celebpeek
  • Home
  • Bollywood
  • Hollywood
  • Lifestyle
  • Fashion
celebpeek
  • Music
  • Celebrity News
  • Events
  • TV & Streaming
Home » TV & Streaming » Page 154
Category:

TV & Streaming

Comedian Ken Flores' Cause Of Death Revealed
TV & Streaming

Comedian Ken Flores’ Cause Of Death Revealed

by jummy84 September 6, 2025
written by jummy84

The cause of death has been revealed for Ken Flores.

The stand-up comic and Latin XL producer died of cocaine toxicity, according to the Los Angeles County Medical Examiner’s office report. Flores also had a history of congestive heart failure, the report said. The manner of death was ruled an accident.

Flores died at his Los Angeles home on January 28. According to TMZ, which cited law enforcement sources, first responders arrived at Flores’ residence and administered CPR, but he was pronounced dead at the scene.

His family announced his death on social media.

“It is with great sadness that we confirm the untimely passing of our friend, brother, and son, Kenyi Flores,” read the statement on Instagram. “Please respect our privacy at this time as we are all shocked and devastated by this loss.”

Flores’ passing prompted an outpouring of remembrances from comedy clubs and fellow comedians.

The Hollywood Improv paid tribute to the late comedian sharing photos of him performing on stage.

“We were honored to share your talent on our stages. You were greatness, and it was only a matter of time until the whole world saw it,” read the Instagram post. “You were also kind and a tremendous friend to all lucky enough to know you. We love you Ken, thank you for all the laughs.”

The Laugh Factory in L.A. wrote in a post on social media, “Rest in peace, make god laugh.” Hollywood Improv added, “We were honored to give him a stage to share his talent. Sending so much love to his family and the comedy community 🖤🤍.”

At the time of his death, Flores was halfway through the first leg of his Butterfly Effect tour, which began in Portland, Oregon, on Jan. 10 and was set to wrap up in San Diego in April.

Flores produced the LatinXL Comedy Show, a showcase for Latin comedy talent.

September 6, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Today Show's Sheinelle Jones Returns, Opens Up About Husband’s Death
TV & Streaming

Today Show’s Sheinelle Jones Returns, Opens Up About Husband’s Death

by jummy84 September 6, 2025
written by jummy84

NBC Today anchor Sheinelle Jones is opening up about the loss of her husband, nearly four months after he passed away from a rare form of brain cancer.

After taking a leave of absence, Jones, the co-host of Today’s third hour, returned to Today on Friday, where a pre-taped interview with her and co-anchor Savannah Guthrie aired, marking Jones’ first time discussing in-depth her husband’s battle and death. Jones had been absent from the show all year while her husband Uche Ojeh battled glioblastoma. Ojeh died in May at age 45.

“My heart is shattered in a million pieces,” Jones told Guthrie in the pre-taped interview. “The life that I’ve known since I was 19 is no more. I’ve always wanted kids, and I have three kids of my own now and they’ve lost their dad. And I’m their mom. It sucks.”

Jones described the moment in time as a “beautiful nightmare” and deals with her pain “day to day.”

Jones said it ordeal felt “scary,” “divine” and “bigger than us,” but they were at their “best” when they were just together. When reflecting on their time at the hospital, Jones said the nurses would call her and Ojeh “love birds” given they would “just hold hands” and “look at each other and say, ‘I love you.’” She also felt like it was “full circle moment” given they’d just sit with each other, enjoy each other’s company and not talk like they did during their college years.

“That’s what I mean by ‘beautiful nightmare,’ because I found beauty in the nightmare. And trust me, it is a nightmare to watch a 45-year-old do two triathlons and live and breathe off of soccer and his kids.” Jones explained. “To take a guy like that and watch him have to deal with this fight was a nightmare. But the way he fought it and the way we rallied together and the way we saw the best of humanity, that was beautiful.”

Jones revealed that she knew about Ojeh’s diagnosis prior to running a marathon and more than a year before she took a leave of absence from Today. But she reiterates she was not “faking” anything. ”I thought, ‘I’m not faking it. My joy is real.’ I was on television for almost a year with this,” she said. “I would do the show and then hop in the car and go be with him during chemo.”

Despite the tough battle, Jones said she “believed that he was going to be okay. I knew it was gonna be tough, but we all believed that he would be fine.” And she took a leave of absence to not miss any moments. “I was his oxygen sometimes,” she said.

After experiencing the loss, Jones said she doesn’t “run away from crying anymore when it comes to grief,” calling it her “cleansing rain.”

“I watched him in his toughest moments, his faith is what gave him peace,” Jones explained. “So I think, ‘Okay, if Uche can have faith, when his life is on the line, surely I can and surely we all can.’”

As she returns to Today, Jones said she hopes that she can encourage anyone to be strong even in a time of grief and remember that ”cancer doesn’t have to steal our joy. We can get up, we can get out of bed, and we can go to work, we can go to school, we can squeeze the most out of the days that we have. And honestly, I feel like Uche’s heartbeat lives on in mine. So I owe it to him to just squeeze the most I can out of this thing.”

She added, ”If you see me now and you see me laughing, or you turn on the morning show and I’m laughing or having a good time, you root for me because I’m fighting for my joy.”

She and Ujeh had been married nearly two decades, first meeting at Northwestern University. They share three kids. Jones has been with the Today show for more than a decade, joining the morning program’s weekend edition in 2014. In 2019, Jones was named co-host of the show’s third hour.

September 6, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Watch Catalunya MotoGP 2025 on TV and live stream | Weekend schedule
TV & Streaming

Watch Catalunya MotoGP 2025 on TV and live stream | Weekend schedule

by jummy84 September 6, 2025
written by jummy84

Marc Márquez has not won at the Catalunya MotoGP, his home race, since 2019 but if he can put that record right and extend his lead by another 10 points, then he could, remarkably, clinch the world title in San Marino next weekend.

The Circuit de Barcelona-Catalunya has offered up so many memorable moments over the years – not least arguably the greatest MotoGP race ever as Valentino Rossi edged out Jorge Lorenzo right at the death in 2009.

You certainly wouldn’t put it past Marc Márquez adding to that lengthy list at this weekend’s Catalunya MotoGP and there will be extensive coverage available for motorsport fans.

RadioTimes.com brings you a full round-up of how to watch the Catalunya MotoGP 2025 on TV and live stream.

When is the Catalunya MotoGP 2025?

Catalunya MotoGP 2025 takes place on Sunday 7th September 2025.

The race begins at 1pm UK time.

How to watch the Catalunya MotoGP 2025 on TV

Catalunya MotoGP 2025 will be shown live on TNT Sports 2.

There are multiple ways to get TNT Sports. If you already have BT Broadband, you can add TNT Sports to your existing contract from just £20 per month. You can add the ‘Big Sport’ package for £45 per month which includes all TNT Sports, discovery+ and Sky Sports channels via a NOW pass.

You can also access TNT Sports via discovery+ and stream directly to your smart TV.

Live stream the Catalunya MotoGP online

You can watch the race on TNT Sports via discovery+ Premium monthly pass without signing up to a contract.

Regular subscribers can also stream races on a variety of devices including laptops, smartphones and tablets via the discovery+ app.

discovery+ is the new streaming home of TNT Sports, showing events including live Premier League, UEFA Champions League, Premiership Rugby, UFC, Boxing and MotoGP. Learn more here: discoveryplus.com

By entering your details you are agreeing to our terms and conditions and privacy policy. You can unsubscribe at any time.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Catalunya MotoGP 2025 schedule

All UK times and dates. All live on TNT Sports 2.

Friday 5th September

  • Free Practice 1 – 9.45am
  • Practice – 2pm

Saturday 6th September

  • Free Practice 2 – 9.10am
  • Qualifying 1 – 9.50am
  • Qualifying 2 – 10.15am
  • Sprint – 2pm

Sunday 7th September

Check out more of our Sport coverage or visit our TV Guide and Streaming Guide to find out what’s on. For more from the biggest stars in TV, listen to The Radio Times Podcast.

September 6, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
THE RAINMAKER -- Episode 104 -- Pictured: Milo Callaghan as Rudy Baylor -- (Photo by: Christopher Barr/USA Network)
TV & Streaming

Milo Callaghan Defends Rudy’s Decision to Seize on Sarah’s Slip

by jummy84 September 6, 2025
written by jummy84

[Warning: The following post contains MAJOR spoilers for The Rainmaker Episode 4.]

Are Rudy Baylor (Milo Callaghan) and Sarah Plankmore (Madison Iseman) finally, fully through? It sure seems that way.

Ever since the two found themselves on opposite sides of the lawsuit between the family of Donny Ray Black and the hospital he died in, they’ve been sniping at one another in small but significant ways. There was the fancy business suit that served as a major metaphor, plus Sarah’s decision to tell her boss about Rudy’s dead brother so they could form emotional leverage against him. This time, it might’ve been the final straw … or tissue, as the case may be.

At the bar where Rudy was still part-timing, he and Sarah broke their no-work-talk rule and started arguing over the missing nurse Jackie Lemanczyk (Gemma-Leah Devereux). That’s when Sarah let it slip that Jackie was a part of the “tissue committee,” whatever that was. (In an earlier flashback, she took her concerns about Melvin Pritcher (Dan Fogler) to a company executive, but she wasn’t happy with the outcome.) That was information Sarah wasn’t supposed to share with anyone, let alone opposing counsel, and she worried it might negatively impact her career if Rudy seized on it. Rudy was torn up about whether to follow that lead, considering Sarah’s pleas for him not to, and consulted with Deck (P.J. Byrne) and Bruiser (Lana Parrilla). Ultimately, he came to the conclusion that this was substantial evidence that deserved to be subject to discovery and went after it, even if it cost him his relationship with Sarah.

 

Milo Callaghan told TV Insider of the decision, “I think part of him knows [it will cause them to break]. I think he makes a half-hearted attempt to cover for her at one point with Bruiser, and I think that’s his last-ditch effort to really sort of save his relationship. But I don’t know if he’s so much as betraying Sarah as fighting for what he believes to be right and true.”

Elsewhere in the episode, we got to see what happened to Jackie after she was kidnapped by Melvin. She woke up in an empty summer camp that he attended as a child and learned her neighbor was a victim of his, too. (An independent autopsy confirmed she died of an overdose.) Jackie was later kept captive in a trunk with an oxygen tank that very nearly ran out while Melvin was in court for his first hearing. Later, as Jackie tried to flee into the woods, she also found the private investigator, Jane Allen (Laura Campbell), tied to a tree and injured from a stab wound, but still alive.

Christopher Barr / USA Network

Also, Rudy decided to inform Kelly Riker (Robyn Cara) that her husband, Cliff (Fionn Ó Loingsigh), was at his house and threatened him, but she didn’t want Rudy to alert the authorities. She’d been squirreling away money as her own exit strategy, but in the final moments of the episode, she discovered he’d taken her hidden stash of cash. Now what?

The Rainmaker, Fridays, 10/9c, USA Network

September 6, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
'John Candy: I Like Me' Review: Colin Hanks Doc
TV & Streaming

‘John Candy: I Like Me’ Review: Colin Hanks Doc

by jummy84 September 6, 2025
written by jummy84

I fell in love with John Candy the moment I saw him serve up those shovel-sized pancakes in “Uncle Buck.” John Hughes wrote the part of Uncle Buck specifically for Candy, and the uncle’s affection for his nieces and nephew was true in real life too.

Now, over 30 years after Candy’s death in 1994, comes a new documentary “John Candy: I Like Me,” full of funny anecdotes about a guy virtually everyone liked and also what being that guy cost him. Directed by Colin Hanks, it premiered on opening night of the 2025 Toronto International Film Festival with Hanks, producer Ryan Reynolds, and Candy’s children, co-executive producers Chris Candy and Jennifer Candy-Sullivan, onstage for a post-screening Q&A.

Stanton Wood. Cillian Murphy as Steve (Center-Right) in
Stanton Wood. Cr. Robert Viglasky/Netflix
© 2025.

If you already loved John Candy, this doc will make you love him even more. If you were born after his time, it will be a lovely introduction. Still, the way the doc lingers on its unabashed celebration of Candy’s life and work yet rushes through its brief examination of his psyche prevents it from being a total knockout.

From Candy’s SCTV improv buddies—Martin Short, Catherine O’Hara, Eugene Levy, Dave Hall, Andrea Martin—to Hollywood collaborators like Steve Martin, Tom Hanks, and Mel Brooks, to close friends Dan Aykroyd and Bill Murray, the film is overflowing with household names. A history of the Toronto sketch comedy scene runs as a convenient subplot.

Some of the most memorable commentary comes from Bill Murray, who is the first and last person to appear. At the premiere, Reynolds said Murray was the hardest person to book. After many unreturned calls and even ghosting a set date, Reynolds finally got Murray to agree when he sent him a video of his then two-year-old son saying, “Do the interview.”

Murray sets up one of the narrative difficulties of the film: John Candy was practically a saint, and it’s hard to find people who have anything negative to say. The film leans into this and focuses primarily on celebrating Candy, who appeared in more than 30 films and died of a heart attack alone in his hotel room on a shoot in Durango, Mexico. He was 43 years old. We learn early on that Candy’s own father, whom he strongly resembled, died of a heart attack when John was just five. He lived with the fear that he too would meet an early grave like his father.

The slew of interviews from family, friends, and colleagues forms the skeleton of the film, alongside clips from Candy’s extensive filmography dating back to the mid-1970s. The archival footage of Candy — on set and at home with his kids — gives the film vitality, and the intimate, relaxed settings where interviewees recount memories of the man who left their lives too soon evoke home and hold the film together visually. The score includes heart-wrenching music sung by a poised Cynthia Erivo, recorded especially for the film. It’s a sincere lovefest, warm without being cloying.

But Hanks’ second documentary feature has a classic problem: it lacks editorial discipline. In other words, it’s too long. The reason is a good problem to have — too many beloved stars who rarely give interviews and genuinely wanted to talk about Candy. For example, the now 40-something Macaulay Culkin, who recalls the fatherly care and bond he felt with Candy at a time when his own father and manager was neglecting the child megastar, has some of the most interesting things to say about Candy, but doesn’t appear until the last act. But the recent interview with Dan Akroyd, while nice to see him on camera again, added very little to Candy’s narrative and could’ve been left on the cutting room floor.

Too often the tension between who Candy was to others and who he was to himself gets lost, veering away from the “I Like Me” ethos. (That line comes from another John Hughes’ film, “Planes, Trains and Automobiles,” in which Candy plays a lovable loser opposite Steve Martin.)

One of the places where the movie reaches beyond simply getting the band back together again is when Candy’s son Chris says that in his father’s last years “his mind was overweight,” complicating the narrative that Candy was unjustly lumped in with “living fast and dying young.” On top of eating his feelings — not to mention smoking and drinking them — Candy, according to his son, a personal trainer, and others included in the doc, increasingly suffered from anxiety and panic attacks as his career slowed and his responsibilities as a businessman grew. Conan O’Brien, recalling when the Harvard Lampoon staff brought Candy to campus, adds a salient point: “The hazard of this business is that it’s very unhealthy for people pleasers.”

What the film eventually draws out is that it wasn’t just Candy’s weight that killed him, but a toxic combination of anxiety, stress, and genetic predisposition to heart disease and obesity. Ultimately the film positions Candy’s legacy as one of a decent guy and a talented performer who, as his daughter Jennifer says, “took care of people,” on and off set. But just as important is how it unravels the long shadow cast by a five-year-old boy’s way of coping with the traumatic loss of a parent.

Many interviewees, like Catherine O’Hara and Candy’s “Splash” castmate Tom Hanks, said that whether acting or not, Candy was extremely present when you were with him. Yet the film doesn’t provide enough space for us to feel that presence. Viewers don’t get much of a chance to sit with the particulars of Candy’s life before the film moves on to the next anecdote. One longs to see a full scene of Candy in action onscreen or in a home video, rather than just snippets. There also wasn’t enough of Candy speaking for himself, rather than people telling us how great he was.

The interviews from the SCTV crew, who had a front-row seat to Candy before and after he became a star, were the most compelling. The doc would have benefitted from more of Catherine O’Hara, shown in the film giving a touching tribute at Candy’s 1994 funeral, whose commentary felt especially rich but truncated.

In the end, Hanks delivers a good, but not great, portrait of a lovable guy whose shortcomings took him out — an ordinary guy with extraordinary talent who remains one of the best comedic actors of the 20th century.

Grade: B-

“John Candy: I Like Me” premiered at the 2025 Toronto International Film Festival. It will stream on Prime Video beginning on October 10.

Want to stay up to date on IndieWire’s film reviews and critical thoughts? Subscribe here to our newly launched newsletter, In Review by David Ehrlich, in which our Chief Film Critic and Head Reviews Editor rounds up the best new reviews and streaming picks along with some exclusive musings — all only available to subscribers. 

September 6, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Blood of My Blood' Stars on Triple-Childbirth Episode 6
TV & Streaming

Blood of My Blood’ Stars on Triple-Childbirth Episode 6

by jummy84 September 6, 2025
written by jummy84

SPOILER ALERT: This post contains spoilers from “Birthright,” Episode 6  of “Outlander: Blood of My Blood,” now streaming on Starz.

“Outlander” has always been a baptism by fire kind of experience for its actors. More than a decade into the franchise, the sweeping romanticism of author Diana Gabaldon’s story is matched only by a constantly evolving definition of trauma, leaving each character –– and the audience –– to brace for the brutality of life and whatever fresh hell awaits them around every corner.

Julia (Hermione Corfield) and Henry Beauchamp (Jeremy Irvine) rounded that proverbial corner in the sixth episode of Starz’s prequel series “Outlander: Blood of My Blood.” In the span of the hour, Corfield gives birth not once but twice on screen, while Irvine plays out Henry’s mental collapse in real time. But before you worry too much for the actors, being handed that defining traumatic moment to chew on is kind of a rite of passage in the world of “Outlander.”

“I think that’s the thing with the show,” Irvine tells Variety. “It’s an epic, epic story, and everyone will have their time, I’m sure.”

Courtesy of Sanne Gault/Starz

Rite of passage or not, it was still a heavy lift for Corfield to perform two birthing scenes back to back, an experience she’s kind of hazy on more than a year later.

“I think it was a week of birthing, actually,” Corfield says of how the scenes were filmed. “If I’m remembering correctly, I think that was why it was so intense because I realized I was doing a whole week of this. [For the main birthing scene], we were in that room filming for three or four days.”

Since inadvertently time traveling back to 1714 Scotland, Julia and Henry have endured enormous hurdles to survive as people out of time. She has been forced into servitude in the home of the cruel, relentless Lord Lovat (Tony Curran), whom she slept with to cover up that she is carrying Henry’s baby. She feared Lovat would get rid of the baby if it wasn’t his, and a seer prophecy that the child will grow up to be king has now made her even more valuable to him. Henry, meanwhile, has been conscripted as an accountant for Isaac Grant (Brian McCardie), a treacherous position that promises the opportunity to search for Julia if only he can navigate the politics of the time.

Julia’s tenuous circumstances at Castle Leathers reach a breaking point in Episode 6 when she goes into labor, leading to a frenzied birthing scene where she is assisted and then berated by a gaggle of howdies (Scottish midwives) who come to support her until her fellow housemaid Davina (Sarah Vickers) begins to question the legitimacy of the pregnancy. When she claims Julia seduced Lovat, the howdies become venomous, leaving the expectant mother writhing on the straw-strewn floor to defend the paternity between contractions. She’s lying, of course. Henry is the father. But in this moment, she vehemently stands her ground as if it were the truth because for her baby to survive, it has to be.

“I think she must die a little bit inside every time she has to lie and say Lovat is the father,” Corfield says.

The actor says she loaded up on energy drinks to get multiple days of shooting the birth, much of which required her to fend off the threats of the howdies and a furious Davina.

Courtesy of Sanne Gault/Starz

“I wanted to map out the intensity of the contractions, as well as the intensity of the women for this moment because it kind of goes hand in hand,” she says. “They both get more and more wild as the scene goes on. But the main thing for Julia is she is just in absolute animal instinct mode. She’s purely trying to protect this child, and that’s her only intention. The howdies were having to grab onto me and I was being sort of manhandled all day every day. So it was really quite easy to do, because I didn’t have to pretend to be exhausted. I was absolutely exhausted fighting for my life!”

This scene is intercut with a comparatively calm flashback to when Julia gave birth to Claire (the character played by Caitriona Balfe in the flagship series). Then, she was standing in a crouched position, grabbing onto the metal bars of her and Henry’s bed in their flat back in London. Meanwhile, he’s fumbling around trying to find something to comfort her in an impossibly uncomfortable moment. It’s become an increasingly rare sight, seeing these two together and happy. 

“There’s an elation there, and it feels like young love epitomized,” Corfield says. “It’s in total opposition to what we see in the other scene, which felt like a totally different experience. In the castle, she’s on her knees a lot. She’s crawling around. [The howdies] are circling her. She tends to be sort of below all of them for quite a lot of it, and there’s that sensation of them closing in on her.”

Throughout the writhing and the screaming, Julia’s fortitude wears down a defiant Davina, whose history with Lovat feeds the moment. Further flashbacks show when Davina was first raped by Lovat and the resulting birth of her own son, Brian Fraser (Jamie Roy), aka the father of Jamie Fraser (Sam Heughan). If you’re counting at home, that’s the third birthing scene in this one episode. But it’s revealed she also rejected the howdies’ scorn for how she got pregnant, just as Julia is doing now. Davina eventually casts out the howdies on Julia’s behalf, and even banishes Lovat when he barges in with a priest trying to marry Julia before the baby is born so it won’t arrive out of wedlock — something that will likely come at her own peril.

“It’s a really lovely moment, because Julia appeals to Davina as a mother,” Corfield says. “She’s saying that the way you shaped your son is down to you. Please let me shape my son. Don’t let me die, and don’t leave me in the hands of Lovat. At that moment, they become a team.”

The impact these three births have on the “Outlander” canon is massive. Fans will undoubtedly be thrilled to see the literal origins of Claire and Brian, both of whom are essential for bringing the original series story to pass. But it’s the new as-yet-named baby boy who remains a question mark. Gabaldon has always told fans Claire’s parents died when she was five years old, making their survival in the past and the arrival of her little brother a new wrinkle in the story. Let the wild theorizing of who he will grow up to be commence!

Courtesy of Sanne Gault/Starz

As for the boy’s father, Henry does not get to share in the joy of his son’s birth. His desperate search to find Julia has angered his boss Grant, who concocts a plan to end the perceived distraction once and for all by paying a local midwife to tell the poor guy that his wife died in childbirth nearby. The sudden loss of his anchor and purpose completely shatters Henry’s fragile grip on reality, triggering a PTSD-induced episode in which he runs off screaming and dry heaving –– he has that in common with Julia’s storyline. Then, all of a sudden, a switch is flipped, and he retracts back to a joyous memory of racing home to tell Julia that WWI was over. The creatively shot scene shows him running through the Scottish woods as vestiges of the 20th century dot his path, cementing his break with reality.

“It’s something I put a lot of thought into,” Irvine says. “We’ve seen why they’re in love when we’ve seen them together. We’ve seen how happy it makes them. So now we need to see that Henry cannot face the facts. When she dies, he dies. We need to see that visceral reaction, and how unsettling would it be to see him have this mental breakdown with the absolute limits of despair and grief, and then that turns into elation and laughter? I thought that would be quite unsettling to watch. This is someone who is incredibly damaged, and who might be so broken at this point that we’re not sure what he’s going to do next.”

Audiences at least know where he’s headed in the immediate future as he runs off into his 1910s fantasy world. While Henry thinks he’s falling into the arms of Julia in his memory, he actually races straight to a sex worker whose advances he’d denied –– until now. In the fog of his mental break, he believes she is Julia and has sex with her, adding yet another line item to the list of things the Beauchamps have to catch up on.

Corfield and Irvine are currently filming Season 2 of the series in Scotland, so they are bound to secrecy on what’s to come. But they both agree this is the moment that will make or break their once-happy couple. “It’s kind of putting unconditional love to the test, I suppose,” he says.

Julia has been with Lovat out of pure survival instincts, so Henry isn’t the only one in bed with another. But Corfield admits this particular twist is different.

“It’s a hard pill to swallow for me and for Julia,” she says. “I was heartbroken when I read it. Their love is so deep, but that’s not to say that something like this would be easily forgotten. It’s something they will definitely have to talk through when they meet again.”

September 6, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
‘Sentimental Value’ Star Inga Ibsdotter Lilleaas Interviewed From Telluride
TV & Streaming

‘Sentimental Value’ Star Inga Ibsdotter Lilleaas Interviewed From Telluride

by jummy84 September 6, 2025
written by jummy84

EXCLUSIVE: Inga Ibsdotter Lilleaas is the quiet sister, Agnes, opposite Renate Reinsve’s louder, more histrionic older sibling Nora in Joachim Trier’s unbelievably brilliant Cannes Grand Prix winner Sentimental Value. “Agnes is the diplomat of the family,” Lilleaas tells us, “trying to keep everyone together in the family.”

Trier didn’t know much about Lilleaas before he decided to cast her as Agnes, an academic historian who lives with her husband and son in the spacious house in Oslo where she was raised with Nora and their late mother.

Their father Gustov Borg, played with a sort of wounded gusto by Stellan Skarsgård, is a once-famous film director who abandoned his family when he made the choice to concentrate on his career.

Sometimes, when I watch movies, my eye is drawn to the quiet character to the left of the frame; they’re just slightly out of the main action. But their stillness compels you to pay attention. That’s what happened when I first saw Lilleaas in Sentimental Value.

Lilleaas comes from a theater background. Her parents ran a theater production company that made sets and costumes. They also went out on the road, putting on shows in the towns and villages surrounding the little mountainside village they lived in at Goc located in Hallingdal Valley in Buskerud County, situated between Oslo and Bergen in Norway.

RELATED: Oscars 2026 International Feature Film Submissions By Country

At the age of 2, her parents cast her in an historical play about a woman who’s beheaded because she had an abortion.

“They thought she killed her baby,” Lilleaas explains.

“I was very little. And I’ve been told that on the day of the premiere I threw a tantrum and said, ‘I don’t want to do it anymore.’ So that’s sort of the beginning for me,” Lilleaas says.

Trier says he met with many actors for Agnes. “And she’s extraordinary,” he says. “And I like actors that sometimes don’t jump up and do the jazz hands.

“Renate can f*cking do that. She’s funny,” he adds. “And she could do levity and all that. So I love that in her, the spectrum of Renate. But I needed someone opposite her who could hold that silence, and that took a bit of work. We had to do a couple of casting sessions, and suddenly I saw it in Inga, who is remarkable and she gives herself to the camera. Her closeups are extraordinary — cinematic as hell.”

RELATED: ‘Sentimental Value’ Trailer: First Look At Joachim Trier’s Cannes Grand Prix Winner Starring Renate Reinsve, Stellan Skarsgård & Elle Fanning

Lilleaas and I meet for a cuppa tea in a private dining room toward the rear of the New Sheridan Hotel along Telluride’s main boulevard. I’d seen her before, at the film’s now-famous 19-minute world premiere ovation during Cannes and at a party. Then up in the mountains, Skarsgård introduced us at the annual brunch for Telluride’s festival patrons.

Stellan Skarsgård and Inga Ibsdotter Lilleaas

Baz Bamigboye/Deadline

They hadn’t sought the busier area. Instead she and Skarsgård stood with their backs to it all. They weren’t being stand-offish, not at all. They just weren’t seeking the limelight. By the way, their fellow stars Reinsve and Elle Fanning were standing out of the spotlight too. The sight of them all made me smile.

Following her tantrum at 2 years old, it was at high school that Lilleaas decided that she wanted to get into the theater program, and that was “the first time I can remember actually thinking about wanting to be an actor. And before that it was just a feeling I had. … I liked doing theater. And then I applied to these theater schools, and that’s sort of when I understood that maybe I could be an actress,” she says as we sip our hot drinks.

RELATED: 2025-26 Awards Season Calendar: Dates For Emmys, Oscars, Grammys & More

She hadn’t fully comprehended that “actually there was a job that people had that was just being an actor, not making the theater, which was what I had seen my parents do, doing the whole thing from the construction and all the work that goes into it.”

Although she loved the “whole process” of making theater, there was a determination to focus on the thespian part of it.

As a big fan of Julia Roberts, Pretty Woman and Steel Magnolias played on repeat. “And I just thought she was so beautiful and a really good actress. So I remember her from when I was young. I remember seeing Erin Brockovich in the cinema actually, and I was so blown away by that movie and by her,” Lilleaas says. 

Equally, she got a kick out of just seeing the kids in high school who were in her parents’ classes. “I went to see their shows, and we went to Oslo to see productions. … And they would go on field trips with the class, and I would come with them twice a year maybe. But what I grew up with is the amateur theater and seeing the high school kids perform. So that’s what I grew up identifying with and wanting to be. So I didn’t really go outside for inspiration. It was sort of there on my doorstep,” she says.

Renate Reinsve and Inga Ibsdotter Lilleaas in ‘Sentimental Value’

Neon/Everett Collection

“And when I look back at it, for me as a kid, they were amazing. They probably maybe weren’t that amazing, but I felt that it was amazing what they were doing. And then I grew up and there was a lot of very good Norwegian actors to look up to.”

Her favourite then was Ane Dahl Torp (The Wave, Cold Lunch), but there were many others she followed.

RELATED: Breaking Baz @ Cannes: Stellan Skarsgård Finds A Sweet Party Spot After The Triumph Of Joachim Trier’s Cannes Sensation ‘Sentimental Value’

At 17, she was an education exchange and went to live in Brazil  and went to a normal high school with Brazilian kids and gradually learned Portuguese for a year.

Her local-language skills were helped along by watching “the telenovelas, like our soap operas.” She remembers seeing telenovelas such as Tropical Paradise and Once in a Blue Moon. The common factor being, both featured Wagner Moura, the Cannes Film Festival Best Actor star of Kleber Mendonça Filho’s The Secret Agent.

“I saw him, he taught me Portuguese in a way,” Lilleaas says brightly. “Because I watched him and other actors, of course, in the telenovelas, and I remember him so well because he was so good.”

Wagner Moura and Inga Ibsdotter Lilleaas

Baz Bamigboye/Deadline

And just hours after hearing that story, there they were, hanging out with the Sentimental Value and The Secret Agent teams at the Neon party. 

I ask Lilleaas about her preparations for taking on the role of Agnes in Trier’s movie. 

“We had a lot a rehearsal. I’ve never done that before to that extent. But we went through every scene that I was in and with the other actors and we blocked it and we had a really thorough talk about it. And so when we came to set, we had had a plan, sort of, that we could follow or not. So it wasn’t like, ‘This is how we’re going to do it,’ but it wasn’t set in stone.”

Trier’s pre-production runthrough of the screenplay gave her confidence. “We’ve been through this. So we’ve tried it out,” Lilleaas says. “We know a little bit about what it’s like. And in Norway, there’s not a lot of money for rehearsals.“

And then “when you do it again, you get deeper into it. I think it’s not just the first read of the thing. So you can actually dig deeper. And you have sort of a memory of what the other actor did.“

They shot in a studio and at various locations including the family home that’s at the center of the film’s drama. It’s a dramatic structure located in Oslo’s posh west end of the city.

Lilleaas knew Reinsve a little because they’d worked together with a  small theater company that Reinsve had started. They worked summer seasons on theater projects with children who are home and don’t go on vacation.

Then Trier brought them together for Sentimental Value. The two actors rehearsed together, and Lilleaas had a feeling of, “How was this dynamic going to be?”

“We had talks about family and sisterhood and stuff like that,” says Lilleaas, who has an older sister and a younger brother. “I’m in the middle,” she says, laughing.

“It’s great. I mean, I know a little bit of what it’s like to be a younger sister, and I know what it’s like to be a bigger sister and how that’s different, how the dynamic is different and the responsibility is different. When you’re someone’s younger sister, like I am in the movie, you’re protected in a way, and there’s someone who’s always been there. You’re not the first, you’re not the test [child],” she says.

From left: Joachim Trier, Inga Ibsdotter Lilleaas, Stellan Skarsgård, Elle Fanning and Renate Reinsve at the Deadline Studio during the 2025 Toronto Film Festival

Deadline

“And when you’re an older sister, at least for me, there’s this enormous responsibility to protect the younger one that I don’t feel with my older sister. They’re so much more relaxed, which is probably annoying for her that you can just walk through life with the feeling of no responsibility.”

I point out that in the film, Agnes, although younger, is the grownup.

“But I think at some point it shifted in their relationship because when there were children, Nora, the older sister, protected the younger sister and took care of her and was her steady rock.” She feels that affected Nora “in a way that broke her a little bit. And it affected her, as you see in the movie. And so at some point, the healthier one becomes the protector in adulthood. … A lot of people can relate to that and recognize that. … And that’s because of the sort of older sibling sacrifice in a way, or her taking the fall, I guess. … That makes the younger one able to be the protector because maybe they’re more secure.”

But, in her view, it doesn’t mean that the younger — and, in this instance, stronger — sister, is not “affected by the childhood.”

Agnes has her scars, only they’re not immediately as visible as Nora’s.

“When we worked on it, I think that Agnes has a relationship with her father. He’s not absent from her life, but he’s not there. So she can call him, but he’s not involved that much,” she says.

As a child, Agnes and her father were close — after all, he chose her to play a role in one of his films.

And then he disappeared into editing and into probably traveling with the film. “And he was gone. And for a child, that must be so devastating and it must make you feel that you were used by your parents somehow. You don’t necessarily understand then. But I imagine that that’s the feeling that you were sort of taken advantage of in a way.

“I can only imagine, being an actor, how much you give of your inner self and how much that costs. And for someone just to take it and leave, it’s hard enough when it’s someone you don’t really know. But when it’s your own father, it must really make you confused to put it lightly,” she says.

I think I understand why actors act and how they can pour themselves into a role. Yet I feel that they’re not always appreciated for what they put into it, I say.

“I think if you turn on your empathy a little and think about it, what you’re actually doing is you’re putting the most vulnerable part of yourself for everyone to see and enjoy,” Lilleaas says. But, she warns: “That does cost something for people. And I think there’s a lot of judgment against actors.”

I suggest that,in part, it’s based on the ever-ready diet of celebrity coverage that dominates the media. Everything is showbiz. The president of the United States treats the White House like some mammoth soundstage where he can treat foreign leaders as if they’re the stooges on a television game show.

And then there’s the assumption that every actor must have stacks of money and that everything is done for them.

“And I think people look at that and they want that,” Lilleaas says. “So maybe there’s a little jealousy in there that you want that, but you don’t know what you’re paying to get that.”

Most actors, she says, “aren’t famous. They’re very hardworking, normal people.”

From left: Inga Ibsdotter Lilleaas, Elle Fanning, Renate Reinsve, Stellan Skarsgård and Joachim Trier at the 2025 Cannes Film Festival

Monica Schipper/Getty Images

I was in the Grand Lumiere in Cannes when Sentimental Value was greeted with that extraordinary 19-minute ovation. 

How did she feel being in that rare moment, I ask.

“It was overwhelming, of course. We’d just seen the movie, which was nice. I had seen it once before, in a smaller theater. So this was huge. And there were a lot of people, and it was so nice to hear people react and you can feel the energy in the room. … And this feels good. And then they applaud. And I was prepared that if they like it, they’ll applaud. And thought, ‘Maybe it’ll last a little,’ but I didn’t know what was long and what was short. You don’t know what six minutes is. You don’t know what 19 minutes is. So I just sort of dissociate a little because you’re filmed at the same time,” she recalls with a delayed looked of shock on her face.

I confess to her that I was one of those from the media who filmed her. Although, I must say that my iPhone is nowhere near as big as the official cameras that Thierry Frémaux escorted into the auditorium to film the ovation. 

“I had tears in my eyes because I thought it was just great and a little overwhelming, of course. And I was moved by the movie,” she says. “I was moved by people’s reaction to the movie. And when you look people in the eye after they’ve seen it, there’s this connection that we know we’ve experienced something together and that we have this understanding of our pain, each other’s pain, without having to say it because we’ve seen the movie and it sort of describes it. And so now we know each other.”

It’s a bond made between people watching a big screen in the dark, she remarks. “I think that’s so powerful to experience, and that makes me cry a little.”

I remember feeling that the Sentimental Value screening was a seminal night for cinema. But the irony of it was that this was a film about acting, about the film industry and the destruction that it can cause to the people who toil in it .And it was taking place in this cathedral of cinema.

“And it was very huge for me to just be there,” Lilleaas says. “I felt so privileged and I felt like it was a dream to be there. And how much respect people have for movies there. That’s very moving.”

But what did she think of the whole the Cannes red carpet — the gowns, the jewelry, the shoes, and all that palava?

Reading my question back, I realize how sexist it is. I guess I wouldn’t have asked Denzel Washington about the color of his tuxedo or his ear stud.

I chastise myself, wishing that I could take it back. 

However, Lilleaas responded that she thought the whole red carpet panoply “was a lot,” especially when that kind of exhibitionism “is so far from the core of the movie.”

Nonetheless, she thought the glam fest was “fun” and that she “likes to dress up” but suggests that she found it “a little overwhelming as well.”

As we’re talking, Lilleaas suddenly looks up with a start. There’s a trophy head of a buffalo known as “Old Joe,” as the brass plaque reveals, mounted on a dining room wall. “It’s garish,” Lilleaas cries.

We’d been so deep into our conversation that neither one of us had noticed the darn buffalo staring right down at us.

Inga Ibsdotter Lilleaas with her “friend” Joe mounted on wall at New Sheridan Hotel in Telluride

Baz Bamigboye/Deadline

Not much call for buffalo in Oslo. She and actor husband Gunnar Eiriksson (Pørni, Power Play) reside there with their 4-year-old son. ”It’s a very chill, everyday life with my family,” she allows.

She went straight home from Cannes and into the routine of picking up her child at kindergarten. “It’s very quick to get back to reality from that unreal setting to somewhere close to normal life. That’s life as life. That’s what’s important to me. And that’s what has value. And the other stuff is fun and a little crazy, but it not real life,” she observes.

Lilleaas agrees that you can’t act real life on stage or screen if you don’t ever experience it as a normal person.

That’s why she believes that “a lot of actors should have other jobs in their life. They need to know what it’s like to have a job that’s not acting and to work with other people who are not actors. Because you can’t spend your whole career life working with the same type of people, we’re very similar often. And to just do the acting, then you don’t actually know what you’re talking about somehow, I think.”

Lilleaas has practiced what she preaches. She has worked in the costume department of her parents’ business. Her first main job was as a dental assistant. “I was super unqualified for the work — I was 17,” she reveals.

That was followed by a stint as a teacher and helping out in a care home for senior citizens.

That last gig must’ve been helpful in her understanding of Agnes’ father, played by Skarsgård.

I’d seen them in Cannes at the Closing Night party, and I liked how he often seemed to be protective of her in a kindly, fatherly way. Same in Telluride. This world was new to Lilleaas, and she appreciated that he was “so sweet to her.”

And, she adds, “He’s so down to earth and so warm and empathetic, and he’s such a good actor.” 

Working with him on Sentimental Value, she says that “when you just look in his eyes, you see his soul, you can feel his presence, and I can see something in there. I don’t know what it is, but it resonates with me. And so I react to that intuitively, which was so much fun and so interesting and rewarding as an actor to work with him. Yeah,and he’s very nice.”

Her Agnes in Sentimental Value, she notes, “is not in the darkest place throughout the movie. So for me it was very light and happy to go to work. And I really like feeling things at work. So it was a lot of fun. We had a great time.”

Future work, Lilleaas says, is “a little up in the air” while she helps promote Sentimental Value through the fall and winter. Following TIFF, the picture screens on four dates at the New York Film Festival beginning with a gala on September 30 at Alice Tully Hall at Lincoln Center. It’s screening three times at the BFI London Film Festival, premiering there on October 12 at the Royal Festival Hall. It’s released into theaters in the US and UK on November 7.

The world of the stage remains in her blood. Before and after filming Sentimental Value she stood in for her uncle, a teacher at a drama school in Oslo, where she taught 19-year-old students for half a semester.

She found the experience refreshing. “I love being a teacher,” she enthuses. “It’s like acting, teaching. I’ve done it before as well. And I learned so much about acting from it because I have to try to explain myself. And I think it’s really interesting and it’s so much fun to see younger people experience themselves in doing that. And to see them grow as people mostly, not so much the acting part, it’s more the human being growing up and taking that step into adulthood. I think it’s such a privilege to be a witness to.”

It’s also a privilege for me as well, to watch a new star get ready to soar.

September 6, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Kristin Davis Is Still Processing the 'And Just Like That' Reaction
TV & Streaming

Kristin Davis Is Still Processing the ‘And Just Like That’ Reaction

by jummy84 September 5, 2025
written by jummy84

Kristin Davis hasn’t yet made sense of the critical reaction to And Just Like That.

The Sex and the City sequel series recently signed off after three seasons (taking place after six seasons of the original series and the two movies) with Carrie Bradshaw (Sarah Jessica Parker) happy and single, and the rest of the cast left in somewhat open-ended but hopeful marriages or relationships.

“It’s been very, very weird, the whole trying to come back with this different, similar show, right? We were very clear about [how] it’s a different show [but] same characters — which I really think I was naive about how weird that was for people, for our fans,” Davis said on the most recent episode of her iHeartRadio podcast Are You a Charlotte? “It’s kind of asking a lot of fans. I guess I’m still trying to figure this out.”

While reflecting on the franchise with guest Dan Futterman, Davis said that her co-star Cynthia Nixon sent her the recent Times podcast where Taffy Brodesser-Akner shared her assessment of the series, which Davis said “really gave me hope. Like at this point, I’m looking for any understanding of what we were trying to do,” she said, quoting Brodesser-Akner as summing up And Just Like That as a “documentary of middle age.” Adding, “I feel so seen.”

Davis admitted, while getting choked up, that they knew people would have “a lot of thoughts and feelings” about Sex and the City coming back in the form of And Just Like That to catch up with the main cast a decade later, “but we didn’t really understand the depth of confusion and/or I guess struggle about us aging and trying to talk about the things that you talk about and deal with in your fifties. It’s like a lot of people have some super strong feelings about it.”

Davis is right in that season three became the talk of the town, as critics and viewers shared their hot takes (which included a “hate-watching” trend) throughout And Just Like That’s recent viral run.

Davis also shared that she didn’t know the series was ending ahead of time: “I think because I didn’t realize that we were going to end And Just Like That, so I’m still processing and, like so Pollyanna, that I thought we would just keep going.”

Writer/director/showrunner Michael Patrick King had officially announced the HBO Max hit series would be ending only two weeks before the finale aired, saying in a statement that “while I was writing the last episode of And Just Like That season three, it became clear to me that this might be a wonderful place to stop.”

He later explained to The Hollywood Reporter that he, star/executive producer Sarah Jessica Parker and HBO made the decision not to announce that it was the final season any earlier because “if you say the word ‘final’ at the beginning of a season… people wouldn’t have struggled with Carrie [Parker] and Aidan [John Corbett] the way they did. If you knew this was a final season, you wouldn’t think about fixing it. You would just say, ‘Well, that’s over,’” he said of splitting up Carrie and longtime love Aidan during season three. “So we made a decision with HBO and with everyone to not say ‘final’ because … you’re going to talk about how it ends before it even begins? This season was so active — as you see, it was very active. The word ‘final’ is like a funeral dirge on something that we wanted to be a party.”

Still, King told THR that he didn’t second guess the decision to wrap the franchise amid the buzzy response because “I believe that sometimes you take the candy away,” he said, “And I believe — in my perhaps delusion — that it will resonate correctly. Once everybody gets over the, ‘I want it to end a different way.’ Once everyone stops writing their show. Also, there’s a whole other unchatty world of the people who have watched and loved these characters for 27 years. And that’s really who we’re writing to. To make sure that Carrie’s taken care of and that they’re taking care of.”

Julie Rottenberg and Elisa Zuritsky, writers on both the original series and And Just Like That, also tried to make sense of the reaction when unpacking the end of the franchise with THR. “[Carrie] represents so much for so many people so, of course, we’re never going to please all the people all the time. I think that has been well documented!” said Rottenberg. “[But] why are people so angry? I think it comes back to the double-edged sword of these characters who have been around for decades, who are so deeply ingrained in people’s lives and imaginations and their feelings. So any choices we made, I think, become incredibly personal.”

During her podcast, Davis similarly shared her confusion when trying to understand how viewers felt and still feel about the sequel series. “People are projecting all kind of things of their own and their own expectations and or desires and or disappointments or whatever it is. They have such strong feelings. And so when I can be calm about it, I know that that’s a compliment, right,” she said, but “it can be really painful. My biggest thing is that it’s been very confusing. I’m still confused, and I do not like to be confused. I like to understand things.”

Davis said that she, Parker and Nixon will continue to be in each other’s lives, noting they went out to dinner last week. But she said it’s been challenging to follow the online conversation while she’s been “mourning” the series and in the public eye with her podcast. “Let me tell you, it was like suddenly walking into your own funeral when you didn’t know it was coming. I mean, it was like we died. At a certain point, I had to be like, ‘OK… I got to put my phone down. I cannot look at Instagram,’” she shared. “Young selves and the odes, you know, they’re lovely odes to the death of our characters, but they didn’t die. And I’m here and I’m fine, I’m good, you know what I mean.”

September 5, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Why Daniel Levy is the best chairman in Premier League history
TV & Streaming

Why Daniel Levy is the best chairman in Premier League history

by jummy84 September 5, 2025
written by jummy84

Levy was reportedly dispatched by Tottenham owners, the Lewis family, and their ENIC group on Thursday night, with reports suggesting the move was motivated by a desire to, essentially, win stuff.

Large portions of the Tottenham fanbase became disillusioned with Levy’s apparent penny-pinching and perceived failure to re-invest commercial windfalls. His lack of ambition ultimately yielded a dusty trophy cabinet. And that has made everyone cross.

Ironically, Levy’s final two major acts for Spurs – winning a trophy and getting rinsed in the transfer market (more on that later) – are just about the most fundamentally ‘un-Spursy’ notes Levy could have ended on.

However, while no chairman is without blemish, certainly not after almost a quarter of a century running the joint, Levy should go down as one of the most positively influential people in Tottenham Hotspur Football Club history. Here’s why.

Daniel Levy has left Spurs after 24 years Getty Images

To accept the merits of Levy, you have to accept what Spurs were prior to his appointment as executive chairman during the 2001/02 season.

Spurs had finished in the bottom-half on five consecutive occasions, with one League Cup trophy in a decade. The 1980s represented a purple patch and there were, of course, great glories in previous generations, but in the Premier League era, Spurs simply attended the party and left without making a scene.

Enter Levy. In 19 of 20 seasons between 2004/05 and 2023/24, Spurs finished inside the top half of the table. Better still, 13 of those seasons concluded with Spurs among the top five, while they enjoyed 13 consecutive seasons of European football.

In parallel to generally raising standards throughout the club, Levy earned his reputation for being one of the shrewdest sellers around, extracting close to £90 million for Gareth Bale, still inside the top 10 fees ever received by a British team.

He coaxed 435 appearances and 280 goals out of academy lad Harry Kane before selling Spurs’ beloved son to Bayern Munich for up to £100m – a staggering fee for an asset on the wrong side of 30 years old.

Missing out on Eberechi Eze to rivals Arsenal was a clear, uncharacteristic failure, though clear details of precisely how the deal imploded remain in-house.

Not all of Spurs’ reinvestments paid dividends, but his dealings yielded seven major finals during his tenure. Tottenham won the League Cup in 2008 and the Europa League in 2025. Four League Cup finals and the 2019 Champions League final were all lost.

Now, is it more difficult to reach a final, or win one? Levy was not responsible for Ben Thatcher’s rebound into the path of Matt Jansen to opening the scoring in the 2002 final, nor did he cause time to stand still to allow Brad Friedel a chance to deny Les Ferdinand’s header from becoming an equaliser.

He did not miss a penalty in the 2009 shootout against Manchester United, nor did the ball deflect off his leg over a well-positioned Hugo Lloris to gift Chelsea the advantage in the 2015 final, nor did the ball strike his arm after 24 seconds of the 2019 Champions League final to hand Liverpool a penalty and drastically change the course of the game.

Son Heung Min

Spurs lost the 2019 Champions League final to Liverpool Getty Images

You can make a reasonable case that ultimately the buck stops with the chairman, that these players were in the employ of Spurs and a looser hand with the chequebook would have seen better players in those crucial moments, but this rudimentary logic overlooks the fact he built teams capable of reaching those moments in the first place.

Had a handful of moments fallen the other way, Levy could be stepping down with a Champions League win and five League Cup trophies to accompany the Europa League title. And surely an unrivalled legacy among Spurs fans? In fact, he wouldn’t be stepping down at all.

Levy appointed wheelers and dealers: Harry Redknapp. He recruited up-and-coming stars: Mauricio Pochettino, Andre Villas-Boas. He appointed serial winners: Antonio Conte, Ange Postecoglou. He even appointed the Special One. Of course, not all appointments can be expected to work out, many have failed, but in each time, each context, Levy was not one to scrimp on finding the right boss.

Tottenham are widely regarded among the big six teams in the biggest league in world football. Their stadium – strangely used as a stick to beat Spurs with because it can’t play up front or hit top bins in cup finals – is among the best in the world, custom-built to maximise revenue streams, an essential part of the PSR era that does precisely fall under the remit of the chairman. Their state-of-the-art training ground rivals any in the world.

Spurs are, in essence, Andy Murray. Competing at the top in an era of GOATs, with an overall record that doesn’t do the underlying work justice and would have shone brighter without the fitness issues.

Daniel Levy

How will Spurs fare without Levy at the top? Getty Images

Clubs of a similar calibre and history – Newcastle, Aston Villa, Everton, grand old clubs with vast fanbases – have not fared nearly as well as Spurs under Levy.

The former pair were both relegated as recently as 2016. Newcastle ended a SEVENTY-YEAR wait for a major domestic trophy in 2025, while Villa have gone without silver since 1996.

Everton spent over three-quarters of a billion pounds on transfers between allowing David Moyes to join Manchester United in 2013 and David Moyes returning to the club in 2025. All that cash transformed them from top-six regulars into, err, perennial relegation candidates.

During the Levy era, Tottenham fans have watched Leeds implode, Sunderland go to the brink, West Ham still fail to articulate what The West Ham Way actually is, and Leicester enjoy a 5000/1 season, receive their flowers and march back to obscurity.

In terms of the ‘big six’, Chelsea were bankrolled to the top in a time when clubs had freedom to do so, Manchester City struck gold (or oil) with their revolutionary ownership group, while Manchester United appear rotten to the core and for all Arsenal’s impressive squad-building program under Mikel Arteta, where is their Premier League title? Where is their European trophy? One piece of major silverware has arrived at the Emirates since Arsene Wenger departed in 2018 – an FA Cup. Hardly a haul to consign Spurs to the shadows.

To crack into the upper echelons is one thing, to stay there has been a whole other success story. Maybe a successor will build on solid foundations to increase the flow of silver, or maybe a successor, armed with a mandate to win trophies, will spend reckless sums and undermine the work done so far. This should be a nervous time for the fans.

Of course, last season’s 17th-place finish was a dire blotch on the record. But Spurs’ start to the fresh season, with a full squad free from injuries, with a tactically adept manager not wedded to a kamikaze style of play, with around £180m invested into the playing squad – including Xavi Simons, whose deal to Chelsea was impeccably hijacked in the wake of missing Eze – demonstrates last term was an anomaly. It will not be repeated.

Spurs’ consistency under Levy has been, by metrics purged of entitlement, an incredible triumph since 2001. But for his leadership, the Premier League would boast a ‘big five’ – and Tottenham Hotspur would not be part of it.

By entering your details you are agreeing to our terms and conditions and privacy policy. You can unsubscribe at any time.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Check out more of our coverage or visit our and to find out what’s on. For more TV recommendations and reviews, listen to .

September 5, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Ireland Baldwin in January 2020; Hilaria Baldwin promo for
TV & Streaming

Ireland Baldwin Supports Stepmom Hilaria Baldwin Joining ‘DWTS’ Season 34

by jummy84 September 5, 2025
written by jummy84

One person who will be cheering on Hilaria Baldwin as she competes on Dancing With the Stars is her stepdaughter, Ireland Baldwin.

“I wanted to take a second to talk about my step mom @hilariabaldwin,” Ireland began a lengthy Instagram post shared on Thursday, September 4. “I think if people actually knew her the way I do, they would be quite surprised. This post may come out of left field since I don’t post about her or any family members much. I expect misinformed comments and plenty of comments about me only playing nice so I can secure my inheritance. C’mon, people. I see the comments. I’m not getting an inheritance. I have 7 siblings 😂.”

Ireland went on to share that she and Hilaria have bonded over their shared “complex and chaotic” upbringings, adding, “She didn’t always feel safe and seen. Sometimes, she is too loyal to a fault. She is eccentric and totally bat s*** crazy (in a fun way) but she saved my dad’s life. She turned his health around and has shown him the forgiveness and kindness that he needed.”

Ireland continued, “She also recognizes and nourishes the parts of my father [Alec Baldwin] that are the most compassionate and wonderful. She’s taught him that he doesn’t need to suffer inside of his own head and stay stuck in his own past. That it’s never too late to admit you need help and it’s never too late to learn to be kind to yourself.”

Ireland credited Hilaria as the reason she and Alec have the “close relationship” they currently do. “She is the reason I get to have siblings/a big family that I’ve always wanted. She has always respected me, accepted my flaws, embraced me, and has always shown me kindness,” the actress and model gushed. “I met her as a teenager and I needed her as an example. I still very much look up to her now.”

Ireland concluded her message of support by writing that she’s “so proud” of Hilaria for joining DWTS Season 34. “I CANNOT wait to cheer her a** on. She deserves this!” she stated. “And it’s not my place to share the ins and outs, but this woman is a gem and deserves all the love.”

Ireland is the only child Alec shares with his ex-wife, Kim Basinger, to whom he was married from 1993 to 2002. He went to wed Hilaria in 2012, and the couple have since welcomed seven children together.

Ireland shared her message alongside a photo of herself and Hilaria holding a dog and one of her siblings, respectively. Hilaria thanked her stepdaughter for the kind words in the post’s comments, writing, “I’m crying. I love you with all my heart, @irelandirelandireland ❤️. These words mean so much. You mean so much to me 💙.”

Disney / Andrew Eccles

Hilaria will compete alongside partner Gleb Savchenko on DWTS Season 34, which premieres this month. Her casting has been met with mixed reactions from fans, with one fan commenting underneath one of Hilaria’s recent TikTok posts, “How is she a star? I have never heard of her. Singer, actress, athlete?” Another user alleged, “Alec had to make a phone call to make this happen.”

Others shared their excitement to see Hilaria on the show. “Fabulous!!!! We’ll be watching and cheering for you!👏👏👏✨✨✨,” one TikTok user commented, while another added, “Rooting for you, Hilaria! You deserve to take this year’s trophy home!!”

Dancing With the Stars Season 34, Live, Tuesday, September 16, 8/7c, ABC, Disney+ (next day on Hulu)

September 5, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Newer Posts
Older Posts

Social Connect

Facebook Twitter Instagram Pinterest Youtube Snapchat

Recent Posts

  • 2009 feels like a whole other world away

  • Watch Ariana Grande and Jimmy Fallon Perform a History of Duets

  • Spotify’s Joe Hadley Talks ARIA Awards Partnership

  • Nick Offerman Announces 2026 “Big Woodchuck” Book Tour Dates

  • Snapped: Above & Beyond (A Photo Essay)

Newsletter

Subscribe my Newsletter for new blog posts, tips & new photos. Let's stay updated!

Categories

  • Bollywood (1,929)
  • Celebrity News (2,000)
  • Events (267)
  • Fashion (1,606)
  • Hollywood (1,020)
  • Lifestyle (890)
  • Music (2,002)
  • TV & Streaming (1,857)

Recent Posts

  • The Black Beauty Club Is Turning a Block Party Into a Shopping and Discovery Experience

  • Shushu/Tong Shanghai Fall 2026 Collection

  • Here’s What Model Taylor Hill Is Buying Now

Editors’ Picks

  • 2009 feels like a whole other world away

  • Watch Ariana Grande and Jimmy Fallon Perform a History of Duets

  • Spotify’s Joe Hadley Talks ARIA Awards Partnership

Latest Style

  • ‘Steal This Story, Please’ Review: Amy Goodman Documentary

  • Hulu Passes on La LA Anthony, Kim Kardashian Pilot ‘Group Chat’

  • Hannah Einbinder Slams AI Creators As “Losers”

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

@2020 - celebpeek. Designed and Developed by Pro


Back To Top
celebpeek
  • Home
  • Bollywood
  • Hollywood
  • Lifestyle
  • Fashion
celebpeek
  • Music
  • Celebrity News
  • Events
  • TV & Streaming