celebpeek
  • Home
  • Bollywood
  • Hollywood
  • Lifestyle
  • Fashion
celebpeek
  • Music
  • Celebrity News
  • Events
  • TV & Streaming
Home » TV & Streaming » Page 70
Category:

TV & Streaming

Coronation Street's Channique Sterling-Brown opens up on ITV soap exit
TV & Streaming

Coronation Street’s Channique Sterling-Brown opens up on ITV soap exit

by jummy84 October 18, 2025
written by jummy84

Fans of Coronation Street were devastated to hear that Channique Sterling-Brown would be stepping down from her role of Dee-Dee Bailey after three years.

The popular character was a fan-favourite, and Sterling-Brown also won the award for Best Newcomer at the British Soap Awards in 2023.

But the decision to leave was Sterling-Brown’s, who explained why to press including RadioTimes.com.

“I made the decision in spring, and it wasn’t a rash decision,” Sterling-Brown explained. “I took a couple of months from being offered my next year’s contract to actually even respond. I felt really torn but I just had the sense that it was time.

“I’m very led by my faith, so I really took my time over it and prayed into it, and I found a real sense that I had done what I’d come to do, I’d achieved what I was sent here to do, so it was time to be brave.”

Speaking about the future, the actress said she wants to explore her career and take on new challenges.

“I’m going in with an open mind because I’m relatively young,” Sterling-Brown said. “I would love to get on the stage again. Telly is amazing, but it’s such a different experience to being on the stage.

“I’d love to do a film, I’d love to do a drama, I’d love to do more comedy. It’s such a big industry out there. I don’t really have a wish list, but I do have private ambitions, which I’ll keep.”

As for beloved Dee-Dee, Sterling-Brown remained tight-lipped on her final storyline, only spilling that “how it ends is right for her journey”.

No air date has been confirmed for Dee-Dee’s final episode.

Read more:

Visit our dedicated Coronation Street page for all the latest news, interviews and spoilers.

Add Coronation Street to your watchlist on the Radio Times: What to Watch app – download now for daily TV recommendations, features and more.

Check out more of our Soaps coverage or visit our TV Guide and Streaming Guide to find out what’s on. For more TV recommendations and reviews, listen to The Radio Times Podcast.

October 18, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
'The Rainmaker' Stars Answer Our Burning Questions About That Finale
TV & Streaming

‘The Rainmaker’ Stars Answer Our Burning Questions About That Finale

by jummy84 October 18, 2025
written by jummy84

[Warning: The following post contains MAJOR spoilers for The Rainmaker finale.]

Case closed! There were some big surprises in store in The Rainmaker‘s finale, even for those who might’ve read John Grisham‘s novel of the same name or watched the cinematic adaptation to know how the trial might end. To break down the biggest moments and find out the answer to some of our most burning questions, TV Insider caught up with the cast and creatives to dish on all the spoilers.

First, a brief recap of events. Melvin Pritcher (Dan Fogler), after talking to Rudy Baylor (Milo Callaghan), agreed to testify in the civil trial against the hospital. After all, he wasn’t going to get out of facing prison time for his crimes, no matter what, but at least this would give him an opportunity to get even with the people responsible for his own mother’s death in the house fire. In his testimony, which was allowed as a rebuttal witness account to the doctor’s cause of death assessment, he admitted to murdering multiple patients, including the son of Rudy’s client. Things went off the rails, though, when he leaped across the room to attack Leo Drummond (John Slattery).

Sarah Plankmore (Madison Iseman) was deeply upset by what happened — not because her client had actively concealed serial murders but because of the attack on Leo. She didn’t waver from her commitment to her client, even under pressure from Rudy, who ultimately admitted he was wrong about her.

At the same time, Brad Noonan (Wade Briggs) faced the very real consequences of doing Leo’s dirty work. After being cornered by the FBI, he then confronted Leo, who quickly surmised he was wearing a wire and refused to say anything that could incriminate himself. He’ll leave Brad holding that bag. Upon learning of this, Sarah approved of Leo’s move, saying, “Somebody’s blood has to end up on the floor, right?”

She also encouraged Wilfred Keeley (Hugh Quarshie) to testify, and he asked her to handle his cross-examination. During the direct, Rudy got Keeley to admit that he was the only person with access to the Narpans machine code to delete the records and that they were erased the day after he learned of Jackie Lemaczyk’s complaint about Pritcher. On cross, though, Sarah found a way to throw Brad under the bus for it, pointing out that he would’ve had access to the master codes as his attorney, too.

Christopher Barr / USA Network

With Bruiser (Lana Parrilla) now encouraging Rudy to rest the case, he had a different idea; he decided to call Leo on the stand. Though Rudy got in some good shots — chiefly, airing out his mantra that “the truth is not your client” — the biggest effect was that Leo then had to sit out the case and let Sarah finish the defense. She, of course, rose to the occasion and delivered a poignant and thoughtful closing argument to discredit the witnesses. However, when the jury verdict came in, Dot Black (Karen Bryson) prevailed with a massive, multi-million dollar verdict. Dot then pledged to use the money to create treatment centers, Rudy bought the bar he used to work out, and Deck (P.J. Byrne) decided to try his hand at the bar exam, again, this time with Rudy’s lucky coin in hand. Meanwhile, Brad went to prison and saw a familiar face in the crowd: Melvin Pritcher.

Below, the cast and creator dissect our most burning questions.

Did Dot get her full settlement money?

Yes. Whereas in the book and prior film adaptation, Dot’s settlement was merely an academic exercise, as Great Benefit simply closed up shop and never paid her (or her attorneys, by extension), in this iteration, she gets the money.

Creator Michael Seitzman explained the decision to change that part of the ending, telling TV Insider, “It’s one place where I differ with the book…. I mean, I love the book and I love John’s writing, but I felt at the end that I wanted there to be a real reward. I just felt like they’ve earned it. And I think especially in television, you’ve gone through 10 episodes with these people. You’ve watched this entire thing take place. You’re rooting with all your heart — if we did it right, that is, you’re rooting with all your heart — that they’re going to win at the end. I don’t want to take that away from the character. Then, I don’t want to take it away from the audience.”

Is Sarah fully committed to Leo’s dark side now?

Sarah might have had personal reasons for knowingly letting Brad take the fall for what Keeley did, but still, her morality was unquestionably compromised throughout the case. So is she just going to do Leo’s bidding or carve out her own way of lawyering in the future?

Madison Iseman guessed, “I would like to think she’s paving her own path and giving into her own ways. I even think there’s a world where she never had to give up Rudy, but unfortunately, with the circumstances, she’s always going to pick herself. And our whole story is about the morally gray, and I think she ends up making a decision that people will find questionable, but over everything, I do think she’s trying to think of herself and her own future. And that closing argument has become one of my party tricks because I will never forget it as long as I live. If I have one glass of wine, I’ll recite the whole thing.”

THE RAINMAKER -- Episode 110 -- Pictured: Madison Iseman as Sarah Plankmore -- (Photo by: Christopher Barr/USA Network)

Christopher Barr / USA Network

Do Rudy and Sarah still have a future together?

It’s still possible, but those involved with the show have very different takes on it. For Milo Callaghan, what Sarah has done in this case and beyond hasn’t changed the way Rudy feels about her deep down: “I think he’s really in love [with her still]. I think it’s a love story at heart… Michael used to say it’s a bit like a bird and a fish who fell in love, but where are they going to live? That’s the height of their housing troubles. They’re trying to figure out, ‘Can we do this?’ We talked about future seasons and future thoughts and reconciliations, and for me, when I read the scripts, I wanted them to find a way back. I thought it was really smart to deprive the audiences of that, but at the same time, I don’t know, I think Rudy still feels the love. I think right to the last moment, he’s got his hand out.”

Iseman, meanwhile, thinks it’s less likely they can rekindle the romantic elements of their relationship, saying, “I don’t know. There’s a lot that happens. I think they love each other. I think they will always love each other. But I think they are so similar in the way that they are so hard-headed, and I think that’s what made them work so well in the beginning. But they might be too hard-headed to ever put the other person first. So I don’t know if they would ever have a healthy relationship. But you never know.”

Seitzman added, “She would have to make a big turn right for him to take her back because he loves the Sarah from Episode 1. The Sarah that she became is impossible for him to love, because even when Rudy makes mistakes, he’s not morally compromised. He is trying always to do the right thing. She knows that she’s making decisions that are the wrong thing. She’s asked numerous times if you want to get your hands dirty, how dirty? And then she does it over and over and over again. She’s given the opportunity… to take an off-ramp, but she doesn’t. Rudy doesn’t behave like that. His is a real coming of age story. Hers is a Faustian bargain. She would have to undo her deal with the devil in order for him to take her back. But I think, like all exes, you know, we all have a soft spot for every ex. We can’t help it.”

THE RAINMAKER -- Episode 110 -- Pictured: John Slattery as Leo Drummond -- (Photo by: Christopher Barr/USA Network)

Christopher Barr / USA Network

Is Leo going to go to jail?

At the end of the finale, Leo revealed that, while Brad was already in cuffs, he was under his own FBI investigation. John Slattery, for one, has faith in his guy.

“I think Leo is going to do his damndest to stay out of jail, and he’s probably done it before,” he said. As for whether Leo has respect for Sarah in the end, after she proved to be a fellow cutthroat, he said, “Certainly. I think he’s respected her the whole way. I think he’s just trying to figure out whether she’s prepared to fight the good fight, as he sees it. But I think he respected her in the moment he met her, and that’s why he had her stick around.”

Is Bruiser happy her dad left?

After Bruiser found out the truth about her father, that he didn’t murder anyone, he still had to go on the lam from the FBI. So now, the firm is fully hers. Is Bruiser secretly happy about that, even if it means she can’t see her dad? According to Lara Parrilla, it’s “100%” yes. “She’s almost kind of relieved, but doesn’t ever say so, but then she’s secretly excited to do something different with the firm and give Rudy a chance because I don’t think her father would’ve ever done that,” she said.

Will Deck pass the bar exam?

P.J. Byrne isn’t so sure if his fast-talking associate counterpart will have what it takes to finally pass the bar, but he does have an idea of what might happen if he does. He told us, “I don’t know. Will Deck pass the bar after he’s failed it seven times in Season 2? I mean, is eight times a charm… I think he’ll do it, but I don’t think it’ll be easy. And I can only imagine him crossing the bar to his first case, he’s probably going to be a sweat pile. So he’s gotta eat some Lewis Barbecue to get his stomach full, and he might throw up.”

What is the significance of Rudy letting go of his coin?

Since we first met Rudy Baylor in Episode 1, his coin from a trip to Myrtle Beach with his brother has been his prized token, thought to give him luck and the memory of his lost brother. So it was a very meaningful moment indeed when he was finally willing to part with it and give it to Deck for luck with the bar.

“This has been both a driving force for him as well as an anchor that’s holding him down. It comes up periodically in these moments of stress. As he tells Kelly, at one point, ‘My brother said, if I rub my fingers over it’ll give me luck.’ She says, ‘Does it work?’ He says, ‘Sometimes.’ But it’s a security blanket, right? It’s somehow, ‘My brother’s wisdom is going to help me become the man that I want to become,’ the man that he felt his brother was. And by the end, we should believe, as he believes, that he’s become that man, and he doesn’t need it anymore. So he gets it to the person he’s closest with, which is Deck.”

Will there be a second season?

A second season has not yet been announced, but we’ve got some intel about what might happen if it does come along right here.

The Rainmaker, USA Network & Peacock

October 18, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
'No Other Land' Rejected a Distribution Deal From MUBI
TV & Streaming

‘No Other Land’ Rejected a Distribution Deal From MUBI

by jummy84 October 18, 2025
written by jummy84

The filmmakers behind the Oscar-winning Palestinian documentary “No Other Land” spent their many months on the awards circuit calling out American distributors for being unwilling to offer the film a U.S. theatrical distribution deal, telling IndieWire last November that “distributors are afraid to engage with the topic of Israel and Palestine.”

Since being released theatrically independently and winning the Oscar, the film is now finally being made available on streaming. The filmmakers have chosen to again release the movie independently, making it available for on-demand digital purchase and rental via Apple TV, Amazon, Google Play, and YouTube, as they announced on Instagram earlier today. But, as it turns out, “No Other Land” did have interest from a major U.S. distributor to release the film via SVOD streaming, but the filmmakers “rejected” the offer.

Channing Tatum and Kirsten Dunst star in Paramount Pictures' "ROOFMAN."

That distributor was MUBI, and in a press release, co-directors Basel Adra and Yuval Abraham said they ultimately turned down the deal over the long-running controversy concerning MUBI’s $100 million investment from Sequoia Capital.

“This film shows the reality of Israeli occupation and oppression against Palestinians — but that truth apparently didn’t fit the narrative that big U.S. streamers wanted to promote. We talked to MUBI for months, and initially thought our film had found its home, but in the end we learned that they were accepting a huge investment from Sequoia Capital,” Adra said in a statement.

“In addition to being unethical, it made no sense to us that they would take our film showing Israel’s oppression of Palestinians, and then also partner with a company contributing to that oppression,” Abraham added.

MUBI declined to comment when reached by IndieWire.

MUBI secured a $100 million investment from Sequoia Capital in May 2024, at which point backlash slowly grew over the fact that, in addition to MUBI (and numerous other tech companies and investments), Sequoia had also invested in Israeli military tech start-up Kela. The start-up was founded by Israeli intelligence veterans in 2024 following the October 7 terrorist attacks, as well as two other Israeli defense companies.

Since that investment became public, filmmakers and even employees internally have called on MUBI to return the investment and accused the art house streamer and distributor of being complicit with genocide in Palestine.

In August, CEO Efe Cakarel put out a lengthy statement stressing that Sequoia is merely a minority investor without oversight over programming, editorial, or financial decisions; that Cakarel remains the majority shareholder in MUBI; and that any assertion that MUBI’s profits would go to fund other companies in Sequoia’s portfolio were untrue. It also clarified that Sequoia partner Shaun Maguire, who came under fire for Islamaphobic social media posts, had no involvement with MUBI operationally or strategically. The company also put in place an “Ethical Funding and Investment Policy” about establishing criteria for future investments.

But the perception and backlash has persisted. Last month, a Los Angeles film festival dropped MUBI as a presenting sponsor over the controversy, and the “No Other Land” news is the latest example.

Though technically released without the aid of a formal distributor, “No Other Land” had a lengthy theatrical run, thanks to aid from other independent exhibition partners, and the movie has since made $3.6 million worldwide at the box office, making it one of the higher-grossing documentaries of the year.

Adra wrote a guest column for IndieWire back in February about the crisis still taking place in Masafer Yatta. A co-director on the film, Hamdan Ballal, was attacked and arrested back in March. In September, Adra revealed that his home in the West Bank was raided by the IDF. And two months ago, a collaborator on “No Other Land,” Awdah Hathaleen, was killed in the conflict.

October 18, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
David-Attenborough
TV & Streaming

David Attenborough Becomes Oldest Daytime Emmys Winner Ever at 99

by jummy84 October 18, 2025
written by jummy84

Dick Van Dyke‘s record as oldest performer to win a Daytime Emmy didn’t last long. At this year’s ceremony, legendary British broadcaster, writer and naturalist Sir David Attenborough has made history, winning the 2024 Daytime Emmy award for outstanding daytime personality – Non-Daily — for Netflix’s “Secret Lives of Orangutans” at the age of 99. (He turns 100 next May.)

That makes him a hair older than Van Dyke, who previously set the record last year at 98 when won the guest performer in a daytime drama series Daytime Emmy last year via his spot on Peacock’s “Days of Our Lives.”

Attenborough’s win was one of three for Netflix’s “Secret Lives of Orangutans,” which also won directing team for a single camera daytime non-fiction program.

Attenborough won over Brad Bestelink, “Living with Leopards” (Netflix); Andi Sweeney Blanco, Courtney Dober, Rob North & Kirin Stone, “The Fixers” (BYUtv); Anthony Mackie, “Shark Beach with Anthony Mackie: Gulf Coast” (National Geographic); and Martha Stewart, “Martha Gardens” (Roku).

Attenborough is known as one of the world’s most famous natural sciences broadcasters, starting with 1954’s “Zoo Quest.” As a narrator, his more recent successes include include “Planet Earth” and its sequels, “Blue Planet” and its sequels, “The Green Planet,” “Wild Isles,” “Dinosaurs: The Final Day With David Attenborough,” “Life In Colour,” “Frozen Planet” and more. 

Here’s the logline for “Secret Lives of Orangtutans”: “Orangutans are not just one of our closest relatives, they’re perhaps more relatable to us than any other great ape. Narrated by David Attenborough, this film follows a remarkable group of orangutans in the pristine jungles of Sumatra. At the centre of this story is 8 year old Eden, who’s about to embark on the most challenging moment of her life.”

The 52nt annual Daytime Emmy Awards took place on Friday, Oct. 17, at the Pasadena Civic Auditorium.

October 18, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Daytime Emmys Winners 2025
TV & Streaming

Daytime Emmys Winners 2025

by jummy84 October 18, 2025
written by jummy84

UPDATED with latest winners: The 52nd Annual Daytime Emmys, otherwise known as the daytime soaps’ biggest night, are underway Friday in Pasadena, CA.

Among this year’s nominations leaders to look for during tonight’s ceremony emceed by Mario Lopez at the Pasadena Civic Auditorium are CBS’ The Young and the Restless with 19, ABC’s General Hospital with 16, Peacock’s Days of Our Lives with 13, The Drew Barrymore Show (syndicated) with nine and The Kelly Clarkson Show (syndicated) with eight.

So far, early winners include Drew Barrymore, who won for Outstanding Daytime Talk Series Host. Later, her show faces off in the Daytime Talk Series category against last year’s winner Kelly Clarkson, The Jennifer Hudson Show, Live with Kelly and Mark and The View.

Also tonight, Apple TV’s The Secret Lives of Animals has taken three Emmys including for Outstanding Science and Nature Program, and Netflix’s Black Barbie, which won for Outstanding Arts and Popular Culture Program and for writing.

Meanwhile, The Young and the Restless‘ Susan Walters and General Hospital‘s Jonathan Jackson have already won their respective supporting categories.

Only three daytime dramas will vie for the top prize for Outstanding Drama: General Hospital (last year’s winner), Days of Our Lives and The Young and the Restless. The National Academy of Television Arts & Sciences says the default target is five, but guidelines state that “in any category where there are fewer than ten (10) submissions, no more than 50% of submitted entries may be nominated. This is a longstanding rule that the National Awards Committee is enforcing across all competitions to ensure the integrity of NATAS competitions and maintain the reputation of excellence for nominees.”

Sadly, a new player in the sudser world won’t be competing this year. CBS’ Beyond the Gates just bowed in February of this year; the eligibility window for this year’s Daytime Emmy nominees ended on December 31, 2024. Beyond the Gates, which has been renewed for a second season, will be eligible next year.

Follow along below to track the winners as they are announced.

Outstanding Regional Content In A Daytime Genre

createid | SARA: A Life in Dreams and Symbols
Idaho Public Television [Northwest Chapter]

Outstanding Culinary Cultural Series

Chasing Flavor with Carla Hall
HBO | Max [Max | Fremantle’s Original Productions]

Outstanding Daytime Talk Series Host

Drew Barrymore
The Drew Barrymore Show
CBS Media Ventures

Outstanding Cinematography

National Parks: USA
National Geographic [Stronghold Studios, LLC]

Outstanding Instructional/How-To Program

Fixer Upper: The Lakehouse
Magnolia Network [Blind Nil]

Outstanding Daytime Personality – Non-Daily

Sir David Attenborough
Secret Lives of Orangutans
Netflix [Silverback Films]

Outstanding Costume Design/Styling

General Hospital
ABC

Outstanding Writing Team For A Daytime Non-Fiction Program

Black Barbie
Netflix [shondalandmedia]

Outstanding Supporting Actor In A Daytime Drama Series

Jonathan Jackson as Lucky Spencer
General Hospital (ABC)

Outstanding Lifestyle Program

You Are What You Eat: A Twin Experiment
Netflix [Netflix | OPS | The Vogt Foundation]

Outstanding Arts and Popular Culture Program

Black Barbie
Netflix [shondalandmedia]

Outstanding Casting

Days of Our Lives
Peacock

Outstanding Art Direction/Set Decoration/Scenic Design

Mysteries of the Terracotta Warriors
Netflix

Outstanding Supporting Actress In A Daytime Drama Series

Susan Walters as Diane Jenkins Abbott
The Young and the Restless (CBS)

Outstanding Travel and Adventure Program

Expedition Unknown
Discovery Channel [Ping Pong Productions]

Outstanding Multiple Camera Editing

Resurrected Rides
Netflix [Bright Bay Creative]

Outstanding Directing Team For A Single Camera Daytime Non-Fiction Program

Secret Lives of Orangutans
Netflix [Silverback Films]

Outstanding Science and Nature Program

The Secret Lives of Animals
Apple TV+

Outstanding Music Direction And Composition

Secret Lives of Orangutans
Netflix [Silverback Films]

Outstanding Live Sound Mixing And Sound Editing

The Kelly Clarkson Show
NBCUniversal Syndication Studios

Outstanding Single Camera Editing

The Secret Lives of Animals
Apple TV+

Outstanding Short Form Program

Ballin’ Out
Outsports

Outstanding Main Title And Graphic Design

Hack Your Health
The Secrets of Your Gut
Netflix [Tremolo Productions]

Outstanding Technical Direction, Camerawork, Video

Disney Parks Magical Christmas Day Parade
ABC [Film 45 | EverWonder Studio | Yellow Shoes Studio]

Outstanding Writing Team For A Daytime Drama Series

General Hospital
ABC

Outstanding Sound Mixing And Sound Editing

The Secret Lives of Animals
Apple TV+

Outstanding Guest Performance In A Daytime Drama Series

Alley Mills as Heather Webber
General Hospital (ABC)

October 18, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Adam Pally’s First Comedy Special Goes Deep About Truth: Interview
TV & Streaming

Adam Pally’s First Comedy Special Goes Deep About Truth: Interview

by jummy84 October 17, 2025
written by jummy84

I don’t know if Adam Pally liked this interview. I think he did, but I can’t say for sure. At one point — maybe two — I inadvertently insulted him, but I think we’re cool. Adam Pally is everybody’s best friend.

On Friday, Pally’s (The Mindy Project, Happy Endings, Sonic the Hedgehog) first-ever comedy special, An Intimate Evening with Adam Pally, premieres at 9 p.m. on HBO and HBO Max. “Equal parts stand-up, documentary and rock concert, Adam Pally plays with the truth — and his guitar — in a one-time-only performance,” the logline reads.

Pally’s schtick is not quite stand-up, and though he dons a guitar for most of the live performance, it’s not what you think. There are no silly songs, just earnest covers strategically placed throughout the set to move along its storytelling. And it probably accomplished that for the 200 audience members at the live taping at the Bell House in Brooklyn. For the vast majority of people who will ultimately consume the Pally performance at home, it won’t be the same experience.

Pally and the documentary’s director Brent Hodge failed to get the rights to, well, any of the cover songs Pally plays. (Pally, the son of lounge singers, is a legitimate musician; when we spoke via Zoom, no fewer than six guitars were visible. So that’s where the Mindy money went!) Their legal failure doesn’t mean viewers won’t find enjoyment in those muted moments, however, as the inability to gain clearances becomes part of a running joke that serves the documentary.

That’s kind of the special in a nutshell. Pally goes with the flow as well as anyone, which puts an interviewer at ease — as that’s when inadvertent insults can happen. It’s chill: Adam Pally is my friend. I think. You decide; read our Q&A below.

***

I didn’t know what to expect from this special, which seems like partially the point. The trailer suggests the performance may have been a shitshow — but it was, in fact, a good show.

I guess then I’ve done it. I’ve set the expectations for something I’ve made so low that people are surprised that it even exists. In some ways, I take that as a huge compliment. I don’t know if I have a brand — a comedic brand — or anything like that. But I think a lot of the times I’ve gotten the chance to do something like this, I tend to do something self-effacing or meta or talk about the actual thing I’m doing, which some people like or some don’t. So this felt kind of on brand, I guess for me.

The special has a bigger point, this theme of truth. I wonder, though, because of your casual, affable style, if you don’t get credit for the depth.

I feel seen in this interview — I feel like you get me. I think I’m always grappling with how much someone’s attention is worth, and whether I’m worthy of that attention. I don’t take it lightly that people would be paying attention to it. I think that leads to a lot of thought, and if you’re not thinking about that then you’re truly an A-grade narcissist. But you have to sometimes be like, “Is my voice worth it? Is my opinion worth it?” It’s OK to have an opinion, but to put it out there, to do your work in public, is there a reason for it? I struggle with that a lot, because making people laugh is sometimes viewed as a less-than-honorable pursuit. Like the idea that a joke is cheap. To me, a joke is high art. A great joke is something like a great album, and a great comedian is like a great musician or great artist. You can hang “Who’s on First?” in a museum, right next to the Mona Lisa. To me, they’re equal parts cerebral and artistic and genius.

Is [this special] worth something to someone? I don’t know. Or is it just what I do? This is something that I felt compelled to do. I think all those thoughts went into making this, and all those thoughts go into a lot of my comedy. They tend to kind of run the gamut of, “Why?”

It can be a lot of work to look like you’re not working hard.

Sometimes people say good style is when you’re wearing something that looks like you’ve worn it for 30 years. I do try to do that. I try to make everything feel lived in. I toured this concept in this show for a long time, and really perfected it. I was all over in small places, really small venues. Not purposely, it just felt like that’s where I could book. That led to every night being different. I’m a child of jam bands. I love the Grateful Dead and Phish and and Dave Matthews Band and Pearl Jam — I love a new set every night.

I came up through improv. Stand-up comics have to do the same set every night, which would frustrate me. What I love about improv is that it’s different. But straight improv can sometimes be really tough to watch, and it doesn’t translate to movies and television, which is ultimately something else I wanted to do. I was thinking there has to be a way to make it feel special and different every night, while having it be the same and well-rehearsed and well-timed. I know where the jokes are, and I know how to take the audience for a ride with me — like a concert.

With the central theme of truth, were all of the recorded voicemails and phone calls between you and director Brent Hodge authentic, or were some of those moments planned out?

I can’t answer that because I truly don’t know the answer. Brett never told me when we were recording when he was recording. So whether that makes it authentic or not — after I saw the first cut, I knew that every time I talked to Brett on the phone, he was recording me. So you could take that answer however you want.

The time you got upset with him over music rights, were you legitimately angry?

At that point, I knew I was being recorded — but I was also legitimately upset.

Adam Pally (left) and Stephen Curry in Peacock’s Mr. Throwback.

David Moir/Peacock

At what point did you decide — or realize — the show was about truth?

About five years ago, I was doing short guest spots on my friends’ shows. I started to bring my guitar because it was all I had, and the spots started to evolve. Around that time, there was a big question about stand-ups and authenticity. How authentic you had to be or how authentic you are, or if these stories happen to me or someone like me, or if I’m confusing it in my mind. It was a hot time. So I started telling these long stories and forming punchlines for them. Then the music kind of supported them. In a lot of ways, to me, it doesn’t matter [if it’s true] unless you want it to matter. I know that sounds strange, but if someone’s telling me a story and it’s funny, they put themselves in the protagonist position for a reason, then I’m judgmental of it. But if they’re just getting a laugh on it, like this is the way to get the point across, or this is the story — that’s how people write movies.

I was trying to exonerate that, and saying, “You know what, none of it matters because we’re all struggling, we’re all the same.” Really the only truth — the only real honest truth for any performer — is that they just want people to look at them and be seen. If someone tells you otherwise, they’re lying. So that was the truth I came to and I was trying to explore as many avenues into that answer as I could — to pull as many cars into that garage as I could.

You said earlier you don’t know if you have a comedic brand. I think you do. I think your brand is “Everybody’s Best Friend.”

My agent would hate to hear that. My publicist is literally like, “[Groans] There goes leading man!” Actually, when I say “agent” and “manager,” it’s actually my own brain. I’m way too fat to be a leading man.

(Laughs.) That’s actually not the way I meant it. You can play a lead, like on Mr. Throwback, which as you know I really liked. But you have an aura of being everyone’s pal — meaning everyone in the audience. Like Ike Barinholtz, whom of course you worked with on The Mindy Project.

No, no. I was kidding. That’s very nice of you, again. To be compared to Ike is a huge, huge, huge— well, he’s big in stature. [Note: Barinholtz is about 6-foot-2 to Pally’s 5-foot-10.] It’s a huge compliment. He’s the greatest. I was just telling someone today, one of the things I loved the most about working on Mindy was watching Ike and Dave Stassen and Mindy [Kaling] work. Truly, I learned from watching them — “Oh, you can run a show and be funny and be on it and get your voice [on it]?” So to have my name brought up in any sense with Ike is a true compliment.

I’m surprised to hear you say [I’m so likable] because I feel like — I don’t know if I have a brand, but I guess it would be maybe chaos? Mindy Kaling once called me a Loki, like a bit of a troublemaker. But I’m trying, especially as I get older, to channel those powers for good.

I just can’t picture you in an argument with somebody.

I do hate confrontation, so that’s fair.

Mr. Throwback is a good example. Your character isn’t a good guy — not at first — but he’s still lovable, and not in an antihero-type way…

Yeah, yeah.

Do you want to play a real villain?

You want to talk about chewing scenery? I mean, I would dig in. I would hope to one day be afforded those opportunities to really stretch and grow. But I’ve been so lucky. I’ve been banging around for almost 20 years. I would love to play a real villain and be given that opportunity, and I know I would do a good job with it. But at the same time, I don’t turn my nose up at any work, really. I need to work. I like to work and I need to work. So I’m so thankful. If someone sees me as the best friend, that’s great, because hopefully I’ll do something different in that best friend role that you can’t imagine anyone else doing. That’s the goal of everything I play — every thing I put out, and every comedic thing I do, or anything I do in general. I would hope that you would say, “No one else could do that.”

Were you crushed by the Mr. Throwback cancellation? It was bizarre how quick Peacock was to pull that trigger after all of the marketing behind it.

You know what? It did what it did — and it’ll do what it’ll do. And you know what it really did? Everybody that worked on it is now working on something else. I’m the only one that’s not. And that happens on almost every job that I’ve been lucky enough to have. I think I’m proud of that the most. Usually people after working with me go on to do really great things — and whether that’s because they (laughs) saw the way I did it and didn’t like it, or because they took a little bit of me with them, I think it’s a nice pattern in my career that I would hope to continue. Everybody on Throwback from the writing staff to the cast is thriving.

Steph [Curry] landed on his feet.

Look, he does Throwback and Jimmy Butler shows up. [Note: Butler was traded from the Miami Heat to Curry’s Golden State Warriors in February.]

Adam Pally as Wade Whipple and Knuckles (voiced by Idris Elba) in Paramount+ Knuckles.

Paramount Pictures/Sega/Paramount+

My daughters and I enjoy the Sonic movies and Knuckles spinoff, which gives you a bit more to do than the films. I understand Idris Elba has had a stellar dramatic acting career, but I cannot be convinced that Knuckles is not his finest role.

I honestly don’t know what the plans are for the franchise. It’s the greatest gig. Truly the best job. Idris is funny. In person, he is very funny. He makes me laugh all the time. To the premiere I invited my aunt and uncle, and they were a little nervous; they didn’t know where to go. I was trying to tell them on the phone where to go. But I was doing interviews — it’s kind of hectic, so was like, “Just go to the theater.” I show up, do the red carpet and then I bump into Idris and he goes, [doing an excellent Idris impression] “Adam, this is your uncle.” He had already been hanging out with my uncle. He’s like, [back to Idris impression] “Your Uncle Robert is very funny!”

That’s a very good Idris impression)

Well, I spent enough time with him. He’s a funny guy. His his tone is perfect — he nails it. I hope he does more comedy. He makes me laugh in real life. I feel like there’s a comedy out there for him, and it’ll be a huge hit.

For Knuckles, are you mostly acting opposite a tennis ball or like a stuffy of Knuckles?

It depends on what the scene is. It runs the gamut from a child in a green suit to a tennis ball, to a live puppet with, like, full animatronic features.

No real echidna?

Haven’t thrown in a real echidna. They know not to. I remember doing a scene with a snake once in Champaign, ILL. I am really good on set. Like, really good. You can beat me up, put me in a cage, feed me through a tube, whatever. I’m an actor’s-actor. I’ve worked with David Caspe, who directed and created that show, a million times. And I remember after we did the snake scene, he came over to me and was like, “Wow, you really hated that snake.” There’s some things I can’t act through.

***

An Intimate Evening with Adam Pally premieres on HBO and streams on HBO Max at 9 p.m. Friday.

October 17, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Ningbo Open 2025 tennis order of play and TV coverage | Schedule today
TV & Streaming

Ningbo Open 2025 tennis order of play and TV coverage | Schedule today

by jummy84 October 17, 2025
written by jummy84

Four players remain in the singles draw of the Ningbo Open 2025 – the penultimate WTA 500 event of the season – and Saturday is all about the semi-finals.

The ranking points on offer at the Chinese hard court tournament could be vital in the battle for the final two spots at next month’s ATP Finals – with Mirra Andreeva, Jasmine Paolini and Elena Rybakina all involved.

Andreeva, the top seed at this year’s Ningbo Open, went out in the second round but Rybakina and Paolini face off in Saturday’s first semi-final.

2024 winner Daria Kasatkina, who beat Andreeva in last year’s finals, is absent after calling an early end to her season due to personal reasons.

As the end of the season approaches, the Ningo Open 2025 ensures there will be plenty of tennis on offer for fans this week.

RadioTimes.com brings you the full order of play for the Ningbo Open 2025, updated each day with the latest slate of matches, plus the full tournament schedule.

Ningbo Open 2025 order of play – Saturday 18th October

All UK time. ATP Singles matches only.

Centre Court

Estimated 8am

  • Elena Rybakina (KAZ) [3] vs Jasmine Paolini (ITA) [2]
  • Ekaterina Alexandrova [4] v Diana Shnaider [7]

Ningbo Open 2025 schedule

Ningbo Open 2024 winner Daria Kasatkin. (Photo by AFP) / China OUT (Photo by -/AFP via Getty Images) (Photo by AFP) / China OUT (Photo by -/AFP via Getty Images)

The tournament started on Monday 13th October and runs until the final on Sunday 19th October 2025.

Play begins around 6am UK time in the early rounds, 8am in the semi-finals, and 10am in the final.

How to watch and live stream the Ningbo Open 2025 in the UK

You can watch the Ningbo Open 2025 live on Sky Sports Tennis and Sky Sports+.

Sky Sports can be added to any Sky TV package for just £22 per month for all nine sports channels, or you can pick up the complete sports package plus Netflix for £35 per month.

Sky Sports customers can live stream the tournament via the Sky Go app on a variety of devices including most smartphones and tablets as part of their subscription.

You can also watch the action via NOW with a day membership (£14.99) or month membership (£34.99).

NOW can be streamed through a computer or apps found on most smart TVs, phones and consoles. NOW is also available via TNT Sports.

Check out more of our Sport coverage or visit our TV Guide and Streaming Guide to find out what’s on. For more TV recommendations and reviews, listen to The Radio Times Podcast.

October 17, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Kathy Bates and Skye P. Marshall in
TV & Streaming

‘Matlock’ Fans ‘Unsettled’ by Season 2 Plot — Does Matty Have Another Secret Plan?

by jummy84 October 17, 2025
written by jummy84

A high-stakes game of chess transpired between friends-turned-unwilling foes Matty (Kathy Bates) and Olympia (Skye P. Marshall) in Matlock Season 2 Episode 2, and fans are concerned about where the season is headed because of it. Some are complaining that there were “immature” scenes in the episode, and others are wondering if there’s a bigger scheme at play here that would explain what they view as confusing choices for the characters of Matty and Olympia.

The episode, titled “Another Matlock,” showed Matty and Olympia constantly trying to one-up each other as they tried to get the Wellbrexa study into their possession, or in Olympia’s case, keep it hidden. Matty found the study in Olympia’s safe at her brownstone, took it, and replaced it with a document of equal size but blank pages. When Olympia discovered what Matty did, she told her that the study was a fake generated by AI. The real Wellbrexa study, according to Olympia, was in a safety deposit box in Connecticut, kept there so that Julian (Jason Ritter) wouldn’t be able to find it and destroy the evidence, should he give in to his fearful impulses and commit another criminal offense.

Olympia took a page from Matty’s book when she secretly recorded a tense conversation between them. Olympia triggered Matty’s anger when she threatened to get her and Edwin (Sam Anderson) imprisoned for bank fraud and other crimes, which would leave their grandson, Alfie (Aaron D. Harris), without guardians. Matty practically growled that she’s “untouchable,” and this audio is now Olympia’s leverage over the Kingston family in this Wellbrexa debacle.

Matty had offered to let Olympia attend her meeting with The New York Times in an act of goodwill to signal that she cared about her fate and the fate of her children, but Olympia doesn’t want her ex-husband implicated in this at all; she wants Julian’s father, Senior (Beau Bridges), to take the fall since it was him who ordered Julian to hide the study. As Matty pointed out, Julian didn’t have to follow that order, but he did.

The comments section of our Matlock Season 2 Episode 2 recap showed a dislike for the episode, particularly the Matty and Olympia feud and the scenes between Julian and Billy (David Del Rio), in which Julian snapped over the idea of sharing an apartment building with him.

“Did not like this episode and how it is leading the two main characters down a path of negativity towards one another,” one comment reads. “If this is just going to be a weekly jostle as to which woman gets the upper hand, then the show will become less watchable. Just like the Julien/Billy scenes. That storyline was bad. Too immature.”

One fan feels that Matty and Olympia’s plot in this episode didn’t make sense, arguing that Matty and Olympia love each other too much to be fighting like this, leading them to wonder if the women are laying out an elaborate scheme to take down Senior and Wellbrexa while protecting Olympia’s family.

Sonja Flemming / CBS

“I want the Olympia/Matty friendship back. How is that going to happen now?” the comment says. “I just hope this is all some secret mastermind plan between Matty and Olympia set up so Olympia can take control of the narrative without being implicated or suspected by Senior. In the last episode, Olympia asked Matty if she liked theater. Granted, this was about the case of the week, but maybe there was a hint that a bigger performance was about to ensue. To take someone like Senior down, a man above the law, they need to be enemies.”

Olympia taking Edwin on a road trip to the Connecticut safety deposit box, only to leave him stranded in a move against her friend, stood out to another fan.

“I really love Bates and I think she [is] doing [a] terrific job as Matlock, love how she quotes ‘innocent old lady.’ But I can’t agree more how this episode was full of [shots] and upper [cuts], very unrealistic, taking Edwin on the trip to just dump him there, so she can record?” they said. “I’m not sure how Matty and Olympia have a chance to bring back friendship. Or maybe there is an act? But for whom?”

A similar discussion is happening over on Reddit.

“I’m not sure I enjoy the direction the show is taking,” a thread said. “Writing, acting, and direction are all great. Perhaps too good. The whole episode gave me anxiety.”

“I think for me it’s because up until this episode Matty always had the upper hand, and for now it seems the tables have turned,” one reply read. “That in [and] of itself created anxiety for me because I am rooting for her and Edwin. We tend to want the happily ever after, neat and tidy. Things just got real messy.”

One fan said in response, “It is, but I just don’t like the way Olympia is trying to cover for Julian. Yeah, Senior was the [kingpin] but doing what she is doing to protect somebody who did do wrong… I just don’t know. I don’t want to hate Olympia, but right now I do, and it hurts.”

The AI study development stood out to one viewer. They said, “Just a casual observation, as a guy who was working on his laptop while his wife watched this episode: it seemed like every single person on the show was hiding something from someone else, who was hiding something from someone else, who thought someone was on their side but who secretly isn’t because, you know, they’re hiding something…it never ended.”

October 17, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
How 'Frankenstein' Invented the Modern Studio Horror Movie in 1931
TV & Streaming

How ‘Frankenstein’ Invented the Modern Studio Horror Movie in 1931

by jummy84 October 17, 2025
written by jummy84

When Guillermo del Toro‘s “Frankenstein” hits theaters today, it will join an honorable lineage of Mary Shelley adaptations that began in 1910, continued throughout the silent era, and helped create the template for the modern studio horror film just a few years after the arrival of sound. Del Toro‘s take on Shelley’s 1818 novel is more faithful to the source material than James Whale‘s 1931 incarnation with Boris Karloff, and follows through on the premise’s potential with greater philosophical depth and visual detail, but when it comes to influence and impact Whale’s “Frankenstein” will likely never be topped.

That’s because “Frankenstein,” along with an earlier 1931 release, Tod Browning’s “Dracula,” introduced the horror genre as a viable form for artistic expression and commercial success within the studio system. Both movies were made at Universal, a studio that became synonymous with horror after the success of “Dracula” and “Frankenstein” gave way to “The Wolf Man,” “The Mummy,” “The Invisible Man,” and myriad sequels and spinoffs well into the mid-1950s.

'Koln 75'

Although Universal had made a few horror or horror-adjacent films in the silent era, the boom in sound horror came courtesy of executive Carl Laemmle Jr., whose father, Universal founder Carl Laemmle, made his son head of production in 1929 as a 21st birthday present. The junior Laemmle was a passionate proponent of horror and pushed for “Dracula,” a film his dad didn’t really believe in; the main reason Laemmle Jr. was able to greenlight Browning’s adaptation of Bram Stoker’s vampire novel was that the young executive had recently had a major success with his World War I epic “All Quiet on the Western Front.”

With Bela Lugosi in the title role, “Dracula” was a smash hit upon its release in February 1931 and validated Laemmle Jr.’s faith in horror. As the studio scurried to capitalize on the film’s success, “Frankenstein” arose as a promising follow-up. Shelley’s story of a scientist who creates a sentient creature out of body parts cobbled together from various corpses was tailor-made for the screen — in fact, it had already been filmed at least three times.

The first adaptation, a 14-minute version made by the Edison Company in 1910, is quite possibly the world’s first horror film. Making these kinds of claims, however, is always dubious given how many silent pictures did not survive the era. Indeed, that was the case for two subsequent “Frankenstein” adaptations, the 1915 feature “Life Without Soul” and an Italian iteration called “The Monster of Frankenstein.” Only the Edison “Frankenstein” still exists in any kind of viewable form, via a restoration currently streaming on the Library of Congress YouTube channel.

Universal’s 1931 “Frankenstein” shouldn’t necessarily have been a game changer — rushed into production after “Dracula” became a hit, the film only gave its creators a handful of months from conception to release in which to make their classic. Yet somehow the stars aligned. “Frankenstein” was not only a better film than “Dracula” — wittier, more visually dynamic, and more poetic and poignant as well as scarier — but also an influence on all future “Frankenstein” movies and a model for much later horror films like Brian De Palma’s “Carrie” and Lucky McKee’s “May.”

As in those films, “Frankenstein” gets a lot of mileage out of creating a central figure who alternates between being the monster, the victim, and the hero all in the same movie. Frankenstein’s monster, as played by Boris Karloff, is one of the all-time great horror movie characters, a figure both terrifying and filled with pathos as an innocent dragged into a world that he did not make and that does not want him.

This remains consistent throughout nearly all of the “Frankenstein” movies that would follow Whale’s, up to and including del Toro’s iteration, which is overall more faithful to Shelley’s conception of the monster as a verbal being than Karloff’s grunting hulk. The monster’s lack of verbal sophistication, in fact, was one of the things that made Bela Lugosi reject the role after he was announced as the film’s star, though reportedly no one was particularly interested in seeing Lugosi in the part after a screen test featuring the actor in full monster makeup met with unintentional laughter. (Lugosi did ultimately play Frankenstein’s monster years later, in 1943’s “Frankenstein Meets the Wolf Man.”)

Once Lugosi and original director Robert Florey left the project, the door was open for the filmmakers who would make “Frankenstein” iconic. James Whale was a recent arrival at Universal whose previous work included directing the dialogue scenes on Howard Hughes’ aviation epic “Hell’s Angels.” He kicked off his Universal contract in 1931 by directing “Waterloo Bridge,” a movie Laemmle Jr. was high enough on to give Whale his pick of material for his next project.

FRANKENSTEIN, Boris Karloff, 1931
‘Frankenstein’Courtesy Everett Collection

Whale responded to “Frankenstein,” and he knew who he wanted for the monster: Boris Karloff, whom he had seen in Howard Hawks’ “The Criminal Code.” (Karloff also had a small role in Hawks’ gangster classic “Scarface,” which had been shot but not released at the time “Frankenstein” went into production.) When Karloff put on Jack Pierce’s prosthetics and makeup (which took several hours each day of shooting to apply), he wasn’t silly like Lugosi. He looked both haunting and haunted, sad and terrifying.

Pierce was a master makeup artist (he would go on to create other Universal monsters like the Wolf Man and the Mummy), and he carefully adapted his design for Frankenstein’s monster to the contours of Karloff’s face, giving the actor maximum opportunities to convey emotion via facial expressions and gestures. This was key given that Karloff had no real dialogue, though he would be given a limited vocabulary in the 1935 sequel “Bride of Frankenstein.”

Karloff’s entrance in “Frankenstein” is one of the great introductions in horror movie history, as Whale blocks the scene with the monster backing into a room, withholding his visage from the audience as long as possible. Once Karloff slowly turns, Whale pushes the camera closer and closer to him in a series of cuts that thrust the viewer into the monster’s space — and which reveal the flawlessness of Pierce’s design in unblinking close-ups.

It’s still a powerful moment nearly a hundred years later, and the poignancy of the performance to follow is only more potent after decades of other — mostly inferior — presentations of the character. Certainly, none of the actors who took on the role in Universal productions after Karloff left the monster behind in “Son of Frankenstein” (1939) replicated Karloff’s subtle emotional effects, and even an actor as capable as Robert De Niro remained in Karloff’s shadow when he played the monster in Kenneth Branagh’s “Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein” in 1994.

One of the many laudable aspects of del Toro’s “Frankenstein” is the performance by Jacob Elordi, which invites and earns comparison with Karloff’s characterization in its depth and complexity; del Toro’s deep empathy for the monster and Elordi’s subtly calibrated evolution of the monster’s awareness make this the best “Frankenstein” since 1931. Elordi is so sympathetic that it doesn’t quite feel right to even call him the monster; Oscar Isaac’s Dr. Frankenstein is by far the more horrific of the characters in del Toro’s conception.

Revisiting Whale and Karloff’s “Frankenstein” after seeing del Toro and Elordi’s, the original film’s achievement is all the more impressive. Unlike “Dracula,” it really hasn’t dated aside from a few stale digressions involving Dr. Frankenstein’s fiancée and a generic rival for her affections. One reason is the movie’s lack of score; modern horror enthusiasts will be surprised to find that aside from the opening and closing credits, there’s no music in “Frankenstein” — something that was typical in 1931, as underscoring didn’t come into widespread use for another year or two.

In “Frankenstein,” the lack of score creates an austere purity, as our attention is focused on the intricacies of Whale’s vertically oriented visual design and the nuances of Karloff’s performance. The movie remains as effective as it presumably was in 1931, when it opened to blockbuster business and firmly determined that Universal would be a house of horror for decades to come.

In fact, the brand is still probably the major studio most associated with the genre thanks to its partnerships with filmmakers like Jordan Peele and Jason Blum, whose “The Black Phone 2” opens in theaters today alongside del Toro’s “Frankenstein.” Whale and Karloff’s classic may now be 95 years old, but its impact and influence are still felt at the multiplex virtually every month.

October 17, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Five Takeaways From the World Soundtrack Awards on Composers Contracts
TV & Streaming

Five Takeaways From the World Soundtrack Awards on Composers Contracts

by jummy84 October 17, 2025
written by jummy84

One of the key issues at the World Soundtrack Awards Music Days, one of the leading events for film composers, was how to negotiate a fair contract. The closing panel of the industry program looked at the question in depth, examining the hidden contradictions and complexities of publishing rights and buy-outs in screen music.

Held in partnership with the European Composer and Songwriter Alliance, the conversation used the alliance’s recently published report “Audiovisual Composers’ Contracts: Current Practices, Challenges and Recommendations” as a starting point. In it, ECSA says that the profession is becoming increasingly precarious, stating that “the secrecy surrounding contractual practices as well as the absence of comprehensive legal or contractual guidance” makes creators vulnerable.

“In recent years, this problem has been compounded by the increasingly high level of concentration of the European audiovisual market, and the rising market share of non-European video-on-demand platforms,” continues the report, emphasizing how this landscape has seen composers “negotiating in the dark,” giving up royalties for “an often meager” lump-sum payment and reducing the sustainability of their careers. “If they refuse such contracts or wish to challenge their terms, they face the risk of being blacklisted and excluded from future work opportunities.”

To discuss best practices and key struggles, the WSA gathered a panel consisting of the CEO of the Screen Composers Guild of Ireland, Sarah Glennane; founder of screen composers agency Strike a Score, Valerie Dobbelaere; commercial rights director at Faber Music, Harriet Moss; media composer and copyright and contract law teacher Johan van der Voet; and Dutch/Irish composer Aisling Brouwer (“The Buccaneers”). Below, you’ll find five takeaways from their conversation: 

Know as much about music rights as you do about music technology

Glennane brought up the above, based on a quote by British composer Kevin Sargent, as a way of highlighting how important it is in the industry to be on top of creative legal rights. “There’s a base level to that,” added Moss. “If you have a contract, it has got to be in writing. Make sure you understand it. Pay somebody to read it or manage it, if that’s not possible, whether that’s through the commission of an agent or a publisher, be it through a lawyer.”

“It’s important to be able to talk to other composers about it,” said Brouwer. “Because these terms we’re signing have become commonplace, and it’s something that sneaks into the industry. The more people agree to them, the more it becomes the new norm. As composers, we have so much power coming together and advocating for our rights and we have a responsibility to protect our sources of income because so much of it has already been taken away.”

Buyout beware

Buyout contracts are agreements that generally see the composer surrender all rights to their work in exchange for a single fee, foregoing any future revenues generated by their work. The ESCA report showed that 53% of its members had experienced buyer contracts, and 47% of audiovisual composers find buyout practices to be one of the main challenges to their fair remuneration.

Van der Voet brought up major streamers when speaking on the issue, saying he “would love to be hired by Netflix, but their contracts are horrible.” “What does happen is that you’re working with directors who are maybe not that famous, but it can happen that your music will be on Amazon or streamers [later]. I did a movie 10 years ago that has just been sold to Disney+. That happens. What contract did I sign 10 years ago? Am I getting money for this? A lot of composers don’t look into the future. What are you signing away? You have to be very wary of that.” 

The composer also made a point of highlighting how full buyout contracts are “an American thing,” given that you cannot buy out the writer’s share in many European countries and the U.K. “In America, the company may own the whole production. If you can negotiate, you might get your writer’s share, but it’s theirs to give. Whereas in Europe we have author’s rights, and basically you cannot take away my author’s right even if I sign all kinds of contracts on top of that.”

Glennane pointed out that buyout contracts seek to remove revenue streams and that she sees composers as “speculators.” “It’s a speculative career. You’re hoping that the work you do is amazing and that you are creatively and economically recognized. Royalties exist in this kind of ecosystem to reward that speculation and investment.”

Production companies are not publishers: pseudo-publishing

In the ESCA report, the practice of producers and broadcasters requiring composers to “sign away or significantly reduce the publishing rights to the works while not fulfilling their legal obligations” to undertake traditional publishing services “related to the exploitation of the works” and to be transparent is called “pseudo-publishing.”

During the panel, Glennane brought up examples like game music being used on screen adaptations of the game to exemplify the practice, making a point of emphasizing that production companies are not publishers and therefore are not the best party to negotiate or be responsible for publishing rights. 

“The problem with pseudo-publishing is they grab the rights and they do nothing in return,” said van der Voet. “An example of that is: you’re working with a director who is working with a production company, and then what happens is that some of these pseudo-publishers contact the production company and say they’ll set up a publishing company for you. Film production companies are not music publishers. In the Netherlands, we’ve seen people consistently getting the composer to sign a deal and after that, nothing happens. You just lose money.”

Moss, who also works in publishing, advised composers about the possibility of a single song assignment, or SSA. “We can just publish an album or a soundtrack, but then you’ve got that representation and also the potential for secondary exploitation if it’s allowed.”

The AI copyrighting issue

The conversation around AI loomed over several panels during the WSA Music Days. Since the subject was the main guiding thread of last year’s edition, many attending participants cited a certain exhaustion over continued discussions on the use of artificial intelligence in composing. Still, it is a key discussion to be had when it comes to negotiating rights.

Moss brought up how she manages a “small catalog” of about 13,000 copyrights. “We know all of those composers and their work inside out. That just means you hear something and your hair immediately goes up, but we work with as much technology as possible to be looking for fingerprinting and things like that to protect our composers’ work.”

“But it’s a difficult thing to balance,” she added. “There are a lot of film scores that sound very similar, and that’s always an issue. There are definitely some gray areas.”

Long live the kill fee

As the panel wrapped, participants were asked what piece of advice they would give budding composers. Most of them agreed on one key thing: always have a kill fee. “You need to have a kill fee in case something goes wrong creatively or there’s a fallout,” said Moss. “It does happen. So you need something [in the contract] ensuring that any work that you have already started on is paid for.”

“I do a lot of low-budget projects where the fees are not that high,” added van der Voet. “But there might be other parties involved who want to invest, so suddenly there’s money, but nothing that can be changed about the movie except for the music. Suddenly, they have money to pay a great composer, and you’re off the project.”

October 17, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Newer Posts
Older Posts

Social Connect

Facebook Twitter Instagram Pinterest Youtube Snapchat

Recent Posts

  • 2009 feels like a whole other world away

  • Watch Ariana Grande and Jimmy Fallon Perform a History of Duets

  • Spotify’s Joe Hadley Talks ARIA Awards Partnership

  • Nick Offerman Announces 2026 “Big Woodchuck” Book Tour Dates

  • Snapped: Above & Beyond (A Photo Essay)

Newsletter

Subscribe my Newsletter for new blog posts, tips & new photos. Let's stay updated!

Categories

  • Bollywood (1,929)
  • Celebrity News (2,000)
  • Events (267)
  • Fashion (1,605)
  • Hollywood (1,020)
  • Lifestyle (890)
  • Music (2,002)
  • TV & Streaming (1,857)

Recent Posts

  • Shushu/Tong Shanghai Fall 2026 Collection

  • Here’s What Model Taylor Hill Is Buying Now

  • Julietta Is Hiring An Assistant Office Coordinator In Dumbo, Brooklyn, NY (In-Office)

Editors’ Picks

  • 2009 feels like a whole other world away

  • Watch Ariana Grande and Jimmy Fallon Perform a History of Duets

  • Spotify’s Joe Hadley Talks ARIA Awards Partnership

Latest Style

  • ‘Steal This Story, Please’ Review: Amy Goodman Documentary

  • Hulu Passes on La LA Anthony, Kim Kardashian Pilot ‘Group Chat’

  • Hannah Einbinder Slams AI Creators As “Losers”

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

@2020 - celebpeek. Designed and Developed by Pro


Back To Top
celebpeek
  • Home
  • Bollywood
  • Hollywood
  • Lifestyle
  • Fashion
celebpeek
  • Music
  • Celebrity News
  • Events
  • TV & Streaming