Welcome to “Face It,” in which practitioners, dermatologists, facialists and other beauty experts answer our rapid-fire questions (quicker than you can say “just a few more units, please?”), revealing their hottest takes, most controversial opinions and the hard truths they wish their clients could …
Continue reading
Kim Kardashian has revealed that she believes the 1969 moon landing “didn’t happen” and was “faked”.
The reality star made the revelation during this week’s episode of The Kardashians, which aired on Thursday (October 30), during a conversation with Sarah Paulson, her co-star on the new legal drama series All’s Fair.
In the scene, we see Kardashian attempt to convince Paulson of the conspiracy by recounting a video in which astronaut Buzz Aldrin, who was the second man to walk on the moon as part of the Apollo 11 mission, allegedly admits he was part of faking the whole thing.
“This girl says, ‘What was the scariest moment?’,” Kardashian said. “And Aldrin goes, ‘There was no scary moment, because it didn’t happen. It could’ve been scary, but it wasn’t, because it didn’t happen.”
😅 Kim Kardashian tries to sway her “All’s Fair” costar Sarah Paulson that the 1969 Apollo 11 moon landing didn’t happen. https://t.co/tYTffUFo8u
🎥: Hulu pic.twitter.com/LbhYLzmXM7
— TMZ (@TMZ) October 30, 2025
Kardashian goes on to say she has been sending Paulson conspiracy videos “all the time”, and offered other “evidence” of the moon landing fake: “There’s no gravity on the moon – why is the flag blowing? The shoes that they have in the museum that they wore on the moon [have] a different print than the photos. Why are there no stars?”
When asked directly if she believes that man has not walked on the moon, she responded: “I don’t think we did. I think it was fake. I’ve seen a few videos [of] Buzz Aldrin talking about how it didn’t happen. He says it all the time now, in interviews.”
“They’re gonna say I’m crazy no matter what,” she added. “But like, go to TikTok. See for yourself.”
NASA conducted six successful manned moon landings between 1969 and 1972, with physical evidence including nearly 400kg of chemically distinct lunar rock samples being brought to Earth, and retroreflectors that were left on the Moon continuing to return laser beams to Earth today.
The seventh season of The Kardashians premiered on Hulu in the US and Disney+ in the UK on October 23 and will run up until the final episode on December 25. All’s Fair, meanwhile, which also stars Glenn Close, Naomi Watts and Teyana Taylor, will run for 10 episodes from November 4 to December 23 on the same networks.
Kardashian also recently revealed on the reality series that she has been diagnosed with a brain aneurysm, with footage showing her undergoing an MRI scan. She also spoke about her relationship with Kanye West, to whom she was married between 2014 and 2022 and with whom she shares four children. “I’m happy it’s over,” she said. “My ex will be in my life no matter what.”
As Outkast’s “Ms. Jackson” celebrates its 25th anniversary on Friday (Oct. 24), Erykah Badu revealed her doubts about being the muse behind the Billboard Hot 100 No. 1 hit.
Explore
See latest videos, charts and news
Badu joined Popcast for an interview earlier this week, where she discussed being the subject of hip-hop songs. While the neo-soul icon doesn’t think “Ms. Jackson” is about herself, her mother, Kolleen Gipson, certainly is taking credit.
“I don’t think ‘Ms. Jackson’ was actually about me. I don’t think so, but people say it,” she said. “[My mom] thinks it was about her. She got the bumper sticker and the airbrush t-shirt. I think it says, ‘Sorry, Ms. Jackson.’”
For years, there’s been fan speculation and theories that “Ms. Jackson” was an apology letter from André 3000 to Erykah Badu’s family following their split. The former couple dated from 1995 to 1999 and welcomed a son in 1997, Seven Sirius Benjamin.
“Ms Jackson” arrived about a year after the Three Stacks-Badu break-up, fueling rumors connecting the track’s content to their relationship. It was the second single on Outkast’s Stankonia album, which was released a week later on Halloween in 2000.
“Ms. Jackson” topped the Billboard Hot 100 and won a Grammy Award for best rap performance by a duo or a group. The anthem has stood the test of time over the course of a quarter-century and feels embedded in the DNA of pop music with an earworm of a chorus.
Watch the interview below. Talk about “Ms. Jackson” takes place just shy of the 30-minute mark.
Just days after taking over as editor-in-chief of CBS News, Bari Weiss has reportedly already rocked the boat with some of her staffers. The New York Times published a report on Sunday, October 19, about alleged tension between Weiss and the staff of 60 Minutes following a meeting on Tuesday, October 14.
Weiss reportedly asked the staff, “Why does the country think you’re biased?”
“The inquiry was met with stunned awkwardness, according to three people who recounted details from the private session in Midtown Manhattan,” Michael M. Grynbaum and Benjamin Mullin wrote in the New York Times piece. “The staff of 60 Minutes, the nation’s most-watched news program, view their coverage as firmly nonpartisan and reject criticism from President [Donald] Trump and his allies who argue that it has a liberal slant.”
President Trump sued CBS News’ parent company, Paramount Global, in 2024, claiming 60 Minutes deceptively edited an interview with Kamala Harris in her favor. Trump and Paramount Global reached a $16 million settlement earlier this year, which has brought the media company under much scrutiny.
Weiss just became the editor-in-chief of CBS News on October 6, but has wasted no time making waves. According to the NYT report, there has been a mixed reaction among CBS News staff to their new leader.
“Some staff members are hopeful that Ms. Weiss will bring some needed energy and ideas to a news division that has struggled to adapt to the digital age,” Grynbaum and Mullin added. “Her interest in big interviews and bigger audiences has buoyed some CBS journalists, who think their network, which has cycled through five presidents in five years, needs a shake-up.”
The journalists also reported that Weiss is “impressing” some top executives at CBS, while “confounding” others. Plus, they noted, she has already been personally involved in some interview bookings with subjects who are right-leaning.
“Ms. Weiss, an ardent supporter of Israel … helped book an interview with Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister,” the report said. “She later worked with 60 Minutes producers to land Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff, the architects of President Trump’s Middle East peace plan, for this Sunday’s episode.”
Sarah Jessica Parker sees Victoria’s Secret as a “fantasy”.
Sarah Jessica Parker attends the Victoria’s Secret Fashion Show
The 60-year-old actress was a guest at the Victoria’s Secret Fashion Show on Wednesday (15.10.25) and took a moment before the glitzy event to reflect on the impact the VS brand has had on her.
She told stylist Law Roach during the pre-show: “I probably have probably the same history with Victoria’s Secret that most civilians do which is it’s sort of this fantasy.
“And whether you fit in or not in reality kind of doesn’t matter.
“It’s a longtime brand that’s played a role in a lot of our lives for a really, really long time.”
The Sex And the City legend stepped out in a black Alexander Wang dress she bought “1,000 years ago”, pairing it with a Dolce and Gabbana jacket, and heels from her own shoe brand.
She joked she was “wearing nothing” for the event, describing her outfit as “pieces I’ve had in my closet forever”.
Sarah recently hinted she could still reprise her SATC character Carrie Bradshaw again in the future, despite seemingly saying farewell to her alter ego at the end of sequel series And Just Like That.
Asked about the decision to bring the series to a conclusion, Sarah told CBS Mornings: “I mean, I’m not certain I understand what that decision means, actually.
“Because I could just be on hiatus, you know.”
Sarah did not expand on what she meant with the “hiatus” suggestion but described the “difficult decision” she and showrunner Michael Patrick King made to finish And Just Like That… .
The Mars Attacks! star said: “Michael and I talked a lot about it, and I think it’s out of respect for this really singular professional experience that you have to consider what you want to do (and) have you done it.
“And sometimes it’s best to gracefully walk away when things feel really right and energetic, versus squeezing and exploiting people’s generosity and hospitality.”
Four years after her unceremonious exit from The Talk, Sharon Osbourne‘s late husband is calling out CBS from beyond the grave.
In Ozzy Osbourne‘s posthumous memoir Last Rites, now available after the Black Sabbath rocker died at age 76 in July, he claimed “they pushed Sharon out” from the show following an on-air argument with her co-hosts over her friend Piers Morgan.
“The person she is convinced set her up — and I ain’t gonna name names, ‘cos the last thing I want to do is stir all that shit up again — knew what they were doing, I think,” wrote Ozzy, according to Entertainment Weekly. “And Sharon, when she feels like she’s being cornered, she”s gonna come out fighting.”
After Sharon had it out with Sheryl Underwood over Morgan’s comments about Meghan Markle, which were perceived as racist, CBS launched an investigation into the exchange and put the show on hiatus before Sharon ultimately departed her seat weeks later.
“They pushed Sharon out,” wrote Ozzy. “Just a few weeks earlier, when Sharon had been in hospital with Covid, the same people had gone on Instagram to say ‘Mrs. O, we love you.’ What a bunch of phoneys.”
Sheryl Underwood, Carrie Ann Inaba, Sharon Osbourne, Sara Gilbert and Eve on ‘The Talk’ on Aug. 2, 2019
Cliff Lipson/CBS
Ozzy added that “the worst part” was people thinking Sharon was racist because of her association with Morgan. “I can tell you without any doubt, my wife is not a racist. It’s against everything she’s ever stood for. Anyone who’s spent more than five seconds with her knows that,” he wrote.
“The people she worked with on that show knew that,” added Ozzy. “To be stuck with that label, it was just f***ing wrong. Because you can never get a gig anywhere on TV once that’s what people think of you. It’s game over. They knew that when they took her down.”
Although Sharon “was devastated for a long while,” Ozzy said he admired how she “just lets it go and never talks about it again.”
“She’s an incredible woman, my wife,” added Ozzy. “As for The Talk, poetic justice was served in the end. It got f***ing cancelled.”
The Talk announced last November it was ending its 15-season run, airing its finale after 2,993 episodes the next month. Developed by Sara Gilbert, the daytime talk show debuted in 2010 with her and Osbourne among the original panel of co-hosts.
Margot Robbie is one of Hollywood’s most popular names. Long before starring in the 2023 box office giant Barbie, the Australia native made a name for herself as an actress and producer. It’s been two years since she graced the big screen, and she’s been busy raising her child, whom she welcomed with husband Tom Ackerley in late 2024. So, why do people think she attended the 2025 Emmys? Find out what we know here.
The 2025 Emmy Awards are currently streaming on Paramount+ for those who missed the live broadcast.
No, Margot was not nominated for an Emmy Award because she did not star in nor produce any of the Emmy-nominated TV series. Her latest television show, Sirens, premiered in May 2025, and could potentially be nominated for an Emmy at next year’s awards ceremony.
Margot Robbie
Photo by Tristan Fewings/Getty pic.twitter.com/kgyip5116E— JumpTrailers (@JumpTrailers) September 14, 2025
No, despite some confusion among fans, Margot did not attend the 2025 Emmy Awards. Two days before the ceremony took place in Los Angeles, the Aussie was in London to promote her new film, A Big Bold Beautiful Journey. The UK premiere was held at the Odeon Luxe Leicester Square, and she visited BBC Radio One to discuss the new movie. Margot was spotted walking into the radio show in a Chanel outfit.
It’s unclear why quite a few on the internet thought that Margot attended the 2025 Emmys, but since she’s one of the world’s most renowned actors, people likely hoped to get another glamorous sighting of the Barbie star.
After all, Margot made quite the fashion statement on the red carpet at the London premiere of A Big Bold Beautiful Journey. She wore a completely sheer beaded dress.
No — though Margot is one of the most lauded actors in the film business, she has not won an Emmy Award yet. The I, Tonya, star is mostly known for her performances in feature-length films. However, she got her start on the small screen in the Australian soap opera Neighbours, playing the role of Donna Freedman. She then appeared in Pan Am as Laura Cameron.
I agree with many commenters that this week’s “attacks” on the Prince and Princess of Wales are likely a temporary blip. They’ll be forgotten – or shelved – as soon as William and/or Kate jazz-hands their way through a public event. The women’s Rugby World Cup starts today, incidentally. It feels like some courtiers are probably suggesting an emergency appearance to quell the British press’s general unrest. It would be sort of funny if Will and Kate still refuse to go outside though, and god knows, they’ve dug in their heels before and refused to take advice. Anyway, let’s enjoy this moment while we have it. The Daily Mail’s columnists have been ripping into Will and Kate all week, and now it’s Robert Jobson’s turn to get some punches in.
Prince William is moving his family to a “forever home” in a bid to build happy memories after three tough years, The Sun exclusively revealed last week. However, according to an expert, the downsized monarchy could come at a huge price. Royal commentator and journalist Robert Jobson told The Sun’s Royal Exclusive show that the father-of-three should be ”careful” of what he wishes for. Chatting to The Sun’s Royal Editor Matt Wilkinson, Robert said that Prince William, 43, could ”become less connected to the people”.
“People do turn out when they see, particularly people like Sophie Wessex and the new Duke of Edinburgh, Prince Edward. They turn out in droves. They like that connection. And if you lose that connection, the monarchy actually loses something that it’s about. I think you’ve got to be careful what you wish for.”
But for the time being, as William is changing ”things the way he wants to”, the expert said fans of the Royal Family will just have to ”wait and see”.
William’s time to become the future King is still away – and in the meantime, Matt Wilkinson said, ”he’s very much focusing on his young family. Remember, Charles as King doesn’t have a very young family that he has to make sure he’s at home when they get back from school […] – that’s what William enjoys. ‘He enjoys the school run, and he wants to bring his children up in the countryside. ‘His life is very different to what King Charles’ is. ‘I know the late Queen Elizabeth II […], she worked extremely hard when she was bringing up her children, but that’s what William perhaps is choosing not to do. But it’s a different era as well.”
However, in Robert’s eyes, ”it’s not a question of choice – it’s a question of duty. I think that William has got to be quite careful whilst doing this balancing act.”
While Robert was understanding of the family going through ”a difficult time” and raising three kids, ”the role of the monarch is one where duty has to come first. I don’t think there’s any way around that unless you want to have a part-time monarch or a president. The reality is that is the job. It’s a job for life and it’s a job that’s pretty relentless.”
“I don’t think there’s any way around that unless you want to have a part-time monarch or a president…It’s a job for life and it’s a job that’s pretty relentless.” At this point, these people WISH they could get William and Kate to commit to being “part-time.” Here in America, part-time would mean working something like twenty hours a week. When was the last time William put in twenty hours of work in any given week? A tumbleweed just rolled by as I asked that question. So, never. When was the last time Kate put in twenty hours of work in a MONTH? Yeah.
Basically, I don’t buy that the roles of king or Prince of Wales are these “relentless” jobs which need a man’s undivided attention, and I completely reject the notion that William couldn’t do the fakakta school run AND work twenty hours a week. The idea that William has to “choose” is a false argument, and they know that too. It’s not that William is rejecting the idea of balancing royal work and fatherhood – it’s that he’s openly quiet-quitting and refusing to do the bare minimum, all while enjoying the perks and privileges of his position.
Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, Cover Images.
Featuring: William, Prince of Wales
Where: London, United Kingdom
When: 11 Sep 2024
Credit: PA Images/INSTARimages
**NORTH AMERICA RIGHTS ONLY**
Featuring: William, Prince of Wales
Where: Cranwell, United Kingdom
When: 12 Sep 2024
Credit: Cover Images
Featuring: William, Prince of Wales
Where: London, United Kingdom
When: 11 Sep 2024
Credit: PA Images/INSTARimages
**NORTH AMERICA RIGHTS ONLY**
There’s been some fascinating backlash to the Prince and Princess of Wales’s planned move to Forest Lodge. It’s reminded me, in a way, of the backlash to Kate’s “cancerfree” video last September. Within the video, Kate announced that she was now “cancerfree,” and then Kensington Palace tried to block reporters from using that word. The video itself was nonsensical, like a hazy commercial for an MAO inhibitor. At the time, I wondered why there was so much discontent over the video, then someone let the cat out of the bad – Buckingham Palace was very displeased with it, and sources close to King Charles noted that Charles and Camilla would never be filmed kissing each other on a beach because “it’s distinctly un-regal.” Another well-placed royal insider noted: “All that lying round, hugging and kissing – they’re not soppy teenagers. It felt manipulative. It’s the sort of thing that Meghan would make. All the time, effort and expense put into making the video could have been much better spent elsewhere. Why not visit other women being treated for cancer? That’s what Diana would have done.”
I bring that up because I feel like we’re just days away from finding Charles and Camilla’s fingerprints all over the backlash to Forest Lodge. Not that I even believe that C&C need to orchestrate anything at this point – royal reporters are clearly already furious with Will and Kate’s laziness and their office’s history of lies and obfuscation. But I wonder if C&C’s courtiers have given the go-ahead to attack. Speaking of, Marca reports that Charles thought the move to Forest Lodge was stupid from the word go.
The tension within the British Royal Family shows no signs of easing up, though this time it has nothing to do with Prince Harry. Instead, it’s Prince William and Kate Middleton who aren’t on the same page as King Charles III when it comes to picking their “forever home”.
While William and Kate are seemingly set on making the move, the decision hasn’t gone down well with King Charles. It isn’t the first time the King has disagreed with the couple over a move, as earlier reports suggested they were considering moving to Fort Belvedere but plans fell through.
The belief is that Charles doesn’t believe William and Kate need another property as they already have three – Kensington Palace, Anmer Hall and Adelaide Cottage. Charles feels that another move wouldn’t go down well with taxpayers and those opposed to the monarchy.
Despite Charles’ opposition, it looks as though Prince William is intent on going through with the move. As a result, two families are being evicted from their homes, which has raised eyebrows and created some bad publicity for the Prince and Princess of Wales.
Now faced with backlash, King Charles has no intention of getting involved in the matter, as he feels the situation could have been avoided had the couple listened to his advice.
My thing is… why did Charles and QEII make such a point of giving Will and Kate such a small house (Adelaide Cottage) in 2022? They were already begging for a much larger and grander property back in 2021-22. They were never going to be happy with Adelaide. Unless the whole point of Adelaide was William and Charles agreeing to sideline Kate and give her a separate, out-of-the-way cottage where William could come and go and his movements would be largely hidden. That being said, I absolutely believe that Charles thinks the move to Forest Lodge is stupid as hell, and he probably did warn them that they were inviting backlash.
Photos courtesy of Avalon Red.
