celebpeek
  • Home
  • Bollywood
  • Hollywood
  • Lifestyle
  • Fashion
celebpeek
  • Music
  • Celebrity News
  • Events
  • TV & Streaming
Home » lawsuit » Page 2
Tag:

lawsuit

Drake to Appeal “Not Like Us” Lawsuit Ruling
Music

Drake to Appeal “Not Like Us” Lawsuit Ruling

by jummy84 October 29, 2025
written by jummy84

Drake is hoping to revive his lawsuit against Universal Music Group (UMG) that a federal judge threw out earlier this month. The musician and his legal team filed a notice of appeal today (October 29) in a New York federal court.

When reached by Pitchfork, a spokesperson for Drake said, “This confirms our intent to appeal, and we look forward to the Court of Appeals reviewing that filing in the coming weeks.” Representatives for Universal Music Group did not immediately respond to Pitchfork’s request for comment.

Drake filed his lawsuit against UMG in January, alleging that the music corporation “waged an unrelenting campaign” to promote “Not Like Us,” Kendrick Lamar’s famous diss song that he believed to be defamatory. UMG had asked for the complaint’s dismissal, arguing that Drake “lost a rap battle that he provoked and in which he willingly participated.”

Judge Jeannette A. Vargas ostensibly agreed with UMG, ruling that “the broader context of a heated rap battle, with incendiary language and offensive accusations hurled by both participants, would not incline the reasonable listener to believe that ‘Not Like Us’ imparts verifiable facts.”

Drake and Kendrick’s Beef Is the Most Miserable Spectacle in Rap History
October 29, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
A$AP Relli Scores Legal Victory As Judge Denies A$AP Rocky's Attorney Joe Tacopina's Motion To Dismiss $500K Defamation Lawsuit
Celebrity News

A$AP Relli Scores Legal Victory As Judge Denies A$AP Rocky’s Attorney Joe Tacopina’s Motion To Dismiss $500K Defamation Lawsuit

by jummy84 October 25, 2025
written by jummy84

A$AP Relli Scores Legal Victory As Judge Denies A$AP Rocky’s Attorney Joe Tacopina’s Motion To Dismiss $500K Defamation Lawsuit

A$AP Relli just scored a significant victory in his ongoing legal fight against A$AP Rocky’s attorney, Joe Tacopina.

On Thursday, a Los Angeles Superior Court judge denied Tacopina’s motion to dismiss Relli’s defamation lawsuit, allowing the case to move forward.

Judge Randolph Hammock ruled that Tacopina’s media comments calling Relli a “liar” and “gold digger” were not protected by litigation privilege but were instead “spin” meant to harm Relli’s reputation.

Tacopina previously told Rolling Stone that Relli’s shooting allegations were “an extortion attempt by a former associate,” adding, “He’s a failed associate–ex–associate of Rocky’s and he’s jealous.”

Relli claims the remarks led to online dath thrats and severe emotional distress. He has spent over $500,000 in legal fees pursuing the defamation and civil a$$ault cases against A$AP Rocky. A jury trial is expected to begin in early 2026.

What are your thoughts on this ongoing battle?


October 25, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Kim Soo Hyun's 500 KRW Lawsuit: A Seven-Month-Old Controversy Heats Up! | Glamsham.com
Lifestyle

Kim Soo Hyun’s 500 KRW Lawsuit: A Seven-Month-Old Controversy Heats Up! | Glamsham.com

by jummy84 October 22, 2025
written by jummy84

Top South Korean actor Kim Soo Hyun is set to appear before the 22nd Civil Division of the Seoul Central District Court on November 21, in connection with a lawsuit filed by a cosmetics company. The brand, identified as Cosmetics Brand A, is seeking damages worth 500 million KRW (approximately $350,000 USD) following the early termination of his endorsement contract.

Originally slated to end in August 2025, the brand abruptly cut ties with the actor in March, citing “serious reasons” that allegedly prevented the continuation of their partnership. In an official statement, the company explained, “We found it difficult to take immediate action regarding the contract termination without first hearing the statements of Kim Soo Hyun and his agency. After reviewing their position, we judged that there were serious reasons preventing the fulfillment of the advertising contract. The termination was then initiated through our legal representatives.”

The company emphasized that its decision was made to uphold the brand’s integrity and maintain consumer trust amid growing concerns over the actor’s personal controversies.

Also Read: Kim Soo Hyun Fights Back! Complaint Filed Against Kim Sae Ron’s Family for Defamation

In response, Kim Soo Hyun’s legal representative, attorney Go Sang Rok, has firmly denied all allegations affecting the actor’s reputation, particularly those linking him to late actress Kim Sae Ron. Attorney Go stressed that Kim never had any inappropriate relationship with Sae Ron during her minor years and provided personal letters as part of the defense.

“These diary-style letters were written to Kim Soo Hyun’s actual partner while he was serving in the military,” Go stated, aiming to clear the actor’s name and prove that the claims were baseless.

As the court date approaches, the case continues to draw attention, with fans and industry watchers awaiting further developments in one of the year’s most talked-about celebrity legal disputes.

October 22, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Jay-Z Accused of Retaliation in Court — Woman Claims Rapper Is Using Legal System to Punish Her for Filing Federal Lawsuit
Celebrity News

Jay-Z Accused of Retaliation in Court — Woman Claims Rapper Is Using Legal System to Punish Her for Filing Federal Lawsuit

by jummy84 October 22, 2025
written by jummy84

Jay-Z Accused of Retaliation in Court — Woman Claims Rapper Is Using Legal System to Punish Her for Filing Federal Lawsuit

Lillie Coley, the woman who recently filed a federal lawsuit against Shawn “Jay-Z” Carter, has asked a California judge for emergency protection—accusing the billionaire mogul of using the court system to retaliate against her.

In new legal documents filed on October 21, 2025, Coley submitted an Application for a Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. She’s asking the court to block Jay-Z from pursuing what she calls a “retaliatory sanctions hearing” scheduled for November 7, 2025 in New Jersey.

Coley claims the New Jersey motion is meant to punish her for filing a federal case against the music icon. She says the move amounts to “vexatious litigation” and argues that without immediate relief, she’ll suffer “irreparable harm,” citing the financial and emotional toll of fighting “a two-front legal war against a billionaire celebrity.”

In the filing, Coley—who is representing herself—accuses Jay-Z of using his influence and resources to silence her. The documents reference serious allegations, including claims that the rapper allegedly impregnated a minor decades ago and then used “systematic judicial manipulation” to avoid accountability.

Coley’s motion insists that the public interest demands intervention, arguing that “wealth and celebrity status cannot be used to corrupt judicial processes or deny justice to vulnerable parties.” She describes her case as a fight not just for herself, but for others who have been “overwhelmed by procedural warfare designed to silence victims.”

The case has been assigned to Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett in Los Angeles federal court, with a decision on the emergency request expected before the November 7 hearing.


October 22, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Trump Refiles Defamation Lawsuit Against NY Times Seeking $15 Billion
TV & Streaming

Trump Refiles Defamation Lawsuit Against NY Times Seeking $15 Billion

by jummy84 October 17, 2025
written by jummy84

Lawyers for President Donald Trump refiled a defamation lawsuit Thursday against the New York Times, with a complaint that is less than half as long as the previous one — after a judge spiked the president’s initial lawsuit for being “tedious and burdensome.” As before, Trump’s refiled complaint seeks an astronomical $15 billion in damages.

The New York Times, in a statement Thursday, reiterated its position that Trump’s lawsuit was meritless and said that “nothing has changed” with the new filing.

“As we said when this was first filed and again after the judge’s ruling to strike it: this lawsuit has no merit,” a Times spokesperson said in a statement. “Nothing has changed today. This is merely an attempt to stifle independent reporting and generate PR attention, but the New York Times will not be deterred by intimidation tactics.”

Trump last month sued the Times, several of its reporters and Penguin Random House (publisher of the book “Lucky Loser” by two Times reporters), alleging that their reporting about the president’s finances and business career defamed him. The suit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida. A few days later, a federal judge threw out Trump’s suit, calling it “tedious and burdensome” and saying that a complaint is not “a protected platform to rage against an adversary.” In the ruling, Judge Steven D. Merryday gave Trump’s lawyers 28 days to refile the suit, ordering that the amended complaint be no more than 40 pages long and that it “accord with the rules of procedure.”

Trump’s refiled complaint is 40 pages (available at this link), less than half the original 85-page complaint. The new filing is shorter, but the main arguments are the same.

“As set forth below, Defendants originated and distributed these publications, and the defamatory statements about President Trump therein, with actual malice,” the revised complaint says. “The statements in question wrongly defame and disparage President Trump’s hard-earned professional reputation, which he painstakingly built for decades as a private citizen before becoming President of the United States, including as a successful businessman and as star of the most successful reality television show of all-time — The Apprentice.”

In his previous ruling finding Trump’s lawsuit “decidedly improper and inadmissible,” Merryday said that several statements in Trump’s initial complaint were unnecessary to make the president’s case. For example, he wrote, “in one of many, often repetitive, and laudatory (toward President Trump) but superfluous allegations, the pleader states, ‘The Apprentice’ represented the cultural magnitude of President Trump’s singular brilliance, which captured the [Z]eitgeist of our time.”

Trump’s suit seeks compensatory damages of at least $15 billion as well as punitive damages, as well as a “retraction of the defamatory publications and statements” from the New York Times and Penguin Random House.

Separately, Trump this summer sued the Wall Street Journal, its parent companies Dow Jones and News Corp, Rupert Murdoch and two Journal reporters, alleging defamation over a WSJ story with details about a birthday letter Trump sent in 2003 to Jeffrey Epstein. According to the lawsuit, Trump is demanding “not less than $10 billion” on two counts of defamation, for at least $20 billion total. Last month, lawyers for the Wall Street Journal filed a motion to dismiss the suit, saying that Trump’s suit should be thrown out because the WSJ article in question “is true,” noting that in response to a congressional subpoena, “Epstein’s estate produced the Birthday Book, which contains the letter bearing the bawdy drawing and [Trump’s] signature, exactly as The Wall Street Journal reported.”

Among other litigation, Trump also sued ABC News and CBS News’ “60 Minutes” and reached separate $16 million settlements in each of those cases.

October 17, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Busta Rhymes Assault Lawsuit: Rapper Countersues Ex-Assistant
Music

Busta Rhymes Assault Lawsuit: Rapper Countersues Ex-Assistant

by jummy84 October 14, 2025
written by jummy84

Busta Rhymes has launched defamation counterclaims against a former assistant who accused the veteran rapper of punching him in the face for using his phone on the job.

Rhymes (Trevor Smith Jr.) was hit with a lawsuit this summer from Dashiel Gables, who worked as the rapper’s personal assistant for roughly six months starting in July 2024. Gables alleges Rhymes routinely abused employees and that the rapper physically assaulted him in the lobby of a Brooklyn luxury high-rise last January.

Related

At the time the lawsuit was filed, Rhymes called it “an attempted shakedown by a disgruntled former assistant” and vowed to countersue. He has now followed through with a defamation counterclaim docketed on Monday (Oct. 13) in federal court.

“Smith did not assault or batter Gables,” writes Rhymes’ attorney Patrick Butler. “Gables knew the statements were false, or acted with reckless disregard for the truth, including by fabricating allegations of criminal conduct and violence, omitting exculpatory facts and deliberately ignoring contrary evidence.”

The countersuit alleges that Gables’ very public lawsuit has damaged Rhymes’ reputation and caused him humiliation and embarrassment. The rapper also says he lost two advertising campaigns as a result of Gables’ defamatory claims.

Generally speaking, statements made in court are shielded from any liability for defamation under a principle known as the litigation privilege. Rhymes’ countersuit attempts to get around this limitation by alleging that Gables shared his lawsuit with the press and encouraged media reports about it.

Gables’ lawyers did not immediately return a request for comment on Monday.

The lawsuit, filed in August, claimed that Rhymes “routinely degraded” Gables and other employees by screaming, threatening, smacking and spitting at them. The rapper demanded that Gables work more than 15 hours a day but refused to pay him overtime, according to the former assistant.

Gables said this poor treatment escalated in the early hours of Jan. 10, when he was unloading Rhymes’ luggage in the lobby of the rapper’s Brooklyn apartment building. Gables allegedly received a call from his daughter and tried to respond via text, sending Rhymes “into a rage.”

“He screamed ‘Stay the f–k off your phone,” wrote Gables’ lawyers in the complaint. “When plaintiff explained it was his daughter, Busta Rhymes responded, ‘Don’t tell me about your f–king kid, what the f–k that gotta do with me? When Plaintiff responded that it could have been an emergency, Busta Rhymes asked ‘are you talking while I’m talking?’ and then, with a closed fist, punched plaintiff in the face.”

The former assistant alleged he had to go to the hospital to get treatment for his injuries, and that he was later “blacklisted” from the hip-hop industry. Gables also filed a police report against Rhymes, but no charges were ever brought.

Rhymes denies all of Gables’ allegations in his Monday answer and counterclaim. He also asserts a slew of defenses to the lawsuit, including that “any conduct to which plaintiff was allegedly subjected constituted no more than petty slights and trivial inconveniences.”

Billboard VIP Pass
October 14, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Judge Throws Out Drake’s “Not Like Us” Defamation Lawsuit Against Universal Music Group
Music

Judge Throws Out Drake’s “Not Like Us” Defamation Lawsuit Against Universal Music Group

by jummy84 October 11, 2025
written by jummy84

Drake’s federal lawsuit against his own record label, Universal Music Group (UMG), for their involvement promoting Kendrick Lamar’s diss track “Not Like Us” is officially over after a federal judge threw it out on Thursday (October 9), reports the Associated Press. In her ruling, Judge Jeannette A. Vargas stated that the song is a series of opinions, not defamatory allegations, and listeners were aware of such.

“Although the accusation that Plaintiff is a pedophile is certainly a serious one, the broader context of a heated rap battle, with incendiary language and offensive accusations hurled by both participants, would not incline the reasonable listener to believe that ‘Not Like Us’ imparts verifiable facts about Plaintiff,” wrote Judge Vargas.

In the lawsuit, Drake also claimed the popularity of “Not Like Us” was to blame for attempted break-ins to his Toronto residence and a security guard getting shot. The single artwork depicts an aerial view of his mansion from Google Maps and overlaid with “more than a dozen sex offender markers,” which Judge Vargas said were “obviously exaggerated and doctored.” She added, “No reasonable person would view the image and believe that in fact law enforcement had designated thirteen residents in Drake’s home as sex offenders.”

After the lawsuit was thrown out yesterday, Drake’s legal team released a statement, saying, “We intend to appeal today’s ruling, and we look forward to the Court of Appeals reviewing it.”

UMG shared their own update following the ruling, stating: “From the outset, this suit was an affront to all artists and their creative expression and never should have seen the light of day. We’re pleased with the court’s dismissal and look forward to continuing our work successfully promoting Drake’s music and investing in his career.”

October 11, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Judge Dismisses Drake Defamation Lawsuit Universal Music Group UMG Kendrick Lamar Not Like Us
Celebrity News

Judge Tosses Lawsuit Against UMG Over ‘Not Like Us’

by jummy84 October 10, 2025
written by jummy84

Drake is again walking away holding an L(oss) from a battle involving Kendrick Lamar. On Thursday (October 9), a judge dismissed the defamation lawsuit Drizzy filed against Universal Music Group (UMG) over the hit song, ‘Not Like Us.’ The federal official ruled that Kenny’s lyrics were opinion, per the Associated Press. While Drake hasn’t spoken out yet, others involved in making the track, including Mustard, seemingly have!

RELATED: Yikes! Social Media Goes OFF After Kendrick Lamar Clowns Drake With THIS Skit At First Tour Stop (VIDEO)

Judge Explains Why She Tossed Drake’s Lawsuit Against UMG 

As previously reported, Drake’s and Kendrick Lamar’s rap beef exploded in the spring of 2024. The superstars traded shots from the booth for several rounds. Then, in May, Lamar put a nail in Drizzy’s metaphorical coffin with ‘Not Like Us.’ The song became a cultural phenomenon and ate the charts up—same energy for the music video he released in July. Even celebrities once tight with Drake, such as LeBron James, picked sides. And, spoiler alert, it often wasn’t the Canadian rapper’s!

‘Not Like Us,’ which calls out Drake by name, attacks him as “a colonizer” of rap culture. It also makes serious allegations about his sex life, including “I hear you like ’em young” — a claim Drake has rejected. This week, Judge Jeannette A. Vargas acknowledged in her written opinion that ‘Not Like Us’ explicitly branded Drake as a pedophile. However, Vargas said a reasonable listener could not have concluded that the song revealed objective facts about Drake.

“Although the accusation that Plaintiff is a pedophile is certainly a serious one, the broader context of a heated rap battle, with incendiary language and offensive accusations hurled by both participants, would not incline the reasonable listener to believe that ‘Not Like Us’ imparts verifiable facts about Plaintiff,” Judge Vargas wrote.

An aerial photo depicting Drake’s mansion doubles as the song’s cover art. The photo, per the judge, had “an overlay of more than a dozen sex offender markers,” but Vargas said it was “obviously exaggerated and doctored.”

“No reasonable person would view the Image and believe that, in fact, law enforcement had designated thirteen residents in Drake’s home as sex offenders,” Judge Vargas wrote.

Judge Vargas also pointed out that Drizzy, too, took low blows in the rap beef. Before ‘Not Like Us,’ she said Drake mocked Kendrick Lamar’s height and shoe size. Additionally, he questioned Lamar’s success in the April 2024 track ‘Push Ups.’ Meanwhile, Kendrick Lamar insulted Drizzy’s fashion sense that same month in ‘Euphoria.’ Judge Vargas wrote that the insults escalated from there, becoming “vicious, personal.”

Considering the medium the rappers used to insult each other, Judge Vargas concluded that the average listener knows better. She said listeners would not consider a diss track “a product of a thoughtful or disinterested investigation, conveying to the public fact-checked verifiable content.”

Per AP, Vargas wrote that ‘Not Like Us’ was “replete with profanity, trash-talking, threats of violence, and figurative and hyperbolic language, all of which are indicia of opinion.” A reasonable listener, she added, “would conclude that Lamar is rapping hyperbolic vituperations.”

Drake’s Team & UMG Reacts To Lawsuit Dismissal

After the decision, Drake’s legal team issued a statement: “We intend to appeal today’s ruling, and we look forward to the Court of Appeals reviewing it.”

For context, Drizzy filed the lawsuit in January. It does not name Kendrick Lamar. Instead, the paperwork alleges Universal Music Group (UMG) intentionally published and promoted ‘Not Like Us,’ despite knowing the lyrics contained false and defamatory allegations. The lawsuit claims the song messed up his reputation and decreased the value of his brand. Additionally, Drake alleged that the song encourages listeners to use vigilante justice against him. He even blamed ‘Not Like Us’ for attempted break-ins and the shooting of a security guard at his Toronto home.

UMG immediately denied the allegations. Interestingly, Universal Music Group is the parent record label for both Drake and Kendrick Lamar. It released a statement following the lawsuit dismissal.

“From the outset, this suit was an affront to all artists and their creative expression and never should have seen the light of day,” UMG said. “We’re pleased with the court’s dismissal and look forward to continuing our work successfully promoting Drake’s music and investing in his career.”

Mustard Shares THIS Post After Dismissal 

It’s no debate that ‘Not Like Us’ was one of 2024’s biggest songs. Even Judge Vargas described it as having a “catchy beat and propulsive bassline.” Outside of court, Kendrick Lamar’s diss won record of the year and song of the year at the Grammys. It also helped make this year’s Super Bowl halftime show the most-watched ever, as fans speculated whether Lamar would actually perform it. He did, but with altered lyrics and the acknowledgment of the UMG lawsuit!

Mustard, who produced the diss, joined Kenny on the Super Bowl stage. He’s stuck by the artist’s rivalry with Drake. After the dismissal news on Thursday, Mustard took to X with a post that has fans thinking it’s a response to the legal update!

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

— Mustard (@mustard) October 9, 2025

Meanwhile, social media users on the same platform haven’t stopped cuttin’ up YET. See additional reactions HERE.

RELATED: Bye King! Drake Ditches LeBron James Tattoo For New Tribute To Canadian NBA Baller (PHOTO)

Associated Press writers Larry Neumeister, Andrew Dalton and Jennifer Peltz contributed to this report via AP Newsroom. 

What Do You Think Roomies?

October 10, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Spitting Image team say they're "baffled" by Paddington Bear lawsuit
TV & Streaming

Spitting Image team say they’re ‘baffled’ by Paddington lawsuit – and insist their parody is going nowhere

by jummy84 October 10, 2025
written by jummy84

The satirical puppet sketch show, which ran from 1984-1996, used to top the TV viewing charts and was beloved for its absurdist caricatures of Britain’s leading figures, from Margaret Thatcher to John Major, even the Queen Mother.

While most politicians and pop culture figures of the time took their puppet parodies (fairly) on the chin, the new revival of the veteran comedy show has ruffled someone’s feathers… or should we say fur.

Created by Al Murray and Matt Forde, the new Spitting Image revival, now available on YouTube, made headlines this week when it was revealed that StudioCanal, the French film and television production company behind the Paddington movies, and the Bond estate have filed a High Court complaint over copyright and design right concerns, following the depiction of the beloved bear.

“We’re baffled by that, to be honest,” says Murray. ‘If we were going to expect anything, it would be a hard stare from Paddington.”

Their radical reimagining of the sweet-natured bear sees Paddington as a foul-mouthed, crazy-eyed Pablo Escobar-esque parody, with a penchant for powder over marmalade sandwiches. He hosts the shows podcast ‘The Rest is Bullsh*t’, a parody of the Goalhanger ‘Rest is’ sphere, alongside an equally caricatured Prince Harry.

“If you’re looking for [podcast] hosts, you need two national treasures. They were the first names on the team sheet,” says Forde.

While his characterisation may be extreme, Forde and Murray insist it is only intended for purely comedic purposes.

“It’s the oldest thing in comedy,” explains Murray. “We’re not saying we’ve done anything particularly original. [Paddington] is normally presented as this very ‘goody-two-shoes’ character and we’ve flipped him over. It’s a very Spitting Image thing to do – to take someone and say ‘Hey, maybe they’re the opposite.’”

“I mean, they’ve fallen into a bear trap of their own making,” says Forde. “We’re getting tons more views as a result of the lawsuits publicity, so more people are watching this depiction of Paddington that they don’t want anyone to see.”

Is it potentially a case of miscommunication involving the ‘British sense of humour’?

“I mean taking the piss is a great British value, as is having a sense of humour about ourselves,” says Murray. “But there obviously has been a drift towards people who want to shut other people’s jokes up – and it’s weird, it seems like an attack on comedy really.”

“In my experience, people find you funny taking the p**s out of things, until you take the p**s out of something they like. Then they don’t find you funny anymore.”

But it’s the fact the call for legal action has come from fellow creatives that really surprises the pair.

“I would imagine that the people at StudioCanal who’ve come to this are the sorts of people who not long ago were pretty outraged by Jimmy Kimmel being pulled off air,” explains Murray. “If they’re sensitive, creative people that’s probably how they felt about it.”

“But they’re trying to do that to our absurdist, ridiculous Paddington and that leaves me scratching my head.”

Whilst they may see a funny side in the call for legal action, (“We are literally talking about a fictional bear and a puppet show!” exclaims Murray at one point) the pair recognise that the dispute over their depiction of Paddington highlights a wider conversation on freedom of speech in our current political climate.

“It’s terrifying that pressure can come from all sorts of different places,” says Forde. “I think the risk is that these kinds of authoritarian instincts exist on left and right.

“They exist in governments; they exist in corporations. We’re living in an era where politicians can get you taken off the air and the consequences of that – and it’s not just comedy – will close people in all sorts of other industries down.

“People need to be careful about thinking. ‘Well, I never liked Jimmy Kimmel anyway, so I’m fine with it’ because eventually, they will get round to you, and they will shut you up.

“Comedy is an easy first target because people don’t like being laughed at, but it’s not comedy that they have an issue with. It’s the freedom of speech.”

Their new YouTube show was born out of the success of their live theatre production – Idiots Assemble: Spitting Image The Musical created by Murray and Forde, alongside Sean Foley. It was during this run they realised the new medium of theatre, unlike TV, avoided outsider input in what content their show could cover.

“There was no one between us and the audience,” explains Murray, “That was what was brilliant about it.”

“As stand-ups we’re used to that,” agrees Forde, “You write it, you perform it and there is a purity in that. Once it filters through more layers, it becomes tamer, and I think in the modern era people want comedy like this to really pack a punch.”

Their YouTube series is not the first revival of the iconic ’80s show. Spitting Image was briefly resurrected in 2021, with both Murray and Forde working on the show as writers and voice actor respectively, parodying a new cast of political and pop culture figures, from Donald Trump to Greta Thunberg. It was cancelled by ITV after just two series.

Hosting their show on YouTube has allowed for this greater freedom when creating the satirical sketches.

“The danger sometimes with television is it becomes very bureaucratic and slow,” says Forde. “The comedy can almost get legislated out of a sketch. I think this smaller team and nimbler production has allowed it to just hit harder.”

And it seems the public would agree. The show’s viewing numbers on YouTube have hit nearly 12 million views and is reaching millions more across other streaming platforms.

The pair believe the media reaction highlights a clear appetite for cutting political satire and hope to bring the beloved classic to the smartphone generation.

“There are different themes, different celebrities, that you want to be lampooning,” says Forde. “To be able to apply that in 2025 when you’ve got TikTok and X and Instagram and make something the younger generation really love – that’s a real thrill.”

It’s not just Paddington viewers can tune into watch; the show parodies a host of recognisable figures, from Taylor Swift to Vladamir Putin. But for Forde, with his spot-on impersonation, his favourite has to be Trump.

“Trump is so much fun,” he says. “The puppet is phenomenal; it’s a grotesque recreation of him. When we’re writing and ad-libbing in the room, you’re inside the mind of this maniac and we have the tools to bring him to life in our own way.”

Parodying figures from all realms of the political spectrum, the pair maintain they never let their personal politics influence their character choices or depictions either.

“They’re all fair game and it’s just so much fun taking the p**s out of them,” says Forde. “But for each one there must be that grain of truth to it. It must be silly and big and daft, but you need to hit upon something that people recognise in those characters.

“In a way, the politics falls away from it. These are characters you’re satirising. They just happen to be political ones.”

“If the impression goes with the puppet,” says Murray, “…it doesn’t need to be laser point accurate because the puppets, after all, aren’t. They’ve got the essence of the person… it’s like, as Matt’s saying, it’s got to have the grain of truth in it. And then you dial it all up.”

The current run of Spitting Image will last for 12 episodes, but what about the show’s future?

“We’re seeing if it’ll work and whether the audience will come to it,” says Murray. “And we haven’t got to wait for someone to say yes, you spend so much time in comedy coming up with things and having to wait for someone to say yes.”

“I mean purely as a viewer, you think, why are these things so rare?” continues Forde. “It’s immensely frustrating that Spitting Image wasn’t around for so long.

“So many of the things we’ve done even in the last two episodes have gone viral, so there is a huge appetite for this sort of comedy. You want it to always be around.”

And what about our furry friend? It looks like he’ll be sticking around – he’s not heading back to Peru just yet.

‘I think if you were to ask our Paddington…” teases Forde. “You know, he’s an energetic guy, wants to work a lot…”

October 10, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Drake’s ‘Not Like Us’ defamation lawsuit against UMG dismissed by judge
Celebrity News

Drake’s ‘Not Like Us’ defamation lawsuit against UMG dismissed by judge

by jummy84 October 10, 2025
written by jummy84

A United States federal judge has dismissed a lawsuit that Drake brought against Universal Music Group (UMG), accusing the record company of defamation over its distribution and promotion of Kendrick Lamar’s diss track, Not Like Us.

District Judge Jeannette Vargas dismissed the suit after she said Lamar’s Not Like Us was a “nonactionable opinion” that is not considered defamatory.

The feud between two of hip-hop’s biggest stars erupted in the spring of 2024, with the pair trading a series of tracks that culminated in Lamar landing the “metaphorical killing blow” with his megahit that May, Vargas said in her written opinion Thursday.

“The fact that the Recording was made in the midst of a rap battle is essential to assessing its impact on a reasonable listener,” Vargas wrote. “Even apparent statements of fact may assume the character of statements of opinion … when made in public debate, heated labor dispute, or other circumstances in which an audience may anticipate the use of epithets, fiery rhetoric or hyperbole.”

Story continues below advertisement

While the track’s lyrics explicitly branded Drake as a pedophile, Vargas said, a reasonable listener could not have concluded that Not Like Us was conveying objective facts about the Canadian superstar.

“Although the accusation that Plaintiff is a pedophile is certainly a serious one, the broader context of a heated rap battle, with incendiary language and offensive accusations hurled by both participants, would not incline the reasonable listener to believe that Not Like Us imparts verifiable facts about Plaintiff,” Vargas wrote.

Recapping “perhaps the most infamous rap battle in the genre’s history,” Vargas noted that before Not Like Us, Drake mocked Lamar’s height and shoe size and questioned his success in an April 2024 track called Push Ups, while Lamar insulted Drake’s fashion sense that same month in Euphoria.

From there, Vargas wrote, the insults escalated, becoming “vicious, personal.”

The judge said she considered the forum in which the insults occurred and concluded that the average listener does not think a diss track “is the product of a thoughtful or disinterested investigation, conveying to the public factchecked verifiable content.”


Click to play video: 'Lawsuit reveals new details about shooting at Drake’s Toronto home'

2:54
Lawsuit reveals new details about shooting at Drake’s Toronto home


After the ruling, a spokesperson for UMG told Variety that, “From the outset, this suit was an affront to all artists and their creative expression and never should have seen the light of day. We’re pleased with the court’s dismissal and look forward to continuing our work successfully promoting Drake’s music and investing in his career.”

Story continues below advertisement

Drake’s representatives told the outlet that they intend to appeal Thursday’s ruling, “and we look forward to the Court of Appeals reviewing it.”

Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day.

Get daily National news

Get the day’s top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day.

Not Like Us — described by Vargas as having a “catchy beat and propulsive bassline” — was one of 2024’s biggest songs.

It won record of the year and song of the year at the Grammys and helped make this year’s Super Bowl halftime show the most watched ever, as fans speculated on whether Lamar would actually perform it. (He did, but with altered lyrics.)


In January, Drake filed the defamation lawsuit against UMG, the record label he and rival Lamar are both signed to.

The Toronto rapper referred to the release of Lamar’s diss track as an example of “corporate greed over the safety and well-being of its artists,” according to the New York Times.

In his filing, Drake’s team said the diss track aimed at the Canadian rapper spreads the “false and malicious narrative” that he is a pedophile. The filing stated that Drake is “not a pedophile” and has “never engaged in any acts that would require him to be ‘placed on neighborhood watch.’”

Trending Now

  • ‘I still feel vulnerable’: Former worker at fined N.B. seafood company speaks out

  • Disneyland visitor found dead after riding Haunted Mansion attraction

“Drake has never engaged in sexual relations with a minor. Drake has never been charged with, or convicted of, any criminal acts whatsoever,” the suit read.

Story continues below advertisement

The lawsuit went on to detail a shooting at Drake’s home a few days after the song was released, resulting in a security guard being seriously injured.

“During the nearly 30 minutes it took for the ambulance to arrive, Drake and others laboured to keep the man alive by applying pressure to the gunshot wound with towels. Blood was everywhere,” the filing read.


Click to play video: 'Police investigate shooting at Drake’s Toronto mansion amid rapper’s beef with Kendrick Lamar'

2:07
Police investigate shooting at Drake’s Toronto mansion amid rapper’s beef with Kendrick Lamar




According to the suit, nothing like that had happened to Drake or his family during the two decades that he had been working in the music industry.

The lawsuit also stated that the multiple break-in attempts on his home that happened following the release of the song were caused by UMG’s actions.

“With the palpable physical threat to Drake’s safety and the bombardment of online harassment, Drake fears for the safety and security of himself, his family, and his friends,” according to the suit.

Story continues below advertisement

Drake’s team made it known that the lawsuit was not directed at Lamar and clearly placed the blame on Universal for releasing, distributing and promoting the song.

“This lawsuit is not about the artist who created Not Like Us,” the suit read. “It is, instead, entirely about UMG, the music company that decided to publish, promote, exploit, and monetize allegations that it understood were not only false, but dangerous.”

The feud between Drake and Lamar is among the biggest in hip-hop in recent years, with two of the genre’s biggest stars at its centre.

The two were occasional collaborators more than a decade ago, but Lamar began taking public jabs at Drake starting in 2013. The fight escalated steeply earlier last year.

— With files from The Associated Press

Curator Recommendations

  • Amazon Prime Day ends tonight: Grab these top best sellers still in stock!

  • Kick off holiday shopping with Amazon Prime Big Deal Days bestsellers

&copy 2025 Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.

October 10, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Newer Posts
Older Posts

Social Connect

Facebook Twitter Instagram Pinterest Youtube Snapchat

Recent Posts

  • 2009 feels like a whole other world away

  • Watch Ariana Grande and Jimmy Fallon Perform a History of Duets

  • Spotify’s Joe Hadley Talks ARIA Awards Partnership

  • Nick Offerman Announces 2026 “Big Woodchuck” Book Tour Dates

  • Snapped: Above & Beyond (A Photo Essay)

Newsletter

Subscribe my Newsletter for new blog posts, tips & new photos. Let's stay updated!

Categories

  • Bollywood (1,929)
  • Celebrity News (2,000)
  • Events (267)
  • Fashion (1,605)
  • Hollywood (1,020)
  • Lifestyle (890)
  • Music (2,002)
  • TV & Streaming (1,857)

Recent Posts

  • Shushu/Tong Shanghai Fall 2026 Collection

  • Here’s What Model Taylor Hill Is Buying Now

  • Julietta Is Hiring An Assistant Office Coordinator In Dumbo, Brooklyn, NY (In-Office)

Editors’ Picks

  • 2009 feels like a whole other world away

  • Watch Ariana Grande and Jimmy Fallon Perform a History of Duets

  • Spotify’s Joe Hadley Talks ARIA Awards Partnership

Latest Style

  • ‘Steal This Story, Please’ Review: Amy Goodman Documentary

  • Hulu Passes on La LA Anthony, Kim Kardashian Pilot ‘Group Chat’

  • Hannah Einbinder Slams AI Creators As “Losers”

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

@2020 - celebpeek. Designed and Developed by Pro


Back To Top
celebpeek
  • Home
  • Bollywood
  • Hollywood
  • Lifestyle
  • Fashion
celebpeek
  • Music
  • Celebrity News
  • Events
  • TV & Streaming