Tag:

Faces

Trump Faces Apparition in Halloween Episode
TV & Streaming

Trump Faces Apparition in Halloween Episode

by jummy84
written by jummy84

In the latest entry into the sporadic but pretty great South Park Halloween episode canon, creators and showrunners did not present a traditional Halloween episode centered around the holiday, but a biting and spooky satire of the Trump administration and suggests some otherworldly repercussions for the very real demolition of the White House’s East Wing.

The situation for Stan Marsh and his family is getting grim: the four have been living in a motel since Tegredy Farms went kaput earlier in the season, and now they will be moving in with a very unwilling Grandpa Marsh in his assisted living home. Stan is not pleased and is looking for a way out of there, like now.

In Washington, D.C., we find lovebirds President Trump and Satan gazing on as the East Wing of the White House is bulldozed and destroyed. But Satan, it seems was misinformed by his beau and thinks the construction is for a nursery for their little bundle of Antichrist, who, looking at the size of Satan’s bump, will arrive soon. Putting their domestic argument aside, they are off to the Oval Office to attend a security briefing.

In the meeting, they learn that someone might be trying to stop the baby from being born — and three characters are, in fact, doing that exact thing: Peter Thiel, who is hellbent on stopping the Antichrist; Vice President J.D. Vance, who wants a happy Trump for his nefarious career ladder climb; and Trump in the Oval Office meeting. United States Attorney General Pam Bondi is told she has human shit literally on her nose as she lays on the brown nosing to Trump, assuring him that there is no way this will happen to the greatest president of all time. 

But the bombshell comes when it’s revealed that by demolishing the East Wing of the White House, the Trump administration has unleashed some sort of vengeful supernatural wrath. The president explains that he’s been noticing a creeping feeling and seeing what looks like a woman in a hat appearing in the mirror and the hallway.

Back at South Park Elementary, Stan is at his wits’ end after spending too much time in the facility with his family. After grousing about it with the boys, he then breaks the fourth wall in what turns into a biting satire on the crypto space and ushers in the return of Kyle’s relative, the nerdy and wheezing Cousin Kyle Schwartz as the crypto scam’s money man. Let’s let Stan explain phase one of his scheme. 

“How many weeks has it been now, dealing with one stupid thing after another?” Stan says to the show’s audience (and is talking about the show here, in case you don’t catch on). “The truth is, I think a lot of people are afraid to admit it. Yeah, everyone knows South Park sucks now and it’s because all this political stuff is being totally bogged down in it. Remember when we used to do stuff, ever since all this political crap took over.”

He’s maybe right. Here’s more.

At 1600, the president continues to see something appearing in the mirror and the hallway of the White House. Viewers then get to see the South Park rendering of Trump in the shower, micropenis on full display. As he towels himself off, what appears to be a woman with a hat is again in the room. But who is she and what does she want?

To expose the truth, it seems. After a grotesque rendering of Trump advisor Stephen Miller allows Cousin Kyle into the White House for a meeting with Donald Trump Jr. to do some cryptoscamming, or “take a big dump” on investors — something Trump the younger says he loves through an unending grin — the entire Trump administration, or at least the ones we’ve seen depicted on the show over this and last season, are conducting a seance led by an even more shit-nosed Bondi.

Bondi (with the shit now all over her face), is leading the seance and quickly becomes a conduit for whatever the spirit or entity haunting Trump’s White House wants to say. It has something to do with “lies,” which are being told by a man. Bondi, speaking for the apparition, mumbles something about “Epstein” — which Trump quickly shouts down. “He lies… corruption… lies…” Bondi garbles, speaking for the ghost. 

Suddenly, Cousin Kyle breaks down as he runs out of the room. He can’t take it anymore, the apparition is right, crypto is a scam, and he’s ashamed of what he’s been doing. It allows the rich to launder money and get richer, he confesses while sobbing. Trump and his gang of administrators remain silent as the episode closes and it’s back to the status quo… at least for now. 

Alls well that ends well this Halloween episode, which didn’t have any real Halloween included. Except for Stan, who is tragically is back at the assisted living facility at episode’s end.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Aaron Levin, Shaan Mirshra and Morgan Walker
TV & Streaming

Reigning Champ Faces a Tough Challenge From Former Reality Show Contestant

by jummy84
written by jummy84

Management consultant Shaan Mirshra returned to defend his title of Jeopardy! champion after beating Tom Devil in last Friday’s showdown. The Carmel, Indiana, resident returns to the podium with a one-day total of $15,600. Will he add to his winnings, or will a new contestant steal his title?

On Monday, October 27, Mishra faced off against Morgan Walker, a marketing director from Glenwood Springs, Colorado, and Aaron Levine, a sports anchor from Seattle, Washington. If Levine looks familiar, it’s because he previously competed on the reality series Dream Job, where he came in second place.

Will they have what it takes to topple the champ?

Ken Jennings welcomed back Mishra and told the anecdote about the young contestant getting the call to be on Jeopardy! while he was on a 17-country backpacking trip. “Quite a Jeopardy! journey for Shaan so far,” commented the host.

Mishra started the game with “Rainforest Meet Desert” for $1,000, which offered the clue: “Much of Eastern Washington is deserty scablands; Out west, this rainforest-filled national park lies on the same-name peninsula.” Levine buzzed in first with the correct answer, “What is Olympic?,” giving him the lead.

Just two clues in and Levine found the first Daily Double of the game under “Final Resting Places” for $800. Wagering $1,000 on the clue, “Levallois-Perret Cemetery is where this civil engineer known as the ‘Magician of Iron’ came to rest after his 1923 death,” Levine got the right answer with Gustave Eiffel. With that correct answer, Levine was able to jump into an early lead.

By the first break, Levine was ahead with $4,400 and Walker was next with $2,000, while champ Mishra was in third with $1,800.

During the anecdote section of the game, Walker talked about her mountain home, where her neighbors are “a river, and a Wendy’s,” which makes her abode a favorite destination for the local bear population. Levine talked about his job as a local sportscaster, and how he was stoked with Jennings reposted one of his commentaries. And Mishra talked about his early entrepreneurial days, when he started a pop-up restaurant while in college that boasted a four-course tasting menu. “I think I set off smoke alarms in six different kitchens in my life,” said the champ. “But I accept no responsibility!”

By the end of the first round of Jeopardy!, Levine was in the lead with $7,200, champ Mishra was second with $4,000, and Walker was in third with $2,200.

In the Double Jeopardy round, Leven found the second Daily Double of the game in the category of “A Bit O’ Lit” for $1,600. The clue was: “A group of 10 young people head to a country villa to escape the plague afflicting Florence in this 14th-century work.” With a wager of $5,000 on his total of $9,200, Levine answered correctly, “The Decameron.” His total surged to $14,200, placing him well ahead of Walker, who had $2,200, and Mishra, whose total was $4,000.

Just three clues later, Mishra found the third and final Daily Double under “Czech Yourself” for $1,600. The clue was, “If you’re gonna defenestrate, do it in Prague, site of them in 1419, 1483 & 1618, the proximate cause of this conflict.” Betting $4,000 against his $6,000 total, Mishra answered incorrectly with Crimean War (the correct answer was the Thirty Years’ War). This plummetted the champ to third place with a $2,000 total, as Walker had a pot of $2,2000 and Levine was in first with a healthy $15,500.

Going into Final Jeopardy, Levine was in the lead with $14,600, Walker moved to second with $10,200, and champ Mishra was in third with $4,800.

The Final Jeopardy category was “On The Map” with the clue: “An official American Viticultural Area spanning multiple states includes this eastern island where you’ll find the town of Chilmark.” Walker lost  with her answer, “What is Long Island?” She bet almost her entire pot with a wager of $10,198, leaving her with $2. Both Mishra and Levine got the right answer with, “What is Martha’s Vineyard?” Mishra bet $4,000, bringing his total to $8,800, which was not enough to hold on to his title as Levine wagered $6,000, marking his total at $20,600.

And with that, Jeopardy! has a new champion with Aaron Levine.

Jeopardy!, weekdays, check local listings, stream next day on Hulu and Peacock

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Anushka Sharma
Bollywood

‘Men’s Egos Need Women To Blame’: Fans Defend Anushka Sharma After She Faces Backlash Over Virat Kohli’s ODI Ducks

by jummy84
written by jummy84

Recently, an Indian cricketer registered consecutive ODI ducks against Australia for the first time in his career, and his wife, actress Anushka Sharma, is once again facing unwarranted criticism. Since Virat Kohli and Anushka made their relationship public and later married in 2017, she has often been blamed for his on-field struggles. Despite years passing, social media trolls continue targeting her after Virat’s recent failures, holding her responsible for his performance. However, Anushka’s supporters have strongly defended her, condemning the unfair backlash and emphasising that an athlete’s performance should never be linked to their partner’s personal life or presence.

Virat Kohli Fans Hold Anushka Sharma Responsible for Consecutive Ducks

A quick search for Anushka’s name on social media reveals countless memes and posts unfairly linking her to Virat’s performance. Many of these posts carry captions such as: “I blame Anushka Sharma for his failure,” and “Virat Kohli is a living example of how having a wrong partner can completely destroy your career. He might feel better about being turned into a “gentleman”. But it came at what cost?” Several others also blamed her for somehow doing ‘irreparable damage’ to his career. One horrendously even wished for her death, writing, “If God is real she died today in London.”

Anushka Sharma

Anushka Sharma’s Fans Rally to Defend Her

However, Anushka’s fans were quick to push back, calling out the blatant misogyny behind such remarks. Many took to social media to defend her dignity and denounce the unfair blame. One Threads user commented, “It’s cute how men’s fragile egos need a woman to blame every time their favorite player has a bad day.” Another pointed out, “That girl has been getting trolled since their dating era. These people just want to blame others for the poor performance of their favs.” One X user wrote, “Shame on Kohli fans for dragging his wife Anushka Sharma after his second consecutive duck.”

Virat Kohli and Anushka Sharma

Some fans have speculated that the growing scrutiny could be one reason Virat and Anushka decided to move their family to London. For those unaware, the couple tied the knot in 2017 after years of dating and are proud parents to daughter Vamika and son Akaay. Known for valuing their privacy, they prefer to keep their personal life away from the spotlight. Anushka, who was last seen in the 2018 film Zero, has not announced any new projects since her much-anticipated sports drama Chakda ‘Xpress was reportedly shelved, leaving fans eagerly awaiting her return to the screen.

Notable couple Virat and Anushka

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
'Didn't Expect This': Diljit Dosanjh Faces Backlash For 'Cheap' 'Kufar' Moves; Singer Responds
Bollywood

‘Didn’t Expect This’: Diljit Dosanjh Faces Backlash For ‘Cheap’ ‘Kufar’ Moves; Singer Responds

by jummy84
written by jummy84

Diljit Dosanjh, the global music icon and beloved actor, has found himself at the center of an unexpected controversy. Fresh off the monumental success of his album Ghost, the artist is facing a wave of sharp criticism for his latest music video, “Kufar,” which co-stars former Miss World, Manushi Chhillar. While the song is climbing the charts, a significant portion of his fanbase has taken to social media to “troll” the star, labeling the video’s dance steps as “vulgar,” “cheap,” and “obscene.”

The song, a standout track from the Ghost album, dropped recently and immediately garnered massive attention, not only for its catchy tune but also for the sizzling chemistry between Dosanjh and Chhillar. The video features the two in a stylish, intimate setting, engaging in choreography that is a departure from Diljit’s more conservative public persona. Almost immediately, the comment sections on YouTube and Instagram became a battleground, splitting his audience into two distinct camps.


On one side, thousands of fans are celebrating the song, praising its international “vibe” and addictive quality. Comments like, “Song on loop,” “What a vibe,” and “Their chemistry is just wow,” flooded the release. Manushi Chhillar’s glamorous appearance also received widespread appreciation. For this segment of the audience, “Kufar” is another successful experiment from an artist who is fearlessly blending his Punjabi roots with global music trends, similar to his acclaimed performances at Coachella.

However, a vocal and seemingly betrayed segment of his audience has expressed profound disappointment. These viewers, many of whom have followed Diljit since his early days, feel the video’s intimate choreography crosses a line. The backlash is pointed, with users deploying strong language to voice their disapproval. “This is too vulgar,” one user commented, while another stated, “Very cheap… so much vulgarity.”

The criticism appears to stem from a perceived clash with the “humble” and “decent” image that Diljit Dosanjh has carefully cultivated over the years. Fans felt the video was a step too far, with one writing, “Diljit paaji, didn’t expect this from you.” Another user lamented what they see as a decline in his content quality, commenting, “He’s lost his mind… He used to be so humble…” This sentiment suggests a feeling of betrayal, as if their idol has “sold out” his wholesome image for mainstream, edgy success.

This controversy highlights the precarious tightrope Diljit Dosanjh walks. As his stardom has exploded internationally, his artistic expression has evolved. Yet, his core fanbase, which fell in love with his down-to-earth personality and more traditional portrayals, expects a certain code of conduct. The “Kufar” video seems to have directly challenged those expectations.

The timing of the video’s release is also significant. Dosanjh and Chhillar are set to star opposite each other in the highly anticipated upcoming Punjabi film, Jatt & Juliet 3. The “Kufar” video was likely intended to build hype and showcase their on-screen chemistry ahead of the film’s release. While it has certainly generated buzz, it has also sparked a debate about the star’s evolving brand.

As Diljit Dosanjh continues to conquer new global arenas, from The Tonight Show to mainstream Bollywood, “Kufar” serves as a stark reminder of the cultural and personal expectations tied to his fame. The song is undeniably a musical hit, but the debate it has ignited proves that for his fans, Diljit is more than just a musician — he’s a cultural icon, and they are holding him accountable for the image he projects.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Teyana Taylor & Leonardo DiCaprio's Film 'One Battle After Another' Faces Massive $100 Million Box Office Loss Despite Critical Praise
Celebrity News

Teyana Taylor & Leonardo DiCaprio’s Film ‘One Battle After Another’ Faces Massive $100 Million Box Office Loss Despite Critical Praise

by jummy84
written by jummy84

Teyana Taylor & Leonardo DiCaprio’s Film ‘One Battle After Another’ Faces Massive $100 Million Box Office Loss Despite Critical Praise

Leonardo DiCaprio and Teyana Taylor’s new film “One Battle After Another” is being hailed by viewers but it’s struggling to make its money back.

Directed by Paul Thomas Anderson, the Warner Bros. drama reportedly cost around $130 million to produce and another $70 million to promote. So far, it’s earned about $140 million worldwide, falling short of what’s needed to turn a profit.

“These prestige-type movies have failed to create a sense of FOMO among audiences,” says Fandango box office analyst Shawn Robbins in a statement to Variety. Warner Bros. pushed back on reports of a $100 million loss, saying, “Films across the studio’s slate, including ‘One Battle After Another,’ have achieved financial reward in 2025 with more than $4 billion earned to date.”

Despite the numbers, “One Battle After Another” is generating major Oscar buzz for its emotional storytelling and standout performances by DiCaprio and Taylor.

Did y’all go catch this action flick?


0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
De De Pyaar De 2: Familiar Chaos With Fresh Faces | Glamsham.com
Lifestyle

De De Pyaar De 2: Familiar Chaos With Fresh Faces | Glamsham.com

by jummy84
written by jummy84

The trailer for De De Pyaar De 2 dropped today, bringing back Ajay Devgn as the charmingly awkward Ashish Mehra — now ready to win over his girlfriend Ayesha Khurana’s family. The sequel to the 2019 hit sees Devgn paired once again with Rakul Preet Singh, alongside R. Madhavan, who steps in as Ayesha’s father Dev. What follows is a comic clash between two men closer in age that neither would like to admit, setting up a series of awkward, witty, and competitive exchanges between their families.

Visually and tonally, DDPD2 stays true to the original — a mix of light romance and situational comedy. The humour feels understated, with one standout moment being Devgn’s signature half-exit from a moving car — a gag that lands purely on timing and restraint. Another noticeable moment comes when Meezaan Jafri rides across two jeeps — a clear nod to Devgn’s legendary debut stunt. It’s meant as a tribute, but the déjà vu is hard to ignore. The repetition of this shot, now a recycled trademark across multiple films, makes even the screenplay feel a bit typecast — playful, yes, but lacking novelty.

With Luv Ranjan backing (story) the project, expectations naturally run high. His brand of urbane, relationship-driven humour has a loyal fan base, and the hope is that the film packs more energy and surprise than what the teaser hints at.

Interestingly, De De Pyaar De 2 arrives close on the heels of Sunny Sanskari Ki Tulsi Kumari, another film in Ranjan’s familiar “rom-com with bite” space. Whether this one hits the same sweet spot remains to be seen. Fans will find out when the film releases on November 14, 2025 — Children’s Day — a fitting date for a story about family approval, second chances, and age-defying love.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Vicious: Dakota Fanning Faces A Terrifying Psychological Mystery In Paramount’s Upcoming Thriller | Glamsham.com
Lifestyle

Vicious: Dakota Fanning Faces A Terrifying Psychological Mystery In Paramount’s Upcoming Thriller | Glamsham.com

by jummy84
written by jummy84

According to the official production notes from Paramount Pictures, Vicious is an upcoming psychological horror film starring Dakota Fanning as Polly, a woman whose life spirals into terror after receiving a mysterious box from a stranger late one night. The only instruction that comes with it is chillingly simple: place three things inside, something you need, something you hate, and something you love.

While the premise sounds deceptively small, what unfolds is far from ordinary. As Polly follows the instructions, her world begins to twist in disturbing ways. Reality fractures, memories blur, and she finds herself in an ever-tightening web of psychological horror. What begins as curiosity soon turns into survival as Polly faces not only an external evil but also the darkness within her own mind.

The film is directed by Bryan Bertino, known for The Strangers, and produced by Richard Suckle and Bertino himself. The supporting cast includes Kathryn Hunter, Mary McCormack, Rachel Blanchard, Devyn Nekoda, Klea Scott, and Emily Mitchell, each playing a part in what is rumored to be a story full of tension and emotional depth.

Though we do not know the full scope of the plot yet, Vicious is being described as a psychological descent that plays with the ideas of guilt, grief, and the human need for control. Early discussions around the project suggest that it may rely more on atmosphere and emotion than traditional jump scares, making it one of the most anticipated thrillers of the season.

Vicious releases on October 10, 2025, and will remain in theaters through early 2026. Based on available information, it appears to combine Bryan Bertino’s signature psychological tension with Dakota Fanning’s emotional range, setting the stage for a gripping and haunting cinematic experience.

Based on official Paramount Pictures production notes and publicly available information.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Aryan Khan Series Controversy: Sameer Wankhede's Family Faces Online Abuse! | Glamsham.com
Lifestyle

Aryan Khan Series Controversy: Sameer Wankhede’s Family Faces Online Abuse! | Glamsham.com

by jummy84
written by jummy84

Ex-Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB) zonal director Sameer Wankhede has sued Red Chillies Entertainment and Netflix for defamation over the scandalous series The Ba*ds of Bollywood, which he says portrays him in a bad light. The co-created show by Aryan Khan has caused big controversy upon release, with Wankhede claiming that the satire aims not only at him but also demeans the efforts of those who battle drug abuse.

Wankhede had asserted that he had moved the Delhi High Court on his own and not as a government official. “My personal opinion is that there is no relation between my profession or my job and this,” he said, declining further comment on the legal case since it is sub judice.

Wankhede also disclosed that the backlash has moved beyond criticism with hate messages reaching his family from outside India. “We have frequently reported the threats given to my sister and my wife by the police on a regular basis. I will not accept the fact that because of me, they have to bear the brunt of it,” he said, showing alarm over the increasing online abuse faced by his loved ones from nations like Pakistan, the UAE, and Bangladesh.

In reply to the criticism, Aryan Khan came to the defense of the series, saying the show was meant to be satirical, not a documentary. “We were taking liberties with it for screen, naturally, but naturally, there’ll be things that are inspired. There’ll be scenes that are inspired by certain realities, and there’ll be exaggerations,” Aryan said, further adding, “If you don’t like it, the show is not meant for you.”

He admitted there were some scenes that invited internal arguments on the sets, but stood firm on his creative position. “We did receive some notes on some scenes where they were like, ‘Oh, this is too this, or this is too that,’ but then I took a stand,” Aryan said.

Also Read: The Ultimate Comeback Story! This Actor’s Journey from Reality TV to Starring in Aryan Khan’s The Bads Of Bollywood

The Delhi High Court has also heard Wankhede’s complaint and issued summons to Red Chillies Entertainment, Netflix, X Corp, Google, Meta, and others. The next date for hearing is October 30.

The Ba*ds of Bollywood stars an ensemble cast of Bobby Deol, Lakshya, Raghav Juyal, Anya Singh, Manoj Pahwa, and Sahher Bambba, with special guest appearances by Shah Rukh Khan, Salman Khan, Aamir Khan, Disha Patani, and S. S. Rajamouli.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Aneet Padda Faces Backlash Over Hurting Religious Sentiment In Resurfaced Video
Bollywood

Aneet Padda Faces Backlash Over Hurting Religious Sentiment In Resurfaced Video

by jummy84
written by jummy84

Aneet Padda, the rising star who recently captivated audiences with her performance in the blockbuster film “Saiyaara,” has found herself embroiled in controversy. An old video of the actress has resurfaced online, sparking a heated debate and accusations of hurting religious sentiments. The clip, which has been widely circulated on social media, shows Padda singing a well-known Urdu poem, “Lab Pe Aati Hai Dua,” in a lighthearted and song-like manner. This has led to a divided response, with some criticizing her for what they perceive as disrespect, while others have come to her defense, offering a different perspective on the matter.

The video, which appears to have been filmed before her recent surge in fame, captures a candid moment of Padda with a friend. In the clip, she is seen enjoying herself while singing the verses of the poem, which was penned by the famed poet Muhammad Iqbal in 1902. While many viewers found the video to be a harmless and joyful expression, a segment of the online community took offense, accusing the actress of mocking a significant piece of Urdu literature that is often recited in schools and holds cultural importance.

The backlash was swift, with numerous social media users expressing their disappointment and anger. Comments flooded in, with many stating that Padda’s actions were inappropriate and insensitive. One user wrote, “Duniya mein gaane kam padh rahe the kya jo naat pe naach gaa rahe ho?” (“Were there not enough songs in the world that you had to sing and dance to a naat?”). Another comment read, “This is very bad. Shame on her.” The criticism largely stemmed from the belief that the poem is a “naat,” a form of devotional poetry in praise of the Prophet Muhammad, and that treating it in a casual manner was disrespectful to Muslim sentiments.

However, the narrative is not one-sided. A significant number of people have come forward to defend the “Saiyaara” actress, clarifying the nature of the poem and Padda’s intentions.

Many have pointed out that “Lab Pe Aati Hai Dua” is not a religious naat but rather a poem that is widely taught in schools across the subcontinent as a “bache ki dua,” or a child’s prayer. One supporter clarified, “She is not making fun of Muslim naat. What @aneetpadda_ and her friend are making fun of is called bache ki dua by Muhammad Iqbal. It’s a form of poetic dua/prayer. It’s recited in schools mostly.”

Others have echoed this sentiment, emphasising that the poem’s universal themes of hope and aspiration transcend any single religion. “This is just poetry,” commented one user, while another urged for calm, writing, “Don’t Be Misguided Guys No Hate For Her ❤️.” The debate has highlighted a cultural and linguistic nuance, with the distinction between a “naat” and a “dua” being a key point of contention.

This controversy comes at a time when Aneet Padda’s career is on a steep upward trajectory. Her debut in “Salaam Venky” (2022) was followed by a role in “Big Girls Don’t Cry,” but it was her lead role opposite Ahaan Panday in “Saiyaara” that catapulted her to nationwide fame. The film’s immense success has made her a household name, and this recent incident marks her first significant brush with public scrutiny.

The resurfaced video and the ensuing debate serve as a reminder of the complexities of fame in the digital age, where past actions can be brought to light and subjected to intense public examination. While the controversy has certainly cast a shadow, it has also opened up a dialogue about cultural understanding and the interpretation of art and literature. As the discussion continues, it remains to be seen how this will impact the promising career of one of Bollywood’s newest stars.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Deepika Padukone-Ranveer Singh Reignite On-Screen Magic In New Ad
Bollywood

Deepika Padukone Faces Backlash Over Abu Dhabi Tourism Ad Attire, Fans Comes To Rescue

by jummy84
written by jummy84

Bollywood star Deepika Padukone found herself embroiled in social media controversy after appearing in a promotional video for Abu Dhabi tourism alongside her husband, Ranveer Singh. The actress drew criticism and was trolled for wearing a hijab and abaya in a segment of the advertisement, which quickly ignited a debate online.

The ad, which unveiled Deepika and Ranveer as brand ambassadors for “Experience Abu Dhabi,” showcased the couple exploring various landmarks in the city. Padukone was seen dressed in traditional Arab attire, including the abaya and a head covering, while visiting a mosque. This sartorial choice sparked a wave of negativity from some users on social media, accusing her of various things.

However, the trolling was immediately met with strong support and a swift defense from her loyal fanbase, who mobilized across various platforms to clap back at the negativity and shield the actress.

Fans Come To Support Deepika- Ranveer

Deepika’s supporters lauded her for displaying respect for another culture and took immense pride in her gesture. Many pointed out the clear context for the attire, stressing that covering one’s head and wearing modest clothing is a requirement for tourists, both male and female, when visiting religious sites like the Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque in Abu Dhabi.

“Let me clarify every tourist who visits Sheikh Zayad Masjid both males and females have to wear decent clothes and women to cover their heads. Many Christian celebrities, too, cover their heads. So stop making issue,” one fan explained, dismantling the basis of the criticism.

Another user drew a parallel to cultural expectations within India: “As Indians we need not show insecurity about everything. She is covering her head just like we would expect foreign tourists to wear decent clothes in our temples.” This sentiment was echoed by those who highlighted that the couple has always dressed appropriately when visiting Indian places of worship, such as the Siddhi Vinayak temple. “Mosque is a worship place just like temple so obviously she would wear clothes appropriately??” a comment read, suggesting the backlash was baseless.

Many fans focused on the professional context of the ad, arguing that as actors, Deepika and Ranveer were simply doing their job, which involved portraying cultural experiences relevant to the region they were promoting. One supporter declared, “In the tourism commercial she is wearing what is appropriate for that culture. You should be proud of someone who can go to any country and be respectful.”

The broader consensus among her defenders was that the backlash stemmed from a desire to spread negativity and hate against a successful individual. Some users dismissed the uproar as a “controversy” manufactured by “lame-a** people criticising her because she’s successful,” and declared that “No hate train can ever make me hate you.”

Other fans simply expressed admiration for the star’s look, with one writing, “She’s definitely the most beautiful woman I’ve ever seen in hijab,” and another sharing, “Their respect for Arab cultures and her wearing the hijab increases my love for her.”

Abu Dhabi Partnership Details

The tourism campaign was officially launched on a Monday, announcing both Deepika and Ranveer as the new faces of “Experience Abu Dhabi.” In a statement about the partnership, Ranveer said, “Abu Dhabi is the ultimate family hotspot… I now get to experience this journey with my wife who joins in as a brand ambassador, Deepika.”

Deepika herself expressed her enthusiasm, adding, “Travel is always more meaningful when it is with the people you love… I cannot wait to travel, explore, and experience everything this beautiful city has to offer.” The couple’s appearance in the ad, including Deepika’s brief wearing of the traditional attire, was part of showcasing the diverse experiences Abu Dhabi provides.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Newer Posts
Older Posts