celebpeek
  • Home
  • Bollywood
  • Hollywood
  • Lifestyle
  • Fashion
celebpeek
  • Music
  • Celebrity News
  • Events
  • TV & Streaming
Home » TV & Streaming » Page 100
Category:

TV & Streaming

Film Club review: Dramedy has potential but it's yet to be unlocked
TV & Streaming

Film Club review: Dramedy has potential but it’s yet to be unlocked

by jummy84 October 3, 2025
written by jummy84

For one thing, Wood has already proven herself to be a delightful and engaging screen presence, so getting to hear her own screenwriting voice was a fascinating prospect.

For another, it’s always a thrill to see new British comedy series come to air, at a time when there are so many unique, funny and vibrant comedies out there (despite what some many would have you believe).

Then there’s the show’s charming concept, it’s quirky visual aesthetic, a central turn for Nabhaan Rizwan, I could go on – the point is, there were a lot of selling points.

It’s therefore a strange feeling to come out of watching all six episodes of Film Club and feel that it hasn’t quite made its mark yet, or fulfilled that desire I had. That’s not to say it wasn’t an enjoyable watch, or that it couldn’t achieve that potential in future – just that, right now, there are a few bumps in the road.

Nabhaan Rizwan as Noa and Aimee Lou Wood as Evie in Film Club. BBC/Gaumont/Ben Blackall

Film Club stars Wood as Evie, a young woman who hasn’t left the house in six months after suffering from a mental health episode, described as a ‘wobble’.

Every Friday, as a weekly escape, she and her friends, including best friend Noa (Rizwan), meet up in her mum’s garage and celebrate film. There’s a different film chosen for each week, decorations are put up to recognise that, costumes are required, phones are banned and a movie-related quiz takes place. It’s delightful. There’s just one snag.

That is that Evie and Noa are quite clearly in love with each other, despite never having expressed their feelings to one another. Oh, and Evie has a boyfriend, Josh. Oh, and Noa is moving to Bristol for his dream job, meaning film club won’t be continuing.

It’s all rather a lot for Evie to deal with, and over the subsequent weeks she goes on a journey of discovery, to reflect on her feelings for Noa, as well as to learn more about herself.

Aimee Lou Wood as Evie in Film Club, wearing a space suit.

Aimee Lou Wood as Evie in Film Club. BBC/Gaumont/Ben Blackall

First things first, there are a lot of things about this set up that are really winning. The idea of the actual film club itself is so charming as to be almost ridiculous.

It’s crucial to note here, that this is not some hang-out for real, hardcore cinephiles. The films they watch each week are the most classic of classics that everyone will have heard of, and the vast majority of viewers will have seen – think Alien and The Wizard of Oz.

This gives the whole thing are a far more wholesome vibe, and the sense that this really is an excuse for socialising first and foremost. The characters have a passion for film (well, most of them do), but it’s their friendship that binds them, and this is just a fun way to express it.

It’s telling that this was conceived of during the Covid pandemic, at a time when physical meet-ups were impossible, yet it also feels deeply resonant today.

Even without restrictions, society has still become so much more virtual and isolated. A series preaching about the joys of social interaction, and showing characters simply enjoying each other’s presence by being a bit silly, with no fear of judgement, is not only endearing, but also kind of critical.

Nabhaan Rizwan as Noa, Aimee Lou Wood as Evie and Adam Long as Josh in Film Club.

Nabhaan Rizwan as Noa, Aimee Lou Wood as Evie and Adam Long as Josh in Film Club. BBC/Gaumont/Ben Blackall

The characters here are also a complete joy to have on our screens, and Wood and her co-creator Ralph Davis have assembled a brilliant cast to bring them to life.

Wood herself is magnificent as Evie, whose positivity and passion are infectious and whose mannerisms are so fantastically specific and clear. Rizwan’s Noa is more straight-laced and, as is commented on at numerous times, formal, but has a habit of breaking out into incredibly bold accents and performances.

As a duo fronting the show, they’re both fantastic, with superb chemistry which feels like a real, long-lasting friendship.

Meanwhile, there are excellent supporting turns throughout, including from Liv Hill as Evie’s sister Izzie, with that sibling relationship between really well-drawn and observed.

Two real MVPs are Suranne Jones as Evie’s mum Suz, a genuinely distinct, brilliant character and such a departure from the typical ‘on-screen mum’ figure, and Adam Long as Josh, who may not be right for Evie, but has an endearing turn of phrase and a excitable energy.

Set up, all great, characters, delightful, intentions, utterly good-natured. So, what are these issues? Well, these come, instead, in the detail of the narrative and in the tone. On the latter, it’s key to note that reviewing comedy is hard – it’s so subjective and every individual will find different things funny.

Liv Hall as Izzie and Suranne Jones as Suz in Film Club. They are both holding champagne flutes.

Liv Hall as Izzie and Suranne Jones as Suz in Film Club. BBC/Gaumont/Ben Blackall

Unfortunately, I personally just didn’t find Film Club all that funny. It’s operating on a grounded, low level of humorous interactions, and sure, there are some funny character beats throughout and some sequences that evoke a chuckle, but for the most part it’s just not something that provided me with any real, deep laughs.

Part of the reason for this is that, despite being billed as a comedy-drama, the synonym dramedy might work better, simply because the drama is really the first port of call.

That brings me neatly to the plot, and in particular, the central romantic tension between Evie and Noa – these two are perhaps just too meant for each other.

Of course, that concept has a long history in romantic comedies, both in film and on TV, but here it’s kind of absurd. Evie doesn’t seem to have any particular chemistry with Josh, she and Noa are practically an old married couple from the word go, and even his moving away doesn’t feel like enough of an impediment to giving it a go.

There’s barely even the standard question of both parties being worried to ruin the friendship if they were to be rejected – their chemistry is so utterly blatant that even they so don’t seem entirely oblivious to how one another feels.

Every time there’s a roadblock in their journey, it just feels like a slightly forced and mechanical way to drag out the will-they-won’t-they storyline.

Nabhaan Rizwan as Noa in Film Club, wearing a silver costume and bicycle helmet, and riding a bike.

Nabhaan Rizwan as Noa in Film Club. BBC/Gaumont/Ben Blackall

However, if you’re not vibing with the central romantic story, there are still plenty of other subplots to go down. In fact, there are slightly too many, with this scattershot approach leaving some of the most crucial ones feeling under-developed.

For instance, Evie’s mental health storyline is drawn in the broadest brush strokes, and never really honed in on in any substantial or meaningful way.

The lack of specificity may be universalising, and therefore a comfort to some, but it means that when Evie does start to get better it’s slightly harder to feel her catharsis, simply because we’ve never been entirely sure what she was struggling with to begin with.

Again, this could be an intentional statement on the ways in which we relate to others in times of crisis, and everyone’s experiences surrounding the topic will be different.

Purely from a dramatic standpoint, it can be somewhat frustrating, as though the show is keeping us at arm’s length. However, on a real-terms level, if this series helps some people who are struggling feel more seen, then that is wonderful, and a real, tangible good.

Kai Assi as Ziggy and Owen Cooper as Callum in Film Club.

Kai Assi as Ziggy and Owen Cooper as Callum in Film Club. BBC/Gaumont/Ben Blackall

The way this storyline is dealt with just does seem to be part of a piece with a number of the other decisions made across the board. For instance, the film club conceit should be grounds to commit to a real episodic structure, wherein the films chosen are used as themes for the instalments, expressing what they’re trying to explore and doing so with aesthetic links.

At times, it feels this is the route the show is going down, and those are arguably some of the best moments of all. One dreamlike sequence involving a spacesuit, inspired by Alien, is fantastic.

However, as in a number of other areas, it fails to commit to this as a long-running structure, or indeed any structure or unifying concept. This keeps you on your toes, for sure, but sometimes a defined framework for episodes is good, helping to act as the glue holding everything else together.

Instead, we get what feels like many different versions of this show, with a number of different branches and characters being underserved – Adolescence breakout Owen Cooper in particular is largely wasted as local kid Callum.

As already expressed, none of this is to write Film Club off. If you’re looking for a really easy, cosy watch of an evening, something fairly light where you can spend time with likeable characters and superb performers, then this could very well fit the bill.

It’s also not to say that a second season couldn’t completely win me round on some of these quibbles. There’s so much potential here that I’d love to see a second iteration of this, one where some of the screws are tightened and a really clear theme, story and structure are honed in on.

But for now, Film Club isn’t quite the knockout personal favourite I wanted it to be – even if it’s still delightful to have a series which firmly celebrates friendship and film.

Film Club begins on Tuesday 7th October at 10pm on BBC Three and iPlayer.

Add Film Club to your watchlist on the Radio Times: What to Watch app – download now for daily TV recommendations, features and more.

Check out more of our Drama coverage or visit our TV Guide and Streaming Guide to find out what’s on. For more TV recommendations and reviews, listen to The Radio Times Podcast.

October 3, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Corey Cott as Det. Jake Griffin, Mariska Hargitay as Capt. Olivia Benson, Kevin Kane as Detective Terry Bruno, Octavio Pisano as Det. Joe Velasco —
TV & Streaming

Benson Learns Stabler’s in the Hospital — From ‘Organized Crime’ Season 5?

by jummy84 October 3, 2025
written by jummy84

[Warning: The below contains MAJOR spoilers for Law & Order: SVU Season 27 Episode 2 “A Waiver of Consent.”]

Captain Olivia Benson (Mariska Hargitay) doesn’t have a choice but to accept the newest member of her squad — Chief Kathryn Tynan (Noma Dumezweni) assigned him there — but does he at least prove to be someone she’ll want around? Detective Jake Griffin is played by Corey Cott, who previously appeared as the son of Benson’s former partner, played by Anthony Edwards — an ER reunion for Hargitay — and went to prison for rape.

The latest SVU episode also seems to set up Detective Joe Velasco’s (Octavio Pisano) exit, as he tells Benson of a new opportunity he received. Plus, Benson gets shocking news at the end of the episode about her former partner, Detective Elliot Stabler (Christopher Meloni), but is there a twist?

Read on for how Benson deals with Griffin and what’s going on with Velasco.

Who’s the new detective on Benson’s squad?

In his first meeting with Benson, Griffin tells her that Tynan and his father were partners on patrol, and when he passed, she took him under his wing. He knows that the new assignment looks like he’s a spy, but he assures he isn’t. He says the chief wants him to learn to be a good detective from the best boss in the department. But she notes that their cases are victim-centric, and they’re extremely vulnerable. They work as one team, and she doesn’t have room for a detective with a different agenda. He promises that he only wants to learn and she’s the boss. And so she gives him the opportunity to prove himself with a rape case.

But right from the start, he’s not exactly making smart choices. He holds back a mark that turns out to be a QR code on the victim’s (Molly Griggs) wrist until he shares that scanning it leads to a members only club, Sensate (an IAB investigation into it was shut down in the past). He tells Benson “let’s roll” when they leave the hospital. When Benson learns the victim, Maya, is trying to check herself out of the hospital early, she brings Griffin with her and calls him out on his actions thus far. They work as a team, she reminds him. Then, when he stands in Maya’s way when she’s trying to leave and Benson tells him to let her go, she reminds him of how they do and do not treat victims and what they’re going through. “Let’s roll,” she pointedly tells him. “I’ll do better,” he says. (Griffin raising his hand when he talks is irksome, but Kevin Kane‘s Detective Terry Bruno makes it clear he needs to stop, or he’ll shoot his hand off.)

Virginia Sherwood/NBC

When Captain Renee Curry (Aimé Donna Kelly) and Velasco don’t get anywhere talking to Sensate’s owner, Derek, who refuses to hand over any members list and says there’s no camera, Griffin brings up an informant who can help. That informant has a comment about Griffin hanging up his “Batman wings,” referring to a nickname the detective apparently received from perps. He does get Bruno and Griffin into the club as prospective members, and Derek invites them to come by as guests that night. First, however, they must sign consent forms, which ADA Sonny Carisi (Peter Scanavino) says is BS. Everyone signs it and thinks it’s legally binding, then anything can happen and go unreported. It’s why Maya’s reluctant to talk; she thinks she can’t.

Benson tells Bruno and Griffin to be careful, but the newest squad member tells her he’s been undercover before. Not like this, she warns. And she’s clearly right. At the club that night, the two detectives, as they report back to the rest of the squad, see high-profile men and women who clearly didn’t want to be there. But they wouldn’t get anywhere with a bust. Benson sends everyone home for the night, but Griffin goes back to the club.

When Benson finds out the next day, she’s, of course, mad. “This is unacceptable. I’ve already told you twice that we do things differently here and we don’t do things alone,” she reminds him. He apologizes, but that’s not enough. She’s ready to call Tynan and tell her it’s not going to work because she doesn’t need a cowboy who makes decisions on his own. But he reveals that he found a woman who works at the club who’s willing to talk to them. Isabella (Emilia Suarez) is willing to do whatever she can to make sure that the position she’s in — unable to say no to the men — doesn’t happen to anyone else, but when the NYPD raids the club, everyone hands over a card for a lawyer, Daniel Olin (Glenn Fleshler).

Another ADA, CJ Jones (Chicago Med‘s Norma Kuhling) joins Carisi as second chair after running into her own issues with Olin in the past; their motion to remove him from the case since he represents Derek and some potential witnesses has the other lawyer drop everyone but Derek. Isabella testifies, but Olin turns it around on her, then tries to paint Derek as someone just running a sexually free club with no violations. Jones handles the cross and brings up the consent waivers — Does he think someone can sign away their consent, that any woman who steps into his club is consenting to be raped? — and gets in his face about “actually running a house of prostitution where women are drugged and used by powerful men.”

The turning point comes when Benson brings a video Bruno finds online of Maya at the club, clearly unable to consent. At first, Maya doesn’t think she can testify, worried about what people will say, but Benson assures her she can. Anyone who doesn’t think she was victimized from the video is not worth listening to. With that, Maya opens up about her assault. “They used your shame to silence you. Think about what happens if you start talking,” Benson tells her. And with that, Maya testifies about her assault and seeing everything that Derek does in the club — including threatening her that she’d have a bad night when she tried to intervene when he was screaming at a shot girl.

Derek is found guilty of promoting prostitution in the third degree, sex trafficking in the second degree, and criminal sale of a controlled substance in third degree. Benson also is impressed by Jones, and Carisi assures her he already got her transferred.

As Griffin’s leaving for the night, he tells Benson he knows he blew it going into the club alone. He always wanted to be a cop and once he saw he was good at it, he never questioned himself. She reminds him that it’s a learning curve and not everyone’s right for SVU but Isabella saw something in him and he made her feel safe, and that’s something that can’t be taught. She proposes a deal: “As long as we are all on the same team, you may have a home here.” He thanks her and promises to never go behind her back.

How is Velasco being written out?

After offering an apology and promise that he’ll never hide something like Fin’s lost gun again, Velasco reveals to Benson that he’s been tapped by DEA to go undercover guarding Ramireaz’s drug runs. She says it makes sense with his experience with cartels, but does he trust the agents? While they seem straight up, he tells her they’ve told him to keep it under wraps, even from her. He knows he’s put her in a bad position and understands if she wants to report it up. But she assures him that it will stay between us. Keep her informed and be careful, she stresses. We then see the start of his assignment.

Wait, what happened to Stabler?

At the very end of the episode, Bruno stops in Benson’s office with an urgent message from Sergeant Bell (Organized Crime‘s Danielle Moné Truitt): Detective Stabler’s is in the hospital. But this seems to just be leading into when Stabler was in the hospital in Organized Crime‘s Season 5 Episode 2 (which aired on NBC right after this one, but dropped on Peacock earlier this year) and Benson visited him, not a new incident.

What do you think of the new detective, Griffin, and Velasco’s news? Let us know in the comments section below.

Law & Order: SVU, Thursdays, 9/8c, NBC

October 3, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
'Fuck My Son' Movie AI Controversy: Todd Rohal Interview
TV & Streaming

‘Fuck My Son’ Movie AI Controversy: Todd Rohal Interview

by jummy84 October 3, 2025
written by jummy84

If you’re worried about AI taking over the entertainment industry, close your eyes for a moment and imagine your worst case scenario.

What kind of villains do you picture? Soulless corporate executives gleefully watching their bottom lines go up while they slash thousands of human jobs? Insufferable tech bros hi-fiving each other at the notion that their lack of creative talent no longer prevents them from flooding the internet with anti-woke “Star Wars” rip-offs generated by typing a few lazy prompts into an app? Unshowered right-wing nationalists producing dangerous deepfakes while sulking in their basements?

Whatever pro-AI bogeymen haunt your particular nightmares, they probably don’t look like Todd Rohal. A seasoned veteran of the American indie film scene, his offbeat comedies have been popping up in places like Sundance, SXSW, and Adult Swim for the better part of three decades. He cut his teeth shooting 35mm films before digital editing was invented. He self distributed his early movies by cold-calling theaters under fake names and convincing them to screen his single 35mm print until he had to drive it to another venue. When he was tired of screening his first feature “The Guatemalan Handshake,” he buried his personal print in the desert and ceremonially burned all of his remaining DVD copies.

1984, (aka NINETEEN EIGHTY-FOUR), from left: John Hurt, Suzanna Hamilton, 1984. ©Atlantic Releasing/courtesy Everett Collection

He’s had the kind of idiosyncratic career that the independent film ecosystem theoretically exists to elevate and promote. So why is he getting death threats over a comic book adaptation about an old lady forcing Tipper Newton to fuck her son at gunpoint?

TORONTO, ONTARIO - SEPTEMBER 10: Todd Rohal attends the premiere of
Todd Rohal attending the TIFF premiere of “Fuck My Son” Getty Images

If you’ve attended a genre film festival this fall, Rohal’s new film “Fuck My Son!” has probably popped up on your radar. Adapted from legendary underground comic artist Johnny Ryan’s graphic novel of the same name, the film is a throwback to the kind of old-school midnight movie that prioritizes shock value above all else. Robert Longstreet dons a dress and a thick layer of prosthetics to play an old lady whose sex positive ethos takes a dark turn when she kidnaps a woman (played by Tipper Newton) and forces her to — you guessed it — fuck her horrifically deformed son.

The film is a feast of practical effects and unapologetic bad taste, designed to be enjoyed with rowdy crowds in packed theaters in the wee hours of the morning. The shock value should be recognizable to anyone who can remember reading Ryan’s comics in the back pages of VICE magazine. During a recent conversation with IndieWire at a Silver Lake sidewalk cafe hours before the film screened at Beyond Fest, Rohal explained that he was drawn to those comics because they reflected the kind of progressive, anti-censorship worldview that he hoped to promote with his own work.

“I saw his stuff as offensive, but in a way I understood that was exciting and funny and made me react,” Rohal said of Ryan’s work. “Not knowing his politics I was basically like ‘We are very aligned politically, I’m guessing, because I’m a very liberal-thinking person, rights for everyone, very against censorship. And that’s everything Johnny is about.”

Rohal’s adaptation begins with a fake pre-show that might exist at a nightmarish MAGA version of AMC Theaters. In the world of the film, a fictional religious movie studio is distributing “Fuck My Son!,” but wants its audience to be able to enjoy the film without offending their Christian sensibilities. It offers the film in a format called Perv-O-Vision, which allows prudish viewers to put on a pair of glasses that makes any nude scene appear as if the actors are fully clothed.

The pre-show includes a demonstration of Perv-O-Vision that’s complete with full frontal male nudity and an audience of theatergoers that are very clearly generated with AI. It’s not a sophisticated attempt at replacing human actors — it’s slop in every sense of the word, intended as a satire of the kinds of right-wing corporations who would sincerely use bad AI to cut video production costs.

“I liked the idea that ‘Fuck My Son’ would be presented as a corporate product,” Rohal said with a laugh. “The beginning of the movie is supposed to feel like you’re in a corporate environment. So I thought ‘What would corporations use when portraying this?,’ which led me to say ‘I want to use AI.’ Thinking that would be very clear in its messaging! I’m learning that it’s not clear, that for any AI usage, the context and intent has no bearing for a lot of people.”

In addition to the pre-show, a character in the film is visited by the Meatie Mates, a fake Christian cartoon about singing meat that is presented as a much more hateful version of “Veggie Tales.” The characters were designed by human animator Cable Hardin in a 2D sequence, but Rohal used a mix of AI tools to make them look worse and worse as they reappear throughout the film. The effect feels like watching the deterioration of a media company in real time, as it’s easy to imagine a Christian TV producer commissioning the original human-drawn characters before switching to cheap AI a decade later.

“Fuck My Son!” premiered in the Midnight Madness section of the Toronto International Film Festival, where the section’s famously rowdy crowds embraced the film wholeheartedly. Rohal thought the AI jokes all landed, so he was shocked to wake up the next day and find that the film was being bombarded with negative Letterboxd reviews. (A large plurality of the film’s reviews are either half a star or one star, and the three most “liked” reviews are devoted to criticizing its use of AI.) Rohal was blindsided by the controversy in part because the online reaction was completely different than the enthusiasm he saw in the theater.

“The Toronto screening was crazy. Through the roof! And then the next day, I didn’t look online but [my publicist] told me ‘It’s pretty rough,’” Rohal said. “The online response is pretty strong. I read it and I was looking through some things, and I had to stop. There were hundreds of comments and I was like ‘This just doesn’t make any sense.’ The difference between what I experienced last night and this… There was no way that much hatred was in the room. Because they would have vocalized that! It would have lessened the cheering and laughter.”

The phenomenon only became more curious when the film experienced similar reactions at Fantastic Fest and Beyond Fest — joy during the actual screenings and hatred online. The disparate reactions suggest that not everyone criticizing the film has seen it. Rohal pointed to his openness about the film’s use of AI in its writeup on the TIFF website, in which Midnight Madness programmer Peter Kuplowsky wrote (with Rohal’s permission) that the pre-show “satirizes the corporatization of theatrical moviegoing, complete with freakish deployments of AI slop” as a possible spark that lit the fire. The online hatred snowballed, with people accusing Rohal and his team of using AI in other parts of the film that were shot entirely practically. The prevailing narrative online became that “Fuck My Son!” is an AI-generated movie, rather than a movie that satirically uses AI in a few carefully chosen shots.

“People saw [the writeup], there must have been some kind of Slack channel and people must have been like ‘We’re gonna blast this with horrible reviews because we’re these patriots of anti-AI.’ Because a lot of things people were saying were inaccurate. People said ‘Fifty percent of this movie is AI.’ That’s not true! The technology isn’t even there to do what I was accused of doing, which is fascinating.”

Rohal continues to tour the film to ravenous festival audiences (next up he’s heading to France for the Strasbourg European Fantastic Film Festival and Spain for the Sitges Film Festival), and he’s self-distributing the movie, with a series of 35mm screenings in theaters across America booked through early 2026. But he can’t help but laugh at the surreal experience of having to defend his film online every day to angry cinephiles spreading blatant misinformation about it. Case in point: he recently posted the film’s poster on Instagram, where he was slammed with complaints about the “AI poster” that was actually made by a human artist without any generative AI.

Rohal is doing his best to keep a sense of humor about the ordeal, noting the parallels between the kinds of hate mail and death threats that Ryan received for his original comics with the ones that he’s now getting for adapting them.

“I responded to some people online, and they just won’t engage in conversation about it,” Rohal said. “People threatened to kill me on Letterboxd. Someone said there should be drone strikes against me until not an atom of my body exists. And Johnny’s gotten death threats his whole life for doing his comics… It’s extreme.”

As an outside observer, it’s hard not to chuckle at the notion that this particular film has become the lightning rod for such impassioned debate about what we want the future of the film industry to look like. We’re talking about a movie in which Tipper Newton is forced to remove a monster’s dirty diaper and look for his genitalia, only to grab what she thinks is his penis but is actually a loose hotdog that he misplaced. In a saner world, this film probably wouldn’t be discussed as anything other than the shocking diversion from everyday life that it offers. But it also makes sense that the midnight movie audience, a group that thrives on its willingness to treat lowbrow films as serious works of art, would react so strongly to AI making its way into their world.

On one hand, it’s easy to empathize with the position that a section of pop culture known for embracing outsiders who lack the resources of corporate filmmakers would object to seeing indie artists use the very tools that corporations use to cut costs and make soul-crushingly bad content. But Rohal makes the opposite argument — if AI is here to stay, why should we cede all the power to the very corporations we’re already mad at?

“It’s like beating up a hobo for stealing your jobs, and he’s just collecting cans, goddamnit! He’s just doing whatever he can, and you’re gonna beat him up? You’ve got to understand that the jobs you’re trying to save are a corporation that’s holding onto something and they’ve got control over our entire culture. And I’m like, that’s really what we should be pushing back against. And I don’t see that,” Rohal said. “The way things are going terrifies me, because we’re essentially handing this technology over to evil people to do evil things, when we should be learning it ourselves.”

Rohal is a bit more optimistic about AI being used in indie films than I am, but it should go without saying that any serious discussion of a piece of art should at least consider the artist’s intentions. How is telling an independent filmmaker that he can’t use a bit of AI to satirize the people who use AI maliciously any different from telling artists that they can’t depict any words or actions that they wouldn’t condone in their own personal lives?

“It’s crazy to me that there is a large majority of people that can’t separate that, that can’t see the context of things or question why it’s being used,” Rohal said. “It’s just blind hatred and a desire to ban something completely. I think there’s an innate human desire to hate and destroy other humans. It just happens, whatever side of the political spectrum you’re on. I remember being a kid and seeing ads for ‘The Last Temptation of Christ.’ I was growing up in Ohio and churches were protesting it. And now we think ‘Oh that’s so cool, you were protested by the Catholic Church!’ But at the time, that was probably not cool to Martin Scorsese when he was like ‘I want people to see this movie! I care about it!’ And that’s how I feel now. It’s so weird that it’s about technology now, but maybe that is just the time we live in. Technology is this weird religion where we have sects.”

“You can use Photoshop, you can use After Effects and green screens and CGI and you can farm things out to India, but you cannot use this software on your computer at home,” he continued. “Even if you’ve learned the whole process. The effects in the movie took me months to do, and people tell me it’s lazy and I’m like, ‘I was up every freaking night until four in the morning working on this by myself. It was not lazy. I absolutely could have asked someone else to do this for me, but I wanted to do it myself because I wanted to learn it myself. I know how film works, from how negative emulsion works to this. And I think that’s what a filmmaker should do. I’m fascinated by film, I’m fascinated by all of this stuff, and the fact that people are mad about it is really confusing to me.”

Rohal never expected a movie called “Fuck My Son!” would give him so many P.R. headaches, but he also never expected the experience to be so life affirming. The film was born out of his commitment to free artistic expression, a tribute to a comic artist who spent his career battling mobs of people trying to tell him what he could and couldn’t say. It feels like destiny that Rohal ended up fending off a mob of his own, but he still doesn’t have any regrets about making his little movie about a twisted mom who just wants someone to fuck her hideous son.

“Making ‘Fuck My Son!,’ as crazy as that sounds, has been the biggest thing in my life that helped me figure out what’s important to me,” he said. “And I know that’s crazy, and you won’t see that in the movie, but following certain instincts and staying away from other things that would have prevented the movie from being what it is, and just allowing it to be itself, has really been life changing for me. And I credit that to the creative freedom that I had, and there’s an aspect of AI that fits into that that’s on the positive side of it. So if people want to assassinate me or drone bomb me for that, so be it.”

Announced theatrical engagements for “Fuck My Son!” can be found below, with starred dates indicating 35mm screenings.

10/16-23 – New York, NY – IFC Center

10/23-30 – Los Angeles, CA – Alamo Drafthouse Los Angeles

10/31 – 11/04 – Austin, TX – Alamo Drafthouse South Lamar

10/31 – 11/01 – Brooklyn, NY – Nitehawk Cinema – Williamsburg*

11/05-08 – San Francisco, CA – Alamo Drafthouse New Mission* 

11/14-15 – Chicago, IL – Music Box Theatre*

11/28-29 – Dallas, TX – Texas Theatre* 

12/05-06 – Seattle, WA – Grand Illusion Cinema at SIFF Film Center* 

12/19 – Toronto, ON – Revue Cinema

12/26-27 – Philadelphia, PA – PhilaMOCA

01/02-03/26 – Omaha, NE – Film Streams’ Dundee Theater*  

October 3, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Diddy Asks Judge for Leniency Ahead of Sentencing
TV & Streaming

Diddy Asks Judge for Leniency Ahead of Sentencing

by jummy84 October 3, 2025
written by jummy84

Sean “Diddy” Combs has filed a letter to the judge asking for mercy less than 24 hours before he’s set to be sentenced in his federal case.

The mogul wrote a four-page letter to Judge Arun Subramanian asking for leniency in his sentencing. “First and foremost, I want to apologize and say how sincerely sorry I am for all of the hurt and pain that I have caused others by my conduct,” he wrote. “I take full responsibility and accountability for my past wrongs.”

In the letter, Combs states that he understands that saying “I’m sorry” will “never be good enough” as the words “cannot erase the pain from the past.” He reflects on his time spent in prison over the past 13 months, stating that “the scene and images of me assaulting Cassie play over and over in my head daily. I literally lost my mind.”

He explains that he has come to terms with his past behavior and takes responsibility for it. “I lost my way. I got lost in my journey. Lost in the drugs and the excess. My downfall was rooted in my selfishness. I have been humbled and broken to my core. Jail is designed to break you mentally, physically and spiritually. Over the past year there have been so many times that I wanted to give up. There have been some days I thought I would be better off dead. The old me died in jail and a new version of me was reborn. Prison will change you or kill you—I choose to live.”

Combs asks for mercy from the judge and says he wants to be a good father to his seven children and resume being the primary caretaker for his ill mother. “Today, I humbly ask you for another chance—another chance to be a better father, another chance to be a better son, another chance to be a better leader in my community, and another chance to live a better life,” he stated. “I am writing this not to gain any sympathy or pity, this experience is simply the truth of my existence and has changed my life forever and I will never commit a crime again.”

Earlier this week, prosecutors in the case asked that Combs be sentenced to at least 11 years in prison on his two counts of transportation for prostitution. This afternoon, Combs’ counsel reinforced their request for Combs to be given 14 months, which would free him by the end of the year, inclusive of time already served. On Tuesday, Judge Subramanian denied Combs’ request for a new trial or acquittal.

Combs is scheduled to be sentenced tomorrow morning at 10 a.m. ET. He’s expected to speak directly to the Judge during the sentencing.

October 3, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Dave Chappelle Says It's Easier To Talk Freely In Saudi Arabia Than America
TV & Streaming

Dave Chappelle Says It’s Easier To Talk Freely In Saudi Arabia Than America

by jummy84 October 3, 2025
written by jummy84

“It’s easier to talk here than it is in America,” Dave Chappelle told an audience in Saudi Arabia on Saturday.

Chappelle was in the kingdom as part of the Riyadh Comedy Festival. His decision — and that of other comics — has become controversial, given Saudi role in 9/11 and the 2018 assassination of journalist Jamal Khashoggi, as well as other human rights abuses and anti LGBTQ+ policies.

“I mean, how do you even promote that? ‘From the folks that brought you 9/11. Two weeks of laughter in the desert, don’t miss it!’” an astounded Marc Maron said in a video from a recent stand-up bit. “I mean, the same guy that’s gonna pay them is the same guy that paid that guy to bone-saw Jamal Khashoggi and put him in a fucking suitcase. But don’t let that stop the yucks, it’s gonna be a good time!”

Others have objected on free speech grounds, especially after comedian Atsuko Okatsuka revealed what she said were strict contract terms that would have had her “adhere to censorship rules” about the kinds of jokes she could make. Those criticisms were set in even higher relief during the recent standoff between Jimmy Kimmel and ABC.

Chappelle’s quip onstage at the festival was likely a rejoinder to such complaints.

“Right now in America, they say that if you talk about Charlie Kirk, that you’ll get canceled,” the comedian said, according to the New York Times. “I don’t know if that’s true, but I’m gonna find out.”

Since Deadline exclusively revealed the initial lineup in July, the Riyadh Comedy Festival has announced Kevin Hart, Aziz Ansari, Hannibal Buress, Bill Burr, Dave Chappelle, Louis C.K., Whitney Cummings, Pete Davidson, Zarna Garg, Gabriel Iglesias, Jim Jefferies, Jo Koy, Bobby Lee, Jeff Ross, Andrew Santino, Tom Segura, Chris Tucker and more as participants. It runs through October 10.

October 3, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Maxton Hall S2
TV & Streaming

Ruby and James’ Love Story Continues

by jummy84 October 2, 2025
written by jummy84

School is back in session.

Prime Video released the season two trailer for Maxton Hall starring Harriet Herbig-Matten and Damian Hardung.

The series’ second season, based on the second part of the bestselling novel series Save You by author Mona Kasten, will debut on Nov. 7. The books and series follow star student Ruby and wealthy heir James Beaufort falling for each other despite their differences.

“After their passionate night together in Oxford and her greatest life goal within reach, everything seems to be going perfectly for Ruby (Herbig-Matten). But a stroke of fate in James’ (Hardung) family changes everything and James himself, of all people, brings her back from cloud nine to a harsh reality,” Prime Video teased of the upcoming season. “But she can’t forget James — especially since he’s doing everything, he can to win her back.”

“Some dreams are beautiful that you want to stop time. And sometimes one second is enough to turn them into a nightmare,” Herbig-Matten’s Ruby says in the trailer as it begins showing her and James in love before transitioning to a party in which James is seen kissing someone else as Ruby looks heartbroken

However, with James determined to win her back, Ruby and James have to confront their lingering chemistry and obstacles including coming from two different worlds, the loss of James’ mother and James’ father insisting he stay away from Ruby.

“If you have a definite goal in life and nothing in the world would stop you getting it, then you mustn’t give it up,” Herbig-Matten’s Ruby is overheard telling James.

In addition to Hardung and Herbig-Matten, Sonja Weißer, Ben Felipe, Fedja van Huêt, Runa Greiner, Justus Riesner, Andrea Guo, Frederic Balonier and Eli Riccardi also star in the series.

Martin Schreier returns to direct the second season of Maxton Hall – The World Between Us.

Markus Brunnemann and Ceylan Yildirim, who also acts as head writer of the series, produce. Juliana Lima Dehne and Marlene Melchior are also screenwriters for the second season. Valentin Debleris produces for UFA Fiction. The series is supported by the German Motion Picture Fund (GMPF).

Following its release last year, Maxton Hall became Amazon’s biggest-ever international launch and the most watched international show of all time in its first week.

Amid the show’s success, Kasten’s German-language book trilogy has been translated in English and published in America for the first time. Save Me released on July 1, with Save You on Sept. 2. Meanwhile, Save Us will publish on Nov. 4.

“Watching Damian and Harriet bring my book characters to life has been truly special. They perfectly captured Ruby’s determination and eagerness, as well as the many layers of James’ personality,” Kasten told The Hollywood Reporter.

“I wanted to write a story that had all the emotional highs and lows, unexpected twists and intense character dynamics I loved in the teen dramas I grew up with; the kind of stories where you’d count down the days until the next episode,” Kasten said. “I wanted readers to feel fully immersed in that world, to fall in love, gasp at secrets and root for characters. By the end, I wanted readers to feel like they had been through it all with them and come out stronger on the other side.”

Season two of Maxton Hall will be available on Prime Video on Nov. 7

October 2, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Jodie Whittaker and Suranne Jones on what makes Frauds "fresh"
TV & Streaming

Jodie Whittaker and Suranne Jones on what makes Frauds “fresh”

by jummy84 October 2, 2025
written by jummy84

It’s one of three shows starring Jones to premiere in as many months, following Netflix thriller Hostage and preceding BBC romcom Film Club, with the wide variety of genres represented in the line-up being noteworthy.

Jones agreed that they’re “different enough” to co-exist, and hoped that Frauds could inspire “more” diversity in the types of stories being told on British television – and especially those featuring female characters.

“When you look at the scale of the show… placing two females in a [male-dominated] heist world, and also, the location, the odd characters – it feels fresh to me,” she told RadioTimes.com. “And obviously that’s what attracted Jodie.”

Suranne Jones and Jodie Whittaker star in Frauds ITV

Jones co-created Frauds with Maryland collaborator Anne-Marie O’Connor and expressed her hope to “see more of this stuff”, referring to dramas that don’t fit the typical British TV mould.

Whittaker concurred: “When I read it, I was just blown away by how different these characters felt [and] this particular relationship, and the world that we were in… but it still felt authentic. I felt like I knew these people.

“As extreme as some of the characters are – we’re all pretty heightened – but there’s some kind of familiarity with it, and within this specific friendship.”

The former Doctor Who star previously said that British television shows can often have only one challenging female role, acknowledging that she and co-star Jones have had to audition against each other in the past.

With that in mind, she spoke to feeling “really lucky to be in an art heist led by two women” and had a “brilliant time exploring roles in a genre we wouldn’t normally get to play in”.

Jones added: “It’s women behaving how you wouldn’t expect women to behave… usually those aspects get diluted and don’t end up on screen. But you can’t dilute these two people because there’s so much frisson and history.”

Frauds premieres on ITV1 and ITVX at 9pm on Sunday 5th October.

Add Frauds to your watchlist on the Radio Times: What to Watch app – download now for daily TV recommendations, features and more.

Check out more of our Drama coverage or visit our TV Guide and Streaming Guide to find out what’s on. For more TV recommendations and reviews, listen to The Radio Times Podcast.

October 2, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Ina Garten (L) and Jeffrey Garten attend Disney
TV & Streaming

Are Ina Garten and Husband Jeffrey Still Together? Relationship Updates and Separation Explained

by jummy84 October 2, 2025
written by jummy84

Food Network star Ina Garten married Jeffrey Garten in 1968 when she was just 20 years old. She met Jeffrey when she was 15.

However, in her 2024 memoir, Ina detailed her separation from the professor and former government official. What happened between them, and are they still together now? Scroll down for everything we know about Ina and Jeffrey’s marriage, separation, and more.

October 2, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Raoul Peck Documentary Premieres at Cannes
TV & Streaming

Raoul Peck Documentary Premieres at Cannes

by jummy84 October 2, 2025
written by jummy84

Editor’s Note: “Orwell 2+2 = 5” originally debuted at the 2025 Cannes Film Festival. It opens at the IFC Center in New York City on Thursday, October 2 and the American Cinematheque in Los Angeles on October 9.

On January 8, 2021, Donald Trump Jr. took to X (then Twitter) to declare that his father’s suspension from the platform was a sign that “We are living in Orwell’s ‘1984.’ Free speech no longer exists in America.” The irony that the elder Trump’s actions leading to the ban — spreading false information that the 2020 election was rigged on the platform and directly causing an attempted insurrection of the U.S. Capitol building — fit far more into George Orwell’s classic dystopian novel and its vision of a future ruled by misinformation and propaganda is one that Jr. was seemingly entirely unaware of.

Mark Kerr, Dwayne Johnson at arrivals for THE SMASHING MACHINE Premiere at the Toronto International Film Festival (TIFF) 2025, VISA Screening Room at the Princess of Wales Theatre, Toronto, ON, September 08, 2025. Photo By: JA/Everett Collection

It was a sign of how, in spite of the cultural ubiquity the short, pioneering 1949 science fiction novel has obtained — introducing terms like “Big Brother,” “doublethink,” and “thoughtcrime” into the cultural lexicon and remaining a staple of high school curriculums in its native Britain and across the pond in the United States — a frighteningly large amount of people seem incapable of processing what Orwell’s vision of a future ruled by fear, surveillance, and a controlling superstate actually means, and how close to home it hits in our current political landscape.

So if Raoul Peck‘s new documentary “Orwell: 2 + 2 = 5” might sometimes feel like it’s preaching to the choir, drawing comparisons between modern politics and the terrors of Oceania that plenty of academics have already made, perhaps it’s best to keep in mind that for many viewers, its conclusions will be far less obvious.

Peck, a Haitian filmmaker whose work has always had a strong political bent, is best known for his 2016 essay film “I Am Not Your Negro,” which uses the unfinished James Baldwin manuscript “Remember This House” as the skeleton for an examination of the deaths of Medgar Evers, Malcolm X, and Martin Luther King, Jr. “Orwell” plays like a spiritual successor to his Oscar-nominated breakthrough, mixing Orwell’s writings and letters — narrated by “Homeland” star Damian Lewis — with archival photographs, footage from various adaptations of “1984” (including the 1956 version starring Edmund O’Brien as bureaucrat Winston and the version starring John Hurt released on the actual year), footage from other movies ranging from “Oliver Twist” to “Notting Hill,” and modern day news reports to argue how Orwell’s fears of a totalitarian state have already come true.

The result isn’t as riveting as “I Am Not Your Negro” — it feels less personal and more generic, like a term paper someone could have written in undergrad. Still, Peck makes his points well, and accomplishes what he sets out to do by getting your blood pressure rising.

The film starts with text explaining how, in 1946, Orwell decamped to Jura, an island off the coast of Scotland, where he would spend the remaining four years of his life working on a manuscript that would become “1984.” Rather than taking the traditional path of focusing on Orwell’s life during this time, however, Peck is more interested in how the ideas the author developed in Jura still feel so relevant today. Loosely, the film structures itself around the famous doublethink party motto of Oceania: “War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength,” using each component as another avenue into exploring modern fascism.

Peck casts a wide net in who he applies to his gaze to, looking broadly at the rise of alt-right movements across the globe, from the USA to Europe to Asia. “War is Peace” incorporates footage of George Bush declaring war on Iraq, as well as disturbing footage of both Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and Israel’s genocide of Palestine. Via “Freedom is Slavery,” Peck takes a look at how modern fascist and right-wing movements build complicity within their bases, as well as the growing income inequality crisis occurring globally. With “Ignorance is Strength,” the film peers into the rampant misinformation caused by conservative news outlets and growing anti-intellectualism and book banning.

Unsurprisingly though, a very large portion of the film centers around Donald Trump, and how his cult of personality, his disregard for the truth and obvious lies, and his willingness to subvert democracy all prove eerily similar to the omnipresent, unseen Big Brother of “1984.” In many respects, the film already feels out of date, mostly covering Trump’s crimes during his first term as well as the January 6 Capitol insurrection rather than dipping into the more flagrant fascism of his past few months back in office. And, in relitigating controversies that have been been pecked and prodded at for years at this point, “Orwell” sometimes winds up making points you’ve probably read in a hundred online essays already.

Still, as pat as a point of reference as “1984” and the phrase “Orwellian” has become on the internet, that doesn’t mean Peck doesn’t make the comparisons well. His research is thorough and persuasive, and occasionally finds a new, refreshing angle to apply the analysis, such as one segment that explores how AI-generated “art” ties back to the themes of the novel. On a technical level, “Orwell” is sharply made, cross-cutting between “1984” footage and modern day interviews to allow the audience to bridge the gap on their own terms, with only occasional graphics used to illustrate particularly disturbing or stark statistics when needed. It helps that Lewis is an excellent narrator, giving his version of Orwell a perfect touch of wry humor in his voice that makes some of the more upsetting moments easier to stomach.

With the film’s sociological critiques so pointed, “2 + 2 = 5” loses its edge whenever it sporadically attempts to include material fleshing out Orwell’s life outside of his most famous creation. His other well-known allegory for Stalinist Russia, “Animal Farm,” gets a brief acknowledgement, but the other work goes largely ignored. Sparse content about his personal life — including the death of his first wife Eileen O’Shaughnessy and how his second Sonia Brownell inspired the character of Julia in “1984” — feels vestigial rather than illuminating.

Most frustrating, Orwell’s limitations both politically and personally — especially the sexism, homophobia, and classism that occasionally seeped into his novels and essays — don’t receive much implicit or explicit acknowledgement within the film. A revealing bit of narration from Orwell notes how, as a young man, “he was both a snob and a revolutionary,” an Eton-educated member of the middle class whose socialism was based more on theory than struggle. But Peck doesn’t take the time to look into how that background affected his portrayal of the proles in “1984” as unwashed, undignified masses. You could read something radical into Peck’s choice to take the words of a white British man who never had much, if anything, to say about race in his writings and apply his concepts to modern-day systemic racism: one segment compiles several quotes from Trump about the Black community juxtaposed with fake AI images he used for his campaign in 2024, while footage from the 2020 Black Lives Matter protests is prominently featured.

“1984” famously ends on a pitch black note of despair: Winston has been broken by the Party’s torture and released back into the world as a complacent puppet, one who passively writes 2 + 2 = 5 on a coffee table while declaring his love for Big Brother. Peck’s film climaxes with a montage of this sequence as depicted in the novel’s various film adaptations, but it ends by looping around to an earlier section of the book, where Winston muses to himself that “If there was hope, it must lie in the proles, because only there, in those swarming disregarded masses, eighty-five percent of the population of Oceania, could the force to destroy the Party ever be generated.”

In some respects, this appeal to the common man conclusion feels a bit false, given how uncompromising Orwell was at denying his audience catharsis. Still, one has to take account of the different functions Orwell and Peck’s works serve: while Orwell wrote “1984” as a warning of where the world could be headed, Peck made a film about the world we already live in. How do you find the strength needed, living in totalitarianism, to believe that things can change for the better?

“My chief hope for the future,” Lewis narrates as Orwell as the film draws to its close, “is that the common people have never parted company with their moral code.”

Grade: B-

“Orwell: 2 + 2 = 5” had its world premiere at the 2025 Cannes Film Festival. It opens at the IFC Center in New York City on October 2 and at the American Cinematheque in Los Angeles on October 9.

Want to stay up to date on IndieWire’s film reviews and critical thoughts? Subscribe here to our newly launched newsletter, In Review by David Ehrlich, in which our Chief Film Critic and Head Reviews Editor rounds up the best new reviews and streaming picks along with some exclusive musings — all only available to subscribers. 

October 2, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
How Charlie Hunnam Transformed into a 'Monster': Daily Variety podcast
TV & Streaming

How Charlie Hunnam Transformed into a ‘Monster’: Daily Variety podcast

by jummy84 October 2, 2025
written by jummy84

On today’s episode of “Daily Variety” podcast, Variety senior correspondent Daniel D’Addario goes inside the mind of a man who is playing a serial killer, “Monster: The Ed Gein Story” star Charlie Hunnam, for our Cover Story segment.

Hunnam is frank and candid in his interview about his career decisions over the past decade, D’Addario reports. Hunnam explains what brought him back to the top of the call sheet in the latest season of the Netflix anthology series produced by Ryan Murphy.

And “Daily Variety” host Cynthia Littleton dives into the Variety archives to revisit a front page from October 1956 that is full of headlines that resonate today. That front page is reproduced below.

The front page of Daily Variety for Monday, Oct. 1, 1956

More to come

Listen to Daily Variety on iHeartPodcasts, Apple Podcasts, Variety’s YouTube Podcast channel, Amazon Music, Spotify and other podcast platforms.

October 2, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Newer Posts
Older Posts

Social Connect

Facebook Twitter Instagram Pinterest Youtube Snapchat

Recent Posts

  • 2009 feels like a whole other world away

  • Watch Ariana Grande and Jimmy Fallon Perform a History of Duets

  • Spotify’s Joe Hadley Talks ARIA Awards Partnership

  • Nick Offerman Announces 2026 “Big Woodchuck” Book Tour Dates

  • Snapped: Above & Beyond (A Photo Essay)

Newsletter

Subscribe my Newsletter for new blog posts, tips & new photos. Let's stay updated!

Categories

  • Bollywood (1,929)
  • Celebrity News (2,000)
  • Events (267)
  • Fashion (1,605)
  • Hollywood (1,020)
  • Lifestyle (890)
  • Music (2,002)
  • TV & Streaming (1,857)

Recent Posts

  • Shushu/Tong Shanghai Fall 2026 Collection

  • Here’s What Model Taylor Hill Is Buying Now

  • Julietta Is Hiring An Assistant Office Coordinator In Dumbo, Brooklyn, NY (In-Office)

Editors’ Picks

  • 2009 feels like a whole other world away

  • Watch Ariana Grande and Jimmy Fallon Perform a History of Duets

  • Spotify’s Joe Hadley Talks ARIA Awards Partnership

Latest Style

  • ‘Steal This Story, Please’ Review: Amy Goodman Documentary

  • Hulu Passes on La LA Anthony, Kim Kardashian Pilot ‘Group Chat’

  • Hannah Einbinder Slams AI Creators As “Losers”

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

@2020 - celebpeek. Designed and Developed by Pro


Back To Top
celebpeek
  • Home
  • Bollywood
  • Hollywood
  • Lifestyle
  • Fashion
celebpeek
  • Music
  • Celebrity News
  • Events
  • TV & Streaming