celebpeek
  • Home
  • Bollywood
  • Hollywood
  • Lifestyle
  • Fashion
celebpeek
  • Music
  • Celebrity News
  • Events
  • TV & Streaming
Home » lawsuit » Page 4
Tag:

lawsuit

Internet Archive & Labels Settle Lawsuit Over Digitizing Old Records
Music

Internet Archive & Labels Settle Lawsuit Over Digitizing Old Records

by jummy84 September 16, 2025
written by jummy84

Universal Music Group, Sony Music Group and Concord have reached a settlement to end their lawsuit  against the Internet Archive over a project to digitize old vinyl records from Frank Sinatra, Ella Fitzgerald, Bing Crosby and other iconic artists.

In a motion filed Friday in Manhattan federal court, both sides say they have a deal to resolve litigation over the “Great 78 Project,” in which thousands of physical records have been digitized and made available to users for free.

Related

Terms of the agreement were not disclosed, and neither side immediately responded to requests for more details on the settlement. The Recording Industry Association of America, which represents the major labels, said in a statement: “The parties have reached a confidential resolution of all claims and will have no further public comment on this matter.”

The labels sued in August 2023, calling the Great 78 Project the “wholesale theft of generations of music” under the guise of historical preservation: “The Great 78 website is a massive, unauthorized, digital record store of recordings.”

The Internet Archive fired back that its project was no such nefarious effort – and that it had “preserved hundreds of thousands of recordings that are stored on shellac resin, an obsolete and brittle medium.”

“When people want to listen to music they go to Spotify,” Internet Archive founder Brewster Kahle said in the statement at the time. “When people want to study sound recordings as they were originally created, they go to libraries like the Internet Archive. Both are needed. There shouldn’t be conflict here.”

Related

Bull Moose

Though the lawsuit claimed that “hundreds of thousands” of songs had been illegally copied, the labels specifically sued over 2,749 songs, including iconic tracks like Crosby’s “White Christmas” and Sinatra’s “I’ve Got the World on a String.” They later added thousand more to the case.

In the two years since the case was filed, it has chugged slowly along. In May 2024, a federal judge refused the Internet Archive’s request to dismiss the lawsuit, allowing it to move into discovery and toward an eventual trial. Earlier this year, the non-profit accused the labels of “gamesmanship,” claiming they were “stonewalling” on key evidence and unfairly trying to add more songs to the case.

But in April, the case was halted after the two sides said they had made “significant progress in settlement discussions.” It has remained largely on ice ever since, leading to Monday’s settlement notice.


Billboard VIP Pass

September 16, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Trey Songz Settles $20 Million Lawsuit Alleging He Forced His Hand Under Woman's Dress At Miami Nightclub
Celebrity News

Trey Songz Settles $20 Million Lawsuit Alleging He Forced His Hand Under Woman’s Dress At Miami Nightclub

by jummy84 September 11, 2025
written by jummy84

Trey Songz


Trey Songz Settles $20 Million Lawsuit Alleging He Forced His Hand Under Woman’s Dress At
Miami Nightclub

#TreySongz has one less legal problem to worry about.

According to legal documents obtained by Billboard, the R&B singer has reached a confidential settlement with Jauhara Jeffries.

If you recall, Jeffries sued Songz for $20 million over allegations that he s3xually a$$aulted her at Miami’s E11Even nightclub on New Year’s Eve 2018. She claimed the “Say Aah” artist forced his hand under her dress without consent during a VIP event.

The lawsuit, which also named the club, was scheduled to go to trial in October 2025, but the case has now been dismissed following the settlement.


September 11, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Trey Songz Settles Sexual Assault Lawsuit Over New Year’s Eve Incident
Music

Trey Songz Settles Sexual Assault Lawsuit Over New Year’s Eve Incident

by jummy84 September 11, 2025
written by jummy84

Trey Songz has reached a confidential settlement to end a lawsuit claiming he sexually assaulted a woman at a Miami nightclub on New Year’s Eve in 2018.

The R&B singer (Tremaine Neverson) was facing assault and battery claims from Jauhara Jeffries, who alleges Songz non-consensually penetrated her with his fingers while they were dancing at E11even Miami in the early hours of Jan. 1, 2018. Songz denied ever assaulting Jeffries.

Related

The pair had been gearing up to go to trial next month alongside E11even Miami, which was accused in Jeffries’ lawsuit of negligently serving alcohol to Songz despite his public history of substance abuse. But new docket entries in Florida court say Jeffries, Songz and the club have all reached a settlement to end the litigation.

“This court has been advised that the matter has been settled as to all parties and therefore, it is hereby ordered and adjudged that this case is dismissed,” wrote Judge Antonio Arzola on Tuesday (Sept. 9). “The court reserves jurisdiction to enforce the settlement and to enter orders necessary to this enforcement.”

The terms of the settlement have not been made public, as is typical for out-of-court resolutions. Jeffries’ lawyer, Ariel Mitchell, tells Billboard on Wednesday (Sept. 10), “I can only comment that the matter has been resolved.”

Reps for Songz and E11even Miami did not immediately return requests for comment.

Related

Fat Joe at Dick Clark's New Year's Rockin' Eve with Ryan Seacrest on December 31, 2024.

Songz has faced numerous allegations of sexual misconduct over the years. The singer previously settled claims that he assaulted a woman at a Los Angeles house party in 2016, and he’s set to go to trial next year over a separate Las Vegas incident from 2021.

Jeffries first filed her lawsuit in 2020, and it had been scheduled to go to trial in Miami this October before a settlement was reached. The case had been muddled by allegations from Songz’s legal team that Mitchell, Jeffries’ attorney, attempted to bribe a witness into backing her client’s version of the events at E11even Miami.

Mitchell has strongly denied these claims, and Judge Arzola ultimately declined to issue penalties earlier this year after finding that there wasn’t conclusive evidence of bribery in what amounted to a “classic ‘she-said versus she-said’ scenario.”

However, Mitchell is facing disciplinary action from the Florida Bar for falsely telling media outlets, including Billboard, back in 2022, that she’d already been cleared of wrongdoing related to the bribery allegations. In reality, says the Florida Bar, Mitchell was still under investigation at the time of these press comments.


Billboard VIP Pass

September 11, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
​GloRilla Files To Dismiss Copyright Lawsuit Over "BBL" Phrase
Music

​GloRilla Files To Dismiss Copyright Lawsuit Over “BBL” Phrase

by jummy84 September 10, 2025
written by jummy84

GloRilla‘s legal team is firing back at a copyright suit filed against her earlier this summer. Natalie Henderson (@slimdabodylast on Instagram) claimed the Memphis rapper stole the phrase “all natural, no BBL” from her and used it in her lyrics without consent. However, Glo is arguing to a judge that copyright law does not protect such a “common” and “cliched” expression.

“The phrase ‘natural[e], no BBL’ —referring to a person with a natural body who has not undergone the ‘Brazilian Butt Lift’ cosmetic procedure—is too common, everyday, trite, and cliched to be protectable by copyright,” her lawyers wrote in the Sept. 8 filing, obtained by Billboard.

“The phrase at issue in plaintiff’s song is not original and thus not copyrightable… Anyone who listens to the two songs should easily reach the conclusion that these songs are not substantially similar,” the motion went on. The document also cites seven other songs with similar verbiage and claims that even if the phrase was copyrightable, there’s no evidence that the “FNF” artist ever heard it from Henderson.

INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA – JULY 19: Rapper GloRilla performs during halftime of the 2025 AT&T WNBA All-Star Game at Gainbridge Fieldhouse on July 19, 2025 in Indianapolis, Indiana. (Photo by Steph Chambers/Getty Images)

Steph Chambers/Getty Images

The bar in question is on Glo’s song 2024 song “Never Find,” which features the line: “Natural, no BBL/ but I’m still gon’ give him hell.” The track appeared on her GLORIOUS album, which peaked at No. 5 on the Billboard 200, as a bonus record. Henderson shared the phrase in a song, writing, “All natural, no BBL/ Mad hoes go to hell,” and her attorneys argued at the time there are “unmistakable similarities between the two works.”

“Based upon a side-by-side comparison of the two songs, a layperson could hear similarities in the lyrics, arrangement, melody, core expression, content, and other compositional elements in both songs and conclude that songs are essentially identical,” they said.

This isn’t the first time Glo was hit with a lawsuit over alleged unauthorized usage of elements in her music. In 2023, she was sued by a producer over using unlicensed samples in her hit songs “Tomorrow” and “Tomorrow 2,” but the case was dismissed last year.

Listen to GloRilla’s “Never Find” below.

September 10, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Twenty One Pilots Accuse Temu of Selling Fake Merch in New Lawsuit
Music

Twenty One Pilots Accuse Temu of Selling Fake Merch in New Lawsuit

by jummy84 September 9, 2025
written by jummy84

Twenty One Pilots have accused Temu of marketing and selling counterfeit merch in a new trademark infringement lawsuit filed against the China-based online retailer. 

The suit, obtained by Rolling Stone, is largely filled with screenshots of what appear to be listings on Temu for an array of allegedly fake Twenty One Pilots merch, such as posters, shirts, mugs, and socks. As the suit notes, some of the items available on Temu appear to be identical to items currently for sale on Twenty One Pilots’ website. Others on Temu appear to contain images and other art associated with the band, such as the cover of their 2015 album, Blurryface.

The complaint alleges that Twenty One Pilots’ trademarks “have been damaged and put at risk by Temu’s knowing and systematic marketing and sale of counterfeit versions,” which they describe as “confusingly and/or virtually identical to” their own trademarked materials.

Temu did not immediately return Rolling Stone’s request for comment.

The lawsuit opens with a pointed salvo at Temu, saying the retailer is “widely understood to be one of the most unethical companies operating in today’s global marketplace. Its business practices are believed to pose great threats to individuals, marketplaces, and the environment.”  

It goes on to cite a complaint recently filed by the State of Nebraska, which alleges that Temu has “flooded the United States with cheap products” and “fuels a whole host of other harms,” including its alleged sale of copyright-protected materials. 

Trending Stories

Twenty One Pilots’ lawyers called Temu a “veritable swamp of infringing and otherwise illegal products,” adding that it “manufactures and sells a myriad of items that are counterfeit or blatant copies of [Twenty One Pilots’] artwork, trademarks, and intellectual property.” 

Counterfeit merchandise has long been a problem for musicians, with suppliers and artists now contending with new school online retailers and old school bootleggers hawking wares outside of concerts. As Billboard notes, merch suppliers for Benson Boone and Tate McRae recently filed separate lawsuits aiming to crack down on fake items sold outside their shows. And Jeff Gluck, the same attorney representing Twenty One Pilots, filed a similar infringement suit against Temu last month on behalf of the MF Doom estate. 

September 9, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
SoundExchange Appeals SiriusXM Royalties Lawsuit Dismissal
Music

SoundExchange Appeals SiriusXM Royalties Lawsuit Dismissal

by jummy84 September 6, 2025
written by jummy84

A major court ruling last month found that SoundExchange doesn’t have the power to collect royalties through litigation. Now, the organization has launched an appeal in hopes of preserving this enforcement strategy.

SoundExchange’s notice of appeal on Friday (Sept. 5) challenges an August federal court ruling that dismissed its $400 million lawsuit against SiriusXM. Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald held in her decision that SoundExchange, a nonprofit designated by the Copyright Royalty Board to collect performance royalties for artists, does not actually have the right to sue anybody under federal law.

Related

This ruling was the first to weigh in on SoundExchange’s standing to collect recorded royalties via lawsuits, and the implications are big. For more than a decade, the organization has regularly used litigation to secure hundreds of millions of dollars in royalties from radio broadcasters like SiriusXM and music streamers such as Slacker and Napster.

Already, music companies are trying to use Judge Buchwald’s ruling in their favor. Just weeks after the decision came down, Sonos told a court that it will file a motion to dismiss its own pending SoundExchange royalties lawsuit based on the rationale in the SiriusXM case.  

Faced with the possibility of losing a key enforcement strategy, SoundExchange is standing firm and using an appeal to go on the offensive. The group wants the Second Circuit Court of Appeals to reverse Judge Buchwald, calling the decision an “erroneous ruling and flawed interpretation” of the Copyright Act in a statement on Friday.

“As Congress surely realized in creating the statutory license, some licensees will seek any available means to avoid paying artists for the full value of their work to maximize profitability,” said SoundExchange in the statement. “For the statutory license to function properly, SoundExchange fully believes Congress intended that the ‘enforcement’ power clearly granted in the statute must necessarily include the ability of its administrator to bring litigation claims when digital music services fail to meet their obligations under the law.”

“In the meantime,” continues the statement, “SoundExchange will continue in its mission of securing fair compensation for artists and rights owners and looks forward to arguing its case in court.”

A rep for SiriusXM did not immediately return a request for comment on the appeal.

The SoundExchange lawsuit against SiriusXM, brought in 2023, accused the satellite radio giant of “gaming the system” with manipulative bundling to withhold more than $150 million in performance royalties up to that point.

SoundExchange says SiriusXM has continued to apply this “faulty methodology” in the years since and now owes more than $400 million to artists and labels. SiriusXM denies all of SoundExchange’s claims.

September 6, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Priscilla Presley's Lawsuit Reveals New Details of Lisa Marie’s Death
Music

Priscilla Presley’s Lawsuit Reveals New Details of Lisa Marie’s Death

by jummy84 September 6, 2025
written by jummy84

The former business advisers who claim Priscilla Presley prematurely ”pulled the plug” on her daughter for financial gain have filed an amended complaint purportedly shedding new light on Lisa Marie Presley’s final hours.

The new complaint, filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court, attaches two pages said to be from Pricilla’s upcoming memoir, Softly, As I Leave You: Life After Elvis, due to publish on Sept. 23. The excerpts appear to offer a detailed account of the day Elvis’ only child died inside a San Fernando Valley community hospital from complications surrounding a small bowel obstruction linked to a prior bariatric surgery.

According to the pages labeled as court exhibits, Priscilla rushed to her daughter’s bedside and was holding her hand, stroking her face, and telling her she was loved as family members gathered. Lisa Marie’s eldest daughter, Riley Keough, was on a plane to join them when a “code blue” emergency alarm indicated Lisa Marie’s heart had stopped, the pages read.

“The next thing I remember is the doctor talking to me. He asked me what I wanted him to do. They had restarted Lisa’s heart, but there was no guarantee it would keep beating,” Priscilla purportedly writes. “I asked the doctor, ‘What kind of life will she have if we keep her on that machine?’ He looked at me with compassion and shook his head. ‘No quality of life at all.’”

In the excerpts, Priscilla allegedly claims Lisa Marie had “little brain activity” and that the daughter she knew as “always so vital, wasn’t there.”

“I thought about my girl, my wild, rebellious, passionate girl, lying in a vegetative state for the rest of her life,” she wrote, according to the exhibits. “I said what I had to. ‘Take her off the machine, Doctor.’ My voice was barely above a whisper.” She then broke down and blacked out.

“It was unbearable. I began to sob. I don’t remember falling,” she purpotedly wrote. “After that, everything went dark. … I don’t want to remember.”

Editor’s picks

Priscilla’s reps had no immediate comment when asked about the book excerpts on Friday. Her lawyers, Marty Singer and Wayne Harman, previously called the first version of the $50 million fraud and breach-of-contract lawsuit, filed last month by Priscilla’s former business advisers Brigitte Kruse and Kevin Fialko, “one of the most shameful, ridiculous, salacious, and meritless lawsuits” they had ever seen.

On Friday, Singer and Harman issued a new statement focusing on other claims in the amended complaint that alleged Priscilla pushed Elvis to an early grave. According to the new complaint, Priscilla’s efforts to increase her divorce settlement “exerted undue pressure on Elvis, pushing him to his death.”

“Priscilla did not have anything to do with the assassination of JFK, she did not cover up Area 51, she did not fake the moon landing, and she is not secretly keeping Bigfoot locked in a cabin in Canada. Take off the aluminum foil hat and face reality,” the lawyers said, before going on the offensive. They then claimed Kruse “engaged in a relentless and calculated campaign of elder abuse and fraud in order to take control of Ms. Presley’s finances for her own benefit.”

In a separate financial elder abuse lawsuit, filed last year, Priscilla claims Kruse and Fialko duped her into signing a series of contracts that gave her only minority interests in the companies they formed to exploit her name, image and likeness. For their part, Kruse and Fialko claim Priscilla entered the contracts knowingly, benefitted from their services and then cut them off, in breach of their agreements, when her fortunes changes in the aftermath of Lisa Marie’s death. (Video unearthed by Rolling Stone shows Priscilla signing the contracts at Kruse’s house with a lawyer present.)

Related Content

“Apparently, Ms. Presley’s defense is to list off nonsense hyperbolic statements that have no substance. The documents are in black and white and speak volumes. To date, Ms. Presley has presented zero evidence in support of her salacious claims, and we intend to hold her accountable for her reckless behavior,” Jordan Matthews, the lawyer representing Kruse and Fialko, said Friday, responding to the latest statement from Priscilla’s lawyers.

Lisa Marie was 54 when she died in the hospital on Jan. 12, 2023. When Kruse and Fialko filed the first version of their Los Angeles lawsuit last month, they garnered headlines with their blockbuster claim that Priscilla violated Lisa Marie’s advanced health care directive. They attached the directive, in which Lisa stated she wanted her life “prolonged as long as possible within the limits of generally accepted health care standards.” The advisers claimed Presley discontinued life support “within hours” because she was estranged from her daughter and knew Lisa Marie was on the verge of removing her as the sole trustee of a $25 million life insurance trust. They said Priscilla already had been removed from her role managing Lisa Marie’s Promenade Trust and was facing threats of possible legal action from Lisa Marie.

As Rolling Stone previously reported, a few weeks after Lisa Marie’s death, Priscilla challenged Lisa Marie’s 2016 amendment to her main asset, the Promenade Trust. The amendment removed Priscilla as co-trustee and replaced her with Riley Keough, as well as Lisa Marie’s now deceased son Benjamim Keough, who died in July 2020. Priscilla was never a beneficiary of the Promenade Trust, so the change meant she lost her only influence over Promenade’s marquis assets, including Elvis’ Graceland mansion, its archives, and Lisa Marie’s 15 percent interest in Elvis Presley Enterprises, the company that owns and manages Elvis’ name, image, and likeness. Priscilla wanted the court to declare the amendment “invalid.”

Trending Stories

With a potential legal war looming, Keough reached a generous settlement with her grandmother in a matter of months. Under the deal, Priscilla received a $1 million lump-sum payment off the top of Lisa Marie’s $25 million life insurance policy. Keough also agreed to pay Priscilla $50,000 to resign as co-trustee of the irrevocable trust whose sole asset was the life insurance policy. And Priscilla was awarded an annual salary of $100,000 for 10 years for her new role as a “special adviser” to the Promenade Trust.

The next hearing in the elder abuse case is set for next week. The first case management conference in Kruse and Fialko’s breach of contract case is set for February.

September 6, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Angie Stone Car Crash Details Emerge Amid Wrongful Death Lawsuit
Music

Angie Stone Car Crash Details Emerge Amid Wrongful Death Lawsuit

by jummy84 September 5, 2025
written by jummy84

The family of late R&B legend Angie Stone is taking legal action following the tragic Alabama car crash that claimed her life in March.

Court documents obtained by WSB-TV 2 revealed that Stone’s two children, Diamond Stone and Michael D’Angelo Archer, filed a wrongful death lawsuit in Gwinnett County, Atlanta, against the drivers, a trucking company, and a truck manufacturer connected to the deadly collision.

According to court documents, Angie initially survived when the Mercedes-Benz Sprinter van carrying her and her team overturned after the driver lost control. While Good Samaritans were able to rescue five of the nine passengers from the wreckage, Angie was still inside, struggling to free herself.

Reportedly, moments later, a tractor-trailer hauling a load of sugar reportedly slammed into the van, ejecting her from the vehicle and pinning her underneath. The lawsuit further claims the truck driver failed to pay proper attention to the road and that the tractor-trailer’s collision mitigation system did not function as it should have.

The lawsuit alleges she endured “conscious suffering” before ultimately passing away on the scene.

At the time of the crash, Angie was traveling home after a performance in Mobile, Alabama. Her daughter Diamond confirmed the heartbreaking loss shortly after the accident, writing on Facebook, “My mommy is gone,” alongside crying emojis.

The “Wish I Didn’t Miss You” singer was 63 years old.

Diamond Stone/Facebook

Stone first rose to prominence in 1979 as a member of The Sequence — one of the pioneering all-female rap groups — before stepping into her own as a solo artist with the release of her acclaimed debut album Black Diamond. She quickly became revered for her soulful vocals and the kind of R&B songs that could stir emotion with just a single line.

Over the years, the three-time Grammy nominee blessed fans with classics like “Wish I Didn’t Miss You,” “Brotha,” and “No More Rain (In This Cloud).” She released her final studio album Love Language in May 2023.

Beyond music, Stone is the voice behind the beloved Girlfriends theme song and even made her presence felt on screen in Fighting Temptations, Scary Movie V, In The Cut, Saints & Sinners, One on One, School Gyrls, and Lincoln Heights.

Angie Stone is survived by her children and grandchildren. May she rest in peace.

September 5, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Prince's estate responds to Apollonia's "frivolous lawsuit"
Music

Prince’s estate responds to Apollonia’s “frivolous lawsuit”

by jummy84 August 22, 2025
written by jummy84

Prince‘s estate has responded to singer-songwriter Apollonia’s lawsuit, dismissing it as “frivolous” and “unwarranted”.

The US artist, actor and former model (real name Patricia Apollonia Kotero) starred in Prince’s classic 1984 film Purple Rain, portraying his love interest who has the name Apollonia.

She recently filed a 14-page complaint against the late icon’s estate, Paisley Park Enterprises, in a Los Angeles federal court, accusing them of “attempting to steal” her name.

Kotero claims in the suit that, after appearing in Purple Rain, Prince never asked her to stop going by the name Apollonia, and did not “contend that the name did not belong to her either personally or professionally” (via Rolling Stone).

She alleges it was on the contrary, and that “Prince himself consented to and encouraged Apollonia in her professional endeavors” under that name. Kotero has now used the name for over four decades and released numerous projects using the alias.

Her legal team claims that Prince’s estate was out of line when it tried to claim ownership of the Apollonia trademark in June. She alleges that the estate filed an “intent-to-use” application that would allow it to use the name in connection with clothing and entertainment services.

Kotero has also claimed that Paisley Park Enterprises has made moves to try and cancel her trademark applications and registrations, despite her being the “rightful owner”.

Now, the estate has responded via a written statement posted on Prince’s official social media channels. “Regrettably, Ms. Patty Kotero a/k/a ‘Apollonia’ filed a frivolous lawsuit,” it began.

“As she acknowledges, Apollonia is the name Prince gave to the character played by Ms. Kotero in Prince’s movie, Purple Rain, over forty years ago. We never instructed her to cease using her adopted professional name, nor did we object to her business activities.”

It continued: “In fact, we repeatedly offered her opportunities to perform at Paisley Park using this professional name.

“Ms. Kotero’s unwarranted lawsuit comes at the tail end of years-long disputes before the Trademark Trial & Appeal Board concerning trademark registrations, in which rulings are imminent and with respect to which we have sought a settlement numerous times despite her highly unreasonable demands.

“Unsurprisingly, her suit fails to acknowledge the cancellation of her APOLLONIA registration by the United States Patent & Trademark Office.”

The statement concluded: “We look forward to the rulings in the pending trademark proceedings and a dismissal of Ms. Kotero’s recent federal action. As is our duty, we will continue to protect and preserve Prince’s assets and legacy.” See the post above.

Kotero lawsuit states that “all of the goodwill associated with the name and trademark ‘Apollonia’ for the past four decades is attributable to plaintiff”. It added: “There is only one Apollonia, and Apollonia is the source of the goods and services provided under this name.”

The complaint also suggests that the estate claimed that Kotero waived her rights to the name in 1983 when she signed a contract for her role in Purple Rain. Contesting this, Kotero’s lawsuit claims that, even if that were true, it was “never enforced” and that the “alleged rights” would have expired by now.

Additionally, the filing states that she and Prince were “lifelong friends”, and she both co-wrote The Bangles’ hit ‘Manic Monday’ with him and provided vocals on his song ‘Take Me With U’ using the stage name.

August 22, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Newer Posts
Older Posts

Social Connect

Facebook Twitter Instagram Pinterest Youtube Snapchat

Recent Posts

  • 2009 feels like a whole other world away

  • Watch Ariana Grande and Jimmy Fallon Perform a History of Duets

  • Spotify’s Joe Hadley Talks ARIA Awards Partnership

  • Nick Offerman Announces 2026 “Big Woodchuck” Book Tour Dates

  • Snapped: Above & Beyond (A Photo Essay)

Newsletter

Subscribe my Newsletter for new blog posts, tips & new photos. Let's stay updated!

Categories

  • Bollywood (1,929)
  • Celebrity News (2,000)
  • Events (267)
  • Fashion (1,605)
  • Hollywood (1,020)
  • Lifestyle (890)
  • Music (2,002)
  • TV & Streaming (1,857)

Recent Posts

  • Shushu/Tong Shanghai Fall 2026 Collection

  • Here’s What Model Taylor Hill Is Buying Now

  • Julietta Is Hiring An Assistant Office Coordinator In Dumbo, Brooklyn, NY (In-Office)

Editors’ Picks

  • 2009 feels like a whole other world away

  • Watch Ariana Grande and Jimmy Fallon Perform a History of Duets

  • Spotify’s Joe Hadley Talks ARIA Awards Partnership

Latest Style

  • ‘Steal This Story, Please’ Review: Amy Goodman Documentary

  • Hulu Passes on La LA Anthony, Kim Kardashian Pilot ‘Group Chat’

  • Hannah Einbinder Slams AI Creators As “Losers”

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

@2020 - celebpeek. Designed and Developed by Pro


Back To Top
celebpeek
  • Home
  • Bollywood
  • Hollywood
  • Lifestyle
  • Fashion
celebpeek
  • Music
  • Celebrity News
  • Events
  • TV & Streaming