celebpeek
  • Home
  • Bollywood
  • Hollywood
  • Lifestyle
  • Fashion
celebpeek
  • Music
  • Celebrity News
  • Events
  • TV & Streaming
Home » Frankenstein
Tag:

Frankenstein

Guillermo del Toro, Oscar Isaac Talk 'Frankenstein' with Patti Smith
TV & Streaming

Guillermo del Toro, Oscar Isaac Talk ‘Frankenstein’ with Patti Smith

by jummy84 December 13, 2025
written by jummy84

Guillermo del Toro has never met a Q&A he doesn’t like. More than most, he enjoys sharing his enthusiasm with moviegoers and smart interlocutors like poet-musician-author Patti Smith (her latest memoir, “Bread of Angels,” is in bookstores). Oscar Isaac joined them for a lively conversation about the awards contender “Frankenstein,” which is currently streaming on Netflix. Watch the video exclusively above.

Here’s the December 2 New York Q&A, edited for brevity and clarity.

Patti Smith: In the early 50s, when I was a child, I saw, as we all did, James Whale’s “Frankenstein” and “The Bride of Frankenstein” and was greatly beguiled and saddened. But when I read, as you did, “The Modern Prometheus” by Mary Shelley, I saw that there was a whole world of imagination and thought processes and the evolution of the creature. And [I] wish that James Whale was still alive and would do another one. But we didn’t need him, because you came along and you gave us really something so much more akin that merged your sensibilities with Mary Shelley’s. Give us a little bit of you as a child. What world of books? I know how it happened to me. I want to hear about you.

Models show walk up stairs at the 2007 Oscar Fashion Preview at the Academy of Motion Pictures Arts and Sciences on January 30, 2007 in Los Angeles, California.

Guillermo del Toro: I was weird. I was extremely thin. I’m not joking. I used to button my shirt all the way up, and had a bowl haircut. I was like a Rutger Hauer son. almost albino, very pale. And in 1969, my father won the National Lottery, and he became a millionaire, and he bought a house, and somebody told him that he needed a library, because he was now a cultured gentleman. So he bought a huge library, which he never visited, and I read everything in there.

I read an encyclopedia of art that made me know as much about painting or sculpture as I would have a comic book artist: Jack Kirby or Monet or Manet or Renoir, they were all mixing in my imagination. I read an encyclopedia of health that made me the youngest hypochondriac in history. I stayed and read. And that was part of the disappointment. “This child is not well.” They sent me to a psychologist, and he gave me clay and said, “Could you do something with this?” And I did a skeleton. It didn’t go well.

Patti Smith: I’ve seen this movie now three times, on a little screen, on the airplane, on a bigger screen… One thing that always intrigues me is Victor Frankenstein’s body language. It’s almost like an artless choreography that becomes art. You’re always in motion. You make everything seem almost like a dance. It gives the film almost an operatic sensibility. I wanted to ask you about your body language, if that was a choice.

Oscar Isaac: It was very much in the conversation with Guillermo. The camera never stops moving. It’s always moving, and so often I’m moving in counterpoint to the camera. It always felt very musical. The whole thing, that first scene, when he’s in the medical conference, it feels very much like an aria. There were times when I was filming it where I was expecting people to start singing; the sets were so operatic as well. And a lot of the movement came from Kate Hawley’s incredible costumes.

Patti Smith: You can see the fabric, like in your shirts, and the threads.

FRANKENSTEIN, Jacob Elordi as The Monster, 2025. ph: Ken Woroner / © Netflix / courtesy Everett Collection
‘Frankenstein’©Netflix/Courtesy Everett Collection

Oscar Isaac: There was a lot of pleasure in wearing those little black high-heeled boots and running up and down the stairs in those plaid pants and the things that she would put me in, that crazy robe. It also came a lot from Guillermo. He’s a fucking superhero of pain (laughs) and darkness and hilarity and absurdity. And so, we became completely linked and synchronized, for better or worse.

Guillermo del Toro: We’re still trying to shake it off.

Oscar Isaac: The movement was like a symbiosis that happens.

Patti Smith: The creature, like you and Jacob — that’s like ballet movement. Then, when you’re giving the exhibition to the courtroom, it’s a different sweeping, and then you take Elizabeth in your arms and a different kind of sweeping, the whole thing, your body language is fantastic.

Guillermo del Toro: We actually designed the wardrobe to look like ’60s London, like he would be coming out with The Rolling Stones or Jimi Hendrix. We wanted him to feel like a rock star.

Oscar Isaac: Yeah, you talked about, especially that scene, that you wanted that swagger, to command that, the flowing shirts. But even using that cape is almost like a matador, yeah, it’s expressive, heightened.

Guillermo del Toro: And a lot of hips.

FRANKENSTEIN. (L to R) Mia Goth as Elizabeth and Oscar Isaac as Victor Frankenstein in Frankenstein. Cr. Ken Woroner/Netflix © 2025.
‘Frankenstein’Ken Woroner/Netflix

Patti Smith: You’re right about the sets. They’re so majestic. You should do [the opera] “Parsifal,” the holy fool. Just throw out Wagner’s “Parsifal,” do some of it!

Guillermo del Toro: Like a Mexican “Parsifal.” Well, we tried to design as if it was an opera, the big Medusa, the minimal elements that are around everything. I always say there’s no eye candy in my movies. There’s high protein, because we’re telling the story. I can take you through the shapes and the colors, precisely why we designed them like that, but we wanted to make it as a novel, as epistolary. And one of the things that Gothic romance does is have a story within a story within a story. So I wanted to have self-contained color and camera language and shape language in each of the points of view, and if I made the fabric of the main characters, we wove. We didn’t buy it. We made it. We hand-embroidered it, we printed it, we dyed it, everything. We created rolls of fabric because all the language and the clothes is from nature, like Elizabeth has natural patterns from minerals, from butterfly wings. Her shawls are X-rays. Victor has the embroidered circulatory system. The vest had that. And we wanted to create this world of natural anatomical fields, and we repeat the patterns of the sets on the clothes, etc.

It’s impossibly rich, all those things. And even with the movement, again, to talk about it, starting in this vital place, alive with movement. And slowly calcifying as he gets more angry and more regret[ful]. And then he becomes more creature-like, even with those costumes and the prosthetic leg, as the creature becomes more human. So even those two are rising in opposite ways.

Patti Smith: I was so in love with that ship. I love all the Antarctic explorers and Shackleton.

Oscar Isaac: Imagine rolling up to the Netflix studio, and there’s a fully-sized ship, like the huge, actual-size ship, on gimbals in the parking lot. That was one of the first things that I saw when I arrived.

Patti Smith: It looks like these glass pictures, found in Antarctica. It almost made me feel nauseous, in a good way.

Guillermo del Toro: My producing partner felt nauseous when I said, “We’re building it for real,” but I was making a point that it should be a handcrafted movie by humans, for humans. There’s something that happens when 90 percent of what you’re seeing has a physical component. Yes, we built a ship. When he moves the ship, it’s on motors, and he’s moving the ship with all the sailors on top. When you see the ship, every shot you see is a real ship. We covered the parking lot with ice. We came up with a method to sandwich translucent solids on the icebergs. And we were inspired mainly by Caspar David Frederick, the glass plates from Shackleton, whatever has been found undocumented. We went to the places in Scotland, the UK. We shot in real locations. And we built full-size sets.

Patti Smith: How you worked is the same process as Victor, because when he’s making the sinews of [the creature’s] fingers and all the details of how he’s putting them together and stripping the other bodies, it’s all by hand. It’s a metaphor for your work.

Oscar Isaac: What’s beautiful is that, as opposed to it being this horror scene, it’s lit so beautifully. There’s this beautiful waltz playing, it’s him at his most calm and peaceful.

Guillermo del Toro: He’s happy.

Oscar Isaac: Yeah, that’s what he knows how to do, make his creature…It’s fast, it’s passion, it’s heightened. This isn’t naturalism. We watched movies, different films, to find the tone of it. Oliver Reed was somebody that we watched; what a complicated, huge, magnetic, and scary person. And Pedro Infante, we watched these 1930s Mexican films. We spoke a lot in the words of telenovelas. [Guillermo] would say, “I need you to give me the Maria Cristina. Come on.” We spoke in Spanish the entire time to each other. For me, it is the mother tongue. My mother spoke to me only in Spanish, even though I grew up here since I was a year old. But there was something about speaking that way, that unlocked a mode of unconscious expression, and giving over to that kind of unbridled expression.

Patti Smith: Of the female characters, like Ofelia [“Pan’s Labyrinth”], who I love so much, and Elisa [“The Shape of Water”], and now Elizabeth, and they all give themselves. They all feel empathy with something that everyone else would be frightened of or repelled by, they’re all drawn. And I wrote my notes, “Who are you in all these films?” I think you’re the little girls. You have that eternal young girl longing for a pure love, and they all find it even in death.

FRANKENSTEIN, from left: Mia Goth, Oscar Isaac as Victor Frankenstein, 2025. ph: Ken Woroner / © Netflix /Courtesy Everett Collection
‘Frankenstein’©Netflix/Courtesy Everett Collection

Guillermo del Toro: The Catholic part is to suffer. But there is a pristine way of looking at life in all its ups and downs. And if you don’t look for perfection, if you look for imperfection, but necessarily, you can either accept or let go. That’s about it. And both are in the lexicon of existing. Elizabeth is the only modern character [in “Frankenstein”] and the only character that is not alone. It’s about loneliness so much, and then for a moment, a brief moment, [she and the creature] are together. The creature and Victor are always in the mirror together because they’re part of one single soul, which is what fatherhood and being a child is. You don’t realize it’s a soul that has been split in two, but Elizabeth and the creature are an emptiness split in two, and they attract each other because they feel that they both were broken in the same way. The tone visually has to be of a piece with the tone of the actors. When you think of Jimmy Cagney or Oliver Reed, they’re not naturalistic, but they’re real.

I like the heightened sensation that you’re in a movie, you’re not in the real world. But all that goes to hell if Elizabeth looks at the creature and she sees makeup. She has to see it like a real soul. So, every time they were together, I would shoot them at 36 frames. So I would be able to slow down when she enters with the dress, it floats, and when she’s looking at him, I speed it up to 18 frames so her face is vibrating. And when she’s looking at him, all these little things that you learn through 30 years of craft are invisible, but her performance being real is the key, the performance of Victor and the creature has to be real. Their arc starts in opposites. Victor finishes his life’s work the night the creature starts his life. And also, he’s so heartbreaking; they’re never going to see eye to eye. He basically becomes a mother in the first four weeks of postpartum. Those three characters form a single soul, Elizabeth, Victor, and the creature for me.

Patti Smith: He starts his sorrow the minute he achieves his goal, when he sits on those steps and thinks that there’s no more, forget what he says about the horizon, it’s done. He’s finished his course, and now the debris of all his work is going to haunt him. But as a girl, I was attracted to the creature. Frankenstein, the monster as James Whale gave us, I was never attracted to him. I felt empathy for him always, even when he accidentally killed the little child; you still have pain for him, but the way that I felt about your creature was completely different. He gave me hope, the idea that he would achieve another level of intelligence or answers to immortality. How did you decide how his countenance would look?

Guillermo del Toro: The two main inspirations were a statue of Saint Bartholomew in Rome, which is made of alabaster, and the lines are anatomically incorrect, but they’re beautiful. They’re almost Art Deco, and the head was designed after the patterns of phrenology that were created as a pseudoscience in the 1800s. There are so many echoes of Christ in the movie with the creature, and we can go through them and raising him, the crown of thorns, the red mantle on his shoulders, the wound on the side when he resurrects after three days, but it’s also Adam expelled, and finding a tree with red fruit, and getting to know pain through that. So all the biblical beauty, for me, tells you this is not a repair job, it’s a newly minted soul. Therefore, the ruining of it is more painful. They’re not ruining something they patched up. They’re ruining something that he minted.

And the pursuit has to be the red of the mother. The color red of the mother pursues Victor through the film and comes back with Elizabeth, the scarf, the gloves, the batteries, the angel, blah, blah, blah. He says he’s interested in life. He’s interested in vanquishing death. The way he treats life is completely cavalier. So the creature needs to be on the same color palette as Elizabeth, and they achieve this sort of translucent alabaster, nicotine oyster grace. And they come together at the end on their wedding night, which I wanted to make the one moment they have together. And the creature becomes, first, a baby, and the reactions are completely clean. And it’s very hard for an actor to do nothing, but he achieves it. Jacob, and then I give him three words: Victor, Elizabeth, friend, and the more he accumulates words, the more he knows pain. And with pain comes questions, and with questions comes the need for answers, and he finally achieves Grace at the end of the film.

He’s brutal with those that are brutal with him, he’s loving with those that are loving, and at the end, he is loving with those that were brutal with him, and accepts the grace of the son. So his performance tracking from Jacob was far from Victor’s part from Oscar, because they have such a beautiful arc together. For that, forgiveness seemed to work. I was betting on one gesture, and that’s the hand grabbing the hand. Oscar found it on the day. The first scene we shot together with the two guys was that scene.

Oscar helped me so beautifully. I wrote it for him, so I would send him pages before anyone, and we found the pentameter, so to speak, the rhythms of the language, so that 90 percent of the dialogue in the movie is completely new. It doesn’t come from the book, but he needed to have the same poetic breath of the book, and we found that.

FRANKENSTEIN, Oscar Isaac as Victor Frankenstein, 2025.  © Netflix / courtesy Everett Collection
‘Frankenstein’©Netflix/Courtesy Everett Collection

Patti Smith: When [Elizabeth] said, “Who hurt you?” I felt like that phrase hovered over the entire film. I felt like it was echoing over and over, even when the brother died, when the brother says, “You are the monster who hurt him.” He has this realization of how no one really hates the other, it’s just human nature or animal nature…The world consciousness, everything.

Guillermo del Toro: Pain is basically inevitable, and because we are mammalian hunter-gatherers, we’re going to necessarily get in the way, because your hope and my hope are never going to fully coincide all the time. And that’s why I wanted to paraphrase the book in giving the creature its own voice and [making] it a fairy tale. And he learns from the animals, the ravens give birth to him. The deer teach him violence. Then the mice adopt him, and then the wolves are the world. The wolves don’t care, but they’re going to hurt you, and that’s a fact. My father was kidnapped in 1998, kept for 72 days. And we had to go through it, and continue functioning, because you cannot stop functioning. You have to stay yourself. And the final image comes from that. When my father was kidnapped in the middle of the kidnapping, I resented the sun. I said, “Why does the sun rise, when I’m in pain?” And then the question became, “Why am I in pain when the sun rises?” You have to give yourself to that grace of a metronome that is much larger than your woes. And if you give in to that metronome, then you find release. So brutality is part of the language that structures reality. I don’t say I’m in favor of it existing. I was so familiar with loss when I was a kid. The familiarity that I have with Mary Shelley, my mother had many miscarriages. I had two siblings younger than me, and whenever she went to the hospital, I thought s”he’s gone, she’s not coming back.” “Who hurt you?” comes from a fairy tale, Oscar Wilde’s “The Selfish Giant.” When he raises the baby Jesus and he says, “Who hurt you?” I love that.

Horror, parable, and fairy tale are closely related. Horror articulates trauma in a way that no other genre does, except fairy tale and parable. And that’s why we are so moved by things that are intangible. Hans Christian Andersen and Oscar Wilde are the masters of pain and beauty. Those are two guys that are as much in touch with the brutality as they are in touch with the beauty. Every other tale can be sadistic or not, and in a more Jungian way. But those two, they are turning to aesthetics, pain, horror, and beauty.

Patti Smith: Well, thank you for being the eternal child. Thank you, Oscar. You’re both awesome.

“Frankenstein” is now streaming on Netflix.

December 13, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Miss the Golden Age of Weird Netflix? Try ‘Frankenstein’s Monster’s Monster, Frankenstein’
TV & Streaming

Miss the Golden Age of Weird Netflix? Try ‘Frankenstein’s Monster’s Monster, Frankenstein’

by jummy84 November 22, 2025
written by jummy84

This surreal half-hour comedy special came to the streaming platform in 2019. But with Guillermo del Toro’s “Frankenstein” and “Stranger Things” Season 5 in the news, it’s never been more timely.

November 22, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Mia Goth Explains Hidden Details In Frankenstein
Fashion

Mia Goth Explains Hidden Details In Frankenstein

by jummy84 November 11, 2025
written by jummy84

The newest adaptation of Mary Shelley’s timeless novel Frankenstein has captivated audiences, with director Guillermo del Toro’s film being praised for being mostly faithful to the source material. Starring Australia’s own Jacob Elordi as The Creature and Oscar Isaac as Victor Frankenstein, somehow it’s Mia Goth, as Elizabeth Lavenza, who steals the show — adorned by Tiffany & Co. jewels and 19th Century gowns. Her extensive wardrobe for Frankenstein came from the mind of Emmy Award-nominated costume designer Kate Hawley, who has worked on projects such as The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power and Crimson Peak. Goth’s character Elizabeth has an interest in entomology and botany, so Hawley included nods to beetles and other insects through patterns and garment shapes. Along with wasp-waisted tight corsets, certain fabrics were also chosen to mimic paper-thin beetle wings.
November 11, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Is Netflix's 'Frankenstein' Guillermo Del Toro's Last Monster Movie?
TV & Streaming

Is Netflix’s ‘Frankenstein’ Guillermo Del Toro’s Last Monster Movie?

by jummy84 November 9, 2025
written by jummy84

Mary Shelley’s “Frankenstein” is Guillermo del Toro’s bible. When he was 11 years old, the novel and subsequent movies were not only his first love, they were how he processed his relationship with his father, and wrestled with his Catholicism.

“I do believe the book questions God for why are we here and what makes us human,” said del Toro. “So the perfect analogy for me, between me and my father, Catholic dogma, the idea that God sends Jesus to be crucified and experience pain and death. And I always wondered as a kid, ‘Why did he do that?’”

While as a kid the story became how del Toro started articulating his feelings about his Catholicism, as an adult, he built a room in his house dedicated to Shelley, a life-size silicon recreation of the author at her desk. His Los Angeles “living room” is dedicated to the various movie incarnations of Victor Frankenstein’s monster through the years, including eight statues.

"Little Amélie or the Character of Rain"

And as a filmmaker, del Toro’s dream of making “Frankenstein” dated back to his childhood years as an 8mm auteur. The director said all the hyperbole —  life’s quest, North Star, Mount Everest — applies, and while on the podcast, admitted his previous films were some version of him trying to tell the “Frankenstein” tale:

“Cronos”: “A 100 percent [“Frankenstein” inspired]. The scar is a Frankenstein scar on his forehead, he is about eternal life and he welcomes the sun in a translucent skin.”

“Blade II”: “Completely a ‘Frankenstein’ story with the villain Nomack [Luke Goss] and his father who sent him out into the world, and says, ‘Why did you make me like this?’”

“‘Hellboy’ is sort of half Frankenstein.”

“Mimic”:  “The science experiment gone awry, where somebody called the creatures ‘Little Frankensteins.’”

One of the defining characteristics of del Toro’s career has been his movie monsters, the pinnacle of which was his desire to make the most “beautiful” version of Victor Frankenstein’s creation imaginable, so much so that his decades-long collaboration with creature designer Mike Hill was a dress rehearsal.

“If Victor has been thinking about making this thing for 20 years or so, he would make a beautiful thing. He wouldn’t look like an ICU victim,” said Del Toro on how he envisioned the skin of the cobbled together monster. “That I’ve been rehearsing, if you watch my movies, the pale vampire on ‘Blade II,’ the pale vampire on ‘Cronos,’ is the same look I was trying to rehearse for ‘Frankenstein.’”

FRANKENSTEIN, from left: director Guillermo del Toro, Oscar Isaac, on set, 2025. ph: Ken Woroner / © Netflix / courtesy Everett Collection
Guillermo del Toro, Oscar Isaac, on the ‘Frankenstein’ set©Netflix/Courtesy Everett Collection

But when it came time on set for Dr. Victor Frankenstein (Oscar Isaac) to finally assemble del Toro’s dream of the perfect monster (Jacob Elordi), it was the filmmaker who felt unexpectedly transformed.

“Something happened when Victor was doing the anatomy assembly. Oscar and I were really linked, and I looked at him, he looked at me, and without saying anything, we felt something had changed,” said del Toro, who after having time to process the moment, has concluded, “I had dreamt of that scene so long, and all of a sudden we’re shooting it and I felt like something left — it was something to do with monsters, something to do with my filming language. Something changed and I think it’s never felt like that ever.”

While on the podcast, del Toro stated he didn’t know if he was done with movie monsters. He is deep in the process of making a stop motion animated version of Kazuo Ishiguro’s fantasy novel “The Buried Giant,” which does feature some creatures, but said his curiosity for the first time lies away from the movie monsters that have defined his career.

But it’s not just creatures, it’s his filmmaking. The polished, precise, colorful, grand, sweeping soundstage craft he has been perfecting for decades — much like Elordi’s monster — seems to have also culminated on “Frankenstein.” In particular, del Toro talked about how he had been sharpening his mastery of camera movement with his last four films, growing to the point he was shooting almost exclusively on a technocrane, as he learned how to dial into the exact emotional rhythm and feeling of a moment with how his camera moved through space.

“I thought about [camera movement] like a symphony, but I want to do something rougher, I want to try different uses of light on set,” said del Toro. “I’m very intrigued by the ’70s. I’ve never allowed cuts to not breathe, I leave every moment to breathe.”

On the podcast, del Toro talked about wanting to make his version of a grounded, gritty ’70s film, with films by Sidney Lumet, Don Siegel, Alan Pakula, and what he calls the “ugly Paris trilogy” of Roman Polanski (“The Tenant,” “Frantic”), calling his name. In other words, the polar opposite of the filmic language he’s been honing for 30 years.

Del Toro, 61, admitted age does have something to do with wanting to mix it up for the first time — inspired by his friend, the sci-fi body horror master David Cronenberg’s 2005 shift to more grounded thrillers, “A History of Violence” and “Eastern Promises.”

“When I talked to David Cronenberg when he turned 74, he said to me, ‘I’m trying to scare myself into being young. You have to, or it goes away.’ And he did ‘A History of Violence’ — it’s a departure, but it’s not,” said del Toro, referring to the fact Cronenberg’s POV as filmmaker is still recognizable in his later films. “So, I’m sure I will not be unrecognizable,  but it would be pushing myself to something else.”

To hear Guilermo del Toro’s full interview, subscribe to the Filmmaker Toolkit podcast on Apple, Spotify, or your favorite podcast platform.

November 9, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
A Final Trailer for del Toro's 'Frankenstein' Reveals the Monster Himself
Hollywood

A Final Trailer for del Toro’s ‘Frankenstein’ Reveals the Monster Himself

by jummy84 November 1, 2025
written by jummy84

A Final Trailer for del Toro’s ‘Frankenstein’ Reveals the Monster Himself

by Alex Billington
October 31, 2025
Source: YouTube

“I must confess – I never considered what would come after creation.” The story of a monster & his unique creation. Netflix has revealed one final trailer for Guillermo del Toro’s new Frankenstein movie, his uniquely gothic and extra dark take on this classic story from author Mary Shelley. After premiering at the 2025 Venice & Telluride Film Festivals (read my review) it will be streaming on Netflix starting next week. This trailer finally gives us a much better look at his monster – as played by Jacob Elordi in one of the best performances of the year. Oscar-winning director Guillermo del Toro adapts the tale of Victor Frankenstein, a brilliant but egotistical scientist who brings a creature to life in a monstrous experiment that ultimately leads to the undoing of both the creator and his tragic creation. The phenomenal cast includes Oscar Isaac as Victor and Jacob Elordi as his “monster”, with Mia Goth, Christoph Waltz, Felix Kammerer, Lars Mikkelsen, David Bradley, Charles Dance, Christian Convery, and Ralph Ineson. The movie has already been playing in theaters for a few weeks and will be playing on Netflix soon – hence why they’re giving it one big push with this final trailer. Catch on the big screen if you can, either way it’s worth a watch.

Here’s the final trailer (+ art poster) for Guillermo del Toro’s take on Frankenstein, direct from YouTube:

Frankenstein Final Trailer

Frankenstein Official Poster

You can rewatch the official trailer for Guillermo del Toro’s Frankenstein movie right here and teaser here.

“In seeking life, I created death…” Inspired by the classic novel originally published in 1818. Set in Eastern Europe in the 19th Century, Dr. Pretorious (Christoph Waltz) has to track down Frankenstein’s Monster (Jacob Elordi)—believed to have died in a fire some 40 years before—in order to continue the macabre experiments of Dr. Victor Frankenstein (Oscar Isaac). “Only Monsters Play God.” Frankenstein is directed by visionary Mexican filmmaker Guillermo del Toro, director of the films Cronos, Mimic, The Devil’s Backbone, Blade II, Hellboy I & II, Pan’s Labyrinth, Crimson Peak, The Shape of Water, Nightmare Alley, and the animated Pinocchio previously, as well as lots of producing work plus other projects. The screenplay is also written by Guillermo del Toro, based on Mary Shelley’s iconic book “Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus.” Produced by Guillermo del Toro, Scott Stuber, J. Miles Dale. It premiered at the 2025 Venice & Telluride Film Festivals. Netflix releases del Toro’s Frankenstein in select US theaters first on October 17th, 2025, then streaming on Netflix starting November 7th this fall. How’s that look? Want to watch?

Share

Find more posts in: Horror, To Watch, Trailer

November 1, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
How 'Frankenstein' Invented the Modern Studio Horror Movie in 1931
TV & Streaming

How ‘Frankenstein’ Invented the Modern Studio Horror Movie in 1931

by jummy84 October 17, 2025
written by jummy84

When Guillermo del Toro‘s “Frankenstein” hits theaters today, it will join an honorable lineage of Mary Shelley adaptations that began in 1910, continued throughout the silent era, and helped create the template for the modern studio horror film just a few years after the arrival of sound. Del Toro‘s take on Shelley’s 1818 novel is more faithful to the source material than James Whale‘s 1931 incarnation with Boris Karloff, and follows through on the premise’s potential with greater philosophical depth and visual detail, but when it comes to influence and impact Whale’s “Frankenstein” will likely never be topped.

That’s because “Frankenstein,” along with an earlier 1931 release, Tod Browning’s “Dracula,” introduced the horror genre as a viable form for artistic expression and commercial success within the studio system. Both movies were made at Universal, a studio that became synonymous with horror after the success of “Dracula” and “Frankenstein” gave way to “The Wolf Man,” “The Mummy,” “The Invisible Man,” and myriad sequels and spinoffs well into the mid-1950s.

'Koln 75'

Although Universal had made a few horror or horror-adjacent films in the silent era, the boom in sound horror came courtesy of executive Carl Laemmle Jr., whose father, Universal founder Carl Laemmle, made his son head of production in 1929 as a 21st birthday present. The junior Laemmle was a passionate proponent of horror and pushed for “Dracula,” a film his dad didn’t really believe in; the main reason Laemmle Jr. was able to greenlight Browning’s adaptation of Bram Stoker’s vampire novel was that the young executive had recently had a major success with his World War I epic “All Quiet on the Western Front.”

With Bela Lugosi in the title role, “Dracula” was a smash hit upon its release in February 1931 and validated Laemmle Jr.’s faith in horror. As the studio scurried to capitalize on the film’s success, “Frankenstein” arose as a promising follow-up. Shelley’s story of a scientist who creates a sentient creature out of body parts cobbled together from various corpses was tailor-made for the screen — in fact, it had already been filmed at least three times.

The first adaptation, a 14-minute version made by the Edison Company in 1910, is quite possibly the world’s first horror film. Making these kinds of claims, however, is always dubious given how many silent pictures did not survive the era. Indeed, that was the case for two subsequent “Frankenstein” adaptations, the 1915 feature “Life Without Soul” and an Italian iteration called “The Monster of Frankenstein.” Only the Edison “Frankenstein” still exists in any kind of viewable form, via a restoration currently streaming on the Library of Congress YouTube channel.

Universal’s 1931 “Frankenstein” shouldn’t necessarily have been a game changer — rushed into production after “Dracula” became a hit, the film only gave its creators a handful of months from conception to release in which to make their classic. Yet somehow the stars aligned. “Frankenstein” was not only a better film than “Dracula” — wittier, more visually dynamic, and more poetic and poignant as well as scarier — but also an influence on all future “Frankenstein” movies and a model for much later horror films like Brian De Palma’s “Carrie” and Lucky McKee’s “May.”

As in those films, “Frankenstein” gets a lot of mileage out of creating a central figure who alternates between being the monster, the victim, and the hero all in the same movie. Frankenstein’s monster, as played by Boris Karloff, is one of the all-time great horror movie characters, a figure both terrifying and filled with pathos as an innocent dragged into a world that he did not make and that does not want him.

This remains consistent throughout nearly all of the “Frankenstein” movies that would follow Whale’s, up to and including del Toro’s iteration, which is overall more faithful to Shelley’s conception of the monster as a verbal being than Karloff’s grunting hulk. The monster’s lack of verbal sophistication, in fact, was one of the things that made Bela Lugosi reject the role after he was announced as the film’s star, though reportedly no one was particularly interested in seeing Lugosi in the part after a screen test featuring the actor in full monster makeup met with unintentional laughter. (Lugosi did ultimately play Frankenstein’s monster years later, in 1943’s “Frankenstein Meets the Wolf Man.”)

Once Lugosi and original director Robert Florey left the project, the door was open for the filmmakers who would make “Frankenstein” iconic. James Whale was a recent arrival at Universal whose previous work included directing the dialogue scenes on Howard Hughes’ aviation epic “Hell’s Angels.” He kicked off his Universal contract in 1931 by directing “Waterloo Bridge,” a movie Laemmle Jr. was high enough on to give Whale his pick of material for his next project.

FRANKENSTEIN, Boris Karloff, 1931
‘Frankenstein’Courtesy Everett Collection

Whale responded to “Frankenstein,” and he knew who he wanted for the monster: Boris Karloff, whom he had seen in Howard Hawks’ “The Criminal Code.” (Karloff also had a small role in Hawks’ gangster classic “Scarface,” which had been shot but not released at the time “Frankenstein” went into production.) When Karloff put on Jack Pierce’s prosthetics and makeup (which took several hours each day of shooting to apply), he wasn’t silly like Lugosi. He looked both haunting and haunted, sad and terrifying.

Pierce was a master makeup artist (he would go on to create other Universal monsters like the Wolf Man and the Mummy), and he carefully adapted his design for Frankenstein’s monster to the contours of Karloff’s face, giving the actor maximum opportunities to convey emotion via facial expressions and gestures. This was key given that Karloff had no real dialogue, though he would be given a limited vocabulary in the 1935 sequel “Bride of Frankenstein.”

Karloff’s entrance in “Frankenstein” is one of the great introductions in horror movie history, as Whale blocks the scene with the monster backing into a room, withholding his visage from the audience as long as possible. Once Karloff slowly turns, Whale pushes the camera closer and closer to him in a series of cuts that thrust the viewer into the monster’s space — and which reveal the flawlessness of Pierce’s design in unblinking close-ups.

It’s still a powerful moment nearly a hundred years later, and the poignancy of the performance to follow is only more potent after decades of other — mostly inferior — presentations of the character. Certainly, none of the actors who took on the role in Universal productions after Karloff left the monster behind in “Son of Frankenstein” (1939) replicated Karloff’s subtle emotional effects, and even an actor as capable as Robert De Niro remained in Karloff’s shadow when he played the monster in Kenneth Branagh’s “Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein” in 1994.

One of the many laudable aspects of del Toro’s “Frankenstein” is the performance by Jacob Elordi, which invites and earns comparison with Karloff’s characterization in its depth and complexity; del Toro’s deep empathy for the monster and Elordi’s subtly calibrated evolution of the monster’s awareness make this the best “Frankenstein” since 1931. Elordi is so sympathetic that it doesn’t quite feel right to even call him the monster; Oscar Isaac’s Dr. Frankenstein is by far the more horrific of the characters in del Toro’s conception.

Revisiting Whale and Karloff’s “Frankenstein” after seeing del Toro and Elordi’s, the original film’s achievement is all the more impressive. Unlike “Dracula,” it really hasn’t dated aside from a few stale digressions involving Dr. Frankenstein’s fiancée and a generic rival for her affections. One reason is the movie’s lack of score; modern horror enthusiasts will be surprised to find that aside from the opening and closing credits, there’s no music in “Frankenstein” — something that was typical in 1931, as underscoring didn’t come into widespread use for another year or two.

In “Frankenstein,” the lack of score creates an austere purity, as our attention is focused on the intricacies of Whale’s vertically oriented visual design and the nuances of Karloff’s performance. The movie remains as effective as it presumably was in 1931, when it opened to blockbuster business and firmly determined that Universal would be a house of horror for decades to come.

In fact, the brand is still probably the major studio most associated with the genre thanks to its partnerships with filmmakers like Jordan Peele and Jason Blum, whose “The Black Phone 2” opens in theaters today alongside del Toro’s “Frankenstein.” Whale and Karloff’s classic may now be 95 years old, but its impact and influence are still felt at the multiplex virtually every month.

October 17, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Jacob Elordi reveals how his "sensitive" golden retriever dog inspired his Frankenstein performance
TV & Streaming

Jacob Elordi reveals how his “sensitive” golden retriever dog inspired his Frankenstein performance

by jummy84 October 17, 2025
written by jummy84

When it came to playing Frankenstein’s monster in Guillermo del Toro’s new adaptation of Mary Shelley’s iconic text, Jacob Elordi had no shortage of previous cinematic portrayals to draw on. From Boris Karloff to Christopher Lee to Peter Boyle to Robert de Niro, the creature has been brought to the screen countless times in a variety of iconic ways.

But rather than looking solely at his acting predecessors, the Saltburn star also found inspiration for his role from another, rather more unexpected, source: his golden retriever, Layla.

“I mean, like a child, she doesn’t speak, obviously, so everything that she does physically is to get what she needs or to show how she feels,” he explained in an exclusive interview with RadioTimes.com.

“So she’s very creature-like in the way that she operates in the world. I suppose she’s also incredibly sensitive. So there was a lot of that in her – I see the whole world in my dog’s eyes.”

Of course, Layla wasn’t the only source that came in handy to Elordi while crafting the physicality of his performance, and he admitted that his wade-range of influences stretched as far as… almost every experience he’s ever had.

“I mean, every movie I’ve ever seen, every conversation I’ve ever had, every time I’ve broken a bone, every little breakdown, every moment of ecstatic joy that I couldn’t control, everything,” he said.

“It was very much a big part of myself, I think, in the physicality of the creature. It’s strange because it’s not human, but it almost feels more human than me walking around like a guy!”

Mia Goth as Elizabeth and Oscar Isaac as Victor Frankenstein in Frankenstein. Cr. Ken Woroner/Netflix © 2025.

Elordi is joined in the cast by Oscar Isaac as the titular scientist, while there are also key roles for the likes of Mia Goth, Christoph Waltz and David Bradley.

The film has received some very positive reviews since premiering at this year’s Venice Film Festival, and in our own five-star write-up we heaped praise on Elordi’s performance – writing that the Australian actor “truly shows his dexterity in a performance of few words but grand and sometimes heartbreaking gestures.”

We also wrote that the film was “the accumulation of three-and-a-half decades of filmmaking knowledge” on the part of Del Toro, and that it all adds up to “a tragic tale told in a captivating manner.”

Frankenstein is now showing in limited cinemas and will arrive on Netflix on 7th November 2025.

Check out more of our Film coverage or visit our TV Guide and Streaming Guide to find out what’s on. For more TV recommendations and reviews, listen to The Radio Times Podcast.

October 17, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Guillermo del Toro’s Frankenstein Review: Best Movie Yet
Music

Guillermo del Toro’s Frankenstein Review: Best Movie Yet

by jummy84 October 16, 2025
written by jummy84

It can’t be said that we, as a culture, are in desperate need of new movies about Dr. Victor Frankenstein and his monster. Literally hundreds of these adaptations have been made since the dawn of the moving image, every year bringing at least one new interpretation of Mary Shelley’s classic tale. In 2022, Rob Zombie remade The Munsters; in 2023, Yorgos Lanthimos brought us the Oscar-winning Poor Things; in 2024, Zelda Williams made her directorial debut with Lisa Frankenstein. And now it’s Guillermo del Toro’s turn.

The Oscar-winning auteur’s big-budget, sumptuously made Frankenstein features Oscar Isaac as the titular scientist, with Jacob Elordi as his creation. Many of the familiar plot beats from Mary Shelley’s original novel are present, including the framing device of Victor Frankenstein telling his story to a ship captain who has led his crew on a potentially doomed expedition to the Arctic. However, del Toro has remixed much of the original plot, keeping many of the characters and details but shifting them around to serve his vision.

Del Toro begins with a prelude in which an injured Victor Frankenstein is found on the Arctic ice and brought to the relative safety of the ship. Then, we get the story of Victor’s less-than-idyllic childhood, leading up to Victor’s attempts to win over the era’s most notable medical minds with his bold ideas about reanimating flesh. They reject his work, but enter Harlander (Christoph Waltz), a rich businessman — and uncle to Elizabeth (Mia Goth), the fiancee of Victor’s brother William (Felix Kammerer) — who’s willing to fund Victor’s experiments.

Related Video

A lot of money and accumulated body parts later, Victor has assembled his “modern Prometheus” and used an electrical storm to bring him to life. Unfortunately, he soon writes the Creature off as a failure after said Creature fails to develop a capacity for language quickly enough, kicking off a series of tragic events that bring the story to its climax.

In a sense, del Toro’s entire career has been building to this moment: Not only has the director talked frequently about his love for the classic Frankenstein in the press, but a parade of painfully human monsters have appeared in past movies like Hellboy, Pan’s Labyrinth, and The Shape of Water. That latter film won four Oscars, including Best Picture and Best Director, a remarkable achievement considering how that movie is most often remembered as “the one where Sally Hawkins has sex with the fish man.” (It is a beautiful movie beyond that fact — or perhaps because of it. What better way to explore the nature of humanity?)

Fueled by that creative passion, not to mention a lot of Netflix’s money, del Toro incorporates some steampunk flair to the action without overdoing it. Really, every period detail on screen is rendered beautifully, from the production design to the costumes — even the effects are downright flawless, with the line between digital and real smoothed other by both brilliant puppetry and CGI. The colors throughout tell a story, red and blue in strict opposition to each other, while del Toro finds just the right balance between too much and too little grotesquerie appropriate to the story.

Frankenstein (Netflix)

None of these aesthetic achievements hold back the cast, either. Oscar Isaac’s eyes capture the necessary madness, but his performance overall stays so grounded and believable that it feels totally separate from any of the many actors who have played the role in the past, from Peter Cushing to Gene Wilder. And as his creation, Jacob Elordi is pretty genius casting when one considers that full articles have been written about how maybe he’s just too tall. But beyond his height, he brings a level of innocence and hurt that really works here, and the prosthetic makeup doesn’t prevent him from drawing out everything vulnerable and relatable about his character. Netflix is keeping his full transformation under wraps (the press site includes no clear images of the Creature design), but the design beautifully captures both his humanity as well as his otherworldly nature.

The supporting cast pales a bit by comparison, largely due to the way they’re incorporated into del Toro’s remix. Christoph Waltz’s character ends up feeling like more of an afterthought/plot contrivance, while Mia Goth gets plenty of opportunity to distinguish herself as more than just a simpering bride-to-be; that character development unfortunately doesn’t translate into much in the way of active participation in the plot. Still, as complaints go they’re mild enough, especially given the depth of thought del Toro has put into the meat of his approach.

What’s most intriguing about often-adapted texts like Frankenstein is what we can learn from the choices made in the adaptation. As one example, Danny Boyle’s 2011 National Theater production of Frankenstein famously featured Benedict Cumberbatch and Jonny Lee Miller trading off the roles every night, pushing the idea of man and his creation as a duality.

Del Toro’s approach, though, involves exploring this narrative as a story of creation as well as of fathers and sons. Hence the early scenes of the film, as the script gives us everything we need to understand Victor as a character, and thus his subsequent actions, by letting the tragic story of his childhood unfold. Victor inflicts the same sort of upbringing upon his creature that his own abusive father (Charles Dance, steely perfection) gave him, only realizing too late his mistakes.

Meanwhile, on the page, Shelley’s Creature was far more violent than del Toro’s; here, Victor ends up being responsible for far more of the story’s carnage, while the Creature retains more innocence. It doesn’t take too deep a dive into del Toro’s past work to suss out the reasons for why he wants his audience to feel more sympathy towards the monster; that’s always where his sympathies have been. And thanks to the love and care he’s put into telling this story, it’s not at all a challenge for the audience to go there with him.

Fueled by that love, the end result is something beautiful and meaningful — an adaptation where one never questions the need for it to be made. And that in itself is quite an achievement: Robert Eggers’ 2024 adaptation of Nosferatu was also beautifully crafted, but never felt essential. By comparison, there’s such humanity and spirit to what del Toro has done that despite the narrative differences, it genuinely feels like the definitive take on Shelley’s classic tale. He’s said what he wants to say about his beloved Creature, and we are better for it.

Frankenstein escapes the lab for a limited release on Friday, October 17th. It makes its Netflix debut on November 7th. Check out the latest trailer below.

October 16, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Hero image for the October cover story with Mia Goth. She is laying on the ground looking to the camera wearing a white crystal embellished bodysuit with ruffled collar detailing.
Fashion

Mia Goth on Frankenstein, Motherhood, and Her Monster Year Coming Up

by jummy84 October 8, 2025
written by jummy84

I meet Mia Goth in late August in Pasadena in a small park in the middle of the California Institute of Technology’s campus. She selects a bench in the shade, fronted by a series of small ponds and encircled by buildings housing the genius minds of tomorrow. It is rather on the nose, I tell her, given the day’s subject matter. She is the female lead in Guillermo del Toro’s Frankenstein, the celebrated director’s 149-minute, $120 million three-decades-in-the-making passion project about a cursed inventor, and here we are, poised between the natural world and the ever-widening reaches of scientific exploration. Goth looks over her shoulder at the Kellogg Radiation Laboratory. “That did cross my mind,” she says impishly. “Scientists…” Really, she says she chose this little park, with its boulders and terraced pools full of friskily scrumming turtles, because it doesn’t feel like L.A. (more on that later) and because she comes here regularly with her 3-year-old daughter, Isabel. It’s one of their favorite outings. “That’s one of the beautiful things about having a child. … Things that you used to take for granted or you just weren’t present for or just completely glazed over as an adult, she really slows down,” she tells me. “This, if I was on my own, I might just look at it and appreciate it. Move on. Turtles. But with her, it becomes a whole morning.” Goth is wearing no makeup (and not in the usual starlet no-makeup makeup way—really, none), and she is beaming. Parenthood, she tells me earnestly, “is the greatest gift of my life.”

(Image credit: Erica Snyder. Wardrobe: Marc Jacobs dress and bow.)

This, it must be said, differs wildly from Victor Frankenstein’s experience—as written by Mary Shelley in her iconic 1818 novel and as depicted in del Toro’s 2025 film, in theaters and on Netflix this fall. The director has taken some liberties with the text: his Dr. Frankenstein (Oscar Isaac) has a cruel, demanding father, and transforms the sorrow of losing his mother, played for a few scenes by an unrecognizable Goth (truly, I triple-checked it with both Netflix and personal reps), at a young age into the determination to create life out of pieces of recovered corpses. He makes himself a parent too— just a really, really bad one. His repulsion by and abandonment of his creation (Jacob Elordi) results in a lot of unnecessary death and destruction. It’s mayhem that could have been mastered by patience, understanding, and love—basically, good mothering (there’s a lot of Freudian emphasis on Victor’s preference for milk) but also a sense of humanity. There is a reason this story has remained relevant for over two centuries and has found its moral lesson applied to everything from the French Revolution to the creation of and increasing reliance on AI: Just because we can do something, Shelley’s work insists, doesn’t mean we should.

Mia Goth photo shoot for Who What Wear's October Cover Story. She is sitting on the floor, leaning on a velvet couch wearing a white crystal-embellished jumpsuit with satin bow detailing and ruffled collar.

(Image credit: Erica Snyder. Wardrobe: Richard Quinn look; Manolo Blahnik shoes.)

Mia Goth photo shoot for Who What Wear's October Cover Story.

(Image credit: Future)

Goth’s real role in del Toro’s film is playing Elizabeth Lavenza. In Shelley’s novel, she is Victor’s pure-hearted cousin and later wife, a benign victim who pushes the plot along. Here, the character is a refined young woman with a mind of her own who Victor finds himself inexplicably drawn to. (Could it be her uncanny similarity to his mother? There’s Freud again.) She is engaged to Victor’s guileless and kind younger brother and has a deep-pocketed uncle (Christoph Waltz) who is willingly and increasingly entangled in Victor’s experiments. Goth’s Elizabeth possesses a genuine appreciation for science, specifically entomology, and a love of both the natural and metaphysical worlds. She has spent her most recent years in a convent. The part is basically the human embodiment of pure female virtue turned all the way up to Virgin Mary levels—all quiet kindness, grace, and maternal instinct wrapped in the halo of a cerulean-feathered fascinator that highlights Goth’s eyes.

Goth spent time with some nuns in Alhambra, California, to prepare for the role, she tells me, and read the stacks of books that del Toro had given her (subjects: entomology; the book of Job; a biography of the 17th century Hieronymite nun, poet, and playwright Sor Juana Ines de la Cruz; a study of the fashions of the time). She also made a playlist, which she does for all of her film projects, mostly made up of scores by the Icelandic composer Jóhann Jóhannsson, though she later decided she needed to break up all the “composer energy” with songs by Jeff Buckley, Beirut, Eve, Big Sean, and Mariah Carey. She found the most success when she’d meditate and try to channel a higher spirit. “I started to realize that actually when I get quiet and I’m able to sit with myself and get silent and really connect to the most authentic part of me, that’s where she exists,” Goth says.

Mia Goth photo shoot for Who What Wear's October Cover Story. She is sitting on the ground next to a velvet coach wearing a white crystal-embellished jumpsuit with stain bow detailing and ruffled collar.

(Image credit: Erica Snyder. Wardrobe: Richard Quinn look; Manolo Blahnik shoes.)

Though she describes the shoot as magical (“I would have done anything Guillermo asked me to,” Goth says with a “pinch me” air. “I never got over the fact that I was a part of Guillermo del Toro’s Frankenstein. I still haven’t gotten over it”), the set was not a nonstop party. “I was taken by how focused and how quiet and how detail oriented the set was,” she says. “I mean, everyone knew what time it was and what this represented and what it could be if we made it work. I guess, in that sense, there were parts of the job that were quite lonely.” She often feels that the energy of the character and the story end up translating to the dynamic and the vibe of the set. She says, “I think just the nature of my character being a woman, the only woman, in a Victorian world is intrinsically lonely.”

Mia Goth photo shoot for Who What Wear's October Cover Story. Mia Goth is sitting on a bed with ornate headboard. She is wearing a blue velvet long sleeve dress with white tights and a white lace headscarf.

(Image credit: Erica Snyder. Wardrobe: Colleen Allen coat; Erik Charlotte bonnet; Falk tights; Alice Waese earring (worn as nail art); Tiffany & Co. ring; Stella McCartney shoes.)

Goth believes all storytelling is, in some part, biographical, and she thinks there was a part of Shelley in all of these characters. At the time of writing Frankenstein, the 18-year-old Shelley had run away with the married poet Percy Bysshe Shelley, just lost their out-of-wedlock child two years prior, and was pregnant with another. It was a period that The New Yorker, reviewing Muriel Spark’s 1951 biography of Shelley, summarized as “eight years of near-constant pregnancy and loss.” Shelley was no stranger to the latter: Her mother, the writer, philosopher, and women’s rights advocate Mary Wollstonecraft, had died soon after childbirth, and her father, the political philosopher William Godwin, rejected her at 16 for her trespasses with Shelley. The impetus for Frankenstein came from a bored Lord Byron (who, it has been suggested, served as a fair amount of the inspiration for the impulsive and morality-challenged Victor and who himself impregnated Shelley’s stepsister with a child he would effectively abandon a few years later). During a stormy weekend visit, he suggested a ghost story competition. Shelley’s story became Frankenstein: a parable of man’s genius perverted to folly, as expressed through the eyes of a hideous, powerful, innocent. (Ultimately, as is so often the case, the problem was other people; as Wollstonecraft had written in 1794, “people are rendered ferocious by misery.”) “I thought a lot about [Mary Shelley] and who she was,” Goth says. “At the core part of it, she was a very lonely woman. She created a friend in the creature,” who, like all infants, didn’t ask to be born and fumbles through the world looking for love and kindness and finds mostly cruelty and fear. “That’s something that I was drawn to in the character,” Goth continues, “this feeling of always feeling kind of an outsider myself.”

Mia Goth photo shoot for Who What Wear's October Cover Story. Top: Mia is seen lying on a bed. She is wearing a velvet long sleeve dress with white lace headscarf. Her arms are crossed by her chest. Bottom: A pull quote from the story that reads, "I always thought to myself, 'You can't have a plan B. You can't live your life like that because if you have a plan B, you're not going to work as hard on plan A. So you have plan A, or you're fucked."

(Image credit: Erica Snyder. Wardrobe: Colleen Allen coat; Erik Charlotte bonnet; Alice Waese earring (worn as nail art); Tiffany & Co. ring.)

***