a heated public debate by challenging Bollywood icon Shah Rukh Khan’s enormous wealth and advertising decisions, most specifically his endorsement of paan masala brands.

In a new video posted on his X (formerly Twitter) handle, Rathee pointed out that the 59-year-old thespian has now gained an estimated net worth of ₹12,400 crore, making him one of the world’s richest stars and even beating many of the best-known Hollywood stars. Rathee emphasized how hard it is even to think of such a huge amount of money and showed his point by making some shocking calculations.

As per Rathee, if Shah Rukh Khan just kept this money in the bank with a 7% annual interest rate, he’d be making approximately ₹870 crore per year without lifting a finger. Even after paying approximately 40% in taxes about ₹500 crore SRK would still have more disposable income per year than most could ever dream of.

Rathee went on to calculate how much luxury this amount could afford. He calculated that if SRK purchased a private aircraft and funded its yearly maintenance expenses, this would cost around ₹200 crore annually. If he bought one upmarket residential property somewhere on the planet each year, that would cost another ₹100 crore. Even with luxurious world tours, five-star accommodations, and personal expenditures, his yearly expenditures would be ₹400 crore still far short of the ₹870 crore he would earn just in interest alone.

The YouTuber made the argument that even with all that lavish spending, Shah Rukh Khan’s fortunes wouldn’t go down. And so he posed a sharp question to the actor:

My question to Shah Rukh Khan.@iamsrk pic.twitter.com/MZjCbsIkjx

— Dhruv Rathee (@dhruv_rathee) October 15, 2025

“Isn’t this money enough? If it is, then why do you still feel the need to promote harmful products like paan masala?”

Rathee remembered that as per a 2014 report, SRK was being given around ₹20 crore a year to promote a paan masala company. He inferred that in 2025, the figure could quite easily be ₹100 to ₹200 crore annually, adjusting for inflation and SRK’s increasing clout.

The influencer concluded by calling upon the actor to consider the social responsibility that goes with such enormous wealth and popularity.

“Ask yourself the question truthfully, what are you going to do with all that money? Think about how good it would be for the nation if such a huge star would refrain from endorsing such dangerous products,” Rathee said.

Also Read: Sukhwinder Singh Thought Shah Rukh Khan Was Drinking 6 Pegs a Day, Not Building 6-Pack Abs

His comments have since triggered debates on celebrity endorsements, money, and ethics in India.

October 17, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Aryan Khan Series Controversy: Sameer Wankhede's Family Faces Online Abuse! | Glamsham.com
Lifestyle

Aryan Khan Series Controversy: Sameer Wankhede’s Family Faces Online Abuse! | Glamsham.com

by jummy84 October 12, 2025
written by jummy84

Ex-Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB) zonal director Sameer Wankhede has sued Red Chillies Entertainment and Netflix for defamation over the scandalous series The Ba*ds of Bollywood, which he says portrays him in a bad light. The co-created show by Aryan Khan has caused big controversy upon release, with Wankhede claiming that the satire aims not only at him but also demeans the efforts of those who battle drug abuse.

Wankhede had asserted that he had moved the Delhi High Court on his own and not as a government official. “My personal opinion is that there is no relation between my profession or my job and this,” he said, declining further comment on the legal case since it is sub judice.

Wankhede also disclosed that the backlash has moved beyond criticism with hate messages reaching his family from outside India. “We have frequently reported the threats given to my sister and my wife by the police on a regular basis. I will not accept the fact that because of me, they have to bear the brunt of it,” he said, showing alarm over the increasing online abuse faced by his loved ones from nations like Pakistan, the UAE, and Bangladesh.

In reply to the criticism, Aryan Khan came to the defense of the series, saying the show was meant to be satirical, not a documentary. “We were taking liberties with it for screen, naturally, but naturally, there’ll be things that are inspired. There’ll be scenes that are inspired by certain realities, and there’ll be exaggerations,” Aryan said, further adding, “If you don’t like it, the show is not meant for you.”

He admitted there were some scenes that invited internal arguments on the sets, but stood firm on his creative position. “We did receive some notes on some scenes where they were like, ‘Oh, this is too this, or this is too that,’ but then I took a stand,” Aryan said.

Also Read: The Ultimate Comeback Story! This Actor’s Journey from Reality TV to Starring in Aryan Khan’s The Bads Of Bollywood

The Delhi High Court has also heard Wankhede’s complaint and issued summons to Red Chillies Entertainment, Netflix, X Corp, Google, Meta, and others. The next date for hearing is October 30.

The Ba*ds of Bollywood stars an ensemble cast of Bobby Deol, Lakshya, Raghav Juyal, Anya Singh, Manoj Pahwa, and Sahher Bambba, with special guest appearances by Shah Rukh Khan, Salman Khan, Aamir Khan, Disha Patani, and S. S. Rajamouli.

October 12, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
The Hijab Controversy Surrounding Deepika Padukone's Latest Ad Explained - But Fans Are Already Defending Her! | Glamsham.com
Bollywood

The Hijab Controversy Surrounding Deepika Padukone’s Latest Ad Explained – But Fans Are Already Defending Her! | Glamsham.com

by jummy84 October 9, 2025
written by jummy84

Bollywood’s favourite power couple Deepika Padukone and Ranveer Singh are back in the spotlight, this time not for a movie, but for their latest campaign with Visit Abu Dhabi. Called “Mera Sukoon”, the stylishly filmed video sees the couple discover the peaceful scenery, vibrant culture, and symbolic landmarks of Abu Dhabi, and celebrate love, peace, and togetherness.

The clip picked up speed online — not just for its imagery but also for a specific scene that caused reaction. Deepika is spotted wearing a hijab while paying a visit to the Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque in one such moment. The actress received widespread acclaim from fans for being so graceful and culturally aware. Social media was filled with comments such as “She looks stunning in a hijab,” and “Their show of respect for Arab culture makes me like her even more,”.

But the same scene had also incited outrage among a section of users, who accused her of disrespecting Hindu customs. Posts like “Boycott Deepika,” and “She’s double-faced,” started trending, with some demanding a boycott of her films.

In turn, the actress’s supporters reminded the critics that donning an abaya or hijab is a dress code required at the mosque — one in which all female guests, of any religion, comply. One of them noted, “Even Rihanna covered up when she went. It has nothing to do with religion, only respect.” Another chimed in, “She has never disrespectfully approached Hindu temples. Why pick on her now?”

Also Read: Deepika Padukone and Ranbir Kapoor’s Airport Reunion Has Fans Going Wild – Watch the Viral Video!

In spite of the digital divide, most comments were favorable, praising Deepika for her cultural sensitivity and demeanor.

The ad also brings Deepika and Ranveer together in their first professional project post-Singham Again, making it all the more special for their fans. Shot in the deserts, museums, and landmarks of Abu Dhabi, the campaign has already gone viral — winning hearts and creating buzz.

October 9, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
'Fuck My Son' Movie AI Controversy: Todd Rohal Interview
TV & Streaming

‘Fuck My Son’ Movie AI Controversy: Todd Rohal Interview

by jummy84 October 3, 2025
written by jummy84

If you’re worried about AI taking over the entertainment industry, close your eyes for a moment and imagine your worst case scenario.

What kind of villains do you picture? Soulless corporate executives gleefully watching their bottom lines go up while they slash thousands of human jobs? Insufferable tech bros hi-fiving each other at the notion that their lack of creative talent no longer prevents them from flooding the internet with anti-woke “Star Wars” rip-offs generated by typing a few lazy prompts into an app? Unshowered right-wing nationalists producing dangerous deepfakes while sulking in their basements?

Whatever pro-AI bogeymen haunt your particular nightmares, they probably don’t look like Todd Rohal. A seasoned veteran of the American indie film scene, his offbeat comedies have been popping up in places like Sundance, SXSW, and Adult Swim for the better part of three decades. He cut his teeth shooting 35mm films before digital editing was invented. He self distributed his early movies by cold-calling theaters under fake names and convincing them to screen his single 35mm print until he had to drive it to another venue. When he was tired of screening his first feature “The Guatemalan Handshake,” he buried his personal print in the desert and ceremonially burned all of his remaining DVD copies.

1984, (aka NINETEEN EIGHTY-FOUR), from left: John Hurt, Suzanna Hamilton, 1984. ©Atlantic Releasing/courtesy Everett Collection

He’s had the kind of idiosyncratic career that the independent film ecosystem theoretically exists to elevate and promote. So why is he getting death threats over a comic book adaptation about an old lady forcing Tipper Newton to fuck her son at gunpoint?

TORONTO, ONTARIO - SEPTEMBER 10: Todd Rohal attends the premiere of
Todd Rohal attending the TIFF premiere of “Fuck My Son” Getty Images

If you’ve attended a genre film festival this fall, Rohal’s new film “Fuck My Son!” has probably popped up on your radar. Adapted from legendary underground comic artist Johnny Ryan’s graphic novel of the same name, the film is a throwback to the kind of old-school midnight movie that prioritizes shock value above all else. Robert Longstreet dons a dress and a thick layer of prosthetics to play an old lady whose sex positive ethos takes a dark turn when she kidnaps a woman (played by Tipper Newton) and forces her to — you guessed it — fuck her horrifically deformed son.

The film is a feast of practical effects and unapologetic bad taste, designed to be enjoyed with rowdy crowds in packed theaters in the wee hours of the morning. The shock value should be recognizable to anyone who can remember reading Ryan’s comics in the back pages of VICE magazine. During a recent conversation with IndieWire at a Silver Lake sidewalk cafe hours before the film screened at Beyond Fest, Rohal explained that he was drawn to those comics because they reflected the kind of progressive, anti-censorship worldview that he hoped to promote with his own work.

“I saw his stuff as offensive, but in a way I understood that was exciting and funny and made me react,” Rohal said of Ryan’s work. “Not knowing his politics I was basically like ‘We are very aligned politically, I’m guessing, because I’m a very liberal-thinking person, rights for everyone, very against censorship. And that’s everything Johnny is about.”

Rohal’s adaptation begins with a fake pre-show that might exist at a nightmarish MAGA version of AMC Theaters. In the world of the film, a fictional religious movie studio is distributing “Fuck My Son!,” but wants its audience to be able to enjoy the film without offending their Christian sensibilities. It offers the film in a format called Perv-O-Vision, which allows prudish viewers to put on a pair of glasses that makes any nude scene appear as if the actors are fully clothed.

The pre-show includes a demonstration of Perv-O-Vision that’s complete with full frontal male nudity and an audience of theatergoers that are very clearly generated with AI. It’s not a sophisticated attempt at replacing human actors — it’s slop in every sense of the word, intended as a satire of the kinds of right-wing corporations who would sincerely use bad AI to cut video production costs.

“I liked the idea that ‘Fuck My Son’ would be presented as a corporate product,” Rohal said with a laugh. “The beginning of the movie is supposed to feel like you’re in a corporate environment. So I thought ‘What would corporations use when portraying this?,’ which led me to say ‘I want to use AI.’ Thinking that would be very clear in its messaging! I’m learning that it’s not clear, that for any AI usage, the context and intent has no bearing for a lot of people.”

In addition to the pre-show, a character in the film is visited by the Meatie Mates, a fake Christian cartoon about singing meat that is presented as a much more hateful version of “Veggie Tales.” The characters were designed by human animator Cable Hardin in a 2D sequence, but Rohal used a mix of AI tools to make them look worse and worse as they reappear throughout the film. The effect feels like watching the deterioration of a media company in real time, as it’s easy to imagine a Christian TV producer commissioning the original human-drawn characters before switching to cheap AI a decade later.

“Fuck My Son!” premiered in the Midnight Madness section of the Toronto International Film Festival, where the section’s famously rowdy crowds embraced the film wholeheartedly. Rohal thought the AI jokes all landed, so he was shocked to wake up the next day and find that the film was being bombarded with negative Letterboxd reviews. (A large plurality of the film’s reviews are either half a star or one star, and the three most “liked” reviews are devoted to criticizing its use of AI.) Rohal was blindsided by the controversy in part because the online reaction was completely different than the enthusiasm he saw in the theater.

“The Toronto screening was crazy. Through the roof! And then the next day, I didn’t look online but [my publicist] told me ‘It’s pretty rough,’” Rohal said. “The online response is pretty strong. I read it and I was looking through some things, and I had to stop. There were hundreds of comments and I was like ‘This just doesn’t make any sense.’ The difference between what I experienced last night and this… There was no way that much hatred was in the room. Because they would have vocalized that! It would have lessened the cheering and laughter.”

The phenomenon only became more curious when the film experienced similar reactions at Fantastic Fest and Beyond Fest — joy during the actual screenings and hatred online. The disparate reactions suggest that not everyone criticizing the film has seen it. Rohal pointed to his openness about the film’s use of AI in its writeup on the TIFF website, in which Midnight Madness programmer Peter Kuplowsky wrote (with Rohal’s permission) that the pre-show “satirizes the corporatization of theatrical moviegoing, complete with freakish deployments of AI slop” as a possible spark that lit the fire. The online hatred snowballed, with people accusing Rohal and his team of using AI in other parts of the film that were shot entirely practically. The prevailing narrative online became that “Fuck My Son!” is an AI-generated movie, rather than a movie that satirically uses AI in a few carefully chosen shots.

“People saw [the writeup], there must have been some kind of Slack channel and people must have been like ‘We’re gonna blast this with horrible reviews because we’re these patriots of anti-AI.’ Because a lot of things people were saying were inaccurate. People said ‘Fifty percent of this movie is AI.’ That’s not true! The technology isn’t even there to do what I was accused of doing, which is fascinating.”

Rohal continues to tour the film to ravenous festival audiences (next up he’s heading to France for the Strasbourg European Fantastic Film Festival and Spain for the Sitges Film Festival), and he’s self-distributing the movie, with a series of 35mm screenings in theaters across America booked through early 2026. But he can’t help but laugh at the surreal experience of having to defend his film online every day to angry cinephiles spreading blatant misinformation about it. Case in point: he recently posted the film’s poster on Instagram, where he was slammed with complaints about the “AI poster” that was actually made by a human artist without any generative AI.

Rohal is doing his best to keep a sense of humor about the ordeal, noting the parallels between the kinds of hate mail and death threats that Ryan received for his original comics with the ones that he’s now getting for adapting them.

“I responded to some people online, and they just won’t engage in conversation about it,” Rohal said. “People threatened to kill me on Letterboxd. Someone said there should be drone strikes against me until not an atom of my body exists. And Johnny’s gotten death threats his whole life for doing his comics… It’s extreme.”

As an outside observer, it’s hard not to chuckle at the notion that this particular film has become the lightning rod for such impassioned debate about what we want the future of the film industry to look like. We’re talking about a movie in which Tipper Newton is forced to remove a monster’s dirty diaper and look for his genitalia, only to grab what she thinks is his penis but is actually a loose hotdog that he misplaced. In a saner world, this film probably wouldn’t be discussed as anything other than the shocking diversion from everyday life that it offers. But it also makes sense that the midnight movie audience, a group that thrives on its willingness to treat lowbrow films as serious works of art, would react so strongly to AI making its way into their world.

On one hand, it’s easy to empathize with the position that a section of pop culture known for embracing outsiders who lack the resources of corporate filmmakers would object to seeing indie artists use the very tools that corporations use to cut costs and make soul-crushingly bad content. But Rohal makes the opposite argument — if AI is here to stay, why should we cede all the power to the very corporations we’re already mad at?

“It’s like beating up a hobo for stealing your jobs, and he’s just collecting cans, goddamnit! He’s just doing whatever he can, and you’re gonna beat him up? You’ve got to understand that the jobs you’re trying to save are a corporation that’s holding onto something and they’ve got control over our entire culture. And I’m like, that’s really what we should be pushing back against. And I don’t see that,” Rohal said. “The way things are going terrifies me, because we’re essentially handing this technology over to evil people to do evil things, when we should be learning it ourselves.”

Rohal is a bit more optimistic about AI being used in indie films than I am, but it should go without saying that any serious discussion of a piece of art should at least consider the artist’s intentions. How is telling an independent filmmaker that he can’t use a bit of AI to satirize the people who use AI maliciously any different from telling artists that they can’t depict any words or actions that they wouldn’t condone in their own personal lives?

“It’s crazy to me that there is a large majority of people that can’t separate that, that can’t see the context of things or question why it’s being used,” Rohal said. “It’s just blind hatred and a desire to ban something completely. I think there’s an innate human desire to hate and destroy other humans. It just happens, whatever side of the political spectrum you’re on. I remember being a kid and seeing ads for ‘The Last Temptation of Christ.’ I was growing up in Ohio and churches were protesting it. And now we think ‘Oh that’s so cool, you were protested by the Catholic Church!’ But at the time, that was probably not cool to Martin Scorsese when he was like ‘I want people to see this movie! I care about it!’ And that’s how I feel now. It’s so weird that it’s about technology now, but maybe that is just the time we live in. Technology is this weird religion where we have sects.”

“You can use Photoshop, you can use After Effects and green screens and CGI and you can farm things out to India, but you cannot use this software on your computer at home,” he continued. “Even if you’ve learned the whole process. The effects in the movie took me months to do, and people tell me it’s lazy and I’m like, ‘I was up every freaking night until four in the morning working on this by myself. It was not lazy. I absolutely could have asked someone else to do this for me, but I wanted to do it myself because I wanted to learn it myself. I know how film works, from how negative emulsion works to this. And I think that’s what a filmmaker should do. I’m fascinated by film, I’m fascinated by all of this stuff, and the fact that people are mad about it is really confusing to me.”

Rohal never expected a movie called “Fuck My Son!” would give him so many P.R. headaches, but he also never expected the experience to be so life affirming. The film was born out of his commitment to free artistic expression, a tribute to a comic artist who spent his career battling mobs of people trying to tell him what he could and couldn’t say. It feels like destiny that Rohal ended up fending off a mob of his own, but he still doesn’t have any regrets about making his little movie about a twisted mom who just wants someone to fuck her hideous son.

“Making ‘Fuck My Son!,’ as crazy as that sounds, has been the biggest thing in my life that helped me figure out what’s important to me,” he said. “And I know that’s crazy, and you won’t see that in the movie, but following certain instincts and staying away from other things that would have prevented the movie from being what it is, and just allowing it to be itself, has really been life changing for me. And I credit that to the creative freedom that I had, and there’s an aspect of AI that fits into that that’s on the positive side of it. So if people want to assassinate me or drone bomb me for that, so be it.”

Announced theatrical engagements for “Fuck My Son!” can be found below, with starred dates indicating 35mm screenings.

10/16-23 – New York, NY – IFC Center

10/23-30 – Los Angeles, CA – Alamo Drafthouse Los Angeles

10/31 – 11/04 – Austin, TX – Alamo Drafthouse South Lamar

10/31 – 11/01 – Brooklyn, NY – Nitehawk Cinema – Williamsburg*

11/05-08 – San Francisco, CA – Alamo Drafthouse New Mission* 

11/14-15 – Chicago, IL – Music Box Theatre*

11/28-29 – Dallas, TX – Texas Theatre* 

12/05-06 – Seattle, WA – Grand Illusion Cinema at SIFF Film Center* 

12/19 – Toronto, ON – Revue Cinema

12/26-27 – Philadelphia, PA – PhilaMOCA

01/02-03/26 – Omaha, NE – Film Streams’ Dundee Theater*  

October 3, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
The Controversy Surrounding Triptii Dimri's Parveen Babi Biopic: Should Her Life Story Be Monetized? | Glamsham.com
Bollywood

The Controversy Surrounding Triptii Dimri’s Parveen Babi Biopic: Should Her Life Story Be Monetized? | Glamsham.com

by jummy84 October 3, 2025
written by jummy84

Triptii Dimri has had a meteoric rise in the Hindi film industry, especially after her unforgettable cameo in Sandeep Reddy Vanga’s Animal. Despite the polarising discourse around her character, her screen presence was undeniable and it catapulted her into the mainstream spotlight. Dubbed the “national crush” soon after, Dimri’s success didn’t just stop at online adoration; it translated into meaty film offers and leading-lady status.

The last year saw a turning point for the Laila Majnu alum. Triptii played full-fledged leading roles, seamlessly shifting from supporting roles to playing top commercial projects. She was the key female presence between Vicky Kaushal and Ammy Virk in Bad Newz, added hot sparks opposite Rajkummar Rao in Vicky Vidya Ka Woh Wala Video, and is next going to be seen sharing screen space with Kartik Aaryan in Bhool Bhulaiyaa 3. She recently hogged the limelight opposite Siddhant Chaturvedi in Dhadak 2, a spiritual follow-up of the Janhvi Kapoor-Ishaan Khatter success.

Though she does not have any other releases planned for this year, the hype about her isn’t dying down anytime soon. If Pinkvilla’s reports are to be believed, Triptii has now been approached to essay Parveen Babi in a new Netflix limited-series biopic. Shonali Bose (The Sky Is Pink) is set to direct the series, which will go on floors by March 2026.

Remembering PARVEEN BABI

(4 Apr 1949 – 20 Jan 2005) pic.twitter.com/dEPF0WM5yD

— Film History Pics (@FilmHistoryPic) January 20, 2024

Parveen Babi is still one of Bollywood’s most mysterious and iconic stars. A superstar of the 1970s and ’80s, she epitomized her era’s Westernized, glamorous image a far cry from the bourgeois representation of women in Hindi cinema during that period. Her formidable screen presence, along with performances in such classics as Deewaar, Amar Akbar Anthony, Shaan, Namak Halaal, and Kaala Patthar, created a space that was all her own.

Also Read: Triptii Dimri dropped from Aashiqui 3! Makers claim she lacks the Innocence factor

So, does Triptii possess the mettle to play someone as strong and charismatic as Parveen Babi? The answer perhaps lies in being able to balance the vulnerability with the strength something she has already shown in her recent performances. The task is certainly Herculean, but the career graph and acting skills of Triptii indicate she could possibly possess the depth and screen presence necessary to do justice to the icon. Everyone will now be looking at this ambitious venture as it starts to come together.

October 3, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
A Complete Breakdown of the J.K. Rowling Transgender-Comments Controversy
Fashion

A Complete Breakdown of the J.K. Rowling Transgender-Comments Controversy

by jummy84 September 29, 2025
written by jummy84

Rowling replied, “Not safe, I’m afraid. Celebs who cosied up to a movement intent on eroding women’s hard-won rights and who used their platforms to cheer on the transitioning of minors can save their apologies for traumatised detransitioners and vulnerable women reliant on single sex spaces.”

Daniel Radcliffe says Rowling’s anti-trans stance makes him “sad.”

In an interview with The Atlantic published on April 30, Radcliffe said that since Rowling began tweeting and writing about trans rights, he has had no direct contact with her. “It makes me really sad, ultimately,” he told the magazine, “because I do look at the person that I met, the times that we met, and the books that she wrote, and the world that she created, and all of that is to me so deeply empathic.”

Rowling goes viral again for falsely claiming an Algerian boxer is a trans woman.

At the 2024 Olympics in Paris, a women’s boxing match between Italian boxer Angela Carini and Algerian boxer Imane Khelif ended when Carini withdrew from the match just 46 seconds after receiving a punch from Khelif. On X, Rowling posted a picture from the bout and claimed that Khelif was a trans woman. “Could any picture sum up our new men’s rights movement better? The smirk of a male who’s knows he’s protected by a misogynist sporting establishment enjoying the distress of a woman he’s just punched in the head, and whose life’s ambition he’s just shattered,” Rowling wrote.

In fact, Khelif was assigned female at birth and is declared female on her passport, per the Associated Press. After the controversy, Carini herself defended her opponent, per The New York Times, stating, “All this controversy certainly made me sad, and I also felt sorry for my opponent, she had nothing to do with it and like me was only here to fight.”

Rowling, however, continued to double down on X.

Rowling targets a trans athlete amid lawsuit.

Khelif, who is not trans, filed a lawsuit against Rowling and X owner Elon Musk for the “cyberbullying” she received as a result of their tirades against her. Instead of becoming more cautious, this apparently caused Rowling to pivot from speculating about athletes to simply finding and mocking the trans ones. In an especially cruel move, she took to Twitter in September 2024 to pick at an Italian Paralympic athlete who is visually impaired and, yes, a trans woman.

Valentina Petrillo is a sprinter and an out trans woman, the first to compete in a Paralympics track event. Though she did not even make it to the finals (no offense to Petrillo, who is 51 years old and really not hurting anyone), Rowling took offense, labeling her a “cheat.”

Rowling takes aim at asexual people.

Over the years Rowling has primarily focused her ire at trans people, but on April 6, 2025, she posted a derogatory comment about asexual people on X. A person who is asexual does not feel sexual attraction toward people of any gender. “Happy International Fake Oppression Day to everyone who wants complete strangers to know they don’t fancy a shag,” Rowling wrote, over an International Asexuality Day graphic.

September 29, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Diljit Dosanjh Slams Media For 'Anti-National' Narrative Amid Sardaar Ji 3, Pahalgam Controversy
Bollywood

Diljit Dosanjh Slams Media For ‘Anti-National’ Narrative Amid Sardaar Ji 3, Pahalgam Controversy

by jummy84 September 25, 2025
written by jummy84

Singer-actor Diljit Dosanjh has finally broken his silence on the swirling controversies surrounding the Pahalgam terror attack, the casting of Pakistani actor Hania Aamir in his film Sardaar Ji 3, and the recent high-stakes cricket match between India and Pakistan. Speaking at his concert in Malaysia, Diljit vehemently pushed back against accusations, particularly from the media, that he was acting against national interests. His candid address offered a rare glimpse into the intense personal and professional pressure he has faced in recent months.

​Diljit began his statement by directly addressing the timeline of events that led to the backlash. He clarified that the shooting for his film Sardaar Ji 3 was completed before the devastating Pahalgam terror attack occurred. He also noted that the match between India and Pakistan was played after the attack. By framing his defense around this chronology, Diljit sought to separate his creative and professional decisions from the subsequent geopolitical events. He did not mince words when criticizing the media, stating, “The national media tried their best to portray me as anti-national, but Punjabis and the Sikh community could never go against the nation.” This powerful counter-narrative resonated with his audience, highlighting his frustration with what he perceives as a deliberate attempt to malign his image.

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DO_zyD7kjQ8/?igsh=ZDNmNHpocTQ5cWZj

​Silence Was the Answer: Diljit Dosanjh’s Response to Accusations

​The popular artist explained his prolonged silence in the face of mounting criticism, admitting that he chose to keep his feelings and many answers private. “I have many answers, but I kept quiet, kept everything inside me. I didn’t speak. I have many answers,” he confessed to the concert attendees. Diljit positioned his silence not as an admission of guilt, but as a defense mechanism and a life lesson. “Whoever tells you anything, you shouldn’t take that poison inside you. I have learned that from life. So I didn’t say anything…There are a lot of things more to say, but I don’t want to do that, I don’t want to do that s*.”** His decision to avoid engaging in the public spectacle reflects a choice to prioritise peace and sanity over the inevitable toxicity of a social media war.

​The core of the recent controversy lay in the casting of Pakistani actor Hania Aamir in his film Sardaar Ji 3. The film, which also starred Neeru Bajwa, Gulshan Grover, and Sapna Pabbi, among others, was released overseas on June 27 and drew significant criticism amidst heightened tensions between India and Pakistan. These tensions escalated following the Pahalgam terror attack. India’s subsequent military response, Operation Sindoor on May 7, which included air strikes on terrorist bases, led to a cultural boycott in India. Consequently, the social media accounts of several prominent Pakistani artists, including Fawad Khan, Mahira Khan, Ali Zafar, Atif Aslam, Rahat Fateh Ali Khan, and Hania Aamir herself, were banned in India.

​The atmosphere was further charged by the recent Asia Cup cricket match, which saw India secure a seven-wicket victory over Pakistan. This clash was the first meeting between the two nations since the Pahalgam attack, placing immense pressure on both sides. Despite the immense pressure and the online backlash for proceeding with the game, the Suryakumar Yadav-led Indian side maintained their dominance from the first ball, securing a decisive win.

​By finally addressing these intertwined controversies, Diljit Dosanjh used his platform to assert his patriotism, criticise media sensationalism, and offer a personal philosophy on dealing with public adversity. His powerful concert speech served as a testament to his resilience and a clear rebuttal to those who questioned his loyalty.

September 25, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Aditya Ojha Reacts to Controversy Around Pawan Singh For Rumors of Destroying People's Career In Industry
Bollywood

Aditya Ojha Reacts to Controversy Around Pawan Singh For Rumors of Destroying People’s Career In Industry

by jummy84 September 25, 2025
written by jummy84

Pawan Singh, popularly known as the “Power Star” of Bhojpuri cinema, enjoys massive stardom in the industry. Alongside his successful career as an actor and singer, he frequently finds himself in the spotlight due to controversies. Recently, Pawan Singh was accused of misbehaving with Anjali Raghav, a Haryanvi singer, which stirred heated discussions on social media. The Bhojpuri star eventually issued an apology, but the matter once again raised questions about his influence in the industry.

Pawan Singh

Aditya Ojha Opened Up On Pawan Singh Accused For Destroying Career of People

For years, there has been a perception that Pawan Singh has the power to “make or break” someone’s career. This belief gained traction especially after his much-publicized breakup with Bhojpuri actress Akshara Singh. Addressing this issue, actor Aditya Ojha, who has worked with Pawan Singh in several Bhojpuri films, shared his opinion in an interview with one of the media houses.

Aditya Ojha

Also Read: Mahesh Bhatt Reveals Alia Bhatt’s Daughter Raha Has Her Own Vanity Van, Read To Know More About It

Talking about this, Aditya Ojha said, “Even if someone wants to harm another person, they cannot do so unless God allows it.” He further gave an example from history, recalling the story of a bandit named Ratnakar during the time of Gautam Buddha, who would kill people and cut off their fingers. “If someone has power, it should be used to uplift others. Ruining someone is easy, but building someone is very difficult,” he explained.

Aditya Ojha

Ojha also clarified that he has never personally heard of Pawan Singh destroying anyone’s career. He emphasized again that ultimately, no one can harm another unless it is destined by God. His statement comes as a balanced response to long-standing rumors that Pawan Singh uses his influence against rivals. Meanwhile, Pawan Singh continues to remain active both in films and on television. He recently participated in the reality show Rise and Fall but left midway to focus on the Bihar elections. Despite his controversies, he remains one of the most popular faces in the Bhojpuri entertainment industry with a loyal fan base.

September 25, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Lilith Fair stage at The Gorge Amphitheatre at Grant County, Washington
TV & Streaming

Lilith Fair Doc Red Carpet Canceled Amid Kimmel Controversy

by jummy84 September 21, 2025
written by jummy84

As Disney contends with a major controversy involving its suspension of Jimmy Kimmel, its ABC News Studios division has canceled a red carpet for today’s premiere of its documentary Lilith Fair: Building a Mystery – The Untold Story.

ABC News Studios informed the press of the red carpet cancellation via email on Saturday night, a day before the event. “Please note this event will no longer be hosting a red carpet,” the email reads, per Variety. “We appreciate your willingness to attend and apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.”

That message also came just 24 hours after a confirmation email told reporters and photographers that Sarah McLachlan, Jewel, and Mýa would be walking the red carpet. The Ford in Hollywood will still host a premiere screening and surprise performances, according to the report.

ABC News Studios didn’t explain the red carpet cancellation, Variety adds, but the switch-up comes after days of outcry over ABC taking Jimmy Kimmel Live! off air over Kimmel’s comments about Charlie Kirk.

Amid mass outrage over the network’s silencing of Kimmel, social media users — including celebrities — are urging others to boycott Disney by canceling their Disney+, Hulu, and ESPN subscriptions. Tatiana Maslany, Misha Collins, and Wil Wheaton all promoted the subscription boycott, USA Today reports.

In unlucky timing for the Lilith Fair team, the documentary, directed by Ally Pankiw, premieres in the United States today on Hulu. The documentary draws from new interviews and 600 hours of footage to “[tell] the history of the groundbreaking music festival featuring only women artists, started by iconic Canadian singer-songwriter Sarah McLachlan and her team in the late 1990s, in opposition to systematic industry barriers that limited women from playing together on a concert bill and getting back-to-back airplay on the radio.”

Aside from McLachlan, Jewel, and Mýa, original Lilith Fair artists Bonnie Raitt, Sheryl Crow, Erykah Badu, Paula Cole, Natalie Merchant, Emmylou Harris, and the Indigo Girls are interviewed in the documentary, as well as Brandi Carlile and Olivia Rodrigo.

Lilith Fair: Building a Mystery – The Untold Story, Now Streaming, Hulu

September 21, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
A split image of Bill Maher and Jimmy Kimmel
TV & Streaming

Bill Maher Defends Kimmel While Reflecting on His 9/11 ABC Controversy

by jummy84 September 20, 2025
written by jummy84

Bill Maher is sharing his opinion on ABC’s decision to indefinitely preempt Jimmy Kimmel Live!, with his perspective as a fellow late night host who endured his own share of controversy while on air with the same network.

The Real Time host wasted no time addressing the suspension of Jimmy Kimmel’s show at the top of his monologue, where he started, “Well, I guess you all heard Jimmy Kimmel, my friend, my compatriot, he’s canned by ABC for comments he made about Charlie Kirk’s assassin.”

“The day right after [he made the comments], the head of the FCC said he’s gonna revoke ABC’s license,” Maher added. “Let me just tell you something: I am not intimidated by the FCC. And if President Trump is watching, I have one thing to say to you — have you lost weight?”

He then addressed his own controversy that arose in 2001 while hosting ABC’s Politically Incorrect.

“It was 24 years to the day that I made comments on ABC that got me canceled from that network, and Jimmy Kimmel took my slot at Politically Incorrect. Oh yes, I got canceled before cancel even had a culture,” he said. “This s*** ain’t new. It’s worse, we’ll get to that, but you know, ABC, they are steady. ABC stands for ‘Always Be Caving.’”

Maher defended Kimmel, noting, “Jimmy, pal, I am with you, I support you, and on the bright side, you don’t have to pretend anymore that you like Disneyland.” Later in his monologue, he showed him even more support, further referencing the end of his tenure with ABC.

“Jimmy, let me just say, you did a great, funny show for two decades,” Maher said. “You should be proud of that. If this firing goes for you the way it did for me, you’ll get 23 years on a better network.”

Maher faced a wave of backlash 24 years ago when he made remarks about the 9/11 hijackers under a week after the attacks occurred on an episode of ABC’s Politically Incorrect. The series was one of the first late now shows to return to air following the terrorist attacks, as the episode arrived on Sept. 17, 2001.

There, conservative commentator Dinesh D’Souza argued against the notion that the hijackers were “cowards,” stating, “Not true. Look at what they did. First of all, you have a whole bunch of guys who are willing to give their life. None of them backed out. All of them slammed themselves into pieces of concrete. These are warriors. And we have to realize that the principles of our way of life are in conflict with people in the world. And so — I mean, I’m all for understanding the sociological causes of this but we should not blame the victim. Americans shouldn’t blame themselves because other people want to bomb them.”

Maher responded, “But also, we should — we have been the cowards, lobbing cruise missiles from 2,000 miles away. That’s cowardly. Staying in the airplane when it hits the building, say what you want about it, it’s not cowardly.” Following his remarks, he issued an apology and ABC released a statement in support of Politically Incorrect.

The series was not pulled from air, though the show was canceled after the 01-02 season. A few months after the end of Politically Incorrect, ABC notably announced a new late night show with Kimmel.

Maher sat down with Joe Manchin and Alex Wagner during the panel segment of the Friday episode of Real Time, where he noted a past X post made my Charlie Kirk discussing free speech in the United States.

“Here’s the ultimate irony, though. Charlie Kirk said, ‘Hate speech does not exist legally in America.’ By the way, I’ve always been on the same page,” he started, before continuing to read Kirk’s post. “‘Hate speech does not exist legally in America,’ says Charlie Kirk. ‘There’s ugly speech. There’s gross speech. There’s evil speech. And all of it is protected by the First Amendment. Keep America free.’ Could you guys at least honor the person you’re insisting that we honor by honoring his words?”

Earlier in his monologue, Maher noted that he didn’t agree with Kimmel’s comments, but noted “he shouldn’t lose his job for it.” He also addressed the silence from The View panel on the matter.

“I gotta say, and I’m friendly with the ladies on The View, but they didn’t say anything about [Kimmel’s suspension] this week. Nothing,” he said. “You know, ’cause it’s never been their thing to weigh in on the issues. It’s just an upbeat party show, that’s why they hired people named Joy and Sunny and Whoopi.”

Maher continued, “Girls, go out strong, OK? It won’t kill you. I promise it’s happened to me, and I may go out after this show. We don’t know.” In tune with the heavy news cycle, he, too, tackled Trump’s lawsuit against The New York Times that was dismissed on Friday.

“Now, Trump is going after The New York Times. He sued them for $15 billion. He said they’re a ‘mouthpiece of the Democratic Party.’ You know what, Don? They are. You’re right, and that’s their right to be that,” he said. “Like there’s not a thousand people on the right who are your mouthpiece. Okay, that’s how we work in this country.”

Maher’s take on the preemption of Jimmy Kimmel Live! comes a day after many late night TV hosts — including Stephen Colbert, Jimmy Fallon and Seth Meyers — voiced their disapproval on the indefinite suspension. On Thursday night, most of the late night shows aired their first taped episode since ABC revealed their decision, where Colbert defended Kimmel.

Jimmy Kimmel Live! was “pre-empted indefinitely” by ABC on Wednesday shortly after Nexstar released a statement noting they would not air the planned episode and would preempt the long-running talk show for the foreseeable future. 

The backlash stemmed from Kimmel’s remarks about Tyler Robinson, the alleged shooter of Charlie Kirk. “We hit some new lows over the weekend with the MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from it,” Kimmel said.

Following Kimmel’s comments during his monologue, Federal Communications Commission chair Brendan Carr went on a podcast on Wednesday where he publicly spoke out against Kimmel and urged affiliates to “push back” on ABC. Later in the day, it was announced that Kimmel was suspended.

A source told The Hollywood Reporter Kimmel was planning to address the backlash on Wednesday night’s show, which was canceled. He prepared to explain what he said and how it was taken out of context. The source added that Kimmel did not intend to apologize.

David Letterman voiced his opinion on the suspension on Thursday during a panel at the Atlantic Festival. “I feel bad about this because we all see where this is going, correct? It’s managed media. And it’s no good. It’s silly. It’s ridiculous,” he said. “You can’t go around firing somebody because you’re fearful or trying to suck up to an authoritarian criminal administration in the Oval Office. That’s just not how this works.”

September 20, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Newer Posts
Older Posts

Social Connect

Facebook Twitter Instagram Pinterest Youtube Snapchat

Recent Posts

  • 2009 feels like a whole other world away

  • Watch Ariana Grande and Jimmy Fallon Perform a History of Duets

  • Spotify’s Joe Hadley Talks ARIA Awards Partnership

  • Nick Offerman Announces 2026 “Big Woodchuck” Book Tour Dates

  • Snapped: Above & Beyond (A Photo Essay)

Newsletter

Subscribe my Newsletter for new blog posts, tips & new photos. Let's stay updated!

Categories

  • Bollywood (1,929)
  • Celebrity News (2,000)
  • Events (267)
  • Fashion (1,605)
  • Hollywood (1,020)
  • Lifestyle (890)
  • Music (2,002)
  • TV & Streaming (1,857)

Recent Posts

  • Shushu/Tong Shanghai Fall 2026 Collection

  • Here’s What Model Taylor Hill Is Buying Now

  • Julietta Is Hiring An Assistant Office Coordinator In Dumbo, Brooklyn, NY (In-Office)

Editors’ Picks

  • 2009 feels like a whole other world away

  • Watch Ariana Grande and Jimmy Fallon Perform a History of Duets

  • Spotify’s Joe Hadley Talks ARIA Awards Partnership

Latest Style

  • ‘Steal This Story, Please’ Review: Amy Goodman Documentary

  • Hulu Passes on La LA Anthony, Kim Kardashian Pilot ‘Group Chat’

  • Hannah Einbinder Slams AI Creators As “Losers”

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

@2020 - celebpeek. Designed and Developed by Pro


Back To Top
celebpeek
  • Home
  • Bollywood
  • Hollywood
  • Lifestyle
  • Fashion
celebpeek
  • Music
  • Celebrity News
  • Events
  • TV & Streaming